Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,462 posts)
Fri Jun 6, 2014, 06:18 PM Jun 2014

Law professor tells senators: If money is speech, outlawing prostