Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,056 posts)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 05:11 PM Jun 2014

Al Gore: The Most Important Step Taken to Combat Climate Change in Our Country's History

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/al-gore/the-most-important-step-t_b_5435702.html


Chairman, Generation Investment Management and The Climate Reality Project

The Most Important Step Taken to Combat Climate Change in Our Country's History
Posted: 06/03/2014 12:25 am EDT Updated: 06/03/2014 8:59 am EDT


Today's announcement by the Obama administration to reduce our nation's global warming pollution from power plants is the most important step taken to combat the climate crisis in our country's history.

We simply cannot continue to use the atmosphere as an open sewer for dirty and dangerous global warming pollution that endangers our health and makes storms, floods, mudslides and droughts much more dangerous and threatening -- not only in the future, but here and now. As with the connection between tobacco and lung cancer, special interests have vehemently denied the linkage between carbon emissions and the climate crisis. But the reality of global warming is now much more apparent and many more people are beginning to demand action. These same special interests now recognize that change is inevitable, but continue to trot out misleading and false claims to spread confusion and delay action for as long as they can. However, it is now clear that further inaction would be extremely dangerous and destructive for America and the rest of the world.

Fortunately, because of the innovation and hard work of America's businesses, scientists and engineers, we now have clean energy solutions that are way more efficient, economically competitive and more widely available than ever before. Solar and wind power are already cheaper than the old dirty sources of energy in many areas, and are getting cheaper every year -- the same way cellphones and computers did.

Following years of stronger and more frequent storms, unprecedented flooding and killer mudslides, widespread drought and spreading wildfires -- not to mention record-breaking heat waves, the need for bold action is obvious and urgent. President Obama has taken hold of the challenges we face through a series of critical actions, empowering the EPA to enforce limits on CO2 emissions for new power plants, accelerating the adoption of renewable energy and enforcing bold new standards for fuel economy, while continuing to raise awareness of the urgency of the climate crisis and reestablish American leadership on the global stage.

Solving the climate crisis will no doubt be difficult, but -- thanks to this action by President Obama and many others -- we are now in a position to put ourselves on the path to a sustainable future.
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Al Gore: The Most Important Step Taken to Combat Climate Change in Our Country's History (Original Post) babylonsister Jun 2014 OP
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #1
KandR mylye2222 Jun 2014 #2
k&r n/t RainDog Jun 2014 #3
"Years Of Living Dangerously" on Showtime, if you dont have Showtime randys1 Jun 2014 #4
Contributing to Gore's Law Prophet 451 Jun 2014 #5
this is serious shit and to those repukes who say it should be Congress's role to do this... CTyankee Jun 2014 #6
Shutting Up Limbaugh would be a great first step Demeter Jun 2014 #7
Except this just enables coal exports. joshcryer Jun 2014 #8
That still changes the economic incentive geek tragedy Jun 2014 #9
There are still plenty of willing buyers in the developing world. joshcryer Jun 2014 #10
the developing world is pretty much going solar and wind-powered rosesaylavee Jun 2014 #16
Not true. joshcryer Jun 2014 #17
Here's where developing nations are developing sustainable energy sources. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #18
+1000 rosesaylavee Jun 2014 #20
Hello, rosesaylavee, Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #21
US Coal Exports Erode All CO2 Savings from Shale Gas joshcryer Jun 2014 #22
I believe this trend will decline as global warming's impact Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #27
these links should make you feel a bit better rosesaylavee Jun 2014 #19
I'm not saying renewables won't play a part. joshcryer Jun 2014 #23
True. rosesaylavee Jun 2014 #24
I hope you're right. joshcryer Jun 2014 #25
there is a graphic I just searched for and am not finding rosesaylavee Jun 2014 #26
Yeah, new coal plants are expensive. joshcryer Jun 2014 #29
What do you think the answer is? rosesaylavee Jun 2014 #31
Fee and dividend (carbon tax). joshcryer Jun 2014 #32
As long as this is an Al Gore thread... rosesaylavee Jun 2014 #28
That is a good video, rosesaylavee. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #34
Yes. rosesaylavee Jun 2014 #35
Bravo President Obama, "At Last", Etta James saidsimplesimon Jun 2014 #11
At some point in the future WHEN CRABS ROAR Jun 2014 #12
if we are around to shake our heads...at the rate we are going, it might not take that long to get CTyankee Jun 2014 #13
Ahh, you've been paying attention. WHEN CRABS ROAR Jun 2014 #15
There still doesn't appear ohheckyeah Jun 2014 #33
This is a great thing. dawg Jun 2014 #14
Good! And, the NYT Chimes in .. Cha Jun 2014 #30
Thanks to Al Gore, President Obama & babylonsister. David Zephyr Jun 2014 #36
Gods I wish Al Gore had been president when he was elected. Even so, he's a statesman... Hekate Jun 2014 #37
K&R.... daleanime Jun 2014 #38
K & R malaise Jun 2014 #39
K&R. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #40
I'm glad to see the President do this. navarth Jun 2014 #41
*Sigh* This all sounds so nice... but skepticscott Jun 2014 #42
I don't believe this will be the end all in methods of fighting carbon pollution Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #43
"Mother Nature will not allow it"? skepticscott Jun 2014 #44
Mother Nature talks to everyone Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #45
 

