General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsClimate Change: Get Ready or Get Sued -- Insurers answer back to North Carolina
With Canada's PM Stephen Harper recently banning government scientists from acknowledging climate change and North Carolina now in year 3 of their ban on any changes in public planning based on climate change, the spotlight is on the relationship between climate change and insurance:
During the past 40 years, climate change in Cook County has caused rains to be of greater volume, greater intensity and greater duration than pre-1970 rainfall history evidenced, a fact that local governments were well aware of, a suit filed in Cook County, Ill., alleges, citing a climate change action plan adopted in 2008 that acknowledges the link between climate change and increased rainfall.
...
I think what the insurers are saying is: Were in the business of covering unforeseen risks. Things that are basically accidents, Ceres insurance industry analyst Andrew Logan told NPR. But were now at a point with the science where climate change is now a foreseeable risk.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/05/19/climate-change-get-ready-or-get-sued/
The defense of suits like this may partially explain why some governments are gagging their employees on climate change -- it admits liability. Another article on this examines the economic risk of not having affordable insurance:
...
Every segment of the insurance industry faces climate risks, yet the industrys response has been highly uneven, said Ceres president Mindy Lubber, in a statement with the report. The implications of this are profound because the insurance sector is a key driver of the economy. If climate change undermines the future availability of insurance products and risk management services in major markets throughout the U.S., it threatens the economy and taxpayers as well.
...
In another sign that the insurance industry may be ready to galvanize action, Lloyds of London, the worlds oldest and biggest insurance market, recently called on insurers to incorporate climate change into their models.
Insurers have an important role to play in mitigating the impact of the changes in climate which have already occurred, through closer coordination with other industries, notably construction, wrote John Nelson, chairman of Lloyds of London, in an op-ed for The Guardian. There need to be policies to drive up standards and make sure we have resilient homes, that we use better materials. All these and strong forward planning will be key to this effort. Here, too, governments must play their role in enshrining standards in legislation.
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/05/19/3439048/insurance-climate-class-action-flood/
blm
(113,043 posts)This issue pits their big-money donors' interests against each other.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)from a comment section of WaPo's article on Norfolk being flooded due to climate change:
As of last week, the world's largest naval base, in Norfolk, must now stop preparing for the coming change:
"WASHINGTON -- The House passed an amendment to the National Defense Authorization bill on Thursday that would bar the Department of Defense from using funds to assess climate change and its implications for national security.
The amendment, from Rep. David McKinley (R-W.Va.), passed in what was nearly a party-line vote. Four Democrats voted for the amendment, and three Republicans voted against it. The bill aims to block the DOD from taking any significant action related to climate change or its potential consequences. It reads:
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to implement the U.S. Global Change Research Program National Climate Assessment, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Fifth Assessment Report, the United Nation's Agenda 21 sustainable development plan, or the May 2013 Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/in-norfolk-evidence-of-climate-change-is-in-the-streets-at-high-tide/2014/05/31/fe3ae860-e71f-11e3-8f90-73e071f3d637_story.html
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)>>bar the Department of Defense from using funds to assess climate change and its implications for national security. <<
DOD doesn't have to worry about insurance but a threat to national security is a threat. And if it is a foreseeable threat then they CAN prepare for it. In fact that is their job. Why tie their hands on this?
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)What kind of money making businesses would be harmed/threatened by accepting climate change?
More specifially what kind of businesses in relation to DOD contracts?
Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)the Department of Defense to ignore threats to national security!?
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)The religious fundies support any events which will lead to the apocalypse that they want to happen.
all earth's disasters are supposedly leading to the end times in which their savior will return to earth and rapture them up.
And they very very seriously believe this will literally happen.
If I had a dollar for every time I have had someone talk about the end times down here.....
freshwest
(53,661 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)the increase.