General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBREAKING: Rep. Tulsi Gabbard running for President in 2020
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/01/11/politics/tulsi-gabbard-van-jones/index.htmlRep. Tulsi Gabbard said Friday she will run for president in 2020.
"I have decided to run and will be making a formal announcement within the next week," the Hawaii Democrat told CNN's Van Jones during an interview slated to air at 7 p.m. Saturday on CNN's "The Van Jones Show."
Gabbard, an Iraq War veteran, currently serves on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. She is the first American Samoan and the first Hindu member of Congress.
Link to tweet
Response to sunonmars (Original post)
Post removed
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)hlthe2b
(102,218 posts)except maybe another invited visit with buddy Assad.
Cha
(297,123 posts)this means she gives up her seat if she's really serious.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)I hope, for the sake of your great state, that proves to be the case!
Cha
(297,123 posts)we'll see how serious she is. I don't really see how she can run for both.
hlthe2b
(102,218 posts)Cha
(297,123 posts)too many don't even know it. lol
Me.
(35,454 posts)so why is she really in, what is the get for her cause it sure isn't the WH, she can't be that delusional
Cha
(297,123 posts)in fact, someone already posted it.
Can't find it.. I'll PM you.
Me
Cha
(297,123 posts)mcar
(42,300 posts)Cha
(297,123 posts)it looks like you can run for 2 offices in Hawaii.
Can You Run for Congress and President? Depends Where
https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/can-you-run-for-congress-and-president-depends-on-where
I hope someone primaries her while she's involved in this silly campaign. I normally am against primarying
Democrats but is she really?
Cha
(297,123 posts)last time she wouldn't even debate her primary opponent so it seems she thinks she has that wrapped up.
BUT.. since she's running for potus, too.. she will be nationally vetted.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,320 posts)At least you're not in Kentucky.
Even Gabbard would be a step up from what represents us hillbillies.
Cha
(297,123 posts)And, we have Hirono and Schatz! Two brilliant Senators
I hope in my lifetime Mitch gets his.. he's not just vile and vicious for Kentucky.. he's spreading his beta & gamma radio active, toxicity to the World.
DarthDem
(5,255 posts)After we got to know each other a little bit in that long thread a few weeks back, I thought of you immediately when I read this (ridiculous) news, and was immediately hoping for your sake (and everyone's) that this would mean she resigned from the House! Must keep her out of the Senate!
Cha
(297,123 posts)post I researched it.. and, anyone can run for POTUS and Congress at the same time in Hawaii.
But.. since she is running for potus she will be nationally Vetted. It won't be like here where she won't even debate her opponents.
And, now she's attacked Mazie Hirono and Kamala Harris..
Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard accuses fellow Democrats of 'religious bigotry' in questioning judicial nominee
It is unfortunate that Congresswoman Gabbard based her misguided opinion on the far-right wing manipulation of these straightforward questions, Hirono spokesman Will Dempster said in a statement.
He added that over the past two years, Hirono has been attacked by right wing ideologues for her examination of Donald Trumps ideologically-driven nominees to the courts.
Senator Hirono asks all judicial nominees particularly those who have expressed very strong personal ideological views in conflict with Supreme Court precedent if they can be fair, Dempster said. She asked Mr. Buescher, who has a clear record of anti-choice activism, whether he could separate his personal beliefs from decisions he would make if confirmed for a lifetime appointment on the federal bench.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hawaii-rep-tulsi-gabbard-accuses-fellow-democrats-of-religious-bigotry-in-questioning-judicial-nominee/2019/01/09/2c17ecdc-1467-11e9-90a8-136fa44b80ba_story.html?utm_term=.97039859a6e2
Senator Kamala Harris was also questioning Buescher.
Since I can only c/p 4 paragraphs these are the ones I chose.. if you want to read more.. please go to the link.
DarthDem
(5,255 posts). . . for the link. I had no idea she made a stink out of that. She is frankly a complete idiot. Great response by Ms. Hirono, no surprise. And of course Gabbard attacks my (home state and favorite overall) senator, too. Oof.