mylye2222

(2,992 posts)
2. KandR
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 05:13 PM
Jun 2014

Powerfull statement, continuing his honorable fight, well awarded by his documentary " An inconvenient truth"

randys1

(16,286 posts)
4. "Years Of Living Dangerously" on Showtime, if you dont have Showtime
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 05:14 PM
Jun 2014

Figure out how to see this series from James Cameron

astounding stuff

We are in real bad shape climate change wise, real proud of Obama today

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
5. Contributing to Gore's Law
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 05:22 PM
Jun 2014

Gore's Law: As a discussion on climate change goes on, the chances that a denier will devolve to insulting Al Gore approaches 1.

He's right, of course.

CTyankee

(63,903 posts)
6. this is serious shit and to those repukes who say it should be Congress's role to do this...
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 05:51 PM
Jun 2014

I say yes, it should be. But look at you slackers, you deniers, you standing against the doors of progress to refuse to do anything and let us all bake and rot to death...you don't even care about your own children and grandchildren....it's all about Obama and your insane belief that human activity had NOTHING to do with climate change (you know who you are!).

I have been in a rant all day about the storm in Congress that I know is coming and I am fed up...

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
10. There are still plenty of willing buyers in the developing world.
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 06:09 PM
Jun 2014

Particularly because we refuse to export cleaner intellectual property (it's one reason Rio+20 was an abject failure).

rosesaylavee

(12,126 posts)
16. the developing world is pretty much going solar and wind-powered
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 10:40 PM
Jun 2014

The US and the UK are the clunkers in this regard - changing what we do here just may save the planet. Even China is on board and working on a carbon tax for 2015.

Uncle Joe

(58,351 posts)
18. Here's where developing nations are developing sustainable energy sources.
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 10:56 PM
Jun 2014


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy_in_developing_countries

Most developing countries have abundant renewable energy resources, including solar energy, wind power, geothermal energy, and biomass, as well as the ability to manufacture the relatively labor-intensive systems that harness these. By developing such energy sources developing countries can reduce their dependence on oil and natural gas, creating energy portfolios that are less vulnerable to price rises. In many circumstances, these investments can be less expensive than fossil fuel energy systems.[1]

(snip)

Kenya is the world leader in the number of solar power systems installed per capita (but not the number of watts added). More than 30,000 small solar panels, each producing 12 to 30 watts, are sold in Kenya annually. Kenya was the first African country to use geothermal power, and still has the largest installed capacity of geothermal power in Africa at 200 MW, with a potential of up to 10 GW.[3]

(snip)

Many recent the importance of developing countries in advancing renewable energy. Collectively, developing countries have more than half of global renewable power capacity. China and India are rapidly expanding markets for renewable. Brazil produces most of the world’s sugar-derived ethanol and has been adding new biomass and wind power plants. Many renewable markets are growing at rapid rates in countries such as Argentina, Costa Rica, Egypt, Indonesia, Kenya, Tanzania, Thailand, Tunisia, and Uruguay.[6]

(snip)

The Philippines could be considered a world leader in renewable energy, with its 30 percent of its power generation being powered by the renewable energy sector. The Philippines is the world's second largest genarator of geothermal energy and was the first Southeast Asian nation to invest in large-scale solar and wind technologies.[15]



There is more on the link.

