General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBattle of the billionaires: Trump could face a super-rich challenger in 2020
As some of the Democratic Party's heavyweight contenders start announcing their intention to run for president, there remains a chance that President Donald Trump will square off with a fellow billionaire come 2020.
But does anyone on the left want a candidate from the private sector as their nominee at a time when some in the party are running hard against big business, corporate greed and Wall Street?
Entering the cycle, three billionaires appeared poised to seek the presidency: Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (Forbes estimated his wealth at over $46 billion); Starbucks founder Howard Schultz (Forbes pegged his riches at $3.3 billion); and ex-hedge fund chieftain and impeachment activist Tom Steyer (Forbes ball-parked him at $1.6 billion), who has since removed his name from contention.
Trump is worth $3.1 billion, according to Forbes.
Early polls showed none of the three would start from a position of power. A December straw poll from the liberal advocacy group MoveOn found Bloomberg in eighth place among 2020 contenders while Steyer finished a distant 23rd and Schultz found himself in dead-last.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/battle-of-the-billionaires-trump-could-face-a-super-rich-challenger-in-2020/ar-BBSx1fc?li=BBnb7Kz
Maybe they shouldn't bother then.
underpants
(182,749 posts)My 2 cents.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)I honestly want someone of the commoner class like myself.
Salviati
(6,008 posts)They aren't getting a dime from me. I'll donate to other campaigns, but not to some dilettante who thinks he can be president just because he's got a big bank account.
tenderfoot
(8,425 posts)dameatball
(7,396 posts)Although any of them would be better than the swillionaire we have now.