Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,984 posts)
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 08:40 AM Jun 2014

Ronald Reagan Gave Iran 1,500 Missiles for Hostages. Obama Trades Five Guys? GOP Heads Explode.

SAT MAY 31, 2014 AT 08:33 PM PDT
Ronald Reagan Gave Iran 1,500 Missiles for Hostages. Obama Trades Five Guys? GOP Heads Explode.
by David Harris Gershon

I don't want to hear another word about GOP lawmakers chest-thumping and foaming-at-the-mouth about the fact that Obama traded, without the requisite 30-day notice to Congress, five indefinitely detained prisoners for the release of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl.

You know why? Because history:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/reagan-iran/

In 1985, while Iran and Iraq were at war, Iran made a secret request to buy weapons from the United States. McFarlane sought President Reagan's approval, in spite of the embargo against selling arms to Iran. McFarlane explained that the sale of arms would not only improve U.S. relations with Iran, but might in turn lead to improved relations with Lebanon, increasing U.S. influence in the troubled Middle East.

Reagan was driven by a different obsession. He had become frustrated at his inability to secure the release of the seven American hostages being held by Iranian terrorists in Lebanon. As president, Reagan felt that "he had the duty to bring those Americans home."
[...]

The arms-for-hostages proposal divided the administration. Longtime policy adversaries Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger and Secretary of State George Shultz opposed the deal, but Reagan, McFarlane and CIA director William Casey supported it. With the backing of the president, the plan progressed. By the time the sales were discovered, more than 1,500 missiles had been shipped to Iran. Three hostages had been released, only to be replaced with three more, in what Secretary of State George Shultz called "a hostage bazaar."


So GOP lawmakers are apoplectic about Obama not giving Congress the 30-day notice required by law before transferring any detainee from Guantanamo Bay, men who have mostly been detained without charge?

But will raise President Reagan upon a pillar, a man who gave Iran over 1,500 missiles for the release of U.S. hostages?

I have one response: shut up and sit down. Class is in session.




