U.S. Must Set Conditions for Remaining in Afghanistan
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-25/u-s-must-set-conditions-for-remaining-in-afghanistan.html
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Afghan President Hamid Karzai had plenty to discuss Monday, when Kerry dropped by Kabul for an unannounced visit. Karzai has developed quite a knack for making Americans think twice about their involvement in his country. Heres the message we hope Kerry delivered: The U.S. still wants to help -- but with conditions.
On March 10, during a visit by U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, Karzai said that two recent suicide attacks by the Taliban were in the service of America. A year and a half ago, Karzai memorably said that if war broke out between the U.S. and Pakistan, we are beside Pakistan.
Strange comments from a supposed ally. The war in Afghanistan has killed or injured more than 20,000 Americans and cost $557 billion so far (including bigger outlays on reconstruction than the U.S. has spent on any other country). This toll, compounded by Karzais bizarre opinions, makes a fast withdrawal look all too attractive.
It isnt so simple. The U.S. needs to safeguard its huge strategic investment in Afghanistan. That demands a realistic appraisal of what will happen as U.S. forces withdraw. It also demands a quiet but firm message to Karzai about conditions for continued assistance. The U.S. shouldnt accelerate its plans to withdraw 34,000 more U.S. troops by February 2014 -- so long as Karzai does his part.