Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,005 posts)
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 11:31 PM Jun 2014

Reagan: Media Myth and Reality by FAIR.org (Reagan died 10 years ago today)

here is a neutral, non-political AP brief of Nancy Reagan visiting Ronald Reagan's gravesite 10 years after the death of the 40th president.

Here is a very interesting FAIR.org article, "Reagan: Media Myth and Reality", documenting how the so-called liberal media left behind any trace of neutrality or objectivity at that time. Examples:

In general, Reagan's popularity during his two terms tends to be overstated. The Washington Post 's lead article on June 6 began by declaring him "one of the most popular presidents of the 20th Century," while ABC 's Sam Donaldson announced, "Through travesty, triumph and tragedy, the president enjoyed unprecedented popularity." The Chicago Tribune (6/6/04) wrote that "his popularity with the electorate was deep and personal... rarely did his popularity dip below 50 percent; it often exceeded 70 percent, an extraordinarily high mark."

But a look at Gallup polling data brings a different perspective. Through most of his presidency, Reagan did not rate much higher than other post-World War II presidents. And during his first two years, Reagan's approval ratings were quite low. His 52 percent average approval rating for his presidency places him sixth out of the past ten presidents, behind Kennedy (70 percent), Eisenhower (66 percent), George H.W. Bush (61 percent), Clinton (55 percent), and Johnson (55 percent). His popularity frequently dipped below 50 percent during his first term, plummeted to 46 percent during the Iran-Contra scandal, and never exceeded 68 percent. (By contrast, Clinton's maximum approval rating hit 71 percent.)


Time magazine (6/14/04) cheered that "the Reagan years were another of those hinges upon which history sometimes turns. On one side, a wounded but still vigorous liberalism with its faith in government as the answer to almost every question. On the other, a free market so triumphant-- even after the tech bubble burst-- that we look first to 'growth,' not government, to solve most problems." As NBC 's John Hockenberry put it (6/5/04), "The Reagan revolution imagined the unimaginable. When poverty and welfare were at crisis levels in the 1980s, Reagan declared war on government and turned his back on the welfare state." The long-term impact of cuts in social spending, gutted environmental protections and other casualties of Reagan's "war on government" were relegated to passing mentions.

Reagan's fervent support for right-wing governments in Central America was one of the defining foreign policies of his administration, and the fact that death squads associated with those governments murdered tens of thousands of civilians surely must be included in any reckoning of Reagan's successes and failures.

But a search of major U.S. newspapers in the Nexis news database turns up the phrase "death squad" only five times in connection with Reagan in the days following his death...Only one news article found in the search (L.A. Times , 6/6/04) considered the death squads an important enough part of Reagan's legacy to be worth mentioning. The three broadcast networks, CNN and Fox didn't mention death squads at all, according to Nexis. Nor were any references found in the transcripts of the broadcast networks to the fact that Reagan's policy of supporting Islamicist insurgents against the Soviet-backed government of Afghanistan led to the rise of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.


Think Progress had this article in Feb. 2011 to mark Reagan's 100th birthday, 10 Things Conservatives Don’t Want You To Know About Ronald Reagan

I was 13 when Reagan died. The Sunday paper had this entire "tribute to Reagan" special section, if I recall correctly.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reagan: Media Myth and Reality by FAIR.org (Reagan died 10 years ago today) (Original Post) alp227 Jun 2014 OP
Who can forget his fireside chats with the Taliban. Historic NY Jun 2014 #1
I was in DC during that period of time of his death/funeral, etc. It was very hot, IIRC. MADem Jun 2014 #2

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. I was in DC during that period of time of his death/funeral, etc. It was very hot, IIRC.
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 11:55 PM
Jun 2014

Rainy, sticky, humid. There was a lot of traffic snarl, and a robust number of "Let's go look at the casket in the rotunda" tourists.

I couldn't help but contrast the lines for Reagan with the lines for JFK. What was most stunning about them was that there were more white people in the Reagan lines, and the Uniform of the Day was shorts and tee shirts and baseball hats and fanny packs. Granted, the weather was warm, but no one even bothered with a tie, and there weren't all that many shirts with collars that weren't golf attire, it seemed. The JFK lines were longer, multi-racial, and people wore their Sunday best, as it was a serious occasion deserving of serious dress. And people in the JFK lines, were, of course, in shock that such a relatively young leader had been murdered. Many were weeping openly.

Of course, that was long, long, ago, and the circumstances of death were tragic and different. A sitting president, not an unwell, retired one.

Nowadays, people have their "casual" shorts and sweat clothes, and their "dress" shorts and sweat clothes. I don't see us--even with the "Mad Men" mini fashion boom popular nowadays--ever going back to that degree of formality on a routine basis. Hell, it's got to be a wedding or funeral before I get out of the comfortable stuff, myself.




Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reagan: Media Myth and Re...