Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
Wed Jan 9, 2019, 02:19 PM Jan 2019

The TEA Party has it backwards.

Average working families are NOT taxed enough already, they are simply not compensated enough.

Tea Partiers love to talk about the supposed crushing burden of taxes, but the truth is that, because wages for workers have basically remained stagnant since the 1980s, it is the spending ability that is the issue.

True, the rich are taxed at lower levels since the Great Depression, and have amassed more wealth that ever. And that could be remedied by re-instituting a much higher rate of taxation for marginal income, and by removing the many loopholes that allow profitable corporations to avoid paying any taxes.

If we pushed for a living wage, a wage sufficient to support a family, and indexed that wage for inflation, that would be a huge step toward real economic prosperity.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The TEA Party has it backwards. (Original Post) guillaumeb Jan 2019 OP
I agree but I think there is even more to it genxlib Jan 2019 #1
Wage stagnation and tax cuts for the rich are, in my view, the 2 biggest reasons. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #2

genxlib

(5,524 posts)
1. I agree but I think there is even more to it
Wed Jan 9, 2019, 02:59 PM
Jan 2019

Workers are feeling a big bite our of there paycheck. However, the amount of that bite attributed to taxes has diminished over the years. I have tracked my taxes over the years and the percentage has gone down significantly in the 30 years I have been in the workforce.

While taxes have gone down, other deductions have risen and overtaken them in their place. Primarily health insurance premiums but also self funded retirement pensions and 401k's.

The other dynamic that is playing out is the definition of what middle class means. Forty years ago, a household with a telephone landline, electricity, gas and a TV was considered middle class. Now, most families would have multiple TV's, cable, internet, cell phones etc that just didn't exist as a household cost back then. Those additional expenses easily run into the thousands.

I'm not saying its right or wrong. I'm just saying that is the environment under which people feel chronically behind on the bills.

Anti-government types have taken advantage of that to convince people to blame taxes when there are a whole lot of other demands on there cash flow.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
2. Wage stagnation and tax cuts for the rich are, in my view, the 2 biggest reasons.
Wed Jan 9, 2019, 03:03 PM
Jan 2019

And 40 years ago, many families were one income families. That is rare now, so the problem is that it takes at least 2 workers to support a smaller family.

And debt is rising.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The TEA Party has it back...