Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rurallib

(62,406 posts)
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:27 AM Sep 2012

To me, Sept. 11 represents the greatest failure of government in our history

I may get royally ripped for this, but among all the ceremonies and speeches tomorrow I doubt one will mention what I have always felt was the major lesson of 9/11. Our government failed at its most basic job.

When Bushco was in power there was always an uneasy feeling that it could happen again, because let's face it, they were incompetent. They went on to prove this by invading one country to get Bin Laden and letting him go and invading another country that had nothing to do with 9/11. In both they started wars that they had no idea how to wage with no goals or endpoints.

To think that Romney would be using many of these total incompetents as his advisers is a total insult to the people of the United States. Those people were discredited and should never advise anyone on anything again.

rant off.

69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
To me, Sept. 11 represents the greatest failure of government in our history (Original Post) rurallib Sep 2012 OP
I agree riverbendviewgal Sep 2012 #1
+1 CabCurious Sep 2012 #24
I agree lunatica Sep 2012 #2
August 6th PDB. VenusRising Sep 2012 #3
Our leadership failed. liberalmuse Sep 2012 #4
Or, they succeeded masterfully in setting up the conditions for what followed. leveymg Sep 2012 #5
What would that make the government's exploitation of 9/11 for the war crime of Iraq? HereSince1628 Sep 2012 #6
LIHOP, MIHOP, or neither, it's hard to argue with your position. NYC_SKP Sep 2012 #7
I think GW and Romney share one dangerous characteristic CanonRay Sep 2012 #8
Conservatives/Republicans simply lack the ethics, talent, and ability to govern competently. Zorra Sep 2012 #9
Cant do something you hate. ErikJ Sep 2012 #20
Most Excellent Point! HangOnKids Sep 2012 #35
it was quite competent newspeak Sep 2012 #33
I agree dreamnightwind Sep 2012 #64
Intelligence failure; airport security failure; visa/passport entry failure= LeftinOH Sep 2012 #10
Watched Fahrenheit 911 again... CanSocDem Sep 2012 #11
I disagree-- things have changed drastically in 11 years Art_from_Ark Sep 2012 #62
To me, it was another mass murder in a string of mass murders by a gang of religious extremists slackmaster Sep 2012 #12
They took what preparedness they were given, and reduced it. JHB Sep 2012 #13
Followed by an even bigger nightmare and loss of life for 3 countries SaveAmerica Sep 2012 #14
His policy team is filled with neocons that used to be part of Bush's team JHB Sep 2012 #50
Thanks, I had no idea. more of a nightmare than I knew SaveAmerica Sep 2012 #58
Even worse Cosmocat Sep 2012 #15
well said nt Voice for Peace Sep 2012 #19
LIHOP? nt Comrade_McKenzie Sep 2012 #16
Let It Happen On Purpose sgsmith Sep 2012 #17
excellent rant Voice for Peace Sep 2012 #18
It was a failure at the highest levels, that administration was incompetent and cowardly Bluenorthwest Sep 2012 #21
Concur. I had a terrible argument with my GOP brother DinahMoeHum Sep 2012 #22
Agreed. It drives me nuts when Republicans repeat the "He kept us safe" lie. Yeah, well, catbyte Sep 2012 #23
That little slip on on 9/11/01 was Clinton's fault. Mariana Sep 2012 #54
And Bush--like Romney--did not care for "you people", Kurovski Sep 2012 #25
remember the EPA announcing to the public after the buildings went down newspeak Sep 2012 #37
I do remember that enormous lie. Kurovski Sep 2012 #42
The abiding failure was a failure to investigate Vox Moi Sep 2012 #26
I understand the sentiment, but "the government" is the wrong fob Sep 2012 #27
yes stuntcat Sep 2012 #45
Attributing the failure to thwart the attacks on 9-11 to incompetence is most generous imv indepat Sep 2012 #28
Considering how they just completely dismissed intelligence reports months in advance, I'd agree. Initech Sep 2012 #29
+1 stuntcat Sep 2012 #44
We got our ass kicked and I know exactly who to blame. Iggo Sep 2012 #30
K&R treestar Sep 2012 #31
There's also the failure of self-serving American foreign policy, ronnie624 Sep 2012 #32
Actually 9/11 was a capitalism failure because before the screeners at airports were hired by craigmatic Sep 2012 #34
How did screeners fail? I don't believe box cutters were prohibited at that time. slackmaster Sep 2012 #38
That's true but in hindsight it was still a failure even though nobody thought that such a small craigmatic Sep 2012 #39
I think you also need to consider the old policy of cooperating with hijackers rather than fighting slackmaster Sep 2012 #40
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2012 #36
no wonder rmoney is hyper on russia. they had 9/11 to wave at america, but pansypoo53219 Sep 2012 #41
+1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Tom Ripley Sep 2012 #66
No one in the world benefited as much from that day as George Bush did. Oh and the M-IC of the US. stuntcat Sep 2012 #43
+1 Electric Monk Sep 2012 #47
+1000 Cleita Sep 2012 #49
i was watching the re-run of the that mornings news JesterCS Sep 2012 #46
Condi Rice's words were that she couldn't keep swatting flies or Cleita Sep 2012 #51
I don't disagree with that viewpoint but to me it also shows how weak and cowardly we as a nation jp11 Sep 2012 #48
Yes. Bush played right into Bin Laden's plan and he did so because his Skidmore Sep 2012 #56
+1000, every word y'all said. 9/11 was a success, with the US blowing so much on neverending wars stuntcat Sep 2012 #60
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #52
9/11 was an attack within the US which had been expected by intelligence rurallib Sep 2012 #63
Absolutely. The most fundamental requirement of any government is to provide basic security for the Proles Sep 2012 #53
The deep state functioned exactly as it was supposed to. JackRiddler Sep 2012 #55
Bill Clinton tried to warn Bushco about OBL, he was ignored. Also ignored was that memo jillan Sep 2012 #57
With Katrina being a close second... Bandit Sep 2012 #59
Oh that was a total 100% Shame. stuntcat Sep 2012 #61
Since that terrible day, Bonobo Sep 2012 #65
We continue to ignore the stated reason for the 911 attacks dreamnightwind Sep 2012 #67
You are right, but many Americans were surprised that we were hit on 9-11 cpwm17 Sep 2012 #68
I see today that the NYT reports that warnings on Al Quieda rurallib Sep 2012 #69

