General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBiden absolutely, 100% should run.
If he wins the nomination, it'll prove to me he's got the mettle needed and was, without question, the strongest candidate we could field. It's not going to be a coronation. It's absolutely going to be a battle. Anyone who has doubts about his viability should want him to run because we need a stacked field with the best and brightest to weed out the weakest so we don't find ourselves in a situation where a Bob Dole or Mitt Romney wins by default over a vastly uninspiring field.
2020 should be a lot like 2008 - where the Democrats produced a very strong field of candidates.
Ultimately, though, we've got to be unified in our belief that no matter who wins the nomination, we'll do everything in our power to make sure they're elected president ... whether that's Biden or someone else.
But absolutely Biden should run. He'll add a tough, experienced voice to the field and he'll have a chance to prove the doubters either correct or not because I don't foresee the Democrats just handing him the nomination without a fight. He'll be battle ready and, to be honest, we need our nominee to be battle ready heading into the general election - whether it's Biden, Warren, Harris, O'Rourke or whoever the Democrats nominate.
UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)Cha
(297,180 posts)onetexan
(13,037 posts)+ Beto as VP is even better
Response to onetexan (Reply #3)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.
onetexan
(13,037 posts)did you forget?
Response to onetexan (Reply #15)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.
onetexan
(13,037 posts)has been ongoing. You also forgot Hillary received 3M more votes.
JI7
(89,247 posts)governor seat was stolen.
your all powerful comments sound naive and like something trump would say.
Woodycall
(259 posts)run an old white man. No matter how much I love and respect Joe (and I do!), the newly inspired young and multi-ethnic/cultural voters will see it as a giant stab in the back by the establishment (which it will be!). Ronald Reagan was 69 when he was elected. Jesus-tap-dancing-Christ, Joe is 76! Worst idea that I've heard lately. We have to get this crazy bullshit out of our minds, and fast. Secretary of State is the fitting and proper place and honor for him.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)we can thank the Electoral College. Any Russian collusion would not have mattered if we chose our POTUS by popular vote, as we do all other elected officials.
MrGrieves
(315 posts)Because if we run a not very qualified person run they will what??? Go easy on them?
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Except, post hoc ergo prompter hoc is a fallacy.
madville
(7,408 posts)In some polls Trump was more likable. That won't be the case with Biden, he'll enjoy likability numbers easily 10-20 points higher than Trump.
dhill926
(16,337 posts)Biden runs for one term. Then Harris for two terms with Beto as VP. Then Beto for two terms with whomever. Then I die happy...
quickesst
(6,280 posts)....and as a matter of fact, given what I've seen so far, I can't even pick a potential running mate for him. I've got a few maybes, but someone needs to step up and distinguish themselves from the general crowd. I'm sure someone will tell me that I don't know what I'm talkin about, but hey, it's my opinion, which I am entitled to have.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,585 posts)That never occurred to them but all 5 Dem adults liked it.
aeromanKC
(3,322 posts)But I also love Biden/Beto and Biden/Klochabar
The Dem bench is loaded with quality!!
AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)And Adam Shiff will become the next senator from CA.
aeromanKC
(3,322 posts)He'll make a great Senator!! (If not a Cabinet Secretary) Too bad that this is not a great time to be an old white guy with that demographic table pretty full already with Biden and well...., with Biden.
lark
(23,097 posts)I'll vote for whoever has the D behind their name in the general.
And enthusiastically at that. The Dems have a very deep bench!! I would say not a clunker in the bunch, but there are two or three I would rather not see on the ticket, but I really don't think they will be. They are probably just angling for a Cabinet position which would be fine. Overall, best collection of candidates in my lifetime.
calimary
(81,220 posts)The way he laughed at Sarah Palin every time she made some lame comment during the 2008 campaign, Just WUNNNNNNNderful! Really was a brilliant way to put her in her place as the simpleton she was (and still is).
Beartracks
(12,809 posts)He was The Wise Man and she was just The Fool.
=========
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)No, thanks.
He's not the candidate for a post MeToo world.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)movement won't survive if it is used against decent men like Biden. Biden is one of the good ones. I should add it was bad enough that Franken was lost for no reason...I was pretty angry about that...although I have let it go.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)as being much too snuggly with women and girls he's only just met. The looks on the female's faces tell the story.
This is from The Guardian, a progressive paper in the UK.
Joe Biden and why Touchy-Feely Men Should Back Off.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/22/joe-biden-touch-stephanie-carter-uninvited
Why is there a recurring problem with men and female personal space? One would have thought that personal would say it all. But its as if some men interpret this as, Cop a feel, whenever you like. As was evidenced by the behaviour of US vice president Joe Biden. While Ashton Carter was being sworn in as defense secretary, Biden placed his hands on the shoulders of Carters wife, Stephanie, for around 20 unspeakably tense seconds, whispered into her ear, and finally let her go.
