Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 05:12 PM Mar 2013

Another flawed environmental review on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline

Danielle Droitsch’s Blog

Another flawed environmental review on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline

A draft environmental review just released by the U.S. State Department for the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline ignores mounting evidence the pipeline is not in the national interest. NRDC has completed a preliminary review of the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and concludes that the State Department failed to account for the pipeline’s impact to water and climate. There is now significant evidence the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline would help trigger a major expansion to tar sands development leading to a sizeable increase in greenhouse gas emissions. And we know that a spill of tar sands oil from Keystone XL would pose much greater risks to precious waterways across America’s heartland. Despite this evidence, the State Department found there would be no significant impact to the environment if the pipeline were approved. We disagree. President Obama should reject this draft environmental review and tell the State Department to re-examine the evidence that shows the pipeline isn’t good for the climate, or water protection, or energy security.

In this latest review, the State Department’s ignored evidence that the pipeline would lead to a significant increase in carbon pollution that would be equivalent to adding 6 million new cars on the road. And that doesn’t even account for additional carbon emissions that weren’t accounted for by the State Department from petroleum coke which would increase the climate impacts from Keystone XL by another 13 percent.

Keystone XL would help to expand the dirtiest fuel on the planet because it is a fundamental element in the oil industry’s plan to triple production of tar sands oil from 2 to 6 million barrels per day by 2030, and in the longer term to hike production to more than 9 million bpd. Keystone XL would enable a significant amount of tar sands expansion that otherwise would not occur. In other words, if we are serious about fighting climate change then you need to take actions that stop making things worse...a sizeable majority of Americans want the President to take action on climate. To fight climate change, we need to be taking measures that reduce climate pollution that brings dangerous and costly extreme weather events like Hurricane Sandy. Building Keystone XL which helps to expand the tar sands industry takes the U.S. in the wrong direction. It is not in our best interest to expanding America’s dependency on tar sands which undermines our efforts to move to clean energy.

The review also failed to recognize the dangerous nature of tar sands spills. This isn’t an ordinary oil pipeline. The Keystone XL pipeline will carry tar sands, a uniquely corrosive and acidic mixture, more risky than most of the pipelines across the country. Tar sands spills are difficult to impossible to clean up. After more than two years and nearly a billion dollars in cleanup cost, officials at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have found that nearly 40 miles of the Kalamazoo river is still contaminated by submerged tar sands.

- more -

http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/ddroitsch/another_flawed_environmental_r.html
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another flawed environmental review on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline (Original Post) ProSense Mar 2013 OP
If this is what our Tax dollars get us randr Mar 2013 #1
This is what tar sands does to the environment JaneyVee Mar 2013 #2
Those photos are incredibly shocking and persuasive karynnj Mar 2013 #3
Google image search for 'Tar sands' below: JaneyVee Mar 2013 #4
Thanks karynnj Mar 2013 #5

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
3. Those photos are incredibly shocking and persuasive
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 06:59 PM
Mar 2013

It looks like something unreal - out of a science fiction horror movie.

Could you list where they are from or the source. There is nothing I have seen that makes the case better than this and with the backup information, it would be the best answer to anyone suggesting that it is ok.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another flawed environmen...