Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEnvironmental Groups Slam Keystone Pipeline Report
http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/312-16/16284-environmental-groups-slam-keystone-pipeline-reportBy Grist Staff
02 March 13
The U.S. State Department just released a draft environmental impact statement for the Keystone XL pipeline, and it's not what climate activists have been hoping for.
As The New York Times puts it, the report "makes no recommendation about whether the project should be built but presents no conclusive environmental reason it should not be." According to The Washington Post, the report "suggest[s] that blocking the project would not have a significant impact on either the future development of Canada's oil sands region or U.S. oil consumption."
Sierra Club Executive Director Michael Brune captured the feelings of many activists with his response to the news: "President Obama said that he's committed to fighting the climate crisis. If that is true, he should throw the State Department's report away and reject the dirty and dangerous Keystone XL pipeline."
This is by no means a final decision on the Keystone XL pipeline. This draft report will be published next week and then subject to 45 days of public comment, after which it will be revised and finalized. The State Department also still has to release an analysis of whether the pipeline is in the "national interest," so look for that to drop on another Friday afternoon. Ultimately, President Obama will make the final decision, probably in late spring or summer.
In the meantime, get those angry comments ready, folks. You know the American Petroleum Institute is already all over it.
02 March 13
The U.S. State Department just released a draft environmental impact statement for the Keystone XL pipeline, and it's not what climate activists have been hoping for.
As The New York Times puts it, the report "makes no recommendation about whether the project should be built but presents no conclusive environmental reason it should not be." According to The Washington Post, the report "suggest[s] that blocking the project would not have a significant impact on either the future development of Canada's oil sands region or U.S. oil consumption."
Sierra Club Executive Director Michael Brune captured the feelings of many activists with his response to the news: "President Obama said that he's committed to fighting the climate crisis. If that is true, he should throw the State Department's report away and reject the dirty and dangerous Keystone XL pipeline."
This is by no means a final decision on the Keystone XL pipeline. This draft report will be published next week and then subject to 45 days of public comment, after which it will be revised and finalized. The State Department also still has to release an analysis of whether the pipeline is in the "national interest," so look for that to drop on another Friday afternoon. Ultimately, President Obama will make the final decision, probably in late spring or summer.
In the meantime, get those angry comments ready, folks. You know the American Petroleum Institute is already all over it.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 707 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Environmental Groups Slam Keystone Pipeline Report (Original Post)
Jackpine Radical
Mar 2013
OP
Unfortunately, people who care about our natural environment have no Party.
blkmusclmachine
Mar 2013
#1
I'm quite sure that this is a final decision on the Keystone XL pipeline.
CaliforniaPeggy
Mar 2013
#3
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)1. Unfortunately, people who care about our natural environment have no Party.
The DEMs only pay lip service to environmentalism. They cash their big Corp. checks, just like the GOPers.
Response to Jackpine Radical (Original post)
politicasista This message was self-deleted by its author.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,531 posts)3. I'm quite sure that this is a final decision on the Keystone XL pipeline.
The decision has almost certainly already been made, and we're getting it piecemeal, on the Friday news dumps.
The thing that makes me so angry, besides what I just said above, is that we were not consulted.
The only folks who were consulted were the ones who stand to benefit hugely from this environmental horror.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)4. So, like, who else matters?
"The only folks who were consulted were the ones who stand to benefit hugely from this environmental horror."
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,531 posts)5. I think you already know the answer to that question!