When you are pregnant with a fetus that is going to die in the womb, and you choose to let it happen that way, that's fine. But do NOT tell people who actually can get pregnant what they should do.

More Faux News fuckwads. He probably wants his own show. Look at that first pic with the phony baloney white teeth.

From a post by Melissa Bales on Facebook about late term abortions:

LATE TERM ABORTIONS ARE RESERVED FOR MOTHERS AND BABIES WITH FATAL HEALTH ISSUES.

WOMEN WHO WISH TO NOT BE PREGNANT DO NOT WAIT UNTIL 24+ WEEKS GESTATION TO ABORT A HEALTHY FETUS. It would NEVER be approved. Ever.

WOMEN WHO HAVE LATE TERM ABORTIONS ARE LOSING A VERY WANTED BABY.

THEY ARE NOT INHUMANE.

This makes me so angry I have no words right now.

Fuck HIM!

It should be one of the options considered for population control. If women choose abortion, they should get cash rewards for it.

A woman should have complete unfettered access to abortion at ANY time of the pregnancy. No restriction at all...period.

IMO...while progressive...the New York law is still too restrictive.

It encourages population reduction.

8 billion is too many. Each person is a carbon footprint. That’s the cold hard truth. Over the next 50 years we need to get back to 4 billion maximum.

and when abusive men start demanding abortions for the cash payout then what? Abortion will become a means of oppression even more traumatic and dangerous than prostitution.

It’s a woman’s decision to make and theirs alone. I believe in rewarding them for making a decision that helps the planet in the long run.

Abortion should be as available as birth control.

Don’t jump to conclusions.

of course it isn't......................... do you think all abortions and births are 100% the decision of a woman?????????????? That's the way morality says it SHOULD work, but not how it DOES work in real life.

Attitudes and mindsets need to change.

I think they will when we reach 500 ppm CO2.

One positive for the planet is that the cost of having children is skyrocketing. That just may do the job of population reduction itself.

We don’t have a population growth problem here.

Next task is to make it worldwide.

which means he absolutely knows the heath risk to a woman if that happens, like infertility and death. He is a vile maggot.

I hope women run from his office in droves.

cause if it happened to her she could of died. Human bodies don't take well to dying tissues that are excreting deathly chemicals to the mom.

But Hey ladies.

Mom does a high five with the doc when she's done.

Hope no one you love needs to make that choice.

so he needs to shut the fuck up.

Why don't you give us your opinion on this tragic case?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Savita_Halappanavar

its female viewers?

Abortion isn't profitable. That's the damned bottom line with a jerk like that.

What about a mother with 2 little boys under age five and gets pregnant, Wants the baby but starts having heart problems that grow worse, until it reaches the point where the doctors say the baby must be aborted or both mother and baby will die and two little boys will be left without a mother. This happened in my bother's late wife. She didn't want to lose the baby which was a girl, but it was aborted in late term to save her life. Her health problems finally caused her death when she was 46, but she did get to raise her boys.

Never listen or repeat any bullshit from Fox News!

To force a woman to be a living incubator is to take possession of her life; it is slavery.

When I'm ready to die, please gift me recreational euthanasia.

But trust me, it was bad.

The child was not viable and she was in danger from a possible infection.

Recreational? My wife and I discovered our son was not going to live to term and if he did, he would die shortly after birth if birth didnt kill him. The decision to end was soul crushing and devastating. I will never forget being in the waiting room while my wife was having the procedure done.. feeling powerless knowing she was back there suffering terribly and there was nothing I could do about it. For weeks we cried both because she had a miscarriage before and this preganancy was after months of fertility treatments.

The OB radiologist who gave us the diagnosis after the ultrasound was so kind and caring, I will never forget his empathy. When we eventually got pregnant with our daughter years later, he remembered us and his congratulations were so warm and hopeful. That is a truly caring doctor. This guy above. He can rot. There was nothing recreational about what we went through and what my wife went through.. I can never really understand.

He is either a liar or an idiot.

Living baby Sun Hudson was deliberately killed because he was an inconvenience to the state.

Republican governor,,, republican Prez.

Conservatives/republicans/supposed pro-lifers had no qualms about it.

Recreational killing.

Sun Hudson case

The Sun Hudson case concerned Wanda Hudson and her infant son, who was allowed to die via removal of his breathing tube, contrary to her wishes.

Chronology
Hudson gave birth to a son with an unknown father on September 25, 2004, at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital in Houston, Texas, with thanatophoric dysplasia, a typically fatal form of congenital dwarfism. She was informed that the infant was most likely unable to survive, and should have his breathing tube removed pursuant to Chapter 166 of the Texas Health & Safety Code, the Advance Directives Act. Under this act, a doctor's recommendations to withdraw medical treatment can be followed, after they have been reviewed by the hospital's ethics committee and after 10 days' notice is given to the patient or guardian. Hudson was given 10 days from written notice to find a new facility to accommodate the infant, but was unable to do so. Texas Children's Hospital states that it attempted to contact 40 facilities without finding a willing one.

Legal delays prevented the removal of the breathing tube, which would have occurred on November 28, 2004, but a judge ruled that the removal of the tube did not require Hudson's agreement. On March 15, 2005, Texas Children's Hospital personnel removed the breathing tube. Official reports state that he was sedated, and asphyxiated in under a minute. Hudson disputes this, and told reporters, who were not permitted entrance, "I wanted y'all to see my son for yourself, so you could see he was actually moving around. He was conscious."

The hospital lacked confidence in Hudson's mental competence; she was quoted by The Dallas Morning News as saying that she didn't seek prenatal care "because I trusted in the Sun", which she claimed fathered the baby. She also made similar comments during an interview with Greta Van Susteren.[2]

Bioethics implications
Bioethicists note that the case is the first time a U.S. hospital has been allowed to remove life sustaining support contrary to the wishes of the legal guardian and lacking advance directives from the patient themselves.[citation needed] This, the bioethicists claim, makes the issue precedent-setting in further cases where it may be applied. Early speculation as to its application was the case of Spiro Nikolouzos. Nikolouzos, however, was accepted at a San Antonio nursing facility on March 21, 2005, where he died of natural causes on May 30.

More:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Hudson_case

Thank you, keithbvadu2.