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
2. I agree
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:31 AM
Sep 2012

We also missed a chance to learn a better foreign relations methodology during the Iran Hostage situation.

liberalmuse

(18,672 posts)
4. Our leadership failed.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:33 AM
Sep 2012

You can believe our government agencies had been alerted to this under Clinton's watch. I sat in meetings with government officials who were told of parts of what would later be known as the Hart/Rudman report and were taking it very seriously in 1998-1999. I'd heard from someone in the FAA that they were told that there was "100% chance of a terrorist attack on American soil within the next 25 years that would kill thousands of Americans." He even gave a scenario of an attack off of New York Harbor. I was freaked out for days. For some reason, Bush/Cheney dismantled what Clinton had put in place to try and stop bin Laden. As I was watching this happen in the months just after Bush took office, I was perplexed. Then 9/11 happened and it all made sense. No conspiracy - I just think they needed something to happen to get Bush/Cheney and the leftover warmongers from Bush I the support to go into Iraq.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
5. Or, they succeeded masterfully in setting up the conditions for what followed.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:35 AM
Sep 2012

But, those in a position to have done so with mens rea would have to be thoroughly investigated and interrogated. But, of course, policy is "looking forward", so that's not going to be discovered.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
7. LIHOP, MIHOP, or neither, it's hard to argue with your position.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:52 AM
Sep 2012

Massive fail, monumental negligence, and the response was possibly worse than the buildup to the event.

CanonRay

(14,097 posts)
8. I think GW and Romney share one dangerous characteristic
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 09:52 AM
Sep 2012

They both wanted to be President, but really don't want to do the job. They just wanted the title.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
9. Conservatives/Republicans simply lack the ethics, talent, and ability to govern competently.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:03 AM
Sep 2012

The last 33 years are a perfect illustration of this fact.

Reagan, Bush I, Bush II - a combined 20 years of Complete Epic Fail that have resulted in catastrophe for our country.

