Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spanone

(135,781 posts)
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 03:57 PM Mar 2013

Justices appear hesitant as they hear arguments over same-sex marriage


Washington (CNN) -- As partisans argued pointedly over same-sex marriage outside the U.S. Supreme Court building, either hoping for or dreading a landmark decision, justices inside seemed reluctant Tuesday to extend a sweeping constitutional right for gays and lesbian to wed in all 50 states.

In the first of two days of hearings on cases that have the potential to fundamentally alter how American law treats marriage, Justice Anthony Kennedy -- considered the likely deciding vote on the divided court -- questioned whether justices should even be hearing the issue.

"This was a deeply divided Supreme Court, and a court that seemed almost to be groping for an answer here," said CNN Senior Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin, who watched the arguments over California's Proposition 8, which bans same-sex marriage. Voters approved the proposal 52% to 48% in November 2008, less than six months after the state Supreme Court ruled that marriage is a fundamental right that must be extended to same-sex couples.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/26/politics/same-sex-marriage-court/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
1. Are they afraid to make a ruling?
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 04:25 PM
Mar 2013

Are they trying to kick the ball back to CA? I really don't get what's going on.

spanone

(135,781 posts)
2. supreme court is a hard read.....sometimes there's no clue as to what they will rule
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 04:27 PM
Mar 2013

but pundits get paid to make themselves look smart

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
4. If they kick it back - it means prop 8 goes away -
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 04:49 PM
Mar 2013

BUT it makes no ruling beyond Cali.

They're afraid of the roe v. Wade effect if they apply the prop 8 case nationally.

SoonerPride

(12,286 posts)
5. Yes, because if my partner of 27 years and I get married in Oklahoma
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 04:54 PM
Mar 2013

it will invalidate every other marriage in the state.

The freaking SCOTUS drives me nuts.

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
6. it's an amazing back flip twist to be afraid of other supremes rulings.
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 04:56 PM
Mar 2013

but it speaks to the power of roe and the anti-choicers in this country.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justices appear hesitant ...