Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocracyInaction

(2,506 posts)
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:13 PM Sep 2012

Did You Hear Romney's Remark About Employer Based Healthcare?

Saw the clip of his interview today. Two things:

First, he said he wouldn't get rid of all Obama's AHC plan-----there goes the congregation, Mitt, you moron!!! Can you hear them all say, "Goddamit, I told you he was a MA liberal"!

But then he sneaked something else in. He blathered something about working towards getting rid of employer based healthcare plans so we could all have the opportunity of buying real cheap insurance. That son-of-a-bitch wants everyone from kids to seniors (when he gets rid of Medicare) to all be out there alone trying to get insurance. There wouldn't be any more group plans. It would be each of us against the insurance company and 90% of us could never afford the premiums these vampires would impose. So, for all of those "I got mine" assholes.....you ain't gonna' have "yours" for long once these filth bags get in control of our govenment.


21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did You Hear Romney's Remark About Employer Based Healthcare? (Original Post) DemocracyInaction Sep 2012 OP
Wha? "once these filth bags get in control of our govenment. " You know something about the cheat? lonestarnot Sep 2012 #1
Half the time he doesn't understand what he is saying. randome Sep 2012 #2
randome---something has changed DemocracyInaction Sep 2012 #8
One way it would work is to give Medicare to everyone, however, I don't think Cleita Sep 2012 #3
The Goodness of This Man jsr Sep 2012 #4
What? ann--- Sep 2012 #6
Ann Romney Says Mitt Is Much Maligned, Emphasizes ‘Goodness of This Man’ jsr Sep 2012 #9
Oh, thanks! ann--- Sep 2012 #21
He is only thinking corporate profits. liberal N proud Sep 2012 #5
Uh-uh! Didn't you hear? Corporations are people, my friend! randome Sep 2012 #7
what he MEANT: "Corporations are friends, my people." lastlib Sep 2012 #16
ignorance! central scrutinizer Sep 2012 #10
I don't like the idea of health insurance being tied to being employed either. Lex Sep 2012 #11
I agree RainbowOverTexas Sep 2012 #14
Well, yeah, but you can bet your ass....... Wounded Bear Sep 2012 #18
Real. Cheap. Insurance. GeorgeGist Sep 2012 #12
this would actually be more progressive than what we have now, IF... nashville_brook Sep 2012 #13
Actually, that is one move that would speed progress toward single payer, kestrel91316 Sep 2012 #15
employer provided health care HURTS the worker-LESS WAGES + non pansypoo53219 Sep 2012 #17
I had to pay COBRA for a short time. It was MORE expensive than buying an individual policy. Honeycombe8 Sep 2012 #19
This is a Republican dream ProSense Sep 2012 #20

DemocracyInaction

(2,506 posts)
8. randome---something has changed
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:27 PM
Sep 2012

I think he is now scrambling to scrub the "kill the bill" they have been preaching to the lunatics. The polling must suggest that people are not liking their plans on healthcare, medicare, etc. But once Mitt loses the lunatics by straying from their gospel, he is dead meat.

central scrutinizer

(11,645 posts)
10. ignorance!
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:29 PM
Sep 2012

there is something called guaranteed issue that large employers can take advantage of - it means that they are big enough that every employee will be guaranteed coverage because actuarial tables tell them that the risk is acceptable. Anybody not in a GI plan is at the mercy of the underwriters who are the actual, functioning death panels that the Klondike Kardashian was whining about.

Lex

(34,108 posts)
11. I don't like the idea of health insurance being tied to being employed either.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:31 PM
Sep 2012

If someone can find affordable health insurance that doesn't go away if they lose their job, then that's a good thing.

RainbowOverTexas

(71 posts)
14. I agree
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:47 PM
Sep 2012

the only problem is how to make sure people are getting paid more because just dropping the insurance would't guarantee that the money would go to the workers.

Wounded Bear

(58,627 posts)
18. Well, yeah, but you can bet your ass.......
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 11:04 PM
Sep 2012

that the Mittster has nothing in mind that actually helps those people.

And BTW, I'm one of them.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
13. this would actually be more progressive than what we have now, IF...
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:45 PM
Sep 2012

there were a true public option where guaranteed issue were offered to all Americans, period. no more working horrible jobs just so we can afford to get sick. this would do more to spur entrepreneurialism than anything else.

of course, this isn't what Mittens has in mind, but maybe we'll get there with a democratic administration + Congress, one day.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
15. Actually, that is one move that would speed progress toward single payer,
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 08:49 PM
Sep 2012

because it would be such a huge disaster.

pansypoo53219

(20,968 posts)
17. employer provided health care HURTS the worker-LESS WAGES + non
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 10:59 PM
Sep 2012

competitive versus europe, but the better option is it being rn by THE GOVERNMENT. so he is 1/2 right.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
19. I had to pay COBRA for a short time. It was MORE expensive than buying an individual policy.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 11:08 PM
Sep 2012

Maybe the individual policy I would buy would have a bit less coverage, but for what I paid for the group policy under COBRA (which is a group policy rate, except I pay what the employer pays), I think there was no discount for it being group.

It could be because under the group policy, the rate is based on a lot of unhealthy people and tons of claims, and includes rates for smokers, people with cancer, etc. All things you have to pay for when you pay for a block of diverse people who lead different lifestyles and have different health situations.

If my employer would give me a raise, I think I could buy my own policy at less expense, because I'm healthy, even though I'm older. I guess that would change, eventually, if I got cancer or whatever.

My point being that group policies aren't necessarily cheaper, unless you're a high risk person.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
20. This is a Republican dream
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 11:18 PM
Sep 2012

"He blathered something about working towards getting rid of employer based healthcare plans so we could all have the opportunity of buying real cheap insurance. "

During the health care debate in th 1990s, one of the things Republicans objected to most was the employer mandate.

Mitt also vetoed this provision in the MA health care law.

On April 12, 2006, Governor Mitt Romney signed the health legislation.[20] Romney vetoed eight sections of the health care legislation, including the controversial employer assessment.[21] Romney also vetoed provisions providing dental benefits to poor residents on the Medicaid program, and providing health coverage to senior and disabled legal immigrants not eligible for federal Medicaid.[22] The legislature promptly overrode six of the eight gubernatorial section vetoes, on May 4, 2006, and by mid-June 2006 had overridden the remaining two.[23]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_health_care_reform#Legislation

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did You Hear Romney's Rem...