http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/05/31/1303494/-GOP-Hero-Reagan-Gave-Iran-1-500-Missiles-for-Hostages-Obama-Trades-Five-Guys-GOP-Heads-Explode
58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ronald Reagan Gave Iran 1,500 Missiles for Hostages. Obama Trades Five Guys? GOP Heads Explode. (Original Post) kpete Jun 2014 OP
No one will give a flip quaker bill Jun 2014 #1
They'll use it to gin up the outrage machine for the week NewJeffCT Jun 2014 #15
Ask Bowe how he feels about it. JaneyVee Jun 2014 #2
Governing while hated... Zoonart Jun 2014 #3
Look at how they scream for the release of the Wayward Marine in prison in Mexico, but Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #14
He should declare the exchange was in the "National Interest".... Historic NY Jun 2014 #4
And Oliver North gave them a cake! GreatCaesarsGhost Jun 2014 #5
Normal people don't care what Republicans have to say The Wizard Jun 2014 #6
If only heads could explode for real! mountain grammy Jun 2014 #7
I think Congress' rule is out of line Demeter Jun 2014 #8
Guantanomo Scarsdale Jun 2014 #9
And the Guantanamo detainees probably weren't guilty of anything to start with. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #10
They were all captured early as known Taliban leaders and commanders..... Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #12
During the period when we were paying bounties for "known Taliban leaders and commanders"... jmowreader Jun 2014 #45
I see it as a Win Win. We get our guy back and we get to move those guys stuck in Gitmo. The Wielding Truth Jun 2014 #33
I like what they did. I agree. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #46
Gitmo is another BUsh legacy the the right wing refuses to part with. The Wielding Truth Jun 2014 #54
Israel, beloved of the Teabangelical, regularity trade "terrorists" for soldiers with Palestine, Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #11
It's Saint Ronnie, though NewJeffCT Jun 2014 #13
And you didn't even mention Reagan's promises that he gave to Iran... George II Jun 2014 #16
"Inane babbling." Symptomatic of a Swine Flu epidemic within the Republican Party. Dark n Stormy Knight Jun 2014 #25
I would think "SARS" would be more appropriate.... George II Jun 2014 #28
Ha! Right. It was the swine part I thought fit. But yours is better. Dark n Stormy Knight Jun 2014 #56
What bothers me is not the "inane babbling" , it's the fact that Americans continue to vote ladjf Jun 2014 #51
One of the reasons they do is that they accept the inane babbling and word salad Dark n Stormy Knight Jun 2014 #55
Hell... DirtyDawg Jun 2014 #17
Exactly !!! pangaia Jun 2014 #20
That's precisely what came to mind... CBHagman Jun 2014 #18
You miss the opportunity for unintended consequences. Igel Jun 2014 #19
The GOP disowns Sgt Bergdhal BootinUp Jun 2014 #21
"Republicans did it too" is my least favorite argument. JayhawkSD Jun 2014 #22
cool peoli Jun 2014 #34
Thank you. I'm glad somebody got my point. n/t JayhawkSD Jun 2014 #43
The argument here is Repug hypocrisy. The Party of Iran-Contra, arms-for-hostages.... lastlib Jun 2014 #39
Perhaps so, but it still says... JayhawkSD Jun 2014 #42
K & R Scurrilous Jun 2014 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author bigtree Jun 2014 #24
Obviously Obama erred Turbineguy Jun 2014 #26
Does hack Gregory know this? malaise Jun 2014 #27
Did you kneel and kiss the Bible before you used Reagan's name? tclambert Jun 2014 #29
Reagan kardonb Jun 2014 #30
It's the fact that Obama is a liberal Democrat and a rather well-liked one, that bothers them....... AverageJoe90 Jun 2014 #31
What else is mstinamotorcity2 Jun 2014 #32
And how many people did those US-made guided missiles kill in the 30+ years since being traded? 4lbs Jun 2014 #35
I couldn't agree more, and that's why I rec'd this. Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2014 #36
NOBODY with even 1 functioning braincell between their ears takes ANYTHING the GOP says with any blkmusclmachine Jun 2014 #37
Yes! pacalo Jun 2014 #38
I told some right winger I know that pardons for the enemy are routine when wars end.... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2014 #40
Ronald Reagan gave Saddam Hussein chemical weapons to fight Iran bemildred Jun 2014 #41
facts ignored by the so called "liberal media" that lets Republicans get away with spin and lies. nt alp227 Jun 2014 #44
It isn't about anything other than scamming Americans. Republican politicians and mouthpieces don't WinkyDink Jun 2014 #47
Does this mean they are going to close Guantanamo? TBF Jun 2014 #48
Another Article (Angle) cynzke Jun 2014 #49
the repukes just found their new fail meme to replace their other failure: benghazi. nt Javaman Jun 2014 #50
Any decent commander in chief would want to bring our soldiers home IronLionZion Jun 2014 #52
The framing should be: Why don't they want to support our troops? grahamhgreen Jun 2014 #53
... napkinz Jun 2014 #57
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2014 #58

quaker bill

(8,224 posts)
1. No one will give a flip
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 08:47 AM
Jun 2014

except the RW on capitol hill. I think most folks would have been just a good handing over 20 or 30 of them, perhaps even the whole lot....

I hope the RW proceeds with their indignation. It will only increase their irrelevance.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
15. They'll use it to gin up the outrage machine for the week
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 10:23 AM
Jun 2014

every week, they need something new to keep the outrage adrenalin pumping in the base.

Zoonart

(11,849 posts)
3. Governing while hated...
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 09:11 AM
Jun 2014

Clearly, the President cannot win. If this young man had died in custody of the Taliban and the action to get him out had not been taken... the President would have been called indecisive, at best! They would have railed that this was an impeachable offense at worst.

The President acted to save the soldier's life and he is "capitulating to terrorists"... the cry goes up for impeachment.

Thank you Mr. President. Thank You for doing the right thing.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
14. Look at how they scream for the release of the Wayward Marine in prison in Mexico, but
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 10:23 AM
Jun 2014

when Obama brings one home.....well, what an outrage!

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
4. He should declare the exchange was in the "National Interest"....
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 09:14 AM
Jun 2014

The NDAA has placed near-impossible restrictions, amounting to an effective prohibition, on the use of military funds to transfer detainees. The only possible Executive exception, or Waiver, is where it is in the United States’ “national interest” to enact a transfer.

The Wizard

(12,541 posts)
6. Normal people don't care what Republicans have to say
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 09:53 AM
Jun 2014

unless it's under oath, and even then no one believes them.

