General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMoving DKos post. Bergdahl witnessed killing of child in 2009. It was covered up.
Bowe Bergdahl: "We Don't Even Care... About Running Their Children Down in the Dirt Streets"Bowe Bergdahl witnessed a careless manslaughter in 2009. The killing of a child.
And then that killing was covered up by the officers in his Army unit: no report to Army Inspector General, no unit prosecution, no detention or reduction in pay grade, no punishment whatsoever for the MRAP driver who crushed the child.
..Bowe Bergdahl was raised as a devout Christian, a Calvinist, a follower of Jesus Christ, Son of God, Son of Mary, Lord of Lords, Messiah, Wonderful. As a Christian he refused to accept hateful delusions.
His last email to his parents made clear that his U.S. Army unit suffered a failure of leadership. This failure extended to support for an aggressive hatred of the local Afghan people.
It might as well have been Water Street in Manhattan in January, 2008. That's where a Wall Street CEO ran down Florence Cioffi, an office worker trying to hail a cab. He was recorded on video going 60 m.p.h. on that city street and kept going and was DUI and suffered not a whole lot more punishment than a strong talking-to. Nothing unusual.
The poster also links to a Rollings Stone article from 2011.
The Kill Team: How U.S. Soldiers in Afghanistan Murdered Innocent Civilians
Early last year, after six hard months soldiering in Afghanistan, a group of American infantrymen reached a momentous decision: It was finally time to kill a haji.
Among the men of Bravo Company, the notion of killing an Afghan civilian had been the subject of countless conversations, during lunchtime chats and late-night bull sessions. For weeks, they had weighed the ethics of bagging "savages" and debated the probability of getting caught. Some of them agonized over the idea; others were gung-ho from the start. But not long after the New Year, as winter descended on the arid plains of Kandahar Province, they agreed to stop talking and actually pull the trigger.
Bravo Company had been stationed in the area since summer, struggling, with little success, to root out the Taliban and establish an American presence in one of the most violent and lawless regions of the country. On the morning of January 15th, the company's 3rd Platoon part of the 5th Stryker Brigade, based out of Tacoma, Washington left the mini-metropolis of tents and trailers at Forward Operating Base Ramrod in a convoy of armored Stryker troop carriers. The massive, eight-wheeled trucks surged across wide, vacant stretches of desert, until they came to La Mohammad Kalay, an isolated farming village tucked away behind a few poppy fields.
Not an easy article to read..
The poppy plants were still low to the ground at that time of year. The two soldiers, Cpl. Jeremy Morlock and Pfc. Andrew Holmes, saw a young farmer who was working by himself among the spiky shoots. Off in the distance, a few other soldiers stood sentry. But the farmer was the only Afghan in sight. With no one around to witness, the timing was right. And just like that, they picked him for execution.
I am glad to see President Obama defending his decision on Bergdahl.
randys1
(16,286 posts)should have sent him to do things he never should have been made to do...
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)are trying to get their spin on him before he comes home.
malaise
(268,930 posts)We have a winner
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)discredits them. The GOP wants to cover up any atrocities our own soldiers may have committed. That's why they hate folks like Kerry who not only served, but came home to reveal some pretty nasty stuff.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)prior to his return..but it is beginning to now.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Someone group is organizing them.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2014/06/04/here_s_how_quickly_conservatives_turned_on_bowe_bergdahl.html
And article quotes Charlie Daniels from 2012 and now.
Here's Charlie Danielsyes, he of "The Devil Went Down to Georgia" fame.
Obama its time to bring Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl home he's been a Taliban prisoner for 4 years Rescue him,it's more important than rescuing G M
Charlie Daniels (@CharlieDaniels) June 12, 2012
And here he is after the controversy began.
Obama can trade five of the most dangerous men in the world for a soldier who may be a deserter and can't even make a call to save a hero
Charlie Daniels (@CharlieDaniels) June 3, 2014
Amazing.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)So I'm just going to throw this on the stoop and see if the cat licks it up...but I'm beginning to develop a clearer sense of why the Right is going after Bowe Bergdahl with all cannons blazing. It's not because he's a "deserter," and though it has something to do with their constant imperative to take a dump on anything the President does, that's not the whole story, either.
