What did the President say, when and to whom regarding the Biden investigation.

Philbin is STILL not answering the question and he mumbled something about stuff that may have been said "in private".

he's know he can't aswer the question, because the truth would suck for him !!!!

This is Bannon's fantasy.

subpoena can be issued was beecausse it was done that way in ALL impeachments! WOW ALL OF 2 TIMES!

every time i see a new one i try to watch..
or sometimes i just click on it to see what's up.....

but within a minute or 2 i throw up and have to cut it off.

but keep up the good work Bumrush----

(this from someone whose own President has ignored EVERY ethics advice that was given and the ethics guy resigned )

They're whole bullshit is literally a slight-of-hand. Do what I say and not what I do.

about these inane questions about Biden.

who didn't investigate corruption. So anything he ever said should not be trusted. So the removal of Shokin would mean that Burisma WOULD BE investigated. And then the Bidens were not involved when this was happening.

of the call?

for the President. Not meddling in an election - meddling in an investigation.

weak. He can't be serious!

No wonder Alan has a hard time getting invites to cocktail parties.

Even his underwear is corrupt. Ick.

heard in the House. What is different about that versus hearing no witnesses for a President's trial?

and is no problem but if the same is asked for a President, then it would take too much time.

meaning the Vice President doesn't exist - AND the Amendments to the Constitution that describe the succession of power don't exist.

Lala land.

for investigations and that has to be illegal.

King praised Klobuchar's question about 26 witnesses for judge impeachment, 0 for president -- "It doesn't pass the straight face test". Then he went on to poke fun at the notion that the impeachment is keeping the Senate from its business. Said he about fell out of his chair. "We haven't done a lot of business in the Senate."

the whistleblower's claims are reviewed by the IG who determines if they are valid and worthy of consideration or not. in short their motivation is not relevant because the CLAIM itself is validated before it is submitted.

If they can't out the whistleblower, they'll try to discredit and claim bias instead - anything but a discussion of the facts.

remote on mute when a tag team of repig Senators ask the pResidents counsel a stupid question l know it's going to be a duzy.

And no chance for House Managers to rebutt unless the next question is open ended.
This can’t be fair.

does not make it okay.

- Used powers of office to solicit foreign interference

- pResident tRump conditioned military aid and a WH meeting on political investigations

=====================


- Grave consequences

- The pResident remains an ongoing threat

- Acting cHief of sTaff Mulvaney:
- “Get Over It”

____
Originally given as side by side columns

and digging up dirt and contacting the President.

Constitutional rights.

They are really, really moving for a dismissal, rather than a convict / do not convict vote.

was NOT a "Constitutional right".

what kind of stupid ass question is that? LOL the whole point of this is that he abused his power for personal gain. he doesn't have a constitutional power to do that.

again and again and again Repigs questions being asked. They really want a dictatorship don't they??

No man is above the law.

Crap these lawyers can go to hell.

in order to force that foreign power to announce an investigation into a political opponent considered to be 'exercising Constitutional powers?' Wha? The question itself should have been thrown out.

These people really seem to hate humanity.

And it wouldn't be one based on the how the branches are divided and how the President is elected vs where the parties SELECT a PM.

What YOU want is a monarchy.

by Russia on social media. Shouldn't we do everything we can with our intelligence agencies, to prevent foreign interference in our elections.

Began with nothing to see here, then okay we did that because we made it policy. Remarkable lowering of the bar - as long as it is in his re-election interest by claiming it is in the U.S. interest and beyond the reach of the Constitution, then it is not impeachable.

A social studies student can see through the lies. Good for Schiff calling it corruption so forcefully.

I have only checked in now and again because this format has my BP soaring, so hats off in admiration for everyone who has stuck with it.

BumDaRush you are a gem to do this. You have a strong stomach.

question. Hakeem is answering.

What a hero. I just love his passion for truth and righteousness.

Correction. I love all the house managers. They are doing such a great job.

and if so, why were the criminal citations not included in the articles.

Now citing Dershowitz said - a criminal violation *or* something AKIN to one. And the "akin" is what happened in this case.

and how is assistance to foreign countries supposed to work.

We have no documents to show that others were aware of the holds.

Compare to Obama's - Congress was TOLD of the hold and why. Never for personal interest. Even previous holds by Drumpfs - for Afghanistan and Central America - they were publicly announced and everyone was in the loop. But this instance was different.

interfere with the financial process.

then don't bother with the impeachment.

and we have seen all the evidence and heard from witnesses. This is really disgusting that they want this POS to be a dictator.

The Constitution is being shredded by these thugs.

don't vote the way you should vote because there isn't a supermajority anyway???? what a fucking fucker!!!

Logic.

So, don’t vote for conviction unless you know it will be a supermajority.

Gawd

the constitution is correct the next president could have them investigated and thrown in jail? Just claim national security issue or interfering in some kind of presidential prerogative or whatever a POTUS wants to claim and they're done? They are just so stupid ...

Weaponization? That's what this so called defense team is trying to justify right now!

But, it’s finally over for tonight!
Time for sleep and another session to face tomorrow!

Have a good night

and would the WH counsel do the same?

Dershowitz is cynically selling out the country. Nothing will stop Trump when he is emboldened and powered with absolute immunity.

was out of his fucking mind.

And now this question being asked our names "the American people" was invoked, when they have no idea what we think.

Did anyone hear that question, what is this action going to


What specific danger does this impeachment pose to our republic, to its citizens?

shut up, underwearman

in 2019 and they were told why. But why was Congress not notified about the hold for Ukraine and what steps would be needed to resolve?

and now he is botching about "sending a signal" And now back to "burden sharing".

evil Bill Nye now saying the secrecy was a benefit. jeebus they are so shameless

bs



✌🏼

... the "IMpResident's" lawyer's responses today, I've gone from to to to to

I'm just so angry that they are allowed to stand there and lie and lie and lie!

it was invalid because it would be 2 charges. The House was going to charge Constitutional crimes ("abuse" of power).

because they make sense and none of tRump defenders do.

Can you imagine saying a Chief Justice's subpoena is not valid and the Chief Justice is sitting right there? The utter gall!

Hmm? Wasn’t a signal? NO SIGNAL? No clear POLICY SIGNALS? Hmmm?

Was he just pulling that outta the air?

___
That wouldn’t hold up to real scrutiny, would it?

and to everyone for the running commentary!

I just don’t know how you do it. I’ll be in here from the start tomorrow.

call your Reps and Senators we need witnesses and documents to conduct a fair trial.

Thanks again BumRushDaShow.