General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLow-wage jobs replace middle-income work. Welcome to your new low-pay future.
Last edited Sat Jun 7, 2014, 12:11 PM - Edit history (2)
The jobs that have been created in this "recovery" are mostly low-pay service jobs. The truth is that it was not a recovery. It was a restructuring to benefit the One Percent.http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/04/28/3431351/recovery-jobs-low-wage/
Recovery Has Created Far More Low-Wage Jobs Than Better-Paid Ones
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/28/business/economy/recovery-has-created-far-more-low-wage-jobs-than-better-paid-ones.html?_r=0
Low-wage jobs proliferate as middle class ones disappear: job growth patterns since the recession
http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2014/04/low-wage_jobs_proliferate_as_m.html
Low-Wage Jobs Replace Middle-Income Work, Study Finds
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/31/low-wage-jobs_n_1846733.html
Careers Are Dead. Welcome To Your Low-Wage, Temp Work Future
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jmaureenhenderson/2012/08/30/careers-are-dead-welcome-to-your-low-wage-temp-work-future/
In addition, the TPP that Obama is hell-bent on supporting will DESTROY jobs and cut wages for over 90 percent of American workers:
http://citizen.typepad.com/eyesontrade/2013/09/the-verdict-is-in-the-trans-pacific-partnership-tpp-a-sweeping-free-trade-deal-under-negotiation-with-11-pacific-rim-coun.html
No, the chocolate ration has not been increased:
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022384139
How the 1 percent won the recovery, in one table
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/09/11/how-the-1percent-won-the-recovery-in-one-table/
Recovery for the Rich, Recession for the Rest
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/recovery-for-the-rich-rec_b_3910615.html
The Rich Get Richer Through the Recovery
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/10/the-rich-get-richer-through-the-recovery/
Incomes Flat in Recovery, but Not for the 1%
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014400736
U.S. corporate profits stronger than ever, workers' wages fallen to lowest-ever share of GDP (CNN)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021922334
U.S. Income Inequality Now Worse Than Many Latin American Countries
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022268073
Ranks of working poor increasing
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022200197
Inequality Rages as Dwindling Wages Lock Millions in Poverty
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022198286
The Middle Class In America Is Being Wiped Out Here Are 60 Facts That Prove It
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022144851
Child poverty rates increase unabated
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022268450
40 Percent of Americans Now Make Less than 1968 Minimum Wage
http://www.democraticunderground.com/111631016
Corporate Profits Have Grown By 171 Percent Under Anti-Business Obama
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014372334
US poverty on track to reach 46-year high; suburbs, underemployed workers, children hit hard
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002998131
Poverty, hunger among retirees increasing
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002748342
The Economy is "Recovering" By Creating More Low-Wage Jobs... Increasingly Filled By Graduates
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022602162
"Recovery" in US is lifting profits, but not adding jobs
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014414149
Obama to use pension funds of ordinary Americans to pay for bank mortgage settlements
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002205218
What Recovery? Across America, People in Distressed Cities and Small Towns Face Economic Catastrophe
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022545596
Real wages decline; literally no one notices
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11172387
Wall Street Soars with Wealth as Wages Stagnate, Jobs Remain in a Slump
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12526154
Wages for bottom 90% declined 1.2% during 2009-2011 recovery, top 1% income grew 8.2%
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022271466
Three Minimum Wage Jobs Needed To Afford Two-Bedroom Apartment
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022578738
Wages have fallen to a record low as a share of Americas gross domestic product.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022183930
The Real Numbers: Half of America in Poverty -- and It's Creeping toward 75%
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022906982
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
questionseverything
(9,651 posts)k&r
Romulox
(25,960 posts)All my life I've seen Detroit used as a scapegoat for the nation's economic and racial insecurities. And for almost as long I've been telling people this process was just beginning here, not ending.
questionseverything
(9,651 posts)building public debt that benefited private corps knowing the population shift to suburbs would not provide the tax base to repay that debt
rickyhall
(4,889 posts)Ft.Worth may be a little better off then Detroit but it's been going hill ever since the War on Viet Nam ended. And DeQueen looks like FDR never existed, except for Walmart and the fast food joints.
KatyaR
(3,445 posts)Nt
alp227
(32,018 posts)nt
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)I went back and fixed a couple of links.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)We cannot afford to tolerate any more Third Way in our party. No Hillary. No more Republicans in Democrat suits.
America will not survive it.
elzenmahn
(904 posts)....this is a DIRECT RESULT of all of those "free trade" deals we've made with various countries and coalitions.
The entire purpose of those trade deals was for corporations to take advantage of CHEAP LABOR. Nothing more. Nothing less.
questionseverything
(9,651 posts)lead to huge increases in food prices
think about it,what do we have to export....food
putting grocery staples on the stock exchange as commodities didnt help either
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Food prices will increase.
Access to medications will decrease.
Internet freedom will decrease.
And corporations will be handed the power to override national sovereignty on major issues ranging from deregulation to worker protection.
This is more than a disaster. It is a direct, deliberate, corporate predatory assault aimed at all of us.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)by reality tv and the Producers Guild buying off the leaders of the Writer's Guild and the Actor's unions to sell them out. Craftspeople used to be able to live middle class lifestyles with union benefits. Because of outsourcing and union busting, a job that used to be $1500 a day is not listed at $500 a WEEK with the most outrageous workloads. The majority of the people I know have had to take other jobs or have left the industry altogether.
It will take an amazing leader to right this course and put in place policies that protect American jobs and domestic goods. For instance, Australia's tariffs are so high, it almost doesn't make sense to import many goods there. Things like tax breaks for American employees and harsh penalties for outsourcing. But how can you do this when the biggest outsourcers of all consult the Whitehouse on "jobs". We see the unemployment numbers going down, but a little digging shows the new jobs are low wage. There may be no stopping it.
Leme
(1,092 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Right now, the employers have the upper hand because people need jobs more than they need people.
When you hit full employment, employers are forced into a position of competing for workers and they can only do that by offering better pay and better benefits. This is, of course, another reason the big corporations like a little bit of high unemployment.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)if/when we (Democrats) take the House and expand the Democratic majority in the Senate.
Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... you can pick from the 20 or 30 who are qualified, based on which will take the lowest salary.
When its only 2 or 3 applicants, or lower, they have to up the wages and benefits.
The idea that the new jobs would be at higher wages doesn't fit reality.
amandabeech
(9,893 posts)they move everything overseas to cheap labor locations or they bring in workers from those cheap locations.
They're addicted to cheap labor, and I mean really addicted.
Unfortunately, our government seems to be their dealer.
ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)has been no recovery.
Orrex
(63,203 posts)The way I hear it, there's absolutely no excuse not to do so.
Slackers!
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)"Life would be a hell of a lot easier fer these kids today if they just mythically pulled themselves up by their bootstraps and got Super PhDs in long-term, non-outsourceable career fields they should have predicted the FUTURE on, by gumption!"
"I mean, if guys like me could have things like 'pensions', 'job security', 'unions', 'a wage that met the cost of living', 'an economic climate that didn't require musical chairs or a bottomless pit of money for multiple trips to college', etc., ANYone can!!11!!!"
the_sly_pig
(741 posts)if you want to drive wages up. Gone are the days of 7% annual wage increases that the baby boomer's got while they smoked at their desk and had their two martini lunches.
Unfortunately, it seems a byproduct of relying on corporations for our sustenance is low wages.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)was 15 years ago. Ir was replaced by 2 or 2.5, if lucky
the_sly_pig
(741 posts)I worked with a bunch in the '90's that always bragged that during the '70's decade they would all get 7%. Additionally they were allowed to smoke at their desk and basically work only half days. After getting liquored up at lunch, most just goofed around.
I've never seen anything close to 7%.
FloriTexan
(838 posts)TheFrenchRazor
(2,116 posts)whatthehey
(3,660 posts)Surely a significant swing to lower pay would show up there
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/wkyeng.t01.htm
Warpy
(111,245 posts)The trend toward eliminating the jobs that sustained whole families in favor of the McJob that won't support even the worker, himself, has been going on for three decades now.
Men's wages have fallen steadily since the 1970s. Women's wages have fallen less because women were more likely to be stuck in McJobs and didn't have that far to fall.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)That is exactly what it was.
But they do it slow so that there is no sudden pain.
progressoid
(49,978 posts)nyabingi
(1,145 posts)and their many allies in power are killing us softly, creating the illusion that things are getting better through their stats but we know better.
Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Yes. I actually heard that today and some even thought we needed to do something about it. Oh my.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Utilities have doubled...food and gas prices are high. In five years, I gone from preparing to buy a house, with a decent 401k...to wondering if I will be able to rent an apartment by myself. The only blessing is that I did not get a mortgage for twice what the property is worth.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)This Census data is from the piece that your last link was to direct readers to.
- In 2011, the official poverty rate was 15.0 percent. There were 46.2 million people in poverty.