Yeah, I'm sure your research is spot on, and I didn't mean she would have to resign from the House; I was just hoping she would! We talked about this before and I know you realize that I want Hirono to stay in office for a long, long time, but only because Gabbard is so damn young I have to ask - is there anyone who can contend with her when she, inevitably IMO, runs for that seat? A Schatz type maybe, young and dynamic, male or female, but not a blockhead like your esteemed Representative?
dalton99a
(81,443 posts)blur256
(979 posts)Dino.
mcar
(42,300 posts)Cha
(297,123 posts)President Obama's!
handmade34
(22,756 posts)waste of time and money
Crutchez_CuiBono
(7,725 posts)We need more political stories and events like we need...a border wall. (Just a joke...no offense to this great forum.)
Freethinker65
(10,009 posts)arthritisR_US
(7,286 posts)LongtimeAZDem
(4,494 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,171 posts)Yosemito
(648 posts)David__77
(23,369 posts)The US regime change policy had terrible consequences in human life. It might be a good debate for Gabbard and others to have, and primary voters can decide what they think.
skylucy
(3,738 posts)Vinca
(50,260 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)No way does she have a snowballs chance. This is going to be a large pool of very qualified candidates.
Itchinjim
(3,085 posts)MrsCoffee
(5,801 posts)Response to sunonmars (Original post)
backabby-blue This message was self-deleted by its author.
qazplm135
(7,447 posts)I rolled my eyes so hard they popped out.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)peggysue2
(10,828 posts)Low blow but really spot on. LOL!
She's going nowhere.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)She is not a friend of the left:
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/05/tulsi-gabbard-president-sanders-democratic-party
If DU is a place where one is not allowed to criticize Gabbard, DU is a place I cannot post anymore.
OnDoutside
(19,952 posts)irresistable
(989 posts)but I like quite a few candidates and potential candidates.
mcar
(42,300 posts)obamanut2012
(26,067 posts)trust me, i know
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I'd rather get this out of the way is this is how it's going to go.
obamanut2012
(26,067 posts)hlthe2b
(102,218 posts)Disturbing.... VERY
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Shes sucking up to some horrible people.
Cha
(297,123 posts)can be vetted.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)I dont think it is an issue
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)Just dial it back and let's see where it goes.
In It to Win It
(8,233 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,079 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,172 posts)a kennedy
(29,644 posts)Response to sunonmars (Original post)
Post removed
obamanut2012
(26,067 posts)Cha
(297,123 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)Last edited Fri Jan 11, 2019, 10:51 PM - Edit history (1)
that shit wouldnt get ramped up for another six months at least.
Cha
(297,123 posts)is getting an early start.
madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)Fuck You, joe.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)brooklynite
(94,495 posts)W_HAMILTON
(7,859 posts)WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)But she leans toward the more frightening side of being a populist, specially of foreign affairs.
Cha
(297,123 posts)WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)Cha
(297,123 posts)WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)I didnt sugar coat that. I think I used the word frightening.
In 2017 you will find she held an almost identical ideological score to ORourke.
Not sure how I can be more clear on my thoughts than frightening.
Cha
(297,123 posts)WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)As far as I know, the worst Dem in the area of foreign affairs.
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)And thats being polite. I hope she doesnt bring too many conspiracies into the campaign.
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)I doubt shed have entered the race without checking with him first.
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)TheFarseer
(9,321 posts)But it's too soon. Hope this is not as bad a career move as it seems.
Cha
(297,123 posts)TheFarseer
(9,321 posts)And how these grades were arrived at. Ive seen these ratings before and really have wonder how certain congress people are behind others. And how are any Democrats getting F's? To be fair though, I've only heard her on Joe Rogan and a couple other interviews, so I need to do more homework. For instance, I dont know anything about this Assad connection people are referring to.
Cha
(297,123 posts)obamanut2012
(26,067 posts)TheFarseer
(9,321 posts)The 2nd most downloaded podcast of 2018. What a piece of shit
David__77
(23,369 posts)...
irresistable
(989 posts)Should we drum Steny Hoyer out of the party as well?