Mr. Bergdahl appears to be a bright, sensitive individual...and once he gets his health back and gets in front of a camera, he is going to tell this snowblind country and the world entire about the horrors he saw while participating in the Afghanistan war.
Can't have that, can we?
trumad
(41,692 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Only in the movie they kidnapped, raped, and then murdered a young girl.
Casualties of War
csziggy
(34,136 posts)csziggy
(34,136 posts)My Dad was Navy (well, so was Mom - Navy Nurse)!
geardaddy
(24,926 posts)mylye2222
(2,992 posts)Its like watching again this Serie Z of crap. Hold, on Bowe!
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)He should probably avoid those.
randys1
(16,286 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)evidence against Bergdahl--but maybe people need to be investigating these soldiers' conduct as well. Maybe there's a reason they all wanted him...not coming back, let's say.
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)clamed to have served at Kerry's side.....when the TRUTH was that they didn't....... I smell a big coup monté against this guy...yes.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)There was a post about it the other day.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)It started so suddenly. It's planned and organized. It's shame.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Heartless bastards.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)He reached a breaking point, or got into an altercation with platoon mates.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and couldn't square it...I am betting THEY are the reason he left....without anything....
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)including dozens of interviews with members of Bravo Company compiled by military investigators, indicates that the dozen infantrymen being portrayed as members of a secretive "kill team" were operating out in the open, in plain view of the rest of the company. Far from being clandestine, as the Pentagon has implied, the murders of civilians were common knowledge among the unit and understood to be illegal by "pretty much the whole platoon," according to one soldier who complained about them. Staged killings were an open topic of conversation, and at least one soldier from another battalion in the 3,800-man Stryker Brigade participated in attacks on unarmed civilians. "The platoon has a reputation," a whistle-blower named Pfc. Justin Stoner told the Army Criminal Investigation Command. "They have had a lot of practice staging killings and getting away with it."
K&R
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)Criminal Investigation Command. "They have had a lot of practice staging killings and getting away with it." )
The persecution of Bergdahl is so harsh that there is not much doubt in my mind now that the radical Right would have been the first to have called for the head of Jesus, too. I hope that there is a major investigation into the state of things in that platoon.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)are always better than live witnesses. This will be taken care off in silence. Too much embarrassment on all sides
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)This duck-and-cover response is the result of the outrageous demonization of Sergeant Bergdahl in the absence of actual facts. Republican operatives have arranged for soldiers in his unit to tell reporters that he was a deserter who cost the lives of several soldiers searching for him. In fact, a review of casualty reports by Charlie Savage and Andrew Lehren of The Times showed there is no clear link between any military deaths and the search.
And a classified military report shows that Sergeant Bergdahl had walked away from assigned areas at least twice before and had returned, according to a report in The Times on Thursday. It describes him as a free-spirited young man who asked many questions but gave no indication of being a deserter, let alone the turncoat that Mr. Obamas opponents are now trying to create.
If anything, the report suggests that the army units lack of security and discipline was as much to blame for the disappearance, given the sergeants history.
....But the critics seeking political advantage dont care about the life or mental state of a particular soldier, or of a principle of loyalty that should provide comfort to any soldier in danger of capture. They live only for the attack.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Its all starting to make sense. Naturally anything the POTUS does is "wrong" or "impeachable" according to the RWNJ's but this just makes it crystal clear why this soldier is being tried in the court of public opinion. Many of us felt as though this newest manufactured "scandal" would blow up in the face of the GOP, and now the whole disgusting dirty truth will come to light.
