Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 10:46 AM Mar 2013

IMPORTANT - Monsanto Teams Up with Congress to Shred the Constitution

<snip> Without any hearings on the matter, the Senate included language that would require the U.S. Department of Agriculture to essentially ignore any court ruling that would otherwise halt the planting of new genetically engineered crops. Here is how Capital Press explains it:

The rider pertains to transgenic crops that have been deregulated by the USDA but then had that approval overturned by a judge — a scenario that has occurred with genetically engineered alfalfa and sugar beets.

In such a situation, the agency “shall” immediately issue permits or a partial deregulation order that would temporarily allow farmers to continue growing and selling the crop until USDA is done re-evaluating its environmental effects, according to the rider.

Why is this such a big deal? The court system is often our last hope, with Congress, the White House, and regulatory agencies deep inside industry’s pocket. Several legal challenges have resulted in court decisions overturning USDA’s approval of new GMO crops, for example, sugar beets.
- -
Senator Jon Tester’s best attempts to stop the so-called biotech rider, the measure was pushed through. (Industry had tried to get a similar measure passed more than once last year.) Tester minced no words in an article in yesterday’s POLITICO about this and other industry power grabs such as weakening small farmer protections:

These provisions are giveaways, pure and simple, and will be a boon worth millions of dollars to a handful of the biggest corporations in this country. They deserve no place in this bill. We simply have got to do better on both policy and process.
--------

Full article at - http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2013/03/monsanto-teams-up-with-congress-to-shred-the-constitution/#.UVGSYb3cjZk

Please sign:

http://action.fooddemocracynow.org/sign/stop_the_monsanto_protection_act_seize_congress/?rd=1&t=11&referring_akid=786.174368.Y3aMio

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IMPORTANT - Monsanto Teams Up with Congress to Shred the Constitution (Original Post) Smilo Mar 2013 OP
Ahem ... Newest Reality Mar 2013 #1
Did you go to the actual link? Smilo Mar 2013 #2
Yes ... Newest Reality Mar 2013 #12
Congress writes law Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #15
K/R, more: NYC_SKP Mar 2013 #3
Thank you. Smilo Mar 2013 #5
Signed, it seems we must do this over and over again. Autumn Mar 2013 #4
Money, greed and power Smilo Mar 2013 #6
I'm with you! All it takes is a strong desire to leave a better world. raouldukelives Mar 2013 #8
remember Anderson KT2000 Mar 2013 #7
K & R !!! WillyT Mar 2013 #9
Monsanto + Congress in same sentence in thread title = Auto-rec before reading. +1 nt Poll_Blind Mar 2013 #10
Rich people must get richer, and poor people must die sooner. 11th commandment. nt valerief Mar 2013 #11
Signed! 2naSalit Mar 2013 #13
Signed and WHO added this rider? benld74 Mar 2013 #14
Hard to say but there is this............ Smilo Mar 2013 #21
Read your two links...and just how did Monsanto accomplish this? George II Mar 2013 #16
It is well hidden Smilo Mar 2013 #22
Maybe we just have to start burning them. nt docgee Mar 2013 #17
So I just had an interesting idea.... Veilex Mar 2013 #18
Yes this is a better idea than burning crops lol docgee Mar 2013 #19
Giveaways to corporations are what a corporatist government does best: it is the pols inimitable indepat Mar 2013 #20
Glad to see you're getting more traction. Le Taz Hot Mar 2013 #23
Le Taz so sorry Smilo Mar 2013 #24
No worries, my friend. Le Taz Hot Mar 2013 #27
kick woo me with science Mar 2013 #25
Bottom Line fredamae Mar 2013 #26
Thanks for posting this -- should be required reading. theHandpuppet Aug 2013 #28
The problem is Congress--the corporations OWN Congress AndyA Nov 2013 #29

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
1. Ahem ...
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 11:09 AM
Mar 2013

What's this "Constitution" being referred to?

It think you may mean, Corporate Charter of the United States, Inc.

Oh, maybe that memo is not in wide circulation yet.

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
2. Did you go to the actual link?
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 11:14 AM
Mar 2013

It starts out -

One of them was the concept of “separation of powers,” which ensures a system of checks and balances among the three branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial. But a dangerous provision snuck into the budget bill passed last week in Congress upends that system.

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
12. Yes ...
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 12:44 PM
Mar 2013

Thanks.

Just seeing as a long time in progress.

Sorry if my sarcasm detracted from your OP.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
15. Congress writes law
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 01:16 PM
Mar 2013

It is not unconstitutional for congress to tell the judiciary what it intends when it writes a law. The judiciary cannot just strike down a law some judge somewhere doesn't like unless that law can be shown to violate the Constitution otherwise that would be an infringement of congress' power to legislate.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
3. K/R, more:
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 11:29 AM
Mar 2013
Without any hearings on the matter, the Senate included language that would require the U.S. Department of Agriculture to essentially ignore any court ruling that would otherwise halt the planting of new genetically engineered crops. Here is how Capital Press explains it:

The rider pertains to transgenic crops that have been deregulated by the USDA but then had that approval overturned by a judge — a scenario that has occurred with genetically engineered alfalfa and sugar beets.