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
22. US Coal Exports Erode All CO2 Savings from Shale Gas
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:15 PM
Jun 2014
As coal consumption declines in the US, our domestic CO2 emissions have dropped—but our coal exports have increased. Is the reduction of national emissions countered by an increase in international emissions? We examine the rising international exports of US coal and quantify its effects on net CO2 emissions. We find that, from 2007 to 2012, US domestic CO2 savings from coal-to-gas fuel switching was more than offset by the increases through the exported CO2 emissions. The interaction between the domestic and international markets lays bare a gaping hole in climate management policies. To decisively cut CO2 emissions, displaced coal in the US electricity sector should remain in the ground. However, the market for shale gas by itself cannot guarantee such an outcome. Both domestic climate management policies and international coordination are needed to achieve meaningful cuts in CO2 emissions.

http://co2scorecard.org/home/researchitem/29


There's more at the link. For CO2 limitations to be meaningful the coal must stay in the ground.

Uncle Joe

(58,351 posts)
27. I believe this trend will decline as global warming's impact
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:30 PM
Jun 2014

becomes ever more severe and sustainable energy development and financing increases.

I hope it's in time.

rosesaylavee

(12,126 posts)
24. True.
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:18 PM
Jun 2014

Personally working on making that happen on a few different fronts. It is a fight we have on our hands but one we will win.

rosesaylavee

(12,126 posts)
26. there is a graphic I just searched for and am not finding
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:25 PM
Jun 2014

but out of the 150 coal plants proposed in the mid 2000s, 65 were cancelled. Working on getting one of the dirtiest ones to go away here in my state... and with luck and the legal system working properly, that just may happen. People are engaged now - more than ever - and this business as usual thing is just not going to continue.

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
29. Yeah, new coal plants are expensive.
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:31 PM
Jun 2014

Because of more stringent pollution standards. They just refurbish them. There probably won't be any more new MW power plants ever built again. My concern isn't the draw down in coal plants, I think that trajectory could be forseen a decade ago. My concern is coal exports, and I think it's in the US's interests (whether good or bad; the policy makers) to make sure coal is exported. And that's why Rio+20 failed. The US wants developing countries to be dependent on its coal because there's still a crapton still left in the ground (I think Peak Coal is about 15 years from now).

rosesaylavee

(12,126 posts)
31. What do you think the answer is?
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:34 PM
Jun 2014

Maybe better jobs for those people working in the mines and at the coal plants?

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
32. Fee and dividend (carbon tax).
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:42 PM
Jun 2014

Set aside a fund for all miners and associated workers from the carbon taxes. Extremely difficult to pass politically, unfortunately. Thus my cynicism.

rosesaylavee

(12,126 posts)
28. As long as this is an Al Gore thread...
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:30 PM
Jun 2014

This video is like a tonic. I watch this when I begin to doubt we can fix this ... but we will turn this craziness around ... we just need to do it together and we will.



You're welcome.

rosesaylavee

(12,126 posts)
35. Yes.
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:52 PM
Jun 2014

Yes it is. I am doing climate presentations now and end them with this to rally the crowd. It's a pretty grim scenario out there ... but it certainly helps to have AG state unequivocally that we are up to the challenge and will 'transcend' ourselves.

WHEN CRABS ROAR

(3,813 posts)
12. At some point in the future
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 07:08 PM
Jun 2014

we will shake our heads and ask ourselves, what could we have been thinking, not to realize what we were doing to ourselves and the earth.

