General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court will review gun restrictions for first time in nearly a decade
The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it will examine New York Citys ban on carrying a licensed and unloaded handgun outside the city limits, the first Second Amendment challenge it has accepted in nearly a decade.
The decision to hear the case in the term that begins in October may signal that the reinforced conservative majority on the court is ready to consider more laws that restrict gun rights.
New Yorks law is not replicated elsewhere: It permits transporting handguns only to firing ranges within the city. Those who challenged the law have a licenses to keep a handgun at their homes. Petitioners included those who want to take their guns to firing ranges or competitions outside the city, and one who wanted to take the gun to his second home upstate.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled for the city. It said petitioners had not shown there was inadequate access to one of the seven firing ranges in the city, that petitioners could not rent a firearm if they wanted to go to a range elsewhere, or that the upstate homeowner could not get a permit to keep a second handgun there.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-will-review-gun-restrictions-for-first-time-in-nearly-a-decade/2019/01/22/d6b36496-1b47-11e9-88fe-f9f77a3bcb6c_story.html?utm_term=.56e795fffd1d&wpisrc=al_news__alert-politics--alert-national&wpmk=1
MichMan
(11,910 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Only to a in-city range or home, no where else.
Cerulean Southpaw
(32 posts)Theyre saying that once a handgun is licenced it cant ever be taken out of the city? That would mean theyre saying the owner doesnt really own it, the city does.
That law doesnt sound like it makes any sense.