Thank you for posting this. Most enlightening indeed.
gvstn
(2,805 posts)http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/06/05/1304556/-The-GOP-is-Heading-for-a-World-iof-Hurt-on-Bergdahl-here-s-why
Source Rolling Stone article: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/americas-last-prisoner-of-war-20120607
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Heading there now. Rolling Stone was right on top of this stuff.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Mr Dixon
(1,185 posts)I HOPE HE GET'S TO TELL HIS STORY however this is nothing new war brings out the worst in people, Vietnam is a prime example only takes a little bit of digging to find out. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_war_crimes
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Yeah,...we've seen the trophy photos.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)My brother in law saw the very same thing happen in southern Iraq. His convoy was heading up the highway when a young girl ran out into the road and stopped. The gunner on their lead vehicle fired a number of shots over her head to get her out of the way, but she just stood there. The truck hit her, and every truck in the convoy ran her over. It gave him nightmares for years.
He explained why they do that. In the early part of the Iraq war, the insurgents figured out that the American troops would stop for a child in the road. Taking advantage of this, they kidnapped a couple of local kids and sent them out into the roadway (along with a threat along the lines of "run away and we'll shoot you/your parents/your sibling, or whatever" . When the Americans stopped for the child, the Iraqi's launched an ambush.
After that the directive went out stating that convoys were no longer allowed to stop for children in roadways. Problem was, the Iraqi's noticed that the American's were still reluctant to run over the children's bodies and would swerve around them. So the Iraqi's started burying IED's along the road shoulders, and would send the children out to stand in the middle of the road or in the lane on the opposite side than the IED. That way, the American vehicles would swerve around the childs body, and CLOSER to the IED. After that, they were instructed to assume that any kid in their path was part of a plan to steer them into a bomb or ambush, and to avoid swerving.
When that was implemented, the Iraqi's stopped using children that way because the tactic no longer offered any strategic advantage.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Xithras
(16,191 posts)My BiL never really tried to justify it, but he lived with it by reasoning that it actually saved more kids than it killed. As he put it, "If using kids as bait was an effective weapon, the Iraqi's would have been throwing children into firefights all over Iraq and even more would have died." By his reasoning, the killing of a few kids made the tactic ineffective, and saved the lives of a lot more kids.
And that, in a nutshell, is why humans should never go to war. It gives "justification" to the most barbaric and horrific acts we can imagine.
RobinA
(9,888 posts)in these discussions is that in large part atrocity-committers in the field are made, not born. Nobody goes off to war wanting to run over some kids or burn down some hooches with babies in them. THAT'S WHAT YOU TURN PEOPLE INTO IN A WAR. Fact.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)the past couple of days, or at least yesterday...I want him to be asked him some additional questions.
Does anyone happen to recall that young man's name?
alsame
(7,784 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)like him (and the others) to answer some questions about their conduct while they were in Afghanistan, considering the tale in the OP.
Video link: http://player.theplatform.com/p/2E2eJC/EmbeddedOffSite?guid=n_hall_bergdahl_140604
alsame
(7,784 posts)deserves to go through the proper channels of an investigation".
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)https://twitter.com/JM_Cornelison - Created specifically to cash in on his association. Is he a lone party in his 15 minutes? Maybe. But, maybe not.
And I would still like to know about his conduct and the conduct of his platoon mates. I want him to answer questions about the war crimes they may have committed, like running over a child with an MCAC or assassinating a lone farmer while no one is looking.
alsame
(7,784 posts)group being represented by the GOP strategists.
I know that one of the others had a 'less than honorable discharge', I don't know about this one. I'll see what I can find.
ETA: Josh Korder:
Even more curious: WCCO reports that when he was discharged from the Army apparently for less than honorable reasons, the TV station says he had to sign an agreement that he would not talk about the Bergdahl case.
http://blogs.mprnews.org/newscut/2014/06/bergdahl-no-pal-to-former-minnesota-soldier/
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)has a couple of names in it.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/01/us/bergdahl-deserter-or-hero/
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)I want to know about their conduct in Afghanistan, in light of the story in the oP.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)global1
(25,241 posts)mylye2222
(2,992 posts)IronLionZion
(45,427 posts)I'm sure a lot of them saw unspeakable shit that would be very difficult to live with.
