General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMultitasking. I say it's spinach
When I was a kid, we had a big book of New Yorker cartoons. The only one I remember- and I've loved it since I first saw it- is the one of mother and kid seated at the dinner table with the mother kind of looming over the child. The caption is:
Mother: "It's broccoli dear"
Child: "I say it's spinach and I say to hell with it".
And that is how I feel about multitasking. It may be all well and good for computers to multitask, and that's where the idea originated, but it's not transferable to people. Multitasking is frustrating, stress inducing and it's spinach. It leads to sloppy work sowed with errors.
From Wiki:
Because the brain cannot fully focus when multitasking, people take longer to complete tasks and are predisposed to error. When people attempt to complete many tasks at one time, or [alternate] rapidly between them, errors go way up and it takes far longeroften double the time or moreto get the jobs done than if they were done sequentially, states Meyer.[9] This is largely because the brain is compelled to restart and refocus.[10] A study by Meyer and David Kieras found that in the interim between each exchange, the brain makes no progress whatsoever. Therefore, multitasking people not only perform each task less suitably, but lose time in the process.
When presented with much information, the brain is forced to pause and refocus continuously as one switches between tasks.[10] Realistically, this is a rapid toggling among tasks rather than simultaneous processing. According to a study done by Jordan Grafman, chief of the cognitive neuroscience section at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the most anterior part [of the brain] allows [a person] to leave something when its incomplete and return to the same place and continue from there, while Broadmans Area 10, a part of the brains frontal lobes, is important for establishing and attaining long term goals.[9] Focusing on multiple dissimilar tasks at once forces the brain to process all activity in its anterior. Though the brain is complex and can perform a myriad of tasks, it cannot multitask well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_multitasking
There's a mountain of evidence that multitasking leads to less productivity and reduced effectiveness, but we're constantly being pressured to do it and given tips about how to do it... better.
There's a simple solution: Do one thing at a time. Do it to the best of your ability and focus as completely as you can on that task or thing.
Multitasking is spinach and I say fuck it.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,010 posts)It certainly works for me in retirement to keep my various hobbies and tasks all moving forward (yes, I am busier - and HAPPIER - retired than I was working!)
And then again we love spinach!
CTyankee
(63,893 posts)women are expected, more than men, to run a household and take care of children and this necessarily requires a certain amount of multitasking. I think as women were more able to have careers outside of the home, the office seemed like a place of escape in addition to being a workplace. It's interesting to see what men who become stay at home Dads while their wives earn money will do...I don't know any man who completely gave up work, even when they get custody of their kids in a divorce...
NRaleighLiberal
(60,010 posts)My wife and I both worked, both pretty much shared the tasks associated with our kids, and shared the stuff that needed to be done around the house. The kids are grown and out of the house - but we still share all tasks - none have a specific name against them. It works great for us...but this is a fascinating topic in which broad brush strokes (multitasking is awful, won't work, etc) can't apply
cali
(114,904 posts)NRaleighLiberal
(60,010 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)writing, gardening, etc.
I do one thing at a time- or try. And virtually all the scientific evidence is that multitasking is inefficient.
But hey, if it works for you, more power to you!
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)http://prayersandapples.com/foods-that-increase-energy-a-look-at-magnesium/
With spinach, multitasking should be easier.
cali
(114,904 posts)I just learned the context of that though- broccoli was a new veggie in the 1920s and became quite popular. When I was a kid, I didn't much care for spinach and liked broccoli only because my mother served it in lemon butter. I'd eat an old shoe if it was bathed in enough lemon butter.
Leme
(1,092 posts)vegetable called broccoli. So they hired a media consultant and invented "Popeye".
----------
hey...the timeline fits at least. : )
cali
(114,904 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)and see my forearms grow disproportionally large.
cali
(114,904 posts)I thought you were going to tell me about some new spinach is poison thing.
Leme
(1,092 posts)Doing the same jobs simultaneously is multi-tasking, for computers Cutting the lawn and listening to an audio book with earphones is multi-tasking. Driving and texting is multi-tasking. Jogging semi naked outside (in daylight) and tanning is multi-tasking.
-
Those are humans multi-tasking similar to computers.
-
I think they have shown that the more one tries to do simultaneously, poorer results occur overall.
-----------------
Adding more responsibilities and projects to do is also called multi-tasking. But that is just a new name for a normal human activity.
longship
(40,416 posts)All the research supports the conclusion that multitasking is harmful. I've heard of one research that showed that people who think they can multitask are actually worse at it (no citation, but heard this on the SGU podcast some years ago).
R&K
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)(bass on left hand, treble on right) takes a lot of practice and concentration to get good at. And two jobs is the minimum to be considered multitasking! Although I can rub my belly and simultaneously pat my head effortlessly.
csziggy
(34,131 posts)Right now, I'm scanning an old scrapbook, reading DU, watching TV, and sometimes I pull out the tablet to play solitaire.
Of course, scanning does not take all my attention, especially when the scanner takes minutes to do large, high resolution scans.
I will admit there are times I "solo-task" - when I am transcribing documents or editing/restoring old photos, I need a lot of concentration. The TV might be on, but often the sound is off.
MineralMan
(146,262 posts)been a programmer. In both lines of work, I've found that I'm much more productive when I focus entirely on the task at hand. I eliminate all distractions and work steadily and stay focused. If I am interrupted, it takes me some time to refocus and return to my most productive pace.
Like everyone, I have to multitask, but I do it serially. I focus on one thing and turn my focus on something else in a separate event. For me, at least, it's my most efficient use of time.