 

ErikJ

(6,335 posts)
20. Cant do something you hate.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 11:13 AM
Sep 2012

How can you get serious about governing when your main objective is to tear it down?

newspeak

(4,847 posts)
33. it was quite competent
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:45 PM
Sep 2012

a brazen little boots let all the world know he had hit the trifecta. and, who wanted to immediately tie 9/11 to iraq? Oh, they had an agenda-they got their pearl harbor.

and how about the anthrax attack? attacks against democratic congressmen and certain journalists? now if those attacks had been against some RW journalists or congressmen, then, the whole scenario including 9/11 would have been seen as a hit against the administration. But, the attacks were against those who would have questioned or gone against the administration. To me, the number one thing that comes up, is creating FEAR within the public, to get your agenda. and they succeeded on that front with flying colors.

and, I question that OBL tape the repugs showed during little boot's second election. Basically telling the public that OBL wants kerry to win (wink, wink), so you better vote for little boots. The whole eight fekkin years reeks.

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
64. I agree
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:36 PM
Sep 2012

It's far too easy to say they were incompetent. It assumes you know what they were trying to do and accomplish. They had other motives than to keep our citizens safe from terrorism, that was just an excuse.

Many of these guys (W excluded) were highly intelligent, competent people who knew how to get things done. Don't underestimate the opposition and assume incompetence, they were quite capable of any number of things, LIHOP to MIHOP.

LeftinOH

(5,353 posts)
10. Intelligence failure; airport security failure; visa/passport entry failure=
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:07 AM
Sep 2012

That day was the result of massive failure to coordinate... and we all knew it was going to happen sooner or later.

 

CanSocDem

(3,286 posts)
11. Watched Fahrenheit 911 again...
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:10 AM
Sep 2012


...a couple of days ago on IFC. The saddest part is that things haven't changed all that much in 11 years.

.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
62. I disagree-- things have changed drastically in 11 years
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 08:22 PM
Sep 2012

Today, everyone who uses US airports, from babies to grannies, is treated as a suspect at secruity-- No liquids or pastes over 3 ounces allowed in security, and put them in a baggie, dammit! Take off your shoes, take your laptop out of your bag, take everything out of your pockets and enter the "telephone booth" for a naked X-ray, then get frisked for good measure when you get out of the telephone booth. Oh, and don't leave your car unattended at the loading zone for even a half minute, or we'll tow it away.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
12. To me, it was another mass murder in a string of mass murders by a gang of religious extremists
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:13 AM
Sep 2012

That's the only aspect of it that I really care about.

JHB

(37,158 posts)
13. They took what preparedness they were given, and reduced it.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:30 AM
Sep 2012

The conservatives like to dump everything on the doorstep of Bill Clinton (and did so within hours, contrary to their "9/12" mythologizing), but he'd built up a pretty effective counterterrorism apparatus by the time he left - usually over Republican opposition. Not perfect, but nowhere near the "practically nothing" the RWers like to claim. And they make that claim because they didn't care for the truth:

Bush took what he got from Clinton and cut it. Decreased priority, decreased resources, decreased manpower. The neocons that made up Bush's "experts" on this dismissed Clinton as "obsessed" with bin Laden when they were cocksure that the only terrorism that they needed to fight was state-supported (presumably by Saddam and/or Iran).

Heck, before 9/11 they gave $43 million to the Taliban (as the effective rulers of Afghanistan) for banning opium.

http://www.thenation.com/article/bushs-faustian-deal-taliban

That's the message sent with the recent gift of $43 million to the Taliban rulers of Afghanistan, the most virulent anti-American violators of human rights in the world today. The gift, announced last Thursday by Secretary of State Colin Powell, in addition to other recent aid, makes the United States the main sponsor of the Taliban and rewards that "rogue regime" for declaring that opium growing is against the will of God. So, too, by the Taliban's estimation, are most human activities, but it's the ban on drugs that catches this administration's attention.

Never mind that Osama bin Laden still operates the leading anti-American terror operation from his base in Afghanistan, from which, among other crimes, he launched two bloody attacks on American embassies in Africa in 1998.

Sadly, the Bush Administration is cozying up to the Taliban regime at a time when the United Nations, at US insistence, imposes sanctions on Afghanistan because the Kabul government will not turn over Bin Laden.


