General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDid You Hear Romney's Remark About Employer Based Healthcare?
Saw the clip of his interview today. Two things:
First, he said he wouldn't get rid of all Obama's AHC plan-----there goes the congregation, Mitt, you moron!!! Can you hear them all say, "Goddamit, I told you he was a MA liberal"!
But then he sneaked something else in. He blathered something about working towards getting rid of employer based healthcare plans so we could all have the opportunity of buying real cheap insurance. That son-of-a-bitch wants everyone from kids to seniors (when he gets rid of Medicare) to all be out there alone trying to get insurance. There wouldn't be any more group plans. It would be each of us against the insurance company and 90% of us could never afford the premiums these vampires would impose. So, for all of those "I got mine" assholes.....you ain't gonna' have "yours" for long once these filth bags get in control of our govenment.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)DemocracyInaction
(2,506 posts)I think he is now scrambling to scrub the "kill the bill" they have been preaching to the lunatics. The polling must suggest that people are not liking their plans on healthcare, medicare, etc. But once Mitt loses the lunatics by straying from their gospel, he is dead meat.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)that's what he has in mind.
jsr
(7,712 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)Sorry I didn't get it.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)Not the people who make up the corporations.
randome
(34,845 posts)lastlib
(23,202 posts)central scrutinizer
(11,645 posts)there is something called guaranteed issue that large employers can take advantage of - it means that they are big enough that every employee will be guaranteed coverage because actuarial tables tell them that the risk is acceptable. Anybody not in a GI plan is at the mercy of the underwriters who are the actual, functioning death panels that the Klondike Kardashian was whining about.
Lex
(34,108 posts)If someone can find affordable health insurance that doesn't go away if they lose their job, then that's a good thing.
the only problem is how to make sure people are getting paid more because just dropping the insurance would't guarantee that the money would go to the workers.
Wounded Bear
(58,627 posts)that the Mittster has nothing in mind that actually helps those people.
And BTW, I'm one of them.
GeorgeGist
(25,318 posts)Sounds Grand.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)there were a true public option where guaranteed issue were offered to all Americans, period. no more working horrible jobs just so we can afford to get sick. this would do more to spur entrepreneurialism than anything else.
of course, this isn't what Mittens has in mind, but maybe we'll get there with a democratic administration + Congress, one day.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)because it would be such a huge disaster.
pansypoo53219
(20,968 posts)competitive versus europe, but the better option is it being rn by THE GOVERNMENT. so he is 1/2 right.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Maybe the individual policy I would buy would have a bit less coverage, but for what I paid for the group policy under COBRA (which is a group policy rate, except I pay what the employer pays), I think there was no discount for it being group.
It could be because under the group policy, the rate is based on a lot of unhealthy people and tons of claims, and includes rates for smokers, people with cancer, etc. All things you have to pay for when you pay for a block of diverse people who lead different lifestyles and have different health situations.
If my employer would give me a raise, I think I could buy my own policy at less expense, because I'm healthy, even though I'm older. I guess that would change, eventually, if I got cancer or whatever.
My point being that group policies aren't necessarily cheaper, unless you're a high risk person.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"He blathered something about working towards getting rid of employer based healthcare plans so we could all have the opportunity of buying real cheap insurance. "
During the health care debate in th 1990s, one of the things Republicans objected to most was the employer mandate.
Mitt also vetoed this provision in the MA health care law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_health_care_reform#Legislation