General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVA Care: Still the Best Care Anywhere?
Solidly researched perspective here.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/06/02/poll-americans-view-of-va-health-care-scandal/9863621/
Last week, when I accepted an invitation to go on Hugh Hewitts nationally syndicated talk show, his first question to me was, So how does it feel to be the author of a book about the VA that has been thoroughly discredited?
Well, yes, as the author of the title Best Care Anywhere, Why VA Health Care would be Better for Everyone, its been dispiriting to have it confirmed by a preliminary inspector generals report that some frontline VA employees in Phoenix and elsewhere have been gaming a key performance metric regarding wait times. But whats really has me enervated is how the dominate media narrative of the VA scandal has become so essentially misleading and damaging to the cause of health care delivery system reform.
<snip>
Just what do we know about how crowded VA hospitals are generally? Heres a key relevant fact that is just the opposite of what most people think. For all the wars weve been fighting, the veterans population has been falling sharply . Nationwide, their number fell by 17 percent between 2000 and 2014, primarily due to the passing of the huge cohorts of World War II- and Korea War-era vets. The decline has been particularly steep in California and throughout much of New England, the Mid-Atlantic and industrial Midwest, where the fall off has ranged between 21 percent and 36.7 percent.
Reflecting this decline, as well a general trend toward more outpatient services, many VA hospitals in these areas, including flagship facilities, want for nothing except sufficient numbers of patients to maintain their long-term viability. I have visited VA hospitals around the county and often been unnerved by how empty they are. When I visited two of the VAs four state-of-the-art, breathtakingly advanced polytrauma units, in Palo Alto and Minneapolis, there was hardly a patient to be found.
But at the same time there is a comparatively small countertrend that results from large migrations of aging veterans from the Rust Belt and California to lower-cost retirement centers in the Sun Belt. And this flow, combined with more liberal eligibility standards that allow more Vietnam vets to receive VA treatment for such chronic conditions as ischemic heart disease and Parkinsons, means that in some of these areas, such as, Phoenix, VA capacity is indeed under significant strain.
<snip>
Similarly, if VA care were not generally very good, the VA would not continue to rank extraordinarily high in independent surveys of patient satisfaction. Recently discharged VA hospital patients for example, rate their experience 4 points higher than the average for the health care industry as a whole. Fully 96 percent say they would turn to VA inpatient care again.
Now if you go out looking for vets who say they have been victimized by the VA, you will have no trouble finding them, and many will be justified in their complaints. But as Ill argue further in future posts, the key question to ask when confronting the real deficiencies of the VA is compared to what? Once that context is established, it becomes clear that VA as a whole continues to outperform the rest of the American health system, making its true lessons extremely important to learn.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)He was taken there by his wife when he started slurring his speech and had a horrific headache. They "checked him out" and sent him home.. He had a massive stroke 4 hours later and died after lingering 26 days