Meanwhile, FBI agents were sent to raid a New Orleans bordello. That was a really Federal matter?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=438214



SaveAmerica

(5,342 posts)
14. Followed by an even bigger nightmare and loss of life for 3 countries
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:46 AM
Sep 2012

I don't think you'll get much ripping here for your feelings.

I didn't know he was using them as advisers, I thought he was keeping them out of the loop. Or is that just out of the limelight (no invite to the RNC).

I hate that they still roam the earth freely when so many thousands of innocent victims do not.

JHB

(37,158 posts)
50. His policy team is filled with neocons that used to be part of Bush's team
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 05:29 PM
Sep 2012

I don't think any of the big names signed on, but all their protégés are looking to make their own names at the expense of ground troops and taxpayers.

Cosmocat

(14,561 posts)
15. Even worse
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:53 AM
Sep 2012

Agree that he let it happen.

What is even worse is the lost potential to use it to get the country behind an effort to alter our energy policy.

THAT is the greatest tragedy from 9-11.

There should have been two things that the president committed to on 9-12-2001.

1) Every mole hill on the planet would be scoured until OBL was brought to justice. This would NOT include going to war with Iraq, it would include doing what President Obama did.

2) Bringing the country in line with an Apollo style effort to alter our energy usage - conservation (including the MPG changes President Obama implemented) and the development of alternative fuels. We should right NOW be where we will be in 10 years with MPG, and we should RIGHT NOW be the leader in the world in the development and production of solar panels.

Instead, the clowns told people to "go shopping" got us into Iraq and used 9-11 for partisan political gain.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
21. It was a failure at the highest levels, that administration was incompetent and cowardly
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 11:14 AM
Sep 2012

both before, during and after the attacks. Cheney in his 'undisclosed secure location' for months on end, trembling and frothing in fear. W neglecting the PDB while Ashcroft read it and stopped flying commercial jets immediately, think about that, they all secured their own persons and families, but did nothing to protect the nation.

DinahMoeHum

(21,783 posts)
22. Concur. I had a terrible argument with my GOP brother
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 11:26 AM
Sep 2012

back in November 2000 when the election was at its impasse.

I had argued against Bush, indicating that I felt he was a lightweight and did not have the gravitas or life experiences for the job. I also remember saying these words that still haunt me to this day:
"Bush as a President will fail us as a nation in a time of real crisis"
Unfortunately, I was proven correct.

catbyte

(34,364 posts)
23. Agreed. It drives me nuts when Republicans repeat the "He kept us safe" lie. Yeah, well,
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 11:26 AM
Sep 2012

he might have "kept us safe" except for that little slip up on 9/11/01. If that had happened on a Democrat's watch, we would never hear the end of it and I'll bet a Democrat would not be elected for 20 years. I feel this country is SO MUCH SAFER now than it ever was under Bush.



Diane
Anishinaabe in MI & mom to Taz, Nigel, and baby brother Sammy, members of Dogs Against Romney, Cat Division
"Dogs Aren’t Luggage--HISS!”

Kurovski

(34,655 posts)
25. And Bush--like Romney--did not care for "you people",
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 11:56 AM
Sep 2012

the little people.

9-11 on its very face, and in every detail was and is a failure of Republican governance.

Never forget...that fact.

newspeak

(4,847 posts)
37. remember the EPA announcing to the public after the buildings went down
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:55 PM
Sep 2012

that the air was safe? the repugs and their public mouth pieces for years have been telling the public how government doesn't work (just let our corporate friends service you), how you can't trust the government (we are the government); while doing every thing in their power to make that rant true. 9//11, katrina are examples how they made sure the government wouldn't work for the people; however, they are more than happy blabbing about freedoms while they spend all our money to curtail ours. before 9/11 our security network was just fine, remember FBI had been monitoring the highjackers, remember colleen rowley and then their was the august PDB report; they've spent billions on their new homeland security and hiring certain corporations for intelligence monitoring. big moolah in the security industry today.

Kurovski

(34,655 posts)
42. I do remember that enormous lie.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:26 PM
Sep 2012

Environmental illness is a part of my life, and from cancer to allergy, NY suffered because of the negligence and lies of a republican administration.