JCanete
(5,272 posts)gleefully posting their findings even though they refuse to defend the methodology.
That said, I won't weigh in on how Gabbard might fair in a more appropriate study. It does seem like there are some issues where I would part company with her on, but I'd have to do more research before asserting that.
BannonsLiver
(16,367 posts)Cha
(297,123 posts)PufPuf23
(8,764 posts)Yuck. She has an ego problem.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)LongtimeAZDem
(4,494 posts)Cha
(297,123 posts)yeah, that's why I contacted her and said "NO More Emails from you."
'Cause she was always on foxscrews dissing President Obama.
Thanks but no thanks.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)seaglass
(8,171 posts)Here is a really long profile on her that I just finished reading:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/11/06/what-does-tulsi-gabbard-believe
Trey Gowdy, the South Carolina Republican, is one of her closest friends in Congress. He first spied her on the House floor, sitting on the Republican side of the aisle.
BannonsLiver
(16,367 posts)Cha
(297,123 posts)David__77
(23,369 posts)I think she may bring a great policy discussion!
backabby-blue
(144 posts)Her policies seem to be right of center.
Raine
(30,540 posts)but I want to find out more about her before making up my mind.
Raine
(30,540 posts)I have looked at her and the other candidates stand on issues now and not just from years ago, opinions change. The past will factor in but not exclusively.
Byronic
(504 posts)I like her, too. She's going to be a great addition to the conversation.
And, if primary voters don't like her, they are going to have plenty of other options to choose from.
Demonaut
(8,914 posts)BannonsLiver
(16,367 posts)Cha
(297,123 posts)It is unfortunate that Congresswoman Gabbard based her misguided opinion on the far-right wing manipulation of these straightforward questions, Hirono spokesman Will Dempster said in a statement.
He added that over the past two years, Hirono has been attacked by right wing ideologues for her examination of Donald Trumps ideologically-driven nominees to the courts.
Senator Hirono asks all judicial nominees particularly those who have expressed very strong personal ideological views in conflict with Supreme Court precedent if they can be fair, Dempster said. She asked Mr. Buescher, who has a clear record of anti-choice activism, whether he could separate his personal beliefs from decisions he would make if confirmed for a lifetime appointment on the federal bench.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hawaii-rep-tulsi-gabbard-accuses-fellow-democrats-of-religious-bigotry-in-questioning-judicial-nominee/2019/01/09/2c17ecdc-1467-11e9-90a8-136fa44b80ba_story.html?utm_term=.97039859a6e2
Since I can only c/p 4 paragraphs these are the ones I chose.. if you want to read more.. please go to the link.
Me.
(35,454 posts)when she attacks Sen. Hirono. What I'm wondering is if AOC and social dems attacking other Dems especially those sit with her in Congress, if that has bolstered Tulsi's attacks on Dems.
I'm also wondering if there are possible ethics violations here with falsely calling out a DEm Senator and AOC's group calling a fellow, sitting Congressperson names.
Cha
(297,123 posts)Senators Mazie Hirono and Kamala Harris over their questioning a trump nominee, for a life time judge appointment, on whether he will uphold the law.
As Mazie's spokesman says..
I don't know about it being Ethics Violations but I'm thinking it will turn out to not be very wise.
Me
Me.
(35,454 posts)Cha
(297,123 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)RelativelyJones
(898 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)David__77
(23,369 posts)...may lose some sleep over her later.
I think she may be an effective tactician, and she has some potentially powerful issues at her disposal that could serve to highlight ideological polarization. For instance, millions of Democratic primary voters may gravitate to the idea of reducing the US foreign military presence, foreign intervention, etc., which may be at odds with some Democrats vision.
Cha
(297,123 posts)Autumn
(45,048 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)I will give her strong consideration in the primaries.
David__77
(23,369 posts)I think its likely she would be a more effective campaigner than Sanders, for instance. Shes said some thing I dont agree with. That certainly doesnt rule out support.
Cha
(297,123 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)Thanks for sharing!