Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:23 PM Sep 2012

Ward Churchill Loses Appeal To Win Back CU Job

DENVER (AP) -- A former University of Colorado professor who compared some Sept. 11 victims with a Nazi has lost his appeal to get his job back.

The Colorado Supreme Court on Monday upheld a lower court decision against Ward Churchill.

The court said that the Denver District Court was right to direct a verdict in favor of the university and to find that the school was entitled to "quasi-judicial immunity."

--clip
Churchill's 2007 termination came after an essay he wrote described some victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks as "little Eichmanns," a reference to Adolf Eichmann, the Nazi leader who helped orchestrate the Holocaust.

MORE...

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_COLORADO_EMBATTLED_PROFESSOR?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-09-10-11-09-47

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ward Churchill Loses Appeal To Win Back CU Job (Original Post) Purveyor Sep 2012 OP
gee, what a shame. cali Sep 2012 #1
Good. Panasonic Sep 2012 #2
Good riddance. earthside Sep 2012 #3
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
1. gee, what a shame.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:25 PM
Sep 2012

and of course, the real reasoned he lost his position was this:

On May 16, 2006 the University released their findings; the Investigative Committee agreed unanimously that Churchill had engaged in "serious research misconduct", including falsification, fabrication and plagiarism. The committee was divided on the appropriate level of sanctions.[3] The Standing Committee on Research Misconduct accepted the findings of the Investigative Committee but also disagreed on what sanctions should be imposed.[56] Churchill's appeal against his proposed dismissal was considered by a panel of the University's Privilege and Tenure Committee, which found that two of the seven findings of misconduct did not constitute dismissible offences. Three members recommended that the penalty should be demotion and one year's suspension without pay, while two favored dismissal.[4][5

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ward_Churchill#Research_misconduct_investigation

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
2. Good.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:27 PM
Sep 2012

He lied on his resume. He doesn't deserve tenure or the job.

Let him go find another place to lie.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
3. Good riddance.
Mon Sep 10, 2012, 01:36 PM
Sep 2012

As I post on March 10, 2005 here at DU:

He is a thief.
There's no 'free speech' issue involved with that.
There's no ethnicity question that matters.

http://news4colorado.com/topstories/local_story_0552005... (video report no longer exists at this location)

'Original' Churchill Art Piece Creates Controversy
Feb 24, 2005 8:03 pm US/Mountain
BOULDER, Colo. (CBS4) An exclusive report by CBS4 News indicates embattled University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill may have broken copyright law by making a mirror image of an artist's work and selling it as his own. Placing Churchill's work beside that of renowned artist Thomas E. Mails and the two look like mirror images. But one is a copyrighted drawing. The other is an autographed print by Churchill.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ward Churchill Loses Appe...