People died needlessly AFTER the attack because of it.

Never forget.

Vox Moi

(546 posts)
26. The abiding failure was a failure to investigate
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:02 PM
Sep 2012

Bush said that an investigation would distract from the hunt for the killers.
Bush resisted any investigation as best he could and we ended up with legacy of unanswered questions and suspicion.
The lessons to be learned from 911 cannot be learned until the hard questions are asked, under oath, in a criminal investigation.
If members of the 911 commission felt that they had been lied to.
With an ending like that, there will never be an ending at all.

fob

(5,578 posts)
27. I understand the sentiment, but "the government" is the wrong
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:06 PM
Sep 2012

entity to blame in this case. "The government" as put in place/left in control via Clinton Admin, was on top of it like no one else, enter the August 6 PDB as proof/evidence, however bush/cheney/rummy/rice/repukes in power FAILED HARD and in the realm of probability FAILED PURPOSEFULLY.

So spread the meme, but change it to "The last Republican Government failed greatly."

Iggo

(47,547 posts)
30. We got our ass kicked and I know exactly who to blame.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:15 PM
Sep 2012

The people who did it, and the people who were too stupid to do anything about it.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
31. K&R
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:19 PM
Sep 2012

If they win, they would start another war. They'd find some excuse. Not only did they fail they used 911 to get us into wars they wanted beforehand.

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
32. There's also the failure of self-serving American foreign policy,
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:43 PM
Sep 2012

which deliberately undermined the development of civil society in Afghanistan for geo-strategic reasons. If not for the meddling by right-wing extremists like Zbigniew Brzezinski and Robert Gates, Al-Qaeda and the Taliban wouldn't even exist.

 

craigmatic

(4,510 posts)
34. Actually 9/11 was a capitalism failure because before the screeners at airports were hired by
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:48 PM
Sep 2012

private firms. It just goes to show that you can't outsource security. The Romans found this out the hard way.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
38. How did screeners fail? I don't believe box cutters were prohibited at that time.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 12:58 PM
Sep 2012

I used to carry a small Swiss Army Knife with me on flights.

 

craigmatic

(4,510 posts)
39. That's true but in hindsight it was still a failure even though nobody thought that such a small
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:06 PM
Sep 2012

item could help kill so many people.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
40. I think you also need to consider the old policy of cooperating with hijackers rather than fighting
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:20 PM
Sep 2012

Anyone who tried to pull that kind of thing on an airliner now would probably be killed by the passengers.

pansypoo53219

(20,968 posts)
41. no wonder rmoney is hyper on russia. they had 9/11 to wave at america, but
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:22 PM
Sep 2012

OBAMA KILLEN OSAMA and took their 9/11 away.

stuntcat

(12,022 posts)
43. No one in the world benefited as much from that day as George Bush did. Oh and the M-IC of the US.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 02:20 PM
Sep 2012

These are the plainest facts I know about what happened that day, who benefited the most.

JesterCS

(1,827 posts)
46. i was watching the re-run of the that mornings news
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 03:38 PM
Sep 2012

and they said white house officials said they had never thought that an attack like that was going to happen.

My first words, bullshit. we know about the memo lol

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
51. Condi Rice's words were that she couldn't keep swatting flies or
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 05:30 PM
Sep 2012

something to that effect. I often wonder how often she even showed up for work.

jp11

(2,104 posts)
48. I don't disagree with that viewpoint but to me it also shows how weak and cowardly we as a nation
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 05:24 PM
Sep 2012

became and are to have destroyed so many of our rights in order to seek out a little bit more safety. You'd think we'd have learned after Pearl Harbor how not to gut react and overreach out of fear but no we didn't.

During those speeches I have little doubt there will be some well placed claims about how safe we are and how we must remain vigilant to ensure such a thing never happens again. Of course it is meant to make people feel better and in part provide cover for all the ill done in the name of our safety. None of which would stop those people bent on doing acts of terrible violence and murder on similar scales as 9/11 or even those content to do significantly less murder.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
56. Yes. Bush played right into Bin Laden's plan and he did so because his
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 06:09 PM
Sep 2012

ties to the Saudi family weakened him--plus he's also a swaggering fool.

stuntcat

(12,022 posts)
60. +1000, every word y'all said. 9/11 was a success, with the US blowing so much on neverending wars
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 07:18 PM
Sep 2012

.