CTyankee

(63,903 posts)
13. if we are around to shake our heads...at the rate we are going, it might not take that long to get
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 07:44 PM
Jun 2014

us extinct on the planet.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
33. There still doesn't appear
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:48 PM
Jun 2014

to be great urgency about the matter. The streets of Miami Beach and Norfolk, VA are flooding at high tide; Sacramento is experiencing salt-water infiltration in the ground water; drought abounds in some areas of the country, and people are still burying their heads in the sand. One of my sisters said "I can't do anything about it, God has our back and maybe Jesus will come back soon and it won't matter." I wanted to scream.

dawg

(10,624 posts)
14. This is a great thing.
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 07:47 PM
Jun 2014

President Obama has shown real leadership in making this move. He deserves all the credit in the world for this.

Hekate

(90,645 posts)
37. Gods I wish Al Gore had been president when he was elected. Even so, he's a statesman...
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 11:59 PM
Jun 2014

... something Bush/Cheney will never be.

Thank you sir for your vision.

navarth

(5,927 posts)
41. I'm glad to see the President do this.
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 03:00 PM
Jun 2014

Yes I am pretty bugged with him about some things but I really like to have an opportunity to say thanks to him. It gives me some hope.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
42. *Sigh* This all sounds so nice... but
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 09:46 PM
Jun 2014

No one, and I mean no one, is daring to speak the real truth here. Even if all of this works exactly as planned, legislatively and environmentally, by the time 2035 rolls around, greenhouse gas levels will still be significantly higher than they are now. The best any of these proposals will do is to slow the rate of increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, but it will still go up and up, almost certainly taking us past tipping points that we cannot recover from (assuming we're not past them already). We're not even close to being able to do anything to reduce overall greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere, and will likely not be until it is far too late (again, assuming that it isn't already).

None of the people talking "cap-and-trade" and other policy wonkish things will come right out and say this, but they know it's true.

Uncle Joe

(58,351 posts)
43. I don't believe this will be the end all in methods of fighting carbon pollution
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 09:58 PM
Jun 2014

and in alleviating the worst effects of global warming.

This is just one successful battle in an ongoing political war and I believe it is a good step forward but more environmental reforms must follow.

The situation is not static certainly not from an environmental standpoint and the same can be said for the political realm as well, Mother Nature will simply not allow it, nor can we.


 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
44. "Mother Nature will not allow it"?
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 10:10 PM
Jun 2014

What does that mean exactly? Have you talked to her?

"Mother Nature" does not care about human beings, human civilization or human inconvenience or suffering. "She" doesn't care about anything at all, in fact. The notion that "things could never get THAT bad" may be comforting, but it has no basis in reality.

Uncle Joe

(58,351 posts)
45. Mother Nature talks to everyone
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 10:26 PM
Jun 2014

every time there is a record breaking drought, fire, flood, mudslide, catastrophic storm, with the increase in number and magnitude of tornadoes, as the oceans become more acidic and sea life dies off increasing the cost of food.

The insurance industry is waking up to Mother Nature's screams and if there is one thing the Republicans and the American People in general (even if they're in denial) do and will hear is the cries of the almighty dollar as the ever increasing cost of doing nothing becomes more and more apparent.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jack-skelley/cities-take-the-heat-for-_b_5442980.html

Cities Take the Heat for Global Warming

Meanwhile, the disastrous climate studies pile up: The earth is facing mass extinctions Antarctic glacier collapse is unstoppable, and hundreds of cities will be swamped by sea-level rise.

(snip)

But while Washington fiddles, America's cities are responding -- if only by necessity. A very interesting development on this front happened in April: Farmers Insurance filed class-action lawsuits against the city of Chicago, arguing it is not sufficiently preparing for disastrous heavy rainfall resulting from climate change.

You can see where this is headed: Unless we do something big soon, climate disasters are only getting worse, and the insurance giant doesn't want to be left holding the bag. Someone has to pay homeowners and other policy holders the cost of ruined property.

As Climate Progress reporter Ari Phillips explained, the lawsuits aim to force cities "to take a more forward-looking approach in designing and engineering for a future made different by climate change."

It's a case of one big industry (insurance companies) attempting to get someone to take responsibility for the disastrous by-products of another industry (fossil fuel companies). Insurers are also cutting their ties to industry groups that deny climate change is real. In 2012, State Farm stopped giving money to right-wing think tank and global-warming skeptic The Heartland Institute.



Mother Nature is going to show them the money.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Al Gore: The Most Import...