Wounded Bear
(58,647 posts)The Wizard
(12,541 posts)demoralized and emotional numbing was getting the best of him. Cognitive dissonance.
Our whole lives we're told killing is a sin, and then the authority that claims the moral high ground rewards killing.
jaycrewz
(23 posts)I think theres two problems here.
1. People too quick to condemn the guy.
2. People way too quick to say Bergdahl didnt do anything wrong.
How about we get all the facts first? And how about we stop talking certain things as gospel while ignoring other possible pieces of truth. I voted for Obama and I dont think he is above criticism or above my being suspicious of some things he does. Hes a politician just like everyone else...so I dont think Im always being told the truth by him...or by any media outlet.
Its possible Bergdahl was captured and didnt desert and that hes being thrown under the bus. Its also possible that he is very much a deserter and that his fellow soldiers are right to call him so. It seems many people are quick to condemn these other soldiers, just as much as other people wanna condemn Bergdahl.
Anyways, regarding whats in the OP...lets say these bad things are true....I dont think that excuses desertion (if he did desert). Seems people here are trying to find any way to sympathize with Bergdahl in the event his desertion is proven. And it seems many are trying to stay stuck on how bad of an idea the war turned out to be.
While I agree that the war was a dumb idea, disagreeing with war doesnt mean its ok to go against oaths youve made to your brothers and your country. Especially when we end up having to trade up bad guys to get back a soldier. Bergdahl may very well be an innocent dude who was captured...but I can see both sides to all this. I can understand not trusting our government and being bitter over an unjust war. I can also understand those who hate the idea of trading 5 guys who can harm more Americans.
I can be a pretty liberal guy myself, and I even have to admit that Bergdahl's dad isnt good PR for this move when hes rocking a beard, speaking a different language, and apparently sympathizes with those who dislike America.
I just wanna see a trial...though I have a feeling thatll never happen and we will have scores of unanswered questions.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)it doesn't?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Or something.
<--- in case it's needed
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)occurred is vital, this OP is helping meet that goal.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)And let's start with this: Obama's duty to bring this kid home has nothing to do with his guilt or virtue, so stop picking a team and wait.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)riverwalker
(8,694 posts)I doubt Cody Full is his real name (the Clive Bundy supporter). Tweets suggest he lives in Texas. Jake Tapper was fawning all over him, as other media. Presented his stories like the Oracle of Delphi. Vetting? Nah, not so much.
https://twitter.com/CodyFNfootball/status/472876978861641728
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)mwrguy
(3,245 posts)I don't blame him for leaving.
DustyJoe
(849 posts)With the exception of a few posters that obviously served and have lived it
this
post
is
full
of
Unmarried Marriage Counsellors
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)As a pacifist I sympathize with Bergdahl. I don't know if he "walked away" as claimed, but if we're offering up witnessing an atrocity as a justification, and war is more or less a continuous atrocity (IMO), does that mean the rules for desertion should be changed for all soldiers?
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Are you aware of the other possibilities, the choices other military have chosen as a coping mechanism?
Looking at all the issues is part of who we are as Americans.
When I learned of the torture we were doing, my first response was our country does not torture. But it does, it really does.
Even reading of it is a shock to me as I am a sensitive person.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)The guys in his platoon knew Bergdahl had a history of heading out for walks.
Now of course THIS walk is "desertion"?
There's been a LOT OF covering up going on with this platoon imho...
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Walking was a pattern with him.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)I'm flashing back on an episode of M*A*S*H where Pierce witnesses a baby being strangled on a bus because his cries might have attracted the enemy. He ended up breaking down in front of the shrink guy.
FloriTexan
(838 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)AnnieBW
(10,424 posts)When he gets out and tells all, they'll claim that he's unreliable, etc.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)It was very interesting. Here's the link and Transcript I posted here on DU:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025044356
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Heading there now.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Actually it was about as much about the horrors our young men have had to endure in these two wars, about the changes in our country which now engages in torture. It is about wondering how in the world our military can heal from seeing such heartless things go on.
