General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump admin is bringing back the use of land mines, which are banned by more than 160 countries
Link to tweet
Vivian Salama
@vmsalama
The Trump admin is expected to loosen restrictions on the US military's ability to use landmines in the coming days, weapons that have been banned by more than 160 countries due to their history of killing & wounding civilians, multiple Defense Dept officials tell @rabrowne75
Javaman
(62,517 posts)underpants
(182,769 posts)Last edited Thu Jan 30, 2020, 12:32 PM - Edit history (1)
BTW - from my Army training, land mines are really designed not to kill just maim. Every wounded soldier takes 3-4 other soldiers out of the fight.
Humans have put a lot of thought time and money into creative ways to hurt each other .....so some people can have some other peoples stuff.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)Verdoux: Oui, Monsieur, I have. However remiss the prosecutor has been in complimenting me, he at least admits that I have brains. Thank you Monsieur, I have. And for thirty five years I used them honestly, after that nobody wanted them. So I was forced to go into business for myself. As for being a mass killer, does not the world encourage it? Is it not building weapons of destruction for the sole purpose of mass killing? Has it not blown unsuspecting women and little children to pieces, and done it very scientifically? As a mass killer, I am an amateur by comparison. However I do not wish to lose my temper, because very shortly I shall lose my head. Nevertheless, upon leaving this spark of earthly existence, I have this to say ..I shall see you all very soon very soon
underpants
(182,769 posts)Hes right.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)dalton99a
(81,451 posts)doc03
(35,325 posts)Liberal In Texas
(13,546 posts)And this makes perfect sense.
bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)gristy
(10,667 posts)Duppers
(28,120 posts)JDC
(10,125 posts)Of course it is
Omen78
(81 posts)Civilians are still being killed in Vietnam some 45 years later because of land mines and unexploded munitions.
bdamomma
(63,836 posts)the corona to make an appearance to the chosen one.
Ilsa
(61,694 posts)I wouldn't put biological warfare past him.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)Mrs. Overall
(6,839 posts)Newsweek: How Princess Diana Crippled the Case for Land Mines
https://www.newsweek.com/princess-diana-diana-william-harry-prince-william-prince-harry-royal-family-383448
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)..."Near the south-eastern town of Dirico, Harry walked into an area that was once an artillery base for anti-government forces, and who had mined the position in 2000 before retreating.
Praising the work of landmine clearance charitythe Halo Trust, Harry called landmines an unhealed scar of war, adding: By clearing the landmines we can help this community find peace, and with peace comes opportunity.
Additionally, we can protect the diverse and unique wildlife that relies on the beautiful Cuito river that I slept beside last night.
.....
More than 120,000 people were killed or injured by landmines between 1999-2017, according to research by Landmine Monitor. Civilians made up 87% of casualties, with nearly half of the victims children.
Camille Wallen, the director of strategy at the Halo Trust, said Harrys visit helped remind the world that landmines are not just a thing if the past.".....(more)
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)What instance in the past 30 years would we have even considered using land mines as a viable choice?
hack89
(39,171 posts)but they were pretty much limited to the DMZ in Korea. The one concesstion we made was to ensure all of our land mines self destructed after a certain period to prevent mines killing people decades after the fact.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)These weapons -- and in fact all delayed-detonation munitions -- are moral abominations.
hack89
(39,171 posts)One the countries that still uses land mines is Finland. They have a strategic border with Russia and they see mines as crucial to their defense. Denying Russia access to large chunks of their border is the only way they can counter an invasion.
The Ottawa treaty is very inconsistent. It bans anti-personnel mines but not anti-vehicle or dual purpose mines. So it is a crime to kill one person walking but not 30 in a bus.
Mines can be used morally but they need to all be engineered such that they become harmless after a relatively short period of time.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)A kid isn't going to set off an anti-vehicle mine by picking it up. But, yeah: Finland is one of the other hold-outs, and I get why they feel that way, especially lately.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)That was the justification he gave for not signing the Ottawa treaty.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,731 posts)Duppers
(28,120 posts)😵😪
Ohiogal
(31,979 posts)shove a land mine up his ample ass