In such a situation, the agency “shall” immediately issue permits or a partial deregulation order that would temporarily allow farmers to continue growing and selling the crop until USDA is done re-evaluating its environmental effects, according to the rider.

Why is this such a big deal? The court system is often our last hope, with Congress, the White House, and regulatory agencies deep inside industry’s pocket. Several legal challenges have resulted in court decisions overturning USDA’s approval of new GMO crops, for example, sugar beets.

Autumn

(44,958 posts)
4. Signed, it seems we must do this over and over again.
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 11:33 AM
Mar 2013

How do we do better on both policy and process when we seem to have to beg people we elected, who very well understand the dangers of this to do the right thing? Follow the money.

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
6. Money, greed and power
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 11:40 AM
Mar 2013

you are so right, but history has shown that the "ordinary" person can triumph and if we only stand together we can do so again.

Thanks for signing.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
8. I'm with you! All it takes is a strong desire to leave a better world.
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 12:18 PM
Mar 2013

So strong that the idea of assisting the Monsanto's of the world and profiting from it turns your stomach more than the money soothes it.

KT2000

(20,566 posts)
7. remember Anderson
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 12:13 PM
Mar 2013

the consulting company? They were the ones who devised Monsanto's business plan to flood the market with GMO products because it is nearly impossible to stop something once it is in the market.
Cost/benefit analysis used to stop dangerous products and practices applies to the cost and benefit to the corporation - not the public.

This is the plan to its extreme - and how many other companies are going to use this method to flood the market with potentially dangerous products.

Corporations are in charge of this country now.

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
21. Hard to say but there is this............
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 03:10 PM
Mar 2013

Last edited Tue Mar 26, 2013, 03:43 PM - Edit history (1)

state rider was anonymous.


Washington, D.C.—“Today, the Senate passed a continuing resolution that was laden with special interest policy riders. Senate Appropriations Chairwoman Barbara Mikulski (D-Maryland) and Ranking Member Richard Shelby (R-Alabama) abdicated their responsibility by offering a stale spending bill from last year that is loaded with special legislative giveaways to big agribusiness companies. The heavy-handed and undemocratic process used to force the Senate to accept a deeply flawed proposal allowed votes on only nine amendments.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2013/03/21/174973235/did-congress-just-give-gmos-a-free-pass-in-the-courts

 

Veilex

(1,555 posts)
18. So I just had an interesting idea....
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 01:24 PM
Mar 2013

Any organic object that is genetically modified and is grown for purposes of consumption... couldn't that be considered a drug as well as food? Would not such an item have to undergo medical trials in addition to certification through the FDA? Might be a non-starter, but if cells can be taken from a person, slightly modified and re-introduced back to the donor and still be considered a drug, then why aren't genetically modified plants considered drugs as well?

Hmmmmmm.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
20. Giveaways to corporations are what a corporatist government does best: it is the pols inimitable
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 01:58 PM
Mar 2013

way of rhetorically saying "fuck the promote the general welfare doctrine, that's for pansy-waisted governments of, by and for the people."

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
24. Le Taz so sorry
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 11:50 PM
Mar 2013

when I did a search I didn't see your posting.

But a great big thank you sir for making a difference - together we can.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
27. No worries, my friend.
Wed Mar 27, 2013, 10:21 AM
Mar 2013

Frankenfood and killer seeds are the issue here -- we're just the messengers. It's just been a challenge getting DUers' interest for this issue.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
26. Bottom Line
Wed Mar 27, 2013, 10:15 AM
Mar 2013

Stop Electing The Same Fkn Problem(s) Over and Over!

We keep recycling incumbants and relatives of the incumbants friends/families that keep doing the same shit to us-not for us-
Votes matter! Not Party affiliation.
When you look Only at the Votes?
All differences between the party's disappear.

AndyA

(16,993 posts)
29. The problem is Congress--the corporations OWN Congress
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 01:31 PM
Nov 2013

The people? Who are they? Oh, you mean "you people"? The little people who pay the bills but get pissed on by the rich people up on the balcony?

We need a clean slate. Fixing this issue with Monsanto alone won't do it. We need to get the money out of our elections. We need to make sure the elections are fair and accurate. We need to make sure everyone eligible to vote gets to vote. We need to vote out the career politicians who no longer represent the people.

That's why it's a big deal. Yes, Monsanto is a big deal. But we can't even get laws passed that make sure our food is labeled accurately. Is this real, or genetically modified? People should have a choice in what they buy, and the only way that happens is to identify the fake stuff, but we can't even make that happen. I think it was California that just voted against labeling genetically modified food--despite overwhelming public support before the election, Monsanto, Coke, Pepsi, Kraft, etc., dumped a ton of money into advertising and actually changed people's minds, so they voted it down.

It's going to take people getting involved for a change. They've got to get off their butts, quit watching the Real Housewives of Spoiledsnottyville and DO something. More people are beginning to pay attention, but we need more.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»IMPORTANT - Monsanto Team...