Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 09:19 AM Jun 2014

The end of fish



People are getting more adventurous with how they eat, and when it comes to seafood, this means exhaustively looking to every exotic corner for the best, newest and tastiest fish. Also, the stuff is delicious. Seafood is a critical portion of more than 3 billion people’s diets. Already, 90 percent of U.S. seafood is imported.

This can’t last. The oceans are stretched, and certain fish species are approaching depletion. Leading scientists project that if we continue to fish this way, without allowing our oceans time to recover, our oceans could become virtual deserts by 2050. That’s just 36 years from now. Given that demand for seafood – along with the world’s population – is rising, don’t be surprised if this window closes even faster. Make your peace with fish, because it may not last much longer.

We’re not biologists and we’re not scientists, but in 2010 – aboard the TED Prize Mission Blue voyage to the Galapagos – we joined 100 of the world’s leading ocean scholars and advocates. The expedition, led by National Geographic explorer and that year’s TED Prize winner, Dr. Sylvia Earle, made us acutely aware of the overfishing crisis.

If this sounds alarmist, look at the data. The Census of Marine Life concluded in 2010 that 90 percent of the large fish are gone, primarily because of overfishing. This includes many of the fish we love to eat, like Atlantic salmon, tuna, halibut, swordfish, Atlantic cod. If we don’t allow for proper recovery, these fish risk total extinction.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/06/03/the-end-of-fish
69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The end of fish (Original Post) onehandle Jun 2014 OP
But Abe Vigoda lives on lame54 Jun 2014 #1
Let's check... onehandle Jun 2014 #2
That is amazing. He must be like 142 by now. More power to him, love the Abe Vigoda. nt ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2014 #14
Much more than 50% of the fish we eat now is farmed KurtNYC Jun 2014 #3
everything you said. nt laundry_queen Jun 2014 #5
Otter populations still not recovered from 19th C fur mania marginlized Jun 2014 #52
Krill is very big in Japan pscot Jun 2014 #55
Human birth control needs increased seveneyes Jun 2014 #4
Um...China has a one child policy and the US has a birthrate of .65 KurtNYC Jun 2014 #7
And why do we need such huge supplies of energy? BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #12
dirty energy is killing the planet -- not children KurtNYC Jun 2014 #15
babies are people. people use resources. dirty fuel is cheap. BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #17
Too many repukes for sure. L0oniX Jun 2014 #9
There might be fewer in the future seveneyes Jun 2014 #16
My guess is sooner than 30. glinda Jun 2014 #6
My guess is never Reter Jun 2014 #60
perhaps a greater collapse of wild fish stocks may be coming Leme Jun 2014 #8
can we talk about HUMAN OVERPOPULATION YET??????? BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #10
Doug Stanhope has it right marginlized Jun 2014 #54
time to become a jellyfish connoisseur shanti Jun 2014 #11
Not to mention smallcat88 Jun 2014 #13
Rev Moon's Unification Church controls more than half this nation's fishing industry and has since blm Jun 2014 #18
hmmmm, big statement about what Moonists control, link please : ) nt Leme Jun 2014 #20
Hoping to defend the Moonies from the bad old lefties, eh, Leme? blm Jun 2014 #21
nah, jus seems unlikely to me they control over 50 % nt Leme Jun 2014 #22
Because? You never paid much attention to the RW 'news' sources pushing the anti-Dem talking points blm Jun 2014 #23
some false claims are just hard not to see, such as yours ........ : )........ nt Leme Jun 2014 #25
LOLOL - And you can prove I made a false claim, Mr. Leme/RandPaul2016? blm Jun 2014 #27
I went to links, and found no such claim Leme Jun 2014 #24
Those links supported Moon's dominance of the fishing industry. You can play your games all you want blm Jun 2014 #26
you equate majority Leme Jun 2014 #30
Nope. The sushi article came out last decade. Frontline doc came out in 1992. What IS goofy blm Jun 2014 #31
show me a quote from your links which says: Leme Jun 2014 #32
Show me proof you watched the Frontline documentary. And show proof that control of sushi industry blm Jun 2014 #33
I don't need show anything, YOU made goofy claim Leme Jun 2014 #34
I can't force you to read or watch a documentary. You're involved in your own game blm Jun 2014 #35
its NOT there Leme Jun 2014 #36
I can't force you to use logic or watch a 1992 Frontline documentary. blm Jun 2014 #38
like i said, sounded untrue. Leme Jun 2014 #39
LOL - Only someone invested in defending RW propaganda media would insist there is nothing blm Jun 2014 #40
geez, either you are this or that.. Leme Jun 2014 #41
It is not an untruth, but, you need to pretend it is, because, it's a truth about Moonie world. blm Jun 2014 #42
the facts are not in your links, and are not even claimed in them..............nt Leme Jun 2014 #43
Yes, they are. Moon controlled over 1/3 when the documentary was made and he increased his blm Jun 2014 #45
like I said about your claim, it is false Leme Jun 2014 #46
You didn't watch the Frontline documentary. And SUPPLYING the fish for sushi IS part of the fishing blm Jun 2014 #49
you claim I didn't watch it; I said YOU couldn't FORCE me to watch it) Leme Jun 2014 #50
Simple math, simple logic. Over 1/3 in 1990 + continuous buyouts of smaller companies blm Jun 2014 #51
like I said Leme Jun 2014 #57
Logic, not magic. You can't show that his holdings since 1990 shrunk instead of grew blm Jun 2014 #58
i don't have to show his holding grew or Leme Jun 2014 #59
NBC News and Frontline reported he controlled over 1/3 the FISHING INDUSTRY in 1990 blm Jun 2014 #63
lol Leme Jun 2014 #64
LOL - Then you can't read. It's in the transcript. blm Jun 2014 #67
K&R nt redqueen Jun 2014 #19
Humans are the heralds of the next big extinction. chrisa Jun 2014 #28
Healthy plant-based diets, goddammit. nt Codeine Jun 2014 #29
I just can't do that yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #37
oh fucking please. kwassa Jun 2014 #47
Then eat leaves yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #48
I forgot that no one who eats charred meat *ever* gets cancer! villager Jun 2014 #53
This is sarcasm, right? flvegan Jun 2014 #56
An anecdote is not data. LeftyMom Jun 2014 #61
For those people that downplay the threat from global warming, this should be a wake up call Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #44
I very rarely eat seafood anymore Flying Squirrel Jun 2014 #62
If only there were something we could do, almost immediately flvegan Jun 2014 #65
But what if I don't want to buy a Vega? LeftyMom Jun 2014 #66
I raise my own fish in my small 1/2 acre pond. B Calm Jun 2014 #68
About all we can do is invest as much money into the great minds of the markets as possible. raouldukelives Jun 2014 #69

