Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 06:00 AM Jun 2014

Ohio May Take Away Low-Income Women’s Access To The Most Effective Form Of Birth Control

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/06/04/3444814/ohio-lawmakers-insurance-iuds/



The Ohio legislature is currently considering a measure that would institute a sweeping ban on insurance coverage for abortion in state residents’ public and private health plans. Restricting women’s ability to use their insurance plans to pay for abortion is becoming an increasingly popular anti-choice strategy — and Ohio’s proposed legislation may actually go even further. The measure would also make it harder for low-income women to afford the most effective form of birth control.

House Bill 351, which was the subject of a committee hearing on Tuesday, seeks to prohibit insurance plans from covering “drugs or devices used to prevent the implantation of a fertilized ovum.” That definition effectively bans several types of contraception, like the birth control pill and the IUD.

Residents with public insurance — which includes state government employees as well as low-income individuals who rely on Medicaid — are already prevented from using their coverage for most abortions. But since HB 351 stipulates they also can’t use it for any drugs that inhibit implantation, the legislation could end up functioning as a birth control ban for public insurance plans.

Rep. John Becker (R), who sponsored the bill, said during Tuesday’s hearing that birth control pills should not be banned under HB 351. But he still wants IUDs, which are long-acting forms of birth control that are inserted in the uterus, to fall under the ban because he considers IUDs to be a form of abortion. “This is just a personal view. I’m not a medical doctor,” he said.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ohio May Take Away Low-Income Women’s Access To The Most Effective Form Of Birth Control (Original Post) xchrom Jun 2014 OP
He's "not a doctor" and yet ... ananda Jun 2014 #1
“This is just a personal view. I’m not a medical doctor,” he said. well maybe you should go talk to leftyohiolib Jun 2014 #2
They will need to change the state motto. "Ohio - Land of Orphanages." Vinca Jun 2014 #3
Clueless bastards liberal N proud Jun 2014 #4
 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
2. “This is just a personal view. I’m not a medical doctor,” he said. well maybe you should go talk to
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 07:46 AM
Jun 2014

one before making medical decisions

Vinca

(50,237 posts)
3. They will need to change the state motto. "Ohio - Land of Orphanages."
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 07:49 AM
Jun 2014

And how's that small government working out? Doesn't every woman want a right wing politician directing her gynecological care?

liberal N proud

(60,332 posts)
4. Clueless bastards
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 07:52 AM
Jun 2014

They think they are taking away a luxury for the poor. The government should be passing out birth control for the poor for free.

Do they think that poor will just stop having sex and reproducing? Heartless and cruel to take actions that will allow unwanted pregnancies.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ohio May Take Away Low-In...