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
9. Guantanomo
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 10:15 AM
Jun 2014

Let's not be too hasty, let us wait until cooler heads prevail. What do $arah PayMe, or Joe The Plumber think of this? McCain is in his usual Sunday perch with Schieffer, he will insist upon invading somewhere. Emptying Gitmo is a good idea. Since the gop is against housing the prisoners on US soil, then send them home. It costs taxpayers a fortune to keep each one of them there. The reputation of the US went down the drain YEARS ago, when the half-wit from Texas was placed into the WH. Then the damage was compounded with his two "wars for awl" The oil was supposed to pay for the cost of the wars, remember?

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
10. And the Guantanamo detainees probably weren't guilty of anything to start with.
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 10:18 AM
Jun 2014

GOP outrage is usually faked up. This time is no exception.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
12. They were all captured early as known Taliban leaders and commanders.....
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 10:21 AM
Jun 2014

The lack of wanting to know who the prisoners are is a fascinating study in how so many have such closed minds.

jmowreader

(50,553 posts)
45. During the period when we were paying bounties for "known Taliban leaders and commanders"...
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 04:19 AM
Jun 2014

...and indiscriminately grabbing anybody that anyone said was a known Taliban leader.

Your next-door neighbor Muhammad borrowed your car and forgot to put gas in it? "Hello American Forces? My neighbor Muhammad is a terrorist. How do I know? He just is. Come get his ass."

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
11. Israel, beloved of the Teabangelical, regularity trade "terrorists" for soldiers with Palestine,
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 10:19 AM
Jun 2014

The ratio is averaging 100 to 1.

5 to 1 is a bargain, especially as ally Qatar is doing the reception of the prisoners.

Just more stupid by the GOP, more equivalency by the media so as to have something to talk about on Endless Panels and Pundits.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
13. It's Saint Ronnie, though
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 10:23 AM
Jun 2014

which means he did it out of the awesomeness of being Ronald Reagan, while obviously, Obama and a weakling and coward who did it out of fear.

George II

(67,782 posts)
16. And you didn't even mention Reagan's promises that he gave to Iran...
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 10:24 AM
Jun 2014

...even BEFORE he was elected, as long as they kept our hostages until after the election. Any "coincidence" that they were released at the very moment that Reagan's hand left the bible during his swearing in?

Of course Lindsey Graham will be out there whining and sniveling, along with Rove and all Faux talking/EXPLODING heads this morning. John McCain already chimed in last night with some inane babbling.

Dark n Stormy Knight

(9,760 posts)
25. "Inane babbling." Symptomatic of a Swine Flu epidemic within the Republican Party.
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 01:37 PM
Jun 2014

"Inane babbling." Symptomatic of a Swine Flu epidemic within the Republican Party.

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
51. What bothers me is not the "inane babbling" , it's the fact that Americans continue to vote
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 09:38 AM
Jun 2014

for those ignorant and disingenuous creeps. nt

Dark n Stormy Knight

(9,760 posts)
55. One of the reasons they do is that they accept the inane babbling and word salad
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 05:48 PM
Jun 2014

speeches ala SarahPalin as legitimate arguments in support of their RW world view. They don't require, nor desire reasoned discussion, for in that context the BS of the RW is clearly revealed.

 

DirtyDawg

(802 posts)
17. Hell...
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 10:27 AM
Jun 2014

...I thought you were talking about the missiles Reagan/Bush/Casey got Israel to give Iran as part of The October Surprise...of course that was to 'hold on' to hostages - only to be released when it would help them win the '80 election. I think it's time for Democrats to 'open up' on Republican treason like the '80 thing, but also the '68 Peace Talks sabotage and the stealing of both the '00 and '04 elections.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
20. Exactly !!!
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 11:08 AM
Jun 2014

Why the hell aren't at least some high level democrats, hell JUST ONE-- out there telling the truth about the past??

And also,why aren't they saying that if Obama had done nothing and the guy died the republican terrorists would be accusing him of murder??

Why don't 'they' put ME on one of those dumb fuck Sunday morning TV shows? Shit, man. I'll tell them.

This is a no brainer. If the truth about anything gets put out enough no republican or blue dog fake democrat will ever win another election.

Don't answer me. I know the answers.