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
3. Much more than 50% of the fish we eat now is farmed
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 10:29 AM
Jun 2014

even much of what is labelled "wild caught" was started in commercial hatcheries. Tilapia would not be available at all without farming.

Why do the alarm ringers always seem to make it about the distant future? 2050 is a year pulled out of their butt -- large wild fish are already mostly gone. The oceans are now a giant heat sink for climate change and therefore they aren't going to "recover" during our lifetimes.

http://www.fishwatch.gov/features/top10seafoods_and_sources_10_10_12.html

marginlized

(357 posts)
52. Otter populations still not recovered from 19th C fur mania
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 09:15 PM
Jun 2014

Anyone who's seen an urchin barren off South California knows this. Sea urchins being otter food.

Watch those 8mm home movies from the 1950's of guys piling abalones on their surf boards. And they're standing in four feet of water.

Its a marvel we have whales at all. Oh yeah, they eat krill and we're not competing for krill.

Entomophagy, anyone?

pscot

(21,024 posts)
55. Krill is very big in Japan
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 09:34 PM
Jun 2014

One quarter of the Japanese catch of E. superba is used in the form of fresh frozen krill as fish bait and half the E. pacifica catch is used as chum for sport fishing. About 43% of the Japanese catch of E. superba is processed for human consumption. The Japanese industry produces boiled, frozen krill and peeled tail meat. Other uses include krill pastes or processed krill as food additives, e.g. in the form of krill oil gel capsules.