- After 3 consecutive years of increases, neither the official poverty rate nor the number of people in poverty were statisti¬cally different from the 2010 estimates1
- The 2011 poverty rates for most demographic groups examined were not statistically different from their 2010 rates. Poverty rates were lower in 2011 than in 2010 for six groups: Hispanics, males, the foreign-born, nonciti¬zens, people living in the South, and people living inside metropol¬itan statistical areas but outside principal cities. Poverty rates went up between 2010 and 2011 for naturalized citizens.
- For most groups, the number of people in poverty either decreased or did not show a statistically significant change. The number of people in poverty decreased for noncitizens, people living in the South, and people living inside metropolitan statistical areas but outside principal cities between 2010 and 2011. The number of naturalized citizens in poverty increased.
- The poverty rate in 2011 for chil¬dren under age 18 was 21.9 per-cent. The poverty rate for people aged 18 to 64 was 13.7 percent, while the rate for people aged 65 and older was 8.7 percent. None of the rates for these age groups were statistically different from their 2010 estimates.2
Go to the "Publications" tab for more information.
Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2011
http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/income_wealth/cb12-172.html
- The poverty rate for males decreased between 2010 and 2011, from 14.0 percent to 13.6 percent, while the poverty rate for females was 16.3 percent, not statistically different from the 2010 estimate.
Health Insurance Coverage
- The number of people with health insurance increased to 260.2 million in 2011 from 256.6 million in 2010, as did the percentage of people with health insurance (84.3 percent in 2011, 83.7 percent in 2010).
- The percentage of people covered by private health insurance in 2011 was not statistically different from 2010, at 63.9 percent. This was the first time in the last 10 years that the rate of private health insurance coverage has not decreased. The percentage covered by employment-based health insurance in 2011 was not statistically different from 2010, at 55.1 percent.
- The percentage of people covered by government health insurance increased from 31.2 percent to 32.2 percent. The percentage covered by Medicaid increased from 15.8 percent in 2010 to 16.5 percent in 2011. The percentage covered by Medicare also rose over the period, from 14.6 percent to 15.2 percent. The percentage covered by Medicaid in 2011 was higher than the percentage covered by Medicare.
- In 2011, 9.7 percent of children under 19 (7.6 million) were without health insurance. Neither estimate is significantly different from the corresponding 2010 estimate. The uninsured rate also remained statistically unchanged for those age 26 to 34 and people age 45 to 64. It declined, however, for people age 19 to 25, age 35 to 44 and those age 65 and older.
- The uninsured rate for children in poverty (13.8 percent) was higher than the rate for all children (9.4 percent).
- In 2011, the uninsured rates decreased as household income increased from 25.4 percent for those in households with annual income less than $25,000 to 7.8 percent in households with income of $75,000 or more.
<...>
http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/income_wealth/cb12-172.html
Dire information, but I would say a decrease in the poverty rate between 2010 and 2011 is big news, as is the information on health insurance coverage.
Fast forward to 2014.
By Russ Britt
More children are getting health insurance, with the greatest increases coming in low-income households...The analysis from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation says the percentage of children without health coverage was 7.5% in 2012, the most recent year for which data are available. Thats down from 9.7% in 2008, according to research conducted by the University of Minnesota.
Low-income households made the greatest gains in getting children insured. That income group, within 138% of the federal poverty line, reportedly had 10.4% of children left uninsured, down from 15.5% in 2008.
Larger gains were made among Hispanic and non-white families. Among Hispanics, 12.6% of children were uninsured in 2012, down from 18.3% in 2008. For non-whites, 7.1% of this group was uncovered in 2012, down from 9.6%.
No state saw a decline in insured children. The greatest drops came from Oregon, Florida, Delaware, Mississippi, South Dakota and Idaho. All saw the percentage of uninsured children drop by five or more points.
The study year doesnt include the effects of the Affordable Care Act, which started taking applicants Oct. 1, 2013. Future studies are expected to gauge the effects of Obamacare.
http://blogs.marketwatch.com/health-exchange/2014/04/10/more-children-and-low-income-kids-getting-health-insurance-study/
Huge! This is a direct result of the CHIP expansion and an Obamacare provision.
Background:
By ROBERT PEAR
WASHINGTON The House gave final approval on Wednesday to a bill extending health insurance to millions of low-income children, and President Obama signed it this afternoon, in the first of what he hopes will be many steps to guarantee coverage for all Americans.
<...>
The roll call ended a two-year odyssey for the child health legislation, which President George W. Bush adamantly opposed on the ground it would lead to government-run health care for every American.
<...>
In a major change, the bill allows states to cover certain legal immigrants namely, children under 21 and pregnant women as well as citizens.