CBHagman

(16,984 posts)
18. That's precisely what came to mind...
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 10:48 AM
Jun 2014

...when I looked at the first headlines about GOP objections to the Taliban prisoner release.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
19. You miss the opportunity for unintended consequences.
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 11:04 AM
Jun 2014

Other Gitmo detainees have been released under similar terms.

Most vanish. Fortunately, that's what most do. They just vanish, and if they return to the battlefield they either remain undistinguished or they die anonymously. Any damage they cause is unattributable to the release of the detainees.

In a few cases they didn't vanish, and it was a minor political problem. You don't want those released to come back and kill US soldiers or any civilians. Fortunately for *, the detainees that were involved in this were released as part of a large-scale release of those judged not so dangerous at a time when there was a lot of support in some sectors for releasing as many as possible. That the release-and-monitor program was so leaky should have been obvious, but the novelty of the program provided some political cover. That was a decade ago. It provides no cover.

All that has to happen is for one of those 5 former detainees to be named as implicated in the death of civilians, US soldiers, or other non-US NATO forces and there'll be hell to pay. One side will say that the price of Bergdahl's freedom was the death of others. The other side will say, "Who knew?" That it was done in a way that is apparently dictated by urgency doesn't reduce the fact that it was done in a way that also minimized transparency and the painful discussion that would have happened.

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
22. "Republicans did it too" is my least favorite argument.
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 11:22 AM
Jun 2014

We are supposed to be better than Republicans, not justify our actions by saying we are the same as them. How can we claim the moral high ground when every time our leader is criticized whe are quick to point out that he is simply copying some fucking Republican? Every time we are challenged we promptly retreat from the high ground and dive down in the muck with our opponent.

How about a simple, "Oh for God's sake grow up. Swapping prisoners of war is a perfectly routine process," and then ignoring them when they try to make something of it.

lastlib

(23,208 posts)
39. The argument here is Repug hypocrisy. The Party of Iran-Contra, arms-for-hostages....
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 12:15 AM
Jun 2014

has zero standing to complain about any such dealings. They can just fuck off and die. Sooner better than later.

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
42. Perhaps so, but it still says...
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 01:32 AM
Jun 2014
"The Republicans did it too." It makes the argument of, "The Republicans are hypocritical to criticize us because both of us are doing the same thing," which is a weak and crappy argument.

A much better argument is, "The Republicans are wrong to criticize us, because what we are doing is the right thing to do."

Do you see the difference in position there? Do you see how the latter position is one of self assurance and pride, while the former is a crouching defensive posture?

And why must we always express ourselves in terms of disdain and contempt for our opponent? Why can we never simply state the value of what we stand for as positive expression? We reject, in fact, the suggestion that we express positives about ourselves and insist that we must be more and more focused on using our voices exclusively to condemn the opposition.

Response to kpete (Original post)

Turbineguy

(37,317 posts)
26. Obviously Obama erred
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 02:18 PM
Jun 2014

if he had been a republican he would have got nothing from the other side in exchange.

 

kardonb

(777 posts)
30. Reagan
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 09:00 PM
Jun 2014

if Obama would turn out to be Jesus Christ incarnate , the Repugs would probably criticize him for not coming sooner ; or feeding and caring for the multitudes instead of letting them go hungry .

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
31. It's the fact that Obama is a liberal Democrat and a rather well-liked one, that bothers them.......
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 09:06 PM
Jun 2014

.....so much; and him being of partial African ancestry makes it even worse in the minds of more than a few(especially Teabagger types).

4lbs

(6,855 posts)
35. And how many people did those US-made guided missiles kill in the 30+ years since being traded?
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 09:50 PM
Jun 2014

They were likely used against Iraq in their 1980s war.

I doubt trading 5 detainees will cause any deaths in 30 years.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
36. I couldn't agree more, and that's why I rec'd this.
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 10:02 PM
Jun 2014

(and don't forget that McFarlane, North, & Poindexter then funneled the profits of the sale to the Contras, in violation of the law)

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
37. NOBODY with even 1 functioning braincell between their ears takes ANYTHING the GOP says with any
Sun Jun 1, 2014, 11:14 PM
Jun 2014

credibility!

The GOP is a vicious pack of America-hating thugs. Secede, already, a--holes!*

*And take our compromised DINOS with you!!!

