Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 11:47 AM Mar 2013

Native Americans Win Right to Prosecute Non-Indians in Tribal Courts

Native Americans Win Right to Prosecute Non-Indians in Tribal Courts


When the Violence Against Women Act is signed by President Barack Obama, it will mark an historic milestone for Native American tribes: for the first time, they will have the authority to prosecute non-Indians who do not live on tribal lands for crimes committed there. Under the Act, Indian tribes will be able to ask the Attorney General for certification that their tribal court system can exercise jurisdiction over non-resident, non-Indians charged with domestic or sexual violence that occurred on Indian lands.

In light of the depressing statistics—Native American women suffer a murder rate 10 times worse than the national average, and more than one in three will be raped at some point (double the rate for other ethnicities)—tribal leaders and women’s rights advocates argued t hat the change was needed to fill a gap in law enforcement. According to them, local police are often reluctant to investigate crimes committed on tribal lands for a variety of reasons, allowing non-Indians to abuse and rape Indian women with impunity.

The problem has its roots in the unique status of the Native American Nations under the U.S. Constitution, which recognizes their sovereignty as organic and not granted by the states where Indian lands are located. Because tribal sovereignty is limited, federal law refers to the tribes as “domestic dependent nations,” and a 1978 Supreme Court case held that one of those limitations was that tribal courts had no jurisdiction to try or punish non-Indians.

Republican critics of the bill contended that the expanded jurisdiction was unconstitutional, and that tribal courts would be unfair to non-Indian defendants. Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) said that “you got to have a jury that is a reflection of society as a whole, and on an Indian reservation, it’s going to be made up of Indians, right? So the non-Indian doesn’t get a fair trial.”

http://www.allgov.com/news/top-stories/native-americans-win-right-to-prosecute-non-indians-in-tribal-courts-130303?news=847237

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Native Americans Win Right to Prosecute Non-Indians in Tribal Courts (Original Post) The Straight Story Mar 2013 OP
My (insert DU-appropriate insult here) representative said... sadbear Mar 2013 #1

sadbear

(4,340 posts)
1. My (insert DU-appropriate insult here) representative said...
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 11:58 AM
Mar 2013

that was the reason he opposed it. I suspect that's not entirely true. But it sounds plausible to his teabagger supporters. (Bill Flores, T(TX))

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Native Americans Win Righ...