It's about how those with different innate qualities cope. There's nothing wrong with being sensitive to wrongdoings.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)
Here's Charlie Danielsyes, he of "The Devil Went Down to Georgia" fame.
Obama its time to bring Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl home he's been a Taliban prisoner for 4 years Rescue him,it's more important than rescuing G M
Charlie Daniels (@CharlieDaniels) June 12, 2012
And here he is after the controversy began.
Obama can trade five of the most dangerous men in the world for a soldier who may be a deserter and can't even make a call to save a hero
Charlie Daniels (@CharlieDaniels) June 3, 2014
Amazing.
More:
Here's the account of Shaughn Adeleye, one of the activists who stung NPR in 2011 by posing as a Muslim Brotherhood ally wanting to invest money for favorable coverage.*
@SenJohnMccain, after 4 Years in captivity in Afghan/Pakistan, let's #BringBoweHome! View Petition http://t.co/EapgRYJT #tcot #lnyhbt #ocra
Shaughn (@Shaughn_A) December 25, 2012
And here he is this week.
#ObamaComesToTheRescueWhen Deserting "fellow citizens" for the waiting arms of the #Taliban makes no difference. pic.twitter.com/VsFRHp6FzF
Shaughn (@Shaughn_A) June 2, 2014
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)4Q2u2
(1,406 posts)That second section of the article has nothing to do with Bergdahl. That was not his unit and he never witness any of the "Kill Teams" actions,(BTW they were found guilty and punished severely). So others in this OP are equating one with the other and that is not proper reporting. It is a cover smear that tries to taint your mind into sympathy toward Bergdahl. You are condemning people for hating on him without all of the facts but this author is and you are doing the same thing in the opposite direction. So only Bergdahl saw that child killed, only Bergdahl had a hard deployment. I see lots of others cutting him lots of slack but none to the others that were in the exact same places as him. They quote the RS article as it is Bible to smear all the other troops as screw ups, malcontents and mass murderers in the waiting while they all faced exactly the same situations that Bergdahl did. As far as we know, non of the other members of that unit has even got a ticket for J-walking since that time but we know they are no good some how.
Also pertaining to the RS article, Bergdahl comes off as a terrible Troop that enlisted for all the wrong reasons and probably would not have been deployed but for the fact of the Surge. He looks like a wannabe Tragic Hero that could not wait to get into combat. Anyone looking for War is an asshole that needs to carefully watched for signs of possible mental break down. That is where Bergdahl was definitely failed by his leadership. We also see his emails and it is only from his point of view, a PV1 who had about as much time in the Army to have a cup of coffee, but all of a sudden we are to take his word on these things like he is some kind of Military Expert. Not even close. He is what we used to call a General Private, knew everything and if only he was in charge the Army would be sooooooo much better.
All the Troops involved are neither Hero's nor Villains. Just men, some boys, sent to do a terrible job that lots of others could not or would not do. Sent there by a Government who's civilian population did not control it and thus failed to do it's Civic duty to those men and woman in Uniform. "It was not their War, It was Bushes" You want to know who the real 1% is. That is the percentage of the population that bore the brunt of the fighting
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/27/opinion/americans-and-their-military-drifting-apart.html
http://www.cohenresearchgroup.com/media/ciav_201006.pdf
The other false info believed even by Vets themselves is that we are tragically damaged and kill ourselves from what we have seen. That is not true. Suicide rate increase among the Military has numerous factors not excluding economic factors as well as previous mental health problems.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/07/military-suicide-study_n_3719850.html
http://www.armytimes.com/article/20130806/NEWS/308060037/New-study-Suicides-not-linked-combat-exposure
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/06/17/majority-of-military-suicides-never-saw-combat.html
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)I took a glance at the studies, and they in effect blame all the suicides on those who are mentally ill. They seem to not include that even normal people would be sickened by some of the careless attitudes toward the civilians of other countries. Seems to ignore the horrors of torture and cruelty they saw.
