General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMessage Control: From the "Nothing to See Here--Move Along--They All Do It" Memory Hole
Rahm Emanuel's Think Tankers Enforce 'Message Discipline' Among 'Liberals'
Posted April 9, 2009--Jeremy Scahill
Over the past several weeks, independent journalists and anti-war activists have tried to shine a spotlight on how groups like the Center for American Progress and MoveOn, which portrayed themselves as anti-war during the Bush-era, are now supporting the escalation and continuation of wars because their guy is now commander-in-chief. CAP has been actively pounding the pavement in support of the escalation in Afghanistan, the rebranding of the Iraq occupation and, more recently, Obama's bloated military budget, which the group said was "on target." MoveOn has been silent on the escalation in Afghanistan and has devoted substantial resources to promoting a federal budget that includes a $21 billion increase in military spending from the Bush-era.
What is clear here is that CAP and MoveOn are now basically psuedo-official PR flaks targeting "liberals" to support the White House agenda. This, though, should not come as a shock to those who have closely monitored these groups. They were the primary force behind Americans Against Escalation in Iraq (AAEI), "a coalition that spent tens of millions of dollars using Iraq as a political bludgeon against Republican politicians, while refusing to pressure the Democratic Congress to actually cut off funding for the war." Now, according to John Stauber, executive director of the Center for Media and Democracy, the Center for American Progress is now running "Progressive Media which was begun by Tom Matzzie and David Brock in 2008 and now 'represents a serious ratcheting up of efforts to present a united liberal front in the coming policy wars....' [These groups] are working hard to push Obama's policies, including rationalizlng or defending his escalation of the wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan as "sustainable security."
On Wednesday, Ben Smith at Politico reported on the latest development in this White House-coordinated campaign to use these think-tankers to whip up support for its agenda. It is a newly formed coalition, the Common Purpose Project, which blogger Jane Hamsher describes as "one of the many groups Rahm Emanuel has set up to coordinate messaging among liberal interest groups." This one includes the direct participation of White House officials, according to Smith:
Unlike those other groups, however, the Common Purpose meeting has involved a White House official, communications director Ellen Moran, two sources familiar with the meeting said. It's aimed, said one, at "providing a way for the White House to manage its relationships with some of these independent groups."
Common Purpose was founded by Erik Smith, a former aide to Dick Gephardt. The group's political director is former Obama aide, Miti Sathe. "Common Purpose is formed as a 501(c)(4), which leaves it focused on policy, rather than electoral, work," notes Smith. "Part of the group's role is to enforce a kind of message discipline." He tells the story of how last month "some of the more liberal members of the coalition" were launching a campaign against conservative Democrats under the banner "Dog the Blue Dogs." The White House, Smith alleged, "was in the midst of discussions with members of the congressional Blue Dog caucus, and objected to the slogan, which was promptly changed, and the page describing the drive is gone from CAF, Campaign for America's Future, a participant in the Common Purposes calls's website."
Hamsher, who wrote an interesting response to the Politico report with a different spin on the above story, concluded:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeremy-scahill/rahm-emanuels-think-tanke_b_185203.html
ananda
(28,837 posts)???
scruboak
(34 posts)Huh? Troops are being gradually withdrawn from Afghanistan, and the Pakistan engagement has been almost solely through drones, which is also being de-escalated.
What kind of fact-free reporting is this?
Of course Progressive groups are out there doing P.R. I remember (about five minutes ago) when we were complaining because they WEREN'T doing enough to counteract Republican lies. Now we're supposed to be upset that they have a message and they're successful at getting it out there. Wut?
Five minutes, America. That's all it's been. Can we please try to retain our memories beyond five minutes? It doesn't seem like much to ask.
scruboak
(34 posts)Apparently OP likes to flog a dead horse for a really long, long time.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)MineralMan
(146,262 posts)It's right in there, just under the title in the body of the post.
How can you comment without reading the thing about which you're commenting?
See:
Posted April 9, 2009--Jeremy Scahill
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)MineralMan
(146,262 posts)Really? Surely, there is current information you could be posting. Or perhaps not.
Leme
(1,092 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)"Don't Worry....They're Here"... is the point....
Article is 2009....but see how its all worked out... Memories fade......