General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChild Stabbing Raises Alarm About Web and Youths
A case of two 12-year-old girls who allegedly lured a middle-school friend into the Wisconsin woods and stabbed her repeatedly before leaving her for dead has reignited a debate about the potentially damaging influence of the Internet on children, with local police calling it a "wake-up call for parents."
The two girls, who have been charged with attempted murder as adults, told authorities they carried out the crime to fulfill the wishes of a fictitious character on a website that gathers horror stories, according to police in Waukesha, Wis., near Milwaukee.
(snip)
The victim, also a 12-year-old girl, remained in stable condition Tuesday. She suffered 19 stab wounds, including to her liver, pancreas and stomach, according to a court complaint. After the attack, the victim crawled out of the woods to the side of a road, where a passerby found her and called 911.
The two alleged perpetrators, who read a website called Creepypasta.wiki and followed Slenderman, a fictional character, had planned the attack for months, the court document said. The girls intended to flee to a mansion in a northern Wisconsin park they believed to be his home and become his followers, which required that they first kill someone.
(snip)
This is a tragic story about our vulnerability to a medium where the lines between what's real and what's a game are blurred," said Sherry Turkle, a psychologist who specializes in our relationship with technology and Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor. She said violent children's stories and myths aren't new societal concepts, but are more confusing on the Internet, where people also seek facts.
Other experts were skeptical.
"It would be highly unlikely for any 12 year old to believe in a mythical character like this," said Christopher Ferguson, a psychology professor at Stetson University. "In my experience, criminals tend to blame their behavior on just about anythingsociety, their parents, the Internetin order to divert their culpability. 'Slenderman' seems to fit that mold here."
http://online.wsj.com/articles/two-12-year-olds-charged-in-stabbing-linked-to-internet-character-1401815374
get the red out
(13,460 posts)Somehow everyone I knew in my Jr. High School understood which ones were fiction and which were not. We had things called movies too. I don't remember kids stabbing each other to try to get Freddie Kruger to approve of them though. Just because fiction is on the web doesn't make it any less fiction and by age 12, shouldn't kids know the difference?
I think that this should wake people up to the fact that psychopathy doesn't have an age limit like driving or drinking alcohol. You don't have to reach a certain age milestone to have it.
question everything
(47,446 posts)And we would hang out together, exchanging stories about movies that we saw and books that we read.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)The only danger of Dungeons and Dragins was to my love life.
get the red out
(13,460 posts)He's a Republican now, but otherwise a decent human being.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)I'm not certain they can be rehabilitated.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)The DA who charged them as adults is running for AG, BTW
Javaman
(62,504 posts)did the kids parents, you know, actually engage themselves into their kids lives?
wouldn't more of these types of incidents be happening if the internet was the soul cause of this?
I really get tired of bad sensational reporting.
question everything
(47,446 posts)I don't think that kids should be in a closed room without anyone knowing what website they visit, with whom they communicate.
I think that it started with Columbine, through Sandy Hook and up to Santa Cruz: disturbed kids and young adults collect information and warp it in their minds without their parents having any inclination.
Yes, I am a dinosaur. When I was a kid, and even with the next generation, there was no such thing as a kid behind a closed door when no one knows what he was doing.
(Houses then were different; we did not always have those tiny tiny individual rooms per kid; often had to share it with a sibling or with an elderly family member who could not live alone).
Javaman
(62,504 posts)if you don't have a good relationship with your child, then the child doesn't feel safe to discuss things with you or you with them.
again, blaming the internet is treating the symptom and not the cause.
question everything
(47,446 posts)blaming the family where kids are allowed to watch (and read) whatever they want without any parental direction and, yes, supervision.
I am an old baby boomers. We were under tight control. Our parents were not our friends and then we grew up and we rebelled and, I think, we were better adults, fighting to create a better society.
Javaman
(62,504 posts)cheers!
TBF
(32,017 posts)because there weren't cell phones and we were pretty much allowed to roam around during the day as we wished as long as we were home for dinner. That didn't turn us into homicidal maniacs however. I wouldn't be surprised to find out down the road that at least one of these girls is seriously mentally ill (maybe both - Waukesha is a big suburban area and kids who have issues tend to find each other).
That said as a parent today you do have to be a little savvy with the devices. My husband tracks what my kids do on line and I agree w/you on the privacy issue - there are no locks on the bedroom doors and I walk in whenever I please to see what they are up to ... but I do think these girls are beyond that level of intervention.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)slightly odd. The idea seems to be that there is some kind of "faking" going on regarding whether these children were delusional.
They carried out a cold-blooded murder plot and stabbed another child nearly to death.
So, what ... they're NOT delusional?
It just seems that when someone does something disturbed that is ALSO evil and destructive, there's a huge impulse to deny the behavior is disturbed in the first place, lest we blunt the case for vengeance.
It's not a question of whether the internet "caused" anything either. People don't become disturbed because they become obsessed with an image or an idea. They become obsessed with an image or idea because they're disturbed. Or, the two feed each other.
There's probably not going to be a simple answer here.
Orrex
(63,173 posts)Otherwise we'd have to blame these attacks on video games, heavy metal music, pornography or reefer.
question everything
(47,446 posts)and supervision.
If 12 year old girls are planning killing; if 17 year old boys collect guns and are planning attack on their schools the same question should be asked: where are/were the parents.
Orrex
(63,173 posts)And parental involvement can be compromised by the demands of economic reality, where parents have to work multiple jobs or irregular hours or both.
It's a sad situation driven by complicated factors, while the media simply wants to focus on the tried-and-true easy answers.
Dr. Strange
(25,917 posts)Clearly you don't care about kids these days.
Orrex
(63,173 posts)Fluoridation of water.