While this was going on, Stephanie Carter had The Look that most women would recognise. The look that said: Sweet Jesus, hes touching me. Stay calm. She was visibly cringing, but trapped by circumstances. She could hardly yell, Dont touch me! at the veep during a public ceremony. Then theres the hideous automatic all-too female slide into coping mode the inbuilt conditioning to keep the peace. Ms Carter should have been enjoying a special moment in her husbands career not enduring the clammy grip of a handsy political silverback, whose position in life suggests that (despite all the apologists for his generation) hes intelligent enough to know exactly what hes doing.
NotHardly
(1,062 posts)No. I would offer that we do not need a second tier guy...I think it is great he served his country. That being said, let's do the next thing, not the last thing... this country needs women who are not on the take, not beholding to the powers that be, and capable of not doing the last thing some guy said they should. Biden is yesterday... he has not said or done anything since leaving office... that is abandonment, not a parliamentary courtesy.
emulatorloo
(44,119 posts)with innuendo and name calling. None of this scorched-earth nonsense in the 2020 primary please.
Unrec
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)be able to push around. He gives as good as he gets. I think Trump will be intimidated by him.
RandiFan1290
(6,229 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)I hear what you're saying. But, for one thing, I don't think people care much about the IW now. Many voters don't remember it, even.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)That would make him nearly a decade older than her when she ran for president, so not really the same age at all.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)BlueStater
(7,596 posts)So it's nine years.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)I have no issue with this...hind sight is 2020...everyone was deceived.
Martin Eden
(12,864 posts)Too old in my book.
Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)Martin Eden
(12,864 posts)They're all about the horse race and WHO instead of WHAT our government needs to do. Let's have a serious debate on policy and see who emerges with the necessary leadership and qualifications to get the job done
I won't even begin to consider who gets my support until 2020.
Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)Nothing wrong with knowing someone's history & whether you think they'd be a good fit for an elected position.
It tells you WHAT they will likely do once in office.
But I do agree that our elections need wholesale reform. My ideal is just a little more radical than most.
Along the lines of,
- no paid advertising.
- position statements on issues posted to a single, gov website.
- prescheduled actual debates w/ predetermined structures
- same, but as meetings with the press instead of a debate chair & with follow up question structure in place.
- along with all affiliations & endorsements
- clear lies prosecuted as fraud
Martin Eden
(12,864 posts)Nearly every facet of our elections is highly dysfunctional. It's a circus.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)I've got issues with Biden, as I'm sure a lot of people do, but if he wants to run, let him run and we'll see what happens. I'm keeping this limited, however, to current actual party members.
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)He has great foreign policy experience and is a direct connection/successor to a very popular President Obama.
Biden is very popular. Later Ill link to his appearance on Ellens show where she begs him to run (hands clasped in prayer). 🙏. Phone typing so cant do it now, but you can Google Ellen Biden appearance and should be able to find it. Biden is popular and has been No. 1 in the polls. Looks like people are looking for stability and experience, not empty/angry demagoguery.
Joe941
(2,848 posts)thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)I don't like the posts about how so and so shouldn't run because they're too old, or because we need a {insert preference here}, or his initials are BS, whatever. Let everyone run. If you don't want them, don't vote for them. No one should be the arbiter of who someone else can vote for.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)But call out Biden, Sanders, and the others for refusing to pass the torch and you get your post hidden for "bigotry" (whatever that means).
Yes, the forum which frequently allows millennial bashing, in which they're attacked as lazy, entitled slackers, is suddenly up in arms when someone dares to say that octogenarians shouldn't be president.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)When you're used to privilege, equality feels like oppression.
sfwriter
(3,032 posts)Let him run, and Im sure she will be brought up.
Joe941
(2,848 posts)BlueStater
(7,596 posts)There is a world of difference in the cognitive abilities between someone who is 70 and 80. The body breaks down significantly in that ten year gap alone.
It's just a fact of life. I believe Ron Reagan once noted how much older and slower his father was at the end of his term (when he almost 78) than at the beginning of it (when he was a few weeks away from his 70th birthday). And Biden would begin his term older than Reagan was when he LEFT office.
Joe941
(2,848 posts)Each person is different. Some people are sharp as a tac at 90 while others have experienced mental decline at 60. Let's judge each person by their abilities, ok?
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Yeah, poor Boomers. Must be really shitty occupying the lion's share of the highest political offices in the Party. I don't know how they get through the day.
standingtall
(2,785 posts)He seems like the logical alternative to Biden with less of the baggage.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Leaving Beto and possibly Hickenlooper as the victor
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)JI7
(89,247 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)He has every right to run, but losing will take some prestige from him.
LongtimeAZDem
(4,494 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)on a level playing field. Biden already made some high school statements about kicking Dotard's behind. This will be the behavior that is expected.
