Really I think Bondi is really there in a Fox News blonde role.

contribution to a campaign is a violation of law.

What might we expect now from other countries based on the argument that there is nothing wrong with foreign intervention in our election?

official acts on the acts by another public officer. How does this apply to the President?

OT: takes over ten seconds for me to be able to type after clicking "reply" -- my connection takes that long just to display the OP. dunno what my ISP is doing today.

or anyone from the outside who were involved in withholding aid and obstruction of Congress?

Exhibit 4 - Friday, July 19, 2019
Email: Robert Blair, Lisa Kenna, Brian McCormack, mick mulvaney, rick Perry, mike pompeo, and Gordon Sondland

Subject: Re: I talked to Zelensky just now

15:28 Gordon Sondland: He is prepared to receive Potus’ call. Will assure him that he intends to run a fully transparent investigation and will “turn over every stone”. He would greatly appreciate a call prior to Sunday so that he can put out some media about a “friendly and productive call” (no details) prior to Ukraine election on Sunday.

21:30 Rick Perry (replying to McCormack and Sondland only): Mick just confirmed the call being set up for tomorrow by NSC.

RP

22:25 Mick Mulvaney (replying to all): I asked NSC to set it up for tomorrow

MM


___
CSPAN clip: https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4850962/user-clip-demings-reviews-subpoenas-needed

This is the corrupt political errand.

((OBVIOUSLY V.P. Biden's fault.))

He is now hunched over because he was caught.

... just trying to convince people water is dry.

(And the reason is those funds were DIRECTED to be spent in FY 2019... DUMB ASSES.)

(and THAT is the problem. They waited too late.)

Answer from DOJ in court down the street today: impeachment.

*laughter*

Wow.

doing thing for personal gain. Is there any other precedent of this?

in the impeachment trial demand they go to court to enforce, the DOJ is in court right now telling the House that they can't go to court for subpoena enforcement. The judge asked DOJ what was the remedy and the DOJ said - "impeachment".

(and the chamber broke out in laughter)

I sure hope one of the Dems brings that up.
And Senator Paul should be arrested. Right now.

Outing a whistleblower is a crime.

just another repuke asshole.

Besides basing the question on a lie, the question is directed to WH counsel even though it is asking why the House did this. Even if the lie were true, only the House could explain their reasons.

And ask them what it means to be an impartial juror.

Is he doing some sort of campaign ad for Trump in the middle of an Impeachment Trial?

I guarantee you Trump gave him this script.

He claimed that Obama’s hot mic with Medvedev was a quid pro quo and an impeachable offense.

If the Senate accepts the pResident’s blanket assertion of privilege, what are the consequences to the American people?

I can hear it just looking at the screen.

Yup you're right idiot. That describes your team's arguments.

Link to tweet

that they keep calling a "transcript".

(i.e., the "do us a favor though..." part)

... without thinking.

(Schumer to both prez + Dem counsel)

... which is asinine seeing house procedures are left up to the house

not that the other managers aren't also worth hearing, but he is in a different category altogether.

I hate to miss any of his responses, but I just can't stand to listen to the WH liars.

The charitable assumption is that law enforcement does not want to lend credibility to whatever name he called out.

The Senate, at least, should censure his rancid ass.

Claire McCaskill now on ABC

Edit to add:

Tim Kaine on NBC
Coons on PBS