General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf Your Congressman Voted Against This Bill.... REPLACE THEM
http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2013/03/21/roll-call-most-democrats-vote-against-progressive-budget-legislation/
If you listened to the Democratic Party and its apologists, youd believe that the United States of America would be enjoying a progressive economic renewal, if only the Republicans could be voted out of power. If only the Democrats were in charge of the House of Representatives, they say, corporations and millionaires would be paying their fair share of taxes, wages would be fair, education and science would be adequately funded, and Social Security and Medicare would not be at risk.
Yesterday, one vote in the House of Representatives proved this argument to be false.
Yesterday, Representative Raul Grijalva, leader of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, introduced the Back To Work Budget as an amendment to replace the right wing Republican budget from Paul Ryan. The Progressive Back To Work Caucus would have done the following:
- Restore proper funding to education
- Provide jobs programs to economically distressed communities
- End tax breaks for families with an income over a quarter million dollars per year
- Create a 4% tax increase for millionaires and billionaires
- Make income from investments taxed at the same rate as income from work, rather than at a lower rate
- Dismantle tax incentives that encouraged corporations to move their factories overseas
- Reduce military spending to 2006 levels
- Prevent budget cuts to Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare
- Eliminate subsidies for oil and gas companies
- Established an economic price for carbon pollution
house democrats vote against progressive budgetThis was the sort of budget bill that Democratic voters have spent years waiting for, and so, naturally, most House Democrats voted against it.
Link to the bill...... http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/back-to-work-budget/
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)vote that is known ahead of time to fail, but which has you voting for a military cut? I am 100% certain that issue alone would be fodder for a barrage of misleading campaign ads by Republican opponents for years to come. Really don't know what their individual reasons might have been, but that is one I see based on what you posted.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)The day that windbag actually represents the wishes and positions of the people of central Montgomery County, MD I will be shocked.
Fla_Democrat
(2,547 posts)the House has seen in quite a while. What was the numbers.. 84-327?
Sure my rep voted no.. even with out playing the odds, just know who he is.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)If there was a bill that would have restored funding for education and my congressmen voted against it they won't get my vote.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)adding a massive % onto electric bills for the poor is going to go over like a floating turd...and adding the 2006 military all but dooms this proposal to a one vote for it floor vote.
I'd LOVE to see the military budget cut but a carbon tax will do nothing but hurt the poorest among us.Forciing families to decide between the electric bill and food isn't a winning strategy
rsmith6621
(6,942 posts)...Then lets take this back to the drawing board and take out the carbon tax and try it again... anyhow through other legislation you can make carbon tax a progressive tax.
Also it is getting real old here on DU to read how many will justify a Congressman voting a bill down because they didnt want to stick their neck out and they fear the fodder that may result. They work for us.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)I just don't want the poorest amongst us to be burdened with even more costs.There has to be a better way
rsmith6621
(6,942 posts)I edited it and added something.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)that's pie in the sky shit.
We need a comprehensive energy policy that looks at EVERYTHING involved in our energy production....NOT a tax that will hurt the poor
rsmith6621
(6,942 posts)...... you use would have a set base fee then use the national medium income to establish a base for income credits/debits so from there you you give people who make less a credit and those who make more pay more.
There.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)that's doomed to fail.Instead how about we use some of our military budget...say 100 billion a year...to invest in energy solutions region by region that make sense
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)dsc
(52,152 posts)I live in the most liberal district outside of Manhattan or Philly so he voted with his constituents. Yeah Price.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Not surprised. 'Course he's not my Congresscritter anymore -- I have a Republican and I don't even have to look at how he voted. But Costa? Complete, utter waste of time. Votes with the Republicans AT LEAST half the time.