As to the rest of the post I can't respond because it stuns me. You read things into my post that aren't there because of your anger toward Bergdahl.
In fact I presented one case for understanding him. If you note, I gave no opinion. Actually the situation is way too complicated to have one simplistic opinion. A lot of my family are/were military, one was a naval commander. I respect the military, but I also know that in 2003 we had cowboys like Rumsfeld and Bush taking this country to war over lies. Rumsfeld said "stuff happens" and "freedom is untidy", and he let the torture at Abu Graib etc go on.
It sickened even the most mentally well among us.
You said:
" Sent there by a Government who's civilian population did not control it and thus failed to do it's Civic duty to those men and woman in Uniform."
I wish you had known how hard most here at the time of the Iraq invasion fought their government on this. There should have been charges brought against many for lying a nation into a war.
4Q2u2
(1,406 posts)I have no hatred of Bergdahl, what I did not like was he was being afforded mitigating circumstances but none of his accusers are. They were there all at the same time and place. The only opinion I offered was one that he was a disillusioned PV1 who thought he had all the answers. He did not, and there are thousands of disillusioned PV1's in the Army, and the vast majority know at that point on the ground in hostile territory it is all about the person next to you. That you stay together and work as a unit to get home. IF they do not it is imperative that the leadership instill that. That part is clear that it was not. I do have problems with some of his actions, yes. As a very experienced Service member I know and understand the many layers that civilians do not. Taking any thought of AWOL or Desertion off the table. Him just wanting to go for a walk is a serious breech of safety, unit cohesion, and morale. The Unit was in a far off remote patch of dirt. Even when you are not on watch you still have responsibilities. During an attack each and every member has a primary, a secondary, and a Final Protective Fire position. If an attack occurred while he was outside the wire, he would not be at his appropriate position. Thus compromising the interlocking fire needed to defend their position. That hole in the defense could be exploited to over run the position and costing the lives of all at the FOB. How would you feel about someone that jeopardized your life because they did not want to do their job at the most important time? Now the case is also reversed as well when his unit went out on patrol not properly equipped or in the right frame of mind, so his morale was compromised. Now you have the back round to how a Unit can fall into disarray with failing morale and lack of accountability. That is usually when really bad things happen. Discipline has to be the Back bone of a unit. Not the punch in the nose scream at you type, but one of Professionalism, duty and trust. In that it looks like they were all very undisciplined including Bergdahl. This is the position his accusers are coming from, but one also needs to have a leg to stand on. Not sure if they all do.
As to the incident with the Child being killed by the MRAP. Horrible, Horrible choices are what War is all about, and unfortunately sometimes it comes down to who is more important. People are trying to find a right and wrong in a situation where there is only 2 wrongs. Are the lives of American Soldiers more important to the Army and the American people. The Army almost has to take that position that they are. Troops have to know that Senior leadership believes their lives are thought of and will be protect when and where they can. One of the OP responses even pointed out that this was a tactic employed to kill American Soldiers. Which child in the road is an ambush and which one is just a child in the road? Should we save that child and have a Troop killed? Should we save that child and have that Troops child without a parent now? Is it easier to run over that poor little child or that dirty little Haji in the road?
Maybe it is not racism but a coping mechanism. If Bergdahl deserves the benefit of doubt then they all do.
I know DU was protesting the War. My indictment was more to the silent American populace that let it's Government destroy so much that was sacred.
smallcat88
(426 posts)My brother was in the army back in Desert Storm days. He told me many of the guys he served with were little better than criminals. He also witnessed the death of far too many civilians (it was the bodies of women and children that hit him hardest). He came back from that war more depressed and disillusioned than I've ever seen him, before or since. My mother told me later that he was near suicidal. I was living in another state at the time so I didn't see him when he first got back.
He has recovered in the years since but some of the stories he told me were just sickening. Absolutely beyond belief that we could consider ourselves the good guys while allowing our military to get away with unspeakable crimes.
Every time I hear about Bergdahl, I think of my brother. I suspect they have a lot in common.