Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 07:38 PM Jan 2020

Manu Raju: This is new - Schiff suggests a one-week period for depositions / witnesses



Manu Raju ✔@mkraju

This is new - Schiff suggests a one-week period for depositions and a “limited” time for witnesses, pushing back on concerns of “endless” delays. He said the Chief Justice can deal with any disputes. “This can be done very quickly.” He calls it a “reasonable accommodation”

6:29 PM - Jan 30, 2020
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

leftieNanner

(15,058 posts)
1. Oh, but then poor widdle twumpie
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 07:52 PM
Jan 2020

won't be able to run his $10 million worth of exoneration ads during the Super Bowl.

He be hazzing a SAD if that happens! And his little friend Hannity will have to change the narrative for their interview.

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
4. Waiting to hear from our esteemed DU constitutional scholars
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 08:13 PM
Jan 2020

But it seems to me that Adam Schiff wouldn't be appealing to the Chief Justice if he didn't think there was a legal avenue to pursue through him.

Something else I seem to remember: when Schiff was on Rachel's program the other night, she asked him if the Dems would go to Roberts if the GOP successfully blocked witness testimony. He shot her a look of "don't go there" and said that he couldn't answer that question, that he didn't want to disclose the Dem's strategy. It indicated to me that that WAS the Dem's strategy.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
12. I Read An Article
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 09:04 PM
Jan 2020

That said that was what happened during the Johnson impeachment and it takes a 2/3 vote to overrule the Chief Justice. But the Chief Justice would have final say on who would be permitted to be a witness and one of the criteria would be relevance to the current case. But Roberts is a pretty political justice so no slam dunk.

totodeinhere

(13,056 posts)
5. No, the Senate has the last word. 51 votes can overrule anything that Roberts does.
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 08:21 PM
Jan 2020

Besides, Roberts has shown no indication that he would do that anyway. Remember, it was his vote that put Citizens United over the top. He is not our ally.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
9. Gotcha. Thanks
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 08:43 PM
Jan 2020

But, if that DOES happen, wonder how well he’ll take that override going forward

Huge blow to his ego/position

RockRaven

(14,886 posts)
8. IIRC Clinton gave a SOTU during his impeachment trial.
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 08:42 PM
Jan 2020

So that is no barrier, except for Trump's fragile ego and the GrOPers total abjection to his every whim.

paleotn

(17,876 posts)
14. My prediction....
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 09:21 PM
Jan 2020

If this extends beyond SOTU, * will be a no show. He'll cancel and want to postpone SOTU until after the Senate wraps up. He's too chicken shit to venture into the lion's den unless he has an "acquittal" in hand.

japple

(9,805 posts)
17. That is my hope. Of course I wake up each morning hoping to
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 09:32 PM
Jan 2020

read that his family has convinced him to resign for health reasons. But his family is too entrenched in their fleecing of the US Treasury for their own benefit that they have nowhere to go...

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)
16. It would be a short challenge
Thu Jan 30, 2020, 09:28 PM
Jan 2020

Legal scholars & pundits say he can't claim privilege because he's discussed the substance of the Bolton charges on Twitter.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Manu Raju: This is new - ...