General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKrugman: Who Should We Listen To?
Last edited Sun Mar 3, 2013, 04:03 PM - Edit history (1)
Dean Baker is feeling dyspeptic not for the first time over a WaPo piece suggesting that slow growth is the new normal. Dean wonders why we should listen to people who have been wrong about everything so far. But its actually worse than he says.
In the article, the case for slow growth forever is mainly made by quoting Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor. And Warsh is indeed someone who has been wrong about everything; a bubble denier who spoke of strong capital markets before the crash, a hawk who has been warning about the risk of inflation for three years, an invoker of invisible bond vigilantes who somehow managed to describe the supposed threat from these vigilantes as somehow both a certainty and unknowable.
If there is a special distinction to those of Warshs speeches and articles Ive read, its this: he has had a habit of saying and writing things that are supposed to be profound, but say nothing at all. Can anyone tell me the point, if any, of this WSJ op-ed?
But wait: who is Kevin Warsh, anyway? Well, hes a lawyer turned investment banker turned Bush appointee to the Fed turned Hoover fellow not an economist at all. Now, I hate credentialism: there are plenty of fools with Ph.D.s, some fools with fancy prizes, and a fair number of first-rate economic thinkers without formal qualifications. Still, if someone is going to make pronouncements about how the whole nature of the business cycle has changed, youd like some sign that somewhere in his life he has thought hard about, well, anything.
- more -
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/03/who-should-we-listen-to/
ProSense
(116,464 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)Faygo Kid
(21,478 posts)He takes unbelievable crap from Fox and the right wing. But he doesn't back down.
jazzimov
(1,456 posts)When, I will tell when and when is never will we appoint people competent people like Mr. Krugman. Why you ask because both sides are so ingrained with Wall Street assholes that a smart man does not have a chance, and so does the chance that America will climb the latter to be the best in the world in the near future.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Those guys are who appoint the "experts".
They are also the ones that CRY when the price of gas FALLS.
Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)What they DON'T have are competent, intelligent ETHICAL people who give a damn about their fellow man.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)....people at the Washington Post, who get to see former officials all the time, surely must know better.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)Count on Krugman to cut through the crap.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)I love his way with words.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)Paul Krugman is thoroughly accessible for someone who might not be an expert in economics. If a person can't understand him, they're hopeless. I love to see that much intelligence all rolled into one brain. Seems to be a good man, too.
Buckley was smart in his own way, but what a waste he made of it. No comparison.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)I haven't read him in a while, but I was impressed by the same kind of qualities.
Yeah, I like how you describe him.
I think he's pretty handsome, too. He's got it all!!