RFN!!

Go Rachel - do not suffer these dangerous fools - gladly or otherwise!

Once again.

and his Spawn are not liking this. There Millions invested in this Propaganda operation just bit them in their ass.

"One America News". The last thing they have in mind is "one America".

I hope now two they can be sued in civil court. Fuck 'em twice!

Junior has invested millions on the bet they can take down Fox.

They're 1/10th the size company as NewsCorp. Comcast (NBC, MSNBC) is 10x that.
And junior is a front man. The family doesn't have $250 million to spend. It's other people's money.
Naturally!

However, they are looking for a network that they can control totally.
Dictators want to dictate, after all.

just east of the I-5, just north of the CostCo on Morena Blvd.
I can’t stand seeing the place when I drive past it.

of moroni on the lds building in La Jolla back in the 90's.

...OAN is your network. It’s a straight up alt-right channel that employs no-shit Russian propagandists.

Because FOX apparently isn't carrying Trump's water enough for his liking. Blatant Trump propaganda. I wouldn't be at all surprised if Russian or Trump money finances it.

NEW: A judge in San Diego rejects the defamation complaint filed by OAN's parent company against MSNBC host Rachel Maddow:

Link to tweet

Case 3:19-cv-01713-BAS-AHG Document 30 Filed 05/22/20 PageID.290 Page 16 of 17

IV. Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that the contested statement is an opinion that cannot serve as the basis for a defamation claim. Plaintiff has not shown a probability of succeeding on its defamation claims, thus, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Special Motion to Strike. Finally, because the Court grants the Motion, Defendants may file a motion for attorney’s fees and costs. See Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16(c)(1) (If the movant prevails on a special motion to strike, it is “entitled to recover [its] attorney’s fees and costs”). The motion is to be referred to Magistrate Judge Goddard.

Because there is no set of facts that could support a claim for defamation based on Maddow’s statement, the complaint is dismissed with prejudice. After Defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees is resolved, the Court will instruct the Clerk to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 22, 2020

legal bills, or to paraphrase Chump, fees "the likes of which the world has never before seen!"

Rachael she has been given ninety minutes starting tonight. So Go Rachael on both fronts.

Nobody would take up the terrible corruption at the meat packing plants and how the workers have suffered but Rachel. Thank her every day and hope that some lives will be saved around the world if only some of the legislators will stand up.

is that awful media whose young female reporter doesn't have a clue about any kind of news but is always called on by Trump and who tells him what a great job he is doing. I'm sure the real reporters who have to sit through this bs are glad they have masks now.

Link to tweet

for his not pardoning President Obama for Obamagate?

NewsMax next!

The bastards find out.

Ms Maddow knows her craft, dots her i’s and crosses her t’s. She also kicked ass and took names.

Hold these fuckers to account. Hold all fuckers to account.

...and then falling for your own scam.

Too bad, you little hack! Rachel just clobbered you!

They're whiny and have a victim complex just like him.

n/t

Bye bye, dickheads!

evaluated and how a decision was reached about whether Maddow's comments on her show were libelous is very logical, as are the examples from previous cases. It's great to see the transparency with which the decision was reached. I have to say it raises my esteem of the American judicial system, particularly when compared to countries where there is no way to determine how a judge reached a verdict of guilt or innocence. There are many such countries.

There are many people to pay besides the lawyer. Researchers, paralegals, trial presentation specialists, court reporters, videographers.

I hope OAN gets soaked for a ton of $$$$$.

Running up the bills and "expenses"!!!!

a client? I'd appreciate any suggestion regarding redundant or unnecessary research someone found in the decision. To my mind, it was a perfect investigation and decision. I'd be very interested to hear concrete examples of why anyone opals think otherwise.

I would like to see some more of this.

A lot more of this.