Response to rurallib (Original post)

rurallib

(62,406 posts)
63. 9/11 was an attack within the US which had been expected by intelligence
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:23 PM
Sep 2012

the biggest single fuck up by the gummint as far as I am concerned.
With an incredible needless loss of life.

Proles

(466 posts)
53. Absolutely. The most fundamental requirement of any government is to provide basic security for the
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 05:55 PM
Sep 2012

nation. Bush his administration not only failed that basic principle, but failed it miserably.

And yet many right-wingers have the audacity to say, "he kept us safe." What?! He freakin' presided over the greatest single loss of American life in an attack on our country since its entire history. And don't tell me it wasn't preventable.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
57. Bill Clinton tried to warn Bushco about OBL, he was ignored. Also ignored was that memo
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 06:25 PM
Sep 2012

dated August 6, 2001 that said OBL determined to strike in the US.

Also ignored was a speech then Senator Joe Biden gave on 9/10/2001 (hey it's the anniversary of that today) warning that we didn't need to spend more money on Star Wars, what we needed to worry about was a terrorist attack coming from the belly of a plane.


BUSH & Cheney & Condi & Rumsfeld ignored it all. And we have been paying since.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
65. Since that terrible day,
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 10:39 PM
Sep 2012

the US has killed 100x that number of Iraqis and Afghanis. Undoubtedly some were bad guys, undoubtedly some were not. All had mothers and fathers and probably brothers, sisters and children. In fact, many were children. 9/11 also caused a historic shift in American's privacy rights. Phones and emails are monitored now with no legal redress, we remove shoes, endure groping before boarding airplanes. We have practiced torture, assassinated US citizens --all in the name of security. The US has lived in fear for 11 years or at least fear has been used to solidify authoritarian polices. It is time to put those things aside and focus on actual US security -namely human infrastructure such as jobs, education, health care and the eradication of poverty. It is also time to stop acting like a frightened bully who punches before anyone else can hurt them.

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
67. We continue to ignore the stated reason for the 911 attacks
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 03:27 AM
Sep 2012

IIRC it had something to do with the U.S. troop presence on Saudi soil.

There needs to be a new global security arrangement. The current method of putting U.S. military bases in every corner of the world, funded by the U.S. tax payer, for the purpose of controlling things like popular uprisings against tyrants we support, multinational access to the natural resources of every country, foreign heads of state and their militaries, etc., not only takes money away from U.S. citizens, it literally creates anti-U.S. terrorism. It's a giant control, alienate, defend, and attack feedback loop. The multinationals are using our military to open and secure markets for them.

There would be many consequences of closing our overseas bases. Power would re-align, things might become less stable (they're pretty unstable now), countries might start nationalizing resources and companies (and they should be able to), who knows what would happen? That's a big concern that would need to be factored in. I know one thing, no way should it be the current system, it makes no sense for our military to be in every corner of the earth. There needs to be shared responsibility, not a pax americana. How do we get there?

 

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)
68. You are right, but many Americans were surprised that we were hit on 9-11
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 04:39 AM
Sep 2012

because they were (and are) clueless about how our government abuses so much of the world. Those that were paying attention figured that a major terrorist attack was almost inevitable.

The terrorists themselves said that they attacked due to our support of military bases in Saudi Arabia, which were also used to maintain a bombing program against Iraq through much of the 90's; support for dictators; genocidal sanctions against Iraq (including all food imports being cut off); support for Israel's destruction of Palestine and its wars against Lebanon.

Americans' ignorance about how our government and media works, plus Americans' ignorance about the reasons for the terrorist attacks allowed the WMD fabrication to be believed. Also this ignorance contributes to the ridiculous truther movement.

rurallib

(62,406 posts)
69. I see today that the NYT reports that warnings on Al Quieda
Tue Sep 11, 2012, 09:12 AM
Sep 2012

started in the early spring. Hell, Clinton told Bush something was up.
Pure fucking negligence at best. I hate to say what the worst is, but you all know.

Republicans should never be in charge of anything more dangerous than the bathroom key.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»To me, Sept. 11 represent...