Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 06:49 AM Jun 2014

The Bergdahl-issue can be resolved with a symbolic vote in Congress.

If they can have 50+ symbolic votes on the ACA, they can have 1 symbolic vote condemning the release of Bergdahl.

"Sgt. Bergdahl should not have been released from captivity in Afghanistan in exchange for afghan prisoners from Guantanamo Bay. Congress hereby condemns his return to american soil."

Let's see, which republican votes on this.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Bergdahl-issue can be resolved with a symbolic vote in Congress. (Original Post) DetlefK Jun 2014 OP
good idea Enrique Jun 2014 #1
At this point customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #2
Yeah, President Obama owns it and my money is on him.. not the assholes who are trying to Cha Jun 2014 #3
My money, too customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #6
There was a great deal of pressure and criticism that Obama wasn't putting forth TwilightGardener Jun 2014 #5
Perhaps customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #7
I find it surprising that lots of people didn't know we had a POW, actually. TwilightGardener Jun 2014 #8
Afghanistan and Iraq customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #9
But having a vote wouldn't allow them to continue to flip flop on the issue davidpdx Jun 2014 #4

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
1. good idea
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 07:04 AM
Jun 2014

we should find some RW candidate trying to primary a GOPer, and suggest they make that proposed resolution part of their campaign.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
2. At this point
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 07:18 AM
Jun 2014

the Rethugs in Congress have the luxury of time. They may or may not have a vote on this subject, but I expect them to have plenty of comments as this story unfolds.

You'd have thought that there was zero controversy regarding Bergdahl when the announcement of the deal was made. Seems that there are a lot of issues around his disappearance, and the way his father has reacted to it. The President now owns whatever comes out of that, and he also owns whatever the released terrorists subsequently do, or plan for others to do.

Cha

(296,893 posts)
3. Yeah, President Obama owns it and my money is on him.. not the assholes who are trying to
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 07:50 AM
Jun 2014

bring him down.



customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
6. My money, too
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 05:35 PM
Jun 2014

But the can of worms is just starting to be opened on Bergdahl, and we also have to hope that Qatar does a good job of babysitting the released Taliban members, and that's only going to be for a year. If they are found later to be involved in any sort of violence towards the United States, the President's going to own that, too.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
5. There was a great deal of pressure and criticism that Obama wasn't putting forth
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 10:24 AM
Jun 2014

enough of an organized effort to free Bergdahl not two months ago (and Congress certainly knew he may have gone AWOL or deserted, so...no, they're not taken by surprise):


http://magicvalley.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/departments-disorganized-in-bergdahl-release-efforts-critics-say/article_71a30af2-cbc4-11e3-ace1-001a4bcf887a.html

What you are seeing now is rank hypocrisy, and anger because Obama went with the prisoner swap as the best of several choices (including directly negotiating with terrorist Haqqani network--even more outcry if that had been pursued). The window was closing, the Taliban had already called off a deal before, and now were suddenly eager, which probably means Bergdahl was growing less useful as a prisoner--not a good sign.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
7. Perhaps
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 05:39 PM
Jun 2014

But that pressure and criticism wasn't front page news. I never heard of Bergdahl before the swap, and now you can't have news radio on for even a half hour without hearing his name.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
8. I find it surprising that lots of people didn't know we had a POW, actually.
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 05:56 PM
Jun 2014

But my husband was in the military until recently, so maybe I was just more interested in the story.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
9. Afghanistan and Iraq
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 06:07 PM
Jun 2014

are becoming like Vietnam, wars that America wants to forget about as soon as practically possible.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
4. But having a vote wouldn't allow them to continue to flip flop on the issue
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 08:25 AM
Jun 2014

Someone has to be the flounder among us.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Bergdahl-issue can be...