send me a pm and I'll give you one (address)

I must have and it's going to look great next to my-
I (heart) Obamacare
and
Don't Tread on my Obamacare (featuring coiled stethoscope in lieu of serpent)

if you pm me I'll give you one (address)

seeing as how they are all created by humans. Also, one voter's definition of perfection in a political party may differ from another's. The perfect party for a progressive may not be so for someone who happens to be a moderate, and it may even differ from another progressive's perspective of perfection. For example, I have came across progressives in real life who have criticized the Green Party's emphasis on environmental issues over other issues.
Getting back to the image from the OP, the Democrats (out of all the political parties) arguably hold the most realistic vision of governance and the best shot for progressives and moderate voters getting what we want in the future. Democrats want to govern, while Republicans obviously do not. However, Republicans are becoming desperate as they are losing their ability to be competitive in presidential elections. There is only a matter of time before it's time for re-apportionment (which coincides with a presidential year), and the gerrymandered districts get redrawn.

for the part that Republicans don't want to govern. They want to control (very different thing). But they can't openly admit that so they say they are against big government. Probably what you meant?

They basically don't want government to do it's job in most cases, but they want to be able to dictate people's private lives.

I may not agree with the party line solution to a problem, but I can be pretty certain "exorcism" or "let's get a big stadium and pray in it" isn't going to be a part of it.

...but just being a little better than the Crazies isn't very inspirational.
That is a very low bar.

In a sane country, that would be enough to give the less than perfect party control of the legislature.

They ARE nuts!

sounds about perfect.

& while it's true, it kind of gets to something Bill Maher was talking about re: Democrats and/or the ACA. We always start off with the, "No, this isn't perfect" - thing. It's like we're partially admitting defeat before the fight's even started. The other side never does that. They tell you about all the good aspects of it. They don't mention the bad. They're always on the attack. We're always on our heels.

and that is coming together when things count.

Otherwise, insanity prevails.

I got fired long ago because I couldn't explain to the boss' brain dead brother why the time for one of his ee was correct. He was an ex-boxer and it showed.