Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 07:54 PM Jun 2014

QUESTION: What are Veteran groups or Veteran/Enlisted saying about POW Bergdahl's release?

As I understand the military, their code of brotherhood leaves no soldier to die a captive in a foreign country. Regardless.

Has anyone heard any statements from a military branch that supports the return of Bergdahl?

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
QUESTION: What are Veteran groups or Veteran/Enlisted saying about POW Bergdahl's release? (Original Post) misterhighwasted Jun 2014 OP
Go to just about any web forum populated with vets or those serving, or place where they comment Lee-Lee Jun 2014 #1
Pretty much this. hardtravelin Jun 2014 #3
Thank you. 840high Jun 2014 #6
Exactly our thoughts.... giftedgirl77 Jun 2014 #9
Thanks. 840high Jun 2014 #4
Too bad they don't express that for the Deserter in Chief TexasProgresive Jun 2014 #10
he was a conservative elite, though, so it's ok eShirl Jun 2014 #14
Is there a better source for this than the Moonie Times? eom MohRokTah Jun 2014 #13
As for veterans groups Lee-Lee Jun 2014 #2
I can't speak for other Veterans, or Veteran groups... NavyDem Jun 2014 #5
The investigation into his capture hasn't been released Lee-Lee Jun 2014 #7
Thanks NavyDem Jun 2014 #8
The psyche can fracture. misterhighwasted Jun 2014 #11
No question about it Andy823 Jun 2014 #12
 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
1. Go to just about any web forum populated with vets or those serving, or place where they comment
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 08:11 PM
Jun 2014

From the Army Facebook page to articles in Army Times and the comments.

The overwhelming sentiment seems to be "Glad we got him back, now bring him to justice for desertion and endangering everyone else."

Leave no man behind doesn't absolve them from accountability for their actions once returned.

And I saw this just now, interesting if true:


The Pentagon on several occasions had ground-level intelligence on where ArmySgt. Bowe Bergdahl was being held captive at various times — down to how many gunmen were guarding him — but special operations commanders repeatedly shelved rescue missions because they didn’t want to risk casualties for a man they believed to be a “deserter,” sources familiar with the mission plans said.



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/2/pentagon-knew-berghdahls-whereabouts-but-didnt-ris/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS

I will say I understand the difference between risking to rescue someone who was captured doing their job and risking to attempt to get somebody who willingly went, in disregard for orders and rules, and the deal didn't work out like he hoped.

hardtravelin

(190 posts)
3. Pretty much this.
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 08:19 PM
Jun 2014

I am active duty Army (Infantry). The universal expression from EVERYONE active duty is: glad he's back; if he warrants punishment, nail his ass to the wall.

A good friend of mine, SSG Clay Bowen died from an IED while he set up and manned a blocking position as Bergdahl's unit raided a village (which turned into a dry hole, obviously) in an effort to find him. Clay died on the 18th of July, about 2 weeks after Bergdahl deserted. By that time he was likely already in Pakistan.

Emotions are running high out here in the regular Army.

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
9. Exactly our thoughts....
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 08:31 PM
Jun 2014

My husband & I were just talking about it as we were deployed at the time & actually remember commenting on who in the hell wanders off in the middle of a combat zone. There is no love lost if he walked off, but there is no doubt that we needed to bring him home.

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
10. Too bad they don't express that for the Deserter in Chief
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 08:38 PM
Jun 2014

When will George W. Bush be brought to justice for desertion, let alone taking U.S. troops into a war under false pretenses? That's what this veteran wants to know.

eShirl

(18,490 posts)
14. he was a conservative elite, though, so it's ok
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 09:44 AM
Jun 2014

Can't expect a Bush to be held to the same law as the rest of us

NavyDem

(525 posts)
5. I can't speak for other Veterans, or Veteran groups...
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 08:22 PM
Jun 2014

But my thought is that it was the right thing to do to get him back. If he did indeed desert, he will have the opportunity to defend his actions via non judicial punishment or courts martial whichever is appropriate.

I haven't followed the story in it's entirety, so I have to ask: Was he confirmed to be a deserter?

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
7. The investigation into his capture hasn't been released
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 08:26 PM
Jun 2014

But pretty much all the evidence available, and all those who were on that outpost with him, point toward such.

I would be hard pressed to find another explanation for him being gone, with his gear neatly piled and left behind and a note left.

And that has been the consensus pretty much since he went missing.

NavyDem

(525 posts)
8. Thanks
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 08:29 PM
Jun 2014

I still stand by bringing him back home 100%. If he has deserted, it would be nice to get a follow-up as to what caused him to desert. I thought I read a story that he disappeared shortly after one of his friends was KIA.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
11. The psyche can fracture.
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 09:19 AM
Jun 2014

No matter how strong someone once was or how well trained a soldier is, the psyche can fracture.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
12. No question about it
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 09:31 AM
Jun 2014

Bringing him home was the right thing to do. As for the other accusations they will be dealt with and whatever the truth is will come out. War is hell and many people break, we need to know all the details, not just accept what is being said, especially what is being said by the right who only care about trying to turn this into another BS scandal to attack the president.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»QUESTION: What are Vetera...