Freeze dried blocks of krill are also fed to animals.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
7. Um...China has a one child policy and the US has a birthrate of .65
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 10:54 AM
Jun 2014

meaning for every 100 Americans alive today there will be only 65 in the next generation.

But the birthrate has almost nothing to do with ecology -- there is very little carbon emitted during child birth. The issue is about using dirty and wasteful means of producing cheap energy and doing almost nothing to make systems cleaner and more efficient.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
12. And why do we need such huge supplies of energy?
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 11:18 AM
Jun 2014

It's not the isolated process of childbirth that's killing the planet. After that singular event, you've got a person who will be using resources and producing waste. For about 75 years.

It's the ever increasing numbers of us, globally, each one of us looking to survive at best, be comfortable and live a "first world" lifestyle, westernizing influence, global corporations ....

Mass production, to satisfy ever growing masses, worldwide. First world countries, and emerging industrialized countries.

Population may be declining in a few countries but that is not true overall.



KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
15. dirty energy is killing the planet -- not children
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 11:28 AM
Jun 2014

The birthrate in the US has gone way down but we are still #1 in greenhouse gas per person so it isn't the number of peoplethat is the problem. We have to get cleaner energy sources online ASAP.

The problem is carbon, not babies.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
17. babies are people. people use resources. dirty fuel is cheap.
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 12:02 PM
Jun 2014

Human population is global. We are not the only industrialised nation.

Unlimited growth of one single species is the philosophy of a cancer cell.

People are driving the mass extinctions going on. Global population is rising.

People are the problem. Babies are people, we have a lifespan, we each use resources and create waste over that span.

I need to go right now. Work.

smallcat88

(426 posts)
13. Not to mention
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 11:19 AM
Jun 2014

In the last episode of Cosmos, Tyson pointed out that the oceans absorb a lot of that excess CO2 we pump into the atmosphere and it's killing the oceans. Killing the oceans totally screws the whole life cycle for the planet. It's not just the fish . . .

blm

(113,043 posts)
18. Rev Moon's Unification Church controls more than half this nation's fishing industry and has since
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 12:08 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Wed Jun 4, 2014, 12:59 PM - Edit history (1)

the early 90s.

Poppy Bush repaying his NWO crony.

Let's see who will pop up to defend the Korean cult leader who developed the RW propaganda media machine.

blm

(113,043 posts)
23. Because? You never paid much attention to the RW 'news' sources pushing the anti-Dem talking points
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 01:29 PM
Jun 2014

over the last 3 decades, Leme?

If you had you would.......

perhaps....

know more.......

and that....

your intentions to prove....

that there is no difference...

between the parties....

is based in ....

utter Horsesh!t.

Horsesh!t = RandPaul2016

blm

(113,043 posts)
27. LOLOL - And you can prove I made a false claim, Mr. Leme/RandPaul2016?
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 02:37 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Wed Jun 4, 2014, 04:22 PM - Edit history (1)

Go ahead.

I've been paying attention to Rev Moon's political adventures for nearly 3 decades.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/unification-church-leaders-vow-to-complete-rev-moons-mission/2012/09/03/ae8c23f4-f5ec-11e1-91cb-58c92a8a140e_story.html

Moon-affiliated companies in the United States and around the world, however, continue to be among the largest players in the fishing industry, supplying much of the sushi served in U.S. restaurants, and are profitably engaged in producing cars in North Korea, helicopters in South Korea and religious icons in Japan, along with Moon’s resorts and real estate operations throughout Asia and South America.
>>>>

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
24. I went to links, and found no such claim
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 01:53 PM
Jun 2014

made that supports what you wrote. You stated :

Rev Moon's Unification Church controls more than half this nation's fishing industry and has since the early 90s.

I found they were connected with large enterprises such as True World

The links between True World's various companies (including crystal tschotchkes as well as foods, specialty grocery stores, various restaurants in the Northeast/Midwest, and boats) and the Unification Church are not noted on any of the websites. And just how directly they're linked is a matter of dispute. The Trib quotes the Rev. Phillip Schanker, a Unification Church spokesman that True World is "not organizationally or legally connected" to the church, but simply "businesses founded by members of the Unification Church."
-
I saw they did have more than 50% of the SUSHI market, which is a far cry from "Rev Moon's Unification Church controls more than half this nation's fishing industry"... which is what you claim.

