General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI don't want a person of color in the White House but I'm not a racist.
I dont want a woman in the White House but Im not a misogynist.
I dont want an LGBTQ person in the White House but Im not a homophobe.
I dont want an older person in the White House but Im not an ageist.
maxsolomon
(33,232 posts)As the kids say, "Welcome to DU".
BBG
(2,521 posts)carrying water for misogynists and homophobes though.
CTyankee
(63,883 posts)Maybe the OP could clarify his/her intent?
Cousin Dupree
(1,866 posts)japple
(9,805 posts)Always, always use the thingy. Even though you think it is 100 obvious that you are being sarcastic, use the thingy. It's there for a reason and could even save your life!
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)...because some people are thick.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)whether it's real trolling or mere sarcasm.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)If A, then B.
IF you know they are Russian trolls, THEN it is obviously not impossible to discern the difference betweeen sarcasm and their clumsy attempts to rile you up.
The sarcasm tag predates the days of Russian meddling. We all know why it's there.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Often it takes several posts to figure it out.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)One of the following is probably true:
A. There is a veritable army of nudniks running around destroying my favorite literary device with insipid shitposting designed to, I dunno, irritate people.
B. Some people are shit at reading.
On a side note, you remember what it was like before the Russians showed up? Back then it was all the "bought" people. Man, they were all over the place. People "bought" by the GOP. People "bought" by Big Pharma and Big Oil. People bought by McDonald's, the Koch brothers, and high fructose corn syrup. I was "bought" once, because I made an unflattering comment regarding then President of Venezuela Hugo Chavez. I never got any money, though. Check must have been lost in the mail. I think my mailman might be bought. >_>
On a side note to my side note, should I have tagged my sidenote "sarcasm"? Because I thought it was pretty obvious.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)No. Unless youre a great writer it isnt always obvious what a person means when they write something. Especially on the spur of the moment.
Your conceit comes across very clearly though.
FSogol
(45,435 posts)irisblue
(32,917 posts)And I'm just pointing this out b/c this is attached to your screen name on the interwebz.
maxsolomon
(33,232 posts)the "Ageism" accusation is rampant on DU and arouses suspicion.
irisblue
(32,917 posts)Okay then.
maxsolomon
(33,232 posts)sorry if that was unclear.
I'm not surprised it was alerted on.
irisblue
(32,917 posts)This emoji... needs to be moved up in the DU list in my opinion.
Tipperary
(6,930 posts)Jeez people.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Especially since the OP doesnt really seem to make a point.
DavidDvorkin
(19,465 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)well god knows they've never done anything wrong, so I totally follow your logic.
Bryant
Cousin Dupree
(1,866 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)You might consider honing your writing skills so people get it.
ret5hd
(20,480 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,391 posts)Take them out.
vlyons
(10,252 posts)I'm reading your post as satire. I suggest that in the future, you include something like *snark* when you post such satire, so folks know that you are ridiculing knuckleheads.
Cousin Dupree
(1,866 posts)Hekate
(90,538 posts)When composing a post, look at the line of buttons below the title. The last one says smilies. Tap that, then tap the ... at the end of those little pictures, and is at the top left. Tap that to enter into the body of your text.
Sorry if you already know this, but not everybody does, and it took me awhile to find out myself.
Croney
(4,656 posts)It's even more obvious that it's satire.
Beartracks
(12,795 posts)... "I don't want a white male in the White House, but I don't hate white men"?
=========
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)(I dig false equivalencies. More so, I dig people trying to rationalize their false equivalencies as pointed...)
Beartracks
(12,795 posts)Do you mean that rephrasing it with "white male" creates a false equivalency?
===========
emulatorloo
(44,057 posts)maxsolomon
(33,232 posts)In this case, it's not.
President is a hard, taxing job - when done properly. Concern about a candidate's age is based in medical reality that ALL of us experience. Senility is a valid concern. Frailty is a valid concern. Death is a valid concern.
Beyond that, Dems win when young people are energized to show up. See: Obama & 2018. An elderly candidate MIGHT not excite them adequately to defeat the worst President the world has ever known. That is a realistic concern, as well.
Do the DUers slinging "Ageist!" around this site in support of Biden and Sanders, et al, have a line where they WOULD be concerned with electing an elderly President?
80? 90?
emulatorloo
(44,057 posts)There are three older candidates I know are running/possibly running. Two of them are look/perform/think much younger than their physical age. The other looks much much older than the physical age, and seems to be stuck in another era conceptually when he talks about race.
brooklynite
(94,302 posts)...who says they DON'T want someone from one of those categories in the White House?
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)nolabear
(41,930 posts)Once youve been around a long time and have established a voice people will understand better. Even then a nudge can help.
Funny/creepy screen name btw.
dlk
(11,509 posts)brush
(53,733 posts)dubyadiprecession
(5,674 posts)They cant all be bad.