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
40. I told some right winger I know that pardons for the enemy are routine when wars end....
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 01:11 AM
Jun 2014

They act like the war isn't over until the other side is completely wiped from the face of the earth.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
41. Ronald Reagan gave Saddam Hussein chemical weapons to fight Iran
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 01:17 AM
Jun 2014

September 10, 2013

It is important to remember times in history when the United States supplied dictators with weapons that are condemned today.

The time is December 1983 near the middle of President Ronald Reagan's first term. Iran and Iraq are at war, and Iran is gaining the upper hand in the military struggle. In an effort to stave off Iranian Islamic dominance in the region President Reagan sent Donald Rumsfeld to broker a secret deal with Saddam Hussein. In the secret 90-minute meeting Rumsfeld arranged for Saddam Hussein to acquire sarin nerve gas, anthrax, bubonic plague, along with others. He also arranged for Iraq to receive billions of dollars in loans to pay for these weapons.

How would Rumsfeld be able to do this? From the years 1977 to 1985 Donald Rumsfeld was the CEO of a major pharmaceutical corporation known as Searle & Company which, coincidentally enough, was sold to Monsanto in 1985.

Records also show that then CIA Director William Casey personally involved himself in assisting funneling cluster bombs to Iraq through a foreign shell company.

http://www.examiner.com/article/ronald-reagan-gave-saddam-hussein-chemical-weapons-to-fight-iran

alp227

(32,016 posts)
44. facts ignored by the so called "liberal media" that lets Republicans get away with spin and lies. nt
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 02:32 AM
Jun 2014
 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
47. It isn't about anything other than scamming Americans. Republican politicians and mouthpieces don't
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 07:35 AM
Jun 2014

care about this exchange.

TBF

(32,047 posts)
48. Does this mean they are going to close Guantanamo?
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 07:39 AM
Jun 2014

I haven't been up on this story but read a little this morning in USA today & on wiki:

Release on May 31, 2014

On May 31, 2014, U.S. officials from the White House and Pentagon announced that Bergdahl had been released by his captors and recovered by U.S. special operations forces in eastern Afghanistan. The release was brokered by the American, Qatar and Afghanistan governments with the Taliban, in exchange for five Guantanamo Bay detainees transferred to Qatari custody for at least one year. Though law states that the President must inform Congress at least 30 days in advance of any transfers at Guantanamo Bay, no notice was given. On 10:30 a.m. (ET) May 31, 2014, Bergdahl was handed over by 18 Taliban members in eastern Afghanistan, near Khost on the Pakistani border, in what was described as a "peaceful handover".

Bergdahl was treated by U.S. military medical staff at an undisclosed base in east Afghanistan. He was then transferred to Bagram Airfield, before being flown to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Germany for specialist medical treatment and is expected to return home to Brooke Army Medical Center in Texas for further recovery.

President Obama and U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel thanked Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, Emir of Qatar, and the government of Afghanistan for their assistance in the rescue of Bergdahl.

The Taliban detainees – known as the "Taliban five"[54] – who were transferred from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to custody in Doha, Qatar are Mohammad Fazl, Khairullah Khairkhwa, Abdul Haq Wasiq, Norullah Noori, and Mohammad Nabi Omari. They are the Taliban army chief of staff, a Taliban deputy minister of intelligence, a former Taliban interior minister and two other senior Taliban figures



I'm not seeing what is so horrible here. A peaceful exchange of prisoners and if they are clearing Guantanamo in order to close it this could be a very good thing indeed.

What am I missing?

IronLionZion

(45,426 posts)
52. Any decent commander in chief would want to bring our soldiers home
Mon Jun 2, 2014, 01:54 PM
Jun 2014

from enemy captivity. If the released taliban are so bad, then charge them with something. Or get them with missile strikes. But its just idiotic to keep them for so many years in prison without any sort of due process.

The most disgusting amount of BS being spewed forth by the GOP propaganda machine is that the 5 talibs were simply freed and returned back in Afghanistan because Dems are pathethic little weaklings. The truth is they are to be held in prison in Qatar for no less than a year from now, but Sargeant Berghdahl is back in US hands already.

The official US military policy has always been no one gets left behind.


Response to kpete (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ronald Reagan Gave Iran 1...