"According to a 2006 Chicago Tribune investigation, Mr. Moon’s True World Foods provided most of the raw fish consumed at sushi restaurants in the United States."
-

so either you don't do this, or you are doing that.
-
Either way you were way, way incorrect. this or that..your choice. : )

blm

(113,043 posts)
26. Those links supported Moon's dominance of the fishing industry. You can play your games all you want
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 02:33 PM
Jun 2014

I know better, Mr 'No difference between the parties' Leme.

I've also known since an early Frontline documentary that Moon was gaining control of the US fishing industry. It was over 1/3 at the time. His business and control GREW since then.

I find your presence here to be amusing - I expected you'd jump in to play your game.

And...you did.

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
30. you equate majority
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 02:43 PM
Jun 2014

of the sushi selling with over 50 % of the fishing industry. That is just plain goofy... even using your sources.

blm

(113,043 posts)
31. Nope. The sushi article came out last decade. Frontline doc came out in 1992. What IS goofy
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 02:51 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Wed Jun 4, 2014, 03:43 PM - Edit history (1)

is you trying to pretend there is no dominance by moonies over this nation's fishing industry.

Your RandPaul2016 efforts compel you to try and cover for RW propaganda machine and the Korean cult leader who developed it, eh Leme?

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/programs/info/1009.html

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
32. show me a quote from your links which says:
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 02:57 PM
Jun 2014
"Rev Moon's Unification Church controls more than half this nation's fishing industry and has since the early 90s."
-
that is what you claim in #18.
-
Just plain silly.

blm

(113,043 posts)
33. Show me proof you watched the Frontline documentary. And show proof that control of sushi industry
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 03:19 PM
Jun 2014

could have happened without first controlling fishing industry. Controlling the fishing industry was/is a huge part of Unification Theology.
http://www.tparents.org/library/unification/books/40years/40-4-40.htm

You're just plain silly for trying to defend RW propaganda empires that you rely on for your silly proRandPaul views. You'll defend any propagandist who supports your views - even the Moonies. Or...you are a moonie, yourself.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/unification-church-leaders-vow-to-complete-rev-moons-mission/2012/09/03/ae8c23f4-f5ec-11e1-91cb-58c92a8a140e_story.html

Moon-affiliated companies in the United States and around the world, however, continue to be among the largest players in the fishing industry, supplying much of the sushi served in U.S. restaurants, and are profitably engaged in producing cars in North Korea, helicopters in South Korea and religious icons in Japan, along with Moon’s resorts and real estate operations throughout Asia and South America.
>>>>

blm

(113,043 posts)
35. I can't force you to read or watch a documentary. You're involved in your own game
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 03:37 PM
Jun 2014

and I and others are aware of that game.

Your predictable attempts to protect your RW propaganda system are kinda funny, though.

blm

(113,043 posts)
38. I can't force you to use logic or watch a 1992 Frontline documentary.
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 04:20 PM
Jun 2014

You just want to play your RandPaul2016 games.

Keep it up....this is fun.

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
39. like i said, sounded untrue.
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 05:09 PM
Jun 2014

and I am now sure of that.
-
you really should do a better fact check and not spout outlandish claims and try to hope people will not catch you.
-
none of your sources support the claim that:

"Rev Moon's Unification Church controls more than half this nation's fishing industry and has since the early 90s."
-
that statement is garbage.
-
when one makes fraudulent claims like that, your entire message becomes suspect.
-
and implying personal attacks also weakens your case/agenda.

blm

(113,043 posts)
40. LOL - Only someone invested in defending RW propaganda media would insist there is nothing
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 05:23 PM
Jun 2014

in those links that support Moon's Unification Church's dominant role in the fishing industry. Yeah - and let's not pretend you saw the Frontline documentary. You didn't.


So - are you a moonie? Or, rather, Moonist as you call yourselves these days? Or, just a plain, old runofthemill RandPaul supporter who needs to protect the credibility of the RW propaganda media that supports you?

