Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Warpy

(111,148 posts)
1. I got in when I was 12 but I was told they didn't accept kids
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 07:43 AM
Jun 2014

I thought that betrayed a great deal of stupidity on their part so I rapidly lost interest. Eventually they agreed with me and admitted children, but too late.

Some groups have absolutely nothing in common when they get together. Those based on hair color, eye color, and IQ are the greatest examples of that.

Over the years, I've come to believe that a high IQ simply means one is good at taking the tests and doesn't necessarily translate into intelligence in real life.

That bozo would seem to be proof of it.

unblock

(52,118 posts)
2. simply put, there are several forms of smarts, and "iq" is just one of them.
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 07:56 AM
Jun 2014

mensa does indeed test for people who are good at taking tests, but hey, why not form a social group for people who like puzzles and are good at solving them?

as for "intelligence in real life", you mean it doesn't necessarily translate into other forms of intelligence, such as social intelligence. it certainly does translate to "intelligence in real life" if your real life includes problem solving and logic and math and so on.

LuvNewcastle

(16,834 posts)
3. I've never taken an IQ test, but I've always been good at taking tests.
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 08:09 AM
Jun 2014

I agree with you you; they prove nothing other than an ability to take tests. Instead of multiple choice or true-false questions on tests, I think there should be fill in the blanks and essay questions. Those tests would take a lot more time to grade, but would give a much more accurate result of a student's abilities. Of course, if we did that, we wouldn't be able to have all this Common Core bullshit and everything and teachers would strictly have to spend all their time teaching.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ye Gawds!