Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(50,555 posts)
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 07:56 PM Jun 2014

One comment attributed to Bergdahl is disturbing me

Apparently Bergdahl asked his sergeant if his leaving the unit with his weapon and night-vision equipment would cause problems.

This is disturbing on two counts:

Why wouldn't his sergeant have asked him why he wants to know this?

And why wouldn't his sergeant then have gone to someone who outranked him - and more important, the first someone-who-outranked-him he could find - and reported what Bergdahl said?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
1. From the snippets I've seen, the leadership sucked there.
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 07:59 PM
Jun 2014

Whether that is the answer to your very good question, is unknown to me.

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
2. Did you get this from a news article or a talking head?...
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 08:00 PM
Jun 2014

If you are quoting a news article, can you provide a link? Thanks in advance.

jmowreader

(50,555 posts)
10. Try this
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 09:54 PM
Jun 2014
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/bergdahls-unit-comrades-recount-disappearance-23979173

Evan Buetow, 27, who was a sergeant in the platoon:

Buetow, speaking from Maple Valley, Washington, said Bergdahl had asked him a number of questions a short time before his disappearance that, in retrospect, make it apparent that Bergdahl had been planning to leave.

Bergdahl asked him, for example, how much of a cash advance he could get and how to go about mailing home his personal computer and other belongings. He also asked what would happen if his weapon and other sensitive items such as night vision goggles went missing. He said he told Bergdahl that, as any soldier would know, that would be "a big deal."

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
3. I'm curious as to what problems they were referring to.
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 08:02 PM
Jun 2014

Problems off post with such things, or problems with those things being gone when not on official duty? Either way, he obeyed--why? Presumably, because he was coming back and not looking to get disciplined for having that stuff off post unauthorized, is my best guess. But yeah, why didn't they watch him and question him?

 

LLD

(136 posts)
5. Why would Bergdahl care about trouble if he was going to get in trouble by leaving anyway?
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 08:12 PM
Jun 2014

Something just doesn't make sense. Soldiers can be Teabaggers too. And I think this is where the swift-boating is coming from.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
6. Agreed. It was common knowledge that Bergdahl took unusual walks (and always came back)
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 08:17 PM
Jun 2014

So his CO may have presumed this was one of those...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014819538

But on the other hand, who authorizes a guy to take a walk on the front lines of Afghanistan?

And if so, it says more about THEM than Bergdahl....

wercal

(1,370 posts)
7. Answer - People ask alot of stupid questions...especially in the Army
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 08:25 PM
Jun 2014

First, the quote is from SGT Buetow...and he did not say Bergdahl asked about "if his leaving the unit with his weapon" would be a problem. Instead he reported that Bergdahl asked what would happen if his weapon and sensitive items 'went missing'.

Its an important distinction. The first phrase implies Bergdahl has a hobo pack on a stick resting on his shoulder, and he's practically on the way out the door.

The second phrase could be interpreted differently. My first question would be (panicked) "did you lose your weapon or a sensitive item?". Other than that, I would figure that Bergdahl had some crazy idea about selling them to locals, or intentionally losing them in some hope of getting out of duty...kind of like pulling a fire alarm at school, I would have thought he was angling to get the unit pulled out of combat duty to go look for a weapon, or something like that.

But soldiers have a lot of time on their hands, and come up with some weird questions.

JHB

(37,158 posts)
8. Did he, in fact, ask that? What's the source for it?
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 08:42 PM
Jun 2014

Not saying he didn't, but considering how invested conservatives have been to paint Bergdahl as a traitor (and thus a bad deal to trade for him), there's a lot of elephant shit mixing with actual facts. Witness the "8 men died looking for him" claim, when it's not clear if any of those deaths had anything to do with Bergdahl.

Check your sources to be sure.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One comment attributed to...