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
41. geez, either you are this or that..
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 06:31 PM
Jun 2014

but foremost you promote an untruth...as shown in your post #18

blm

(113,043 posts)
42. It is not an untruth, but, you need to pretend it is, because, it's a truth about Moonie world.
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 07:07 PM
Jun 2014

And you are invested in protecting the RW propaganda machine that serves your interests.

blm

(113,043 posts)
45. Yes, they are. Moon controlled over 1/3 when the documentary was made and he increased his
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 07:17 PM
Jun 2014

interests in the years after. It is also evident in Moon's theological teachings that it was important for Unification Church to focus on the fishing industry. You just refuse to apply logic. You are invested in the illusion that Moon's reach into the US has been benign.


Controlling the fishing industry was/is a huge part of Unification Theology.
http://www.tparents.org/library/unification/books/40years/40-4-40.htm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/unification-church-leaders-vow-to-complete-rev-moons-mission/2012/09/03/ae8c23f4-f5ec-11e1-91cb-58c92a8a140e_story.html
>>
Moon-affiliated companies in the United States and around the world, however, continue to be among the largest players in the fishing industry, supplying much of the sushi served in U.S. restaurants, and are profitably engaged in producing cars in North Korea, helicopters in South Korea and religious icons in Japan, along with Moon’s resorts and real estate operations throughout Asia and South America.
>>

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2012_09/rip_sun_myung_moon039624.php
>>
The preacher also built a vast seafood enterprise that includes fishing boats, processors and distributors from Alaska to Gloucester, Mass. According to a 2006 Chicago Tribune investigation, Mr. Moon’s True World Foods provided most of the raw fish consumed at sushi restaurants in the United States.
>>

Yeah - there is nothing in those links that indicate Moon's dominance of the fishing industry. LOL - Especially if you don't WANT to see it.

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
46. like I said about your claim, it is false
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 07:34 PM
Jun 2014

your claim in post # 18:

"Rev Moon's Unification Church controls more than half this nation's fishing industry and has since the early 90s. "


the closest you come to that is: "True World Foods provided most of the raw fish consumed at sushi restaurants in the United States."

Sushi is not the nation's fishing industry.

blm

(113,043 posts)
49. You didn't watch the Frontline documentary. And SUPPLYING the fish for sushi IS part of the fishing
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 07:57 PM
Jun 2014

industry that Moon developed from building the boats to fishing the waters to distribution and processing plants, the trucking fleets, and supplying most of the sushi to restaurants and food store chains all across America. Sushi is just ONE PART of it.

http://spitfirelist.com/news/sushi-and-rev-moon/

You are just desperate to cling to your internet game of pretend. Moonist, eh?

Transcript of NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw - August 1990. Jamie Gangel reporting from Washington D.C..

Tom Brokaw: Over a decade ago Rev. Sun Myung Moon was accused of controlling the minds of young people - creating so called "moonies." Well, he's avoided public controversy since that time but quietly, he and his organization have been building a powerful business empire and some of his former top aids say that makes him even more dangerous now.
The latest from NBC's Jamie Gangel:

(scene: Moon mass wedding with participants at Moon's direction raising hands and yelling "mansie" in unison three times)

Gangel: Sun Myung Moon, 1982, this is what most people remember; the mass weddings, the moonies, young people sent out to sell flowers and give all their money to the church. Since then, Rev. Moon and his followers have built an empire but critics still charge the UC is a destructive cult.

Steve Hassan: It's an international conglomerate of people who are completely under the control of Moon and his leadership. It's an organization that wants to take over the world and has been working to do so, relentlessly.

JG: They own - prime real estate in all fifty states, one third of the U. S. fishing industry, banks, hotels, a weapons factory, even this fancy French jewelry company (show Christian Bernard Jewelers) and now the Moon organization is focusing on television. In a rare interview we spoke to Moon's right hand man, Bo Hi Pak. He told us, their goal is a national cable network.

Bo Hi Pak: It's going to be a America's television, promote America's ideology, America's worldview, which is God centered world view, traditional values, that is what America needs.