Gothmog
(145,152 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)In my opinion he should run
ailsagirl
(22,896 posts)onit2day
(1,201 posts)just not as a candidate for president. It will be a crowded field but I doubt he'll win. The progressive caucus is largest in congress telling corporate dems it's a new day, new blood is needed. But Biden is always welcome and loved but I want to hear from other candidates at debates who will address the issues progressives have brought to the table like Medicare for all. income inequality, pre-Reagan tax rates when we were so prosperous and ceos made only 30-50 times what lowest paid employees made instead of 500 -1000 times; accountability is responsibility, we need climate change to be #1 in dealing with EPA, pollution and renewable energy. Not talk...action...now. What does Biden want to do? What has he attempted to do? Same with all our candidates...and we have the best
LisaM
(27,804 posts)For whatever reason, he's not been able to make it through the primaries. He was lucky that Obama chose him as VP (and I'm not disagreeing with the choice, I thought he was a good VP). But he lost in 1988 and he lost in 2008. Would he have won in 2016? Hard to say, he was coping with the death of his beloved son, and I don't think his heart was in it.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)another Obama. I don't see another Obama in the roster of wanna-be's. Yet.
It's true that Biden isn't progressive. The Democratic Party has changed over the years and moved left, I think. Making it far left of Biden. I'm not sure that Biden would push healthcare for all or anything that's bold. But maybe he would. I haven't heard him speak on his current thinking.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)I think he could win.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)As I said, I haven't heard his views on things in a while. It can't be argued he's not experienced, at least. He could handle almost anything, I think.
lostnfound
(16,177 posts)Walking in to the chaos that trump leaves behind.. if your house is ransacked by robbers while you are away, who knows what it looked like before the robbery? Biden and Obama.
Hed hopefully rehire many of the great staffers and even cabinet that Obama had chosen.
Obama did a great job recovering economy the last time, and was respected internationally. Obama in a high level or informal advisory role, perhaps, not actually VP.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 8, 2019, 12:36 AM - Edit history (1)
I like Uncle Joe just fine. I think he did an excellent job as Veep. I think he did less well as a Senator and I think running will bring all of that back up. Two real low points? Anita Hill / Clarence Thomas. The credit card bankruptcy bill.
I think he should have run last time--I think he would have beaten tRump--but perhaps he deferred to Hillary. I also think his time is past. He represents a return to the status quo ante, and that is simply not good enough. My two cents.
eta: Charles Pierce agrees: https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a25782295/joe-biden-2020-democrats-divisive/
btw: he brings up the two things I objected to, and adds a third: Biden's support for Clinton's horrible crime bill. In short, minorities, women and anti-oligarchs will all have issues with Biden. This is the right candidate at this time? No.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Joe941
(2,848 posts)Demit
(11,238 posts)He's got too much baggage. Does poorly in presidential campaigns. Of course he can run, if he wants, it's his last hurrah, and he has a sizable ego so he probably will. But I won't waste my primary vote on him.
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)None of this "let's elect the best person" crap for you! Life is easy, when you narrow down the choices to an age range, a race, and a gender.
LakeArenal
(28,817 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)I mean, have you heard him speak a number of times, know his views on things? I'm waiting to hear that. I must admit I get a bit of the feeling from him that I got from Obama. Not exactly like my reaction to Obama, which was immediate and definite. But seeing and hearing Beto on tv made me take notice and think, "I hope he runs on a national level. I'm likin' what I see and hear."
As for Biden, I haven't heard his views in a while. But he's certainly experienced and likable. Unlike others, I think that likability is a key component of getting elected, usually.
LakeArenal
(28,817 posts)My mom from Texas.
I have listened to Beto speak. Lots of smarts, wit, quick on the take.
Obama also met with him and said he recognized a lot of himself in Beto. That is really the clincher for me.
And many folks hate to be reminded, but neither Biden or Beto have connection to the Al Franken debacle. That to me is important.
PS Im not interested in responding to any back and forth on Franken and will not respond.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)I agree w/you on the Franken thing.
I hope to hear Beto speak. I saw him on Bill Maher's Real Time. I saw him on tv a couple of times. But that's it. I was impressed. I could tell he was green, but I thought he had that "it" factor that is charisma, that natural leaders have. But I didn't see him enough to really know for sure.
Biden is Biden. We all know him. He's experienced, very competent to handle anything and anybody (even Trump). So I'm okay with him, but I think many Dems won't go for an older white man. I'd like to see a woman, too, but it's more important to have the right person who has experience, I think.
I was hoping a Governor would step forward, but hasn't happened.
Then there's Tom Steyer.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)kentuck
(111,085 posts)It is damn near impossible to catch lightning twice in a bottle. Usually, although there are exceptions, like Richard Nixon, who can win on the second time around, it is very difficult to do. I think some Democrats are still living in the Obama world. It's a new reality.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,417 posts)Soxfan58
(3,479 posts)We have the better. And we potentially have a plethora of high quality choices.