FAIR: 'Muddying a Murky Picture': NYT's Ukraine Kremlinology
'Muddying a Murky Picture': NYT's Ukraine Kremlinology
By Peter Hart
There is a tendency to believe that Russian president Vladimir Putin is orchestrating the unrest in eastern Ukraine, sending in irregular Russian forces to stir up pro-Russian separatist sentiment. As guesses go, this might not be a bad onebut journalism is supposed to be about presenting evidence to confirm such speculation. The New York Times clearly has a hunch about deep Russian involvement in Ukraine. The ways it tries to confirm this hunch are curious.
Back in April, the Times got into some trouble (FAIR Blog, 4/23/14) with a "scoop" showing photos of people they claimed were Russian special forces and intelligence forces. A few days later, the Times was conveying skepticism about its own storyskepticism noticeably lacking in the original report.
<SNIP>
So the fighters raise "new questions" about Russian "role"but there's no evidence the fighters are Russian soldiers. But Putin has such a "powerful will" that "motley assortments" of fighters wouldn't be there if he didn't want them to be thereso say the "experts."
As if that wasn't curious enough, the Times adds:
The disclosure of Russian nationals among the fighters here muddies an already murky picture of the complex connections and allegiances that are beginning to form. While their presence does not draw a straight line to the Kremlin, it raises the possibility of a more subtle Russian game that could keep Ukraine unbalanced for years.
So, to recap: There is no evidence that Russia is in control of any of this, but the lack of such evidence may be a sign of a "more subtle" game.
Full discussion from FAIR (Fairness and accuracy in Reporting)
http://www.fair.org/blog/2014/06/03/muddying-a-murky-picture-nyts-ukraine-kremlinology/
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.)