JG: And the point man for the TV operation is Jonathon Park, Bo Hi Pak's son. Funded in part by Church related businesses, in the past five years Park has bought virtually every independent television production company in Washington DC. He's built this $90 million dollar complex and now controls five companies, including the largest state of the art studio in town. He's even bought into Nostalgia cable, a system that reaches almost 11 million viewers. It's made competitors nervous.

Joe Rothstein: I think the immediate danger in the Washington area is that they would get a lock on all the means of television and video production.

Jonathon Park: There is no other motive, no other hidden agenda. These businesses are run for profit and they're operated very much like any other well run company.

JG: And the church will not influence them?

Jonathon Park: Absolutely, no.

JG: In fact, Park's clients say there has not been any influence and very few of his employees are even church members but critics say there is another agenda.

Warder: If you want to be the second coming of Christ, you want all the power you want all the money, you want control of all the media. That's the objective.

JG: And if the names of your clients are a measure of your power and prestige, Jonathon Park and the Moon organization can now claim they are accepted by a virtual who's who of the TV industry.

(video of CNN lead in) CNN is one of the most visible. It rents many of its crews and technical staff from Park. NBC, ABC, CBS, and many of their affiliates also give Park business.

James Whelan: People are cooperating willy nilly throwing their money at them, throwing their reputations, their prestige, their honor even, at the moonie cause and choosing not to look. See no evil, hear no evil....

JG: Others are Ted Koppel communications, many foreign networks and Entertainment Tonight.

SH: Doing business with Moon is giving credibility and legitimacy to a man who is, in my opinion, a total demagogue, who runs a destructive cult that uses deception, mind control, and hurts thousands and thousands of people.

JG: The Moon organization vehemently denies these attacks.

Bo Hi Pak: They're the liars, they're liars and premeditated to destroy our church and I know one thing, we're speaking the truth. And I know who Rev. Moon is, he's a man of God. (...unintelligible) God is truth. I know we shall prevail because "truth" shall prevail.

JG: Should anyone be worried about this? Critics say "Yes" - that Moon's agenda is power, taking over the world. But the church insists that's absurd, that it's just investing in legitimate businesses.

Jamie Gangel NBC News Washington.

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
50. you claim I didn't watch it; I said YOU couldn't FORCE me to watch it)
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 08:17 PM
Jun 2014

I claim you didn't provide any proof...and you still have not, except that that True World supplied more than 50 % of the sushi... which is not the same as controlling most of the fishing industry in the USA.
-
and your new link doesn't show or prove that your original statement in #18 is true.
-
sadly for you, I doubt there is anything even close that shows that one company controls over 50% of the USA fishing industry.

blm

(113,043 posts)
51. Simple math, simple logic. Over 1/3 in 1990 + continuous buyouts of smaller companies
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 08:28 PM
Jun 2014

Sadly for you, I doubt there is anything even close that shows that Moonies shrunk their dominant hold on the US fishing industry.

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
57. like I said
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 09:37 PM
Jun 2014

your links have nothing showing validity of your statement.
-
Only your magic math supports you. That just will not do.

blm

(113,043 posts)
58. Logic, not magic. You can't show that his holdings since 1990 shrunk instead of grew
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 09:51 PM
Jun 2014

and all the links speaking to his dominant role in the fishing industry don't matter to you - so - it's apparent your role here is to protect the benign image that Moonies, or Moonists as you prefer to be called, like to portray outwardly even as you rev up your RW lie machine to catapult the propaganda.

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
59. i don't have to show his holding grew or
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 09:56 PM
Jun 2014

became less.
-
You made the claim he/moonies controlled over half the fishing industry in the USA, You showed some evidence that he perhaps had over half of the sushi market. lol

blm

(113,043 posts)
63. NBC News and Frontline reported he controlled over 1/3 the FISHING INDUSTRY in 1990
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 12:28 AM
Jun 2014

You need to pretend that Moon never acquired anything more than that, go ahead. You're still not fooling anyone.