Until now, legal immigrants have generally been barred from Medicaid and the State Childrens Health Insurance Program for five years after they enter the United States. States will now be able to cover those immigrants without the five-year delay.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/05/us/politics/05health.html
By Sarah Barr
At least six states have opened their Childrens Health Insurance Program to the kids of low-income state employees, an option that was prohibited until the passage of the 2010 health-care law.
This relatively small step has as its backdrop years of debate over the program, known as CHIP, including concerns that it encourages states and consumers to replace private insurance with taxpayer-subsidized coverage.
Now, as a result of the policy change, families of lower-income state workers who have struggled to pay for family coverage can qualify for the program. CHIP, which is jointly financed by the states and the federal government, provides coverage to the uninsured children of families who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid but cannot afford private insurance.
The federal government had closed that option to most states when CHIP was established in 1997, because of concerns that it might be an easy way for financially strapped states to shift the costs of some public-employee health benefits to the federal government. Federal employees were allowed to enroll their children.
- more -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/2011/11/04/gIQAeDvotM_story.htm
More 2014:
Michelle Obama Expands Program That Gives All Students Free Meals
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024563502
Why isn't there more focus on shareholders' say on executive pay?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024877216
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)COC types and their concubines in the media will ballyhoo "job creation" or "business friendly" in the abstract, as though a job is a job is a job. In this manner, an anti-labor shit pit like Texas will poach once good paying jobs from blue states and replace them with lower paying ones.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Assaults, and then deliberate misrepresentation about those assaults.
Skittles
(153,150 posts)haven't you read the LIST in the BOG? HE'S PERFECT!!!
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)American workers slip into poverty.
"Half of America in poverty and creeping toward 75%"
American workers are now much worse off than quite a few other 'first world' countries.
Bet some states can't wait until people can't afford their required yearly property taxes and neighborhood association fees. So the state/county/neighborhood association lawyers can legally take their homes away.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=11951
Excellent info in your thread, thanks.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)ARE NORMAL PART OF THE SYSTEM. What's happened lately is that the recessions that are a normal part of the system have gotten worse and closer together. The result of this is that the average person doesn't have a chance to recover before the NEXT one hits.
It's always been known that the recovery starts at the top and THEN "trickles down" to the workers and the masses. Since we're in the process of end-stage capitalism the "recoveries", such as they are, doesn't have a chance to "trickle down" before the next one hits.
amandabeech
(9,893 posts)I've wondered whether the speed up might be partially attributable to technology that speeds up nearly every process. We've had three recessions that can be attributed in part to financial bubbles--junk bonds and the S&L crisis that started in the late '80s, the tech bubble bust in the early 2000s, and the derivatives-mortgage-backed-securities crash in 2008-9. Financial transactions run at lightning speeds now with computerized trading, and computers allow the faster spread of bad ideas through out the financial work.
The way the recession waves are timed, it would seem that we should be having another recession around 2015. That won't be good for us Dems. Folks will be more apt to throw the bums out if we Dems can't show progress by November 2016.
davidthegnome
(2,983 posts)I earn 8 dollars an hour doing a job that, in most places, you'd get paid at least 11-15 for. No benefits, along with a "special set" of rules that apply to certain types of workers (hotel, front desk) such as not qualifying for the half hour unpaid break. My schedule is ridiculous, frequently forcing me to work 8, 9, even 10 days in a row - while management is careful to make sure my hours don't go above forty on any given week.
Even up here in the backwoods of Northern Maine, rent is too high for me (approximately 500 a month, just for rent, lower than some places, but...) and the idea of buying a house is just laughable. You need things for that, like a down payment, or a credit score that creditors don't look at and wince.
No choice for most of us, Woo. This job and all of it's many details and lacks is kind of kicking my ass. But it's better than being unemployed, so I keep telling myself.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)And you speak for millions.
Thank you for putting this here. You deserve better. This country deserves better.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)and 8 out of 10 will tell you the problem is the poor are gaming the system and that is where all the waste is
try it, i shit you not
moondust
(19,972 posts)You can basically give the profits to the people who do the work or to the CEO and shareholders demanding a return on their investment (while they lounge by the pool). Or stash it in offshore accounts to avoid taxes and enable a quick getaway if the guillotines ever start to make a comeback.
Enjoy the cat food!
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)ctsnowman
(1,903 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)[center][/center]
Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)Initech
(100,063 posts)But I honestly wouldn't mind if we rounded up every copy of every Ayn Rand book in the country and tossed them in a giant bonfire.
nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)to sign the repeal of Glass Steagall
She made him sign NAFTA too. It's right there on the video. Most people can't even see her.
And she's in the background threatening Rodham-Clinton in this short clip- see her?