Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(24,695 posts)
Mon Jan 21, 2019, 12:05 PM Jan 2019

'Ancient' Scottish stone circle was built in 1990s

Archaeologists were studying site until former farm owner came forward

A stone circle thought to be thousands of years old has turned out to be a lot more modern after a former farm owner admitted building it in the 1990s.

The “recumbent stone circle” in the parish of Leochel-Cushnie, Aberdeenshire, was reported by the site’s current farm and was considered unusual for its small diameter and relatively small stones.

Historic Environment Scotland and Aberdeenshire council’s archaeology service celebrated it as an authentic discovery and continued their research until being contacted by the former owner who said they had built it as a replica in the mid-1990s.

Neil Ackerman, the historic environment record assistant at Aberdeenshire council, said: “It is obviously disappointing to learn of this development, but it also adds an interesting element to its story. That it so closely copies a regional monument type shows the local knowledge, appreciation and engagement with the archaeology of the region by the local community.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jan/21/ancient-scottish-stone-circle-was-built-in-1990s


Oop's.........................

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Ancient' Scottish stone circle was built in 1990s (Original Post) turbinetree Jan 2019 OP
Oops! Wounded Bear Jan 2019 #1
Stoner Heads reveal traces of THC Achilleaze Jan 2019 #2
Spinal Tap. yardwork Jan 2019 #3
"But I want to believe." Igel Jan 2019 #4
Science begins with a healthy scoop of skepticism, periodic additions of more scoops. nt NCjack Jan 2019 #5

Igel

(35,300 posts)
4. "But I want to believe."
Mon Jan 21, 2019, 01:06 PM
Jan 2019

It's a horrible way to conduct anything called "science".

It's okay if it's a researcher or team engaging in "I wanna believe" research. If you don't think there's a point, you're not going to do it.

It's when the "I wanna believe" stretches to the surrounding environment--other scholars, public opinion. Then there's no drive to disconfirm the conclusion or facts, there's no critical analysis, there's just belief masquerading as secular truth.

At least in this case it was inconsequential because nothing apart from accuracy for the sake of accuracy depended on it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Ancient' Scottish stone ...