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
64. lol
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 12:37 AM
Jun 2014

I don't need to pretend anything. You claimed they controlled over 50%. and you show yourself now to pretend that Frontline made a claim of 1/3... and they did not. Or NBC had a claim they had 33 % of the fishing industry... and I saw no such claim. But somehow you get to add 17% in any case. lol

blm

(113,043 posts)
67. LOL - Then you can't read. It's in the transcript.
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 08:00 AM
Jun 2014

Sorry your logic cells are not engaging - perhaps you're not exercising them enough at this site?

chrisa

(4,524 posts)
28. Humans are the heralds of the next big extinction.
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 02:39 PM
Jun 2014

It's probably already occurring. Most of the planet will die, and the survivors will live on to evolve into new species the way they did in prior extinctions. Whether or not humans will survive this extinction is up in the air, but it's unlikely we will (unless if we have mastered interstellar travel).

Could be one hundred years, could be one thousand or more - who knows? Imo, humans are much too stubborn and arrogant to change anything. We'll continue stabbing holes in the sinking ship until we all drown.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
37. I just can't do that
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 03:56 PM
Jun 2014

I would love too but my problem is that Linda McCartney ate very well on a plant leaf diet and ended up getting cancer and died. It is too scary to just eat plant-based and expect to live a long life. Had that not happened, I might have been able to get on board, but I think we all need some animal products as well just not the huge amount most humans take in.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
47. oh fucking please.
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 07:42 PM
Jun 2014

There are hundreds of millions of vegetarians in this world. They are not dying from cancer.

Linda McCartney died from breast cancer. No one knows what causes it, and there is certainly no known link between breast cancer and vegetarianism.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
48. Then eat leaves
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 07:47 PM
Jun 2014

I love how nice you are. I give my reason and you stomp all over me. You are just way too nice. Thanks!

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
53. I forgot that no one who eats charred meat *ever* gets cancer!
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 09:21 PM
Jun 2014

They all live to be be 98!

I can't believe I've been overlooking that!

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
61. An anecdote is not data.
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 10:56 PM
Jun 2014

We actually have a pretty good idea of what things increase and decrease one's chances of cancer:

1. Heredity. Some families are at risk for certain cancers. Nothing you can do about this one, except in a few cases where there's a genetic test to identify risk. Some women with BRCA genes get their breasts and/or reproductive tracts removed as a precaution.

2. Diet. Plant based diets are protective, there's a great deal of data to back this up for many different cancers.

3. Lifestyle factors like smoking and excessive alcohol use.

4. Other factors: For example with breast cancer we know that the fewer menstrual cycles one has lifetime, the lower their risk. So late menarche is protective (and slightly effected by diet, but mostly genetic, as well as varying wildly among human populations) and pregnancy and breastfeeding are protective.

Any one individuals' disease generally can't be blamed on one specific cause. But we understand populations and their risks pretty well. Deciding to engage in risky behavior because one famous person engaged in a safer one and died makes about as much sense as deciding to commute on a motorcycle at high speed because you once heard of died in a crashed Volvo.

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
44. For those people that downplay the threat from global warming, this should be a wake up call
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 07:14 PM
Jun 2014

for not only are the oceans being increasingly over fished, as the water turns more acidic, there will be fewer fish, the entire food chain gets adversely affected.

Coral reefs are vital for fish and they are being hammered by global warming.

Thanks for the thread, onehandle.

 

Flying Squirrel

(3,041 posts)
62. I very rarely eat seafood anymore
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 11:21 PM
Jun 2014

I became a vegetarian over two years ago, but make very occasional exceptions at restaurants for seafood. Maybe 2-3 times a year. The gulf oil spill has made me especially leery of shrimp etc.

flvegan

(64,407 posts)
65. If only there were something we could do, almost immediately
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 01:07 AM
Jun 2014

to help put an end to this. Hmmmm...

Don't let my DU handle give too many hints.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
69. About all we can do is invest as much money into the great minds of the markets as possible.
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 09:10 AM
Jun 2014

I'm sure they will use it to find a solution and not to mask reality. Otherwise, what legacy would an investor leave behind but one of shameful acquiescence in the face of the greatest evil life on earth has faced?

"When we are no longer able to change a situation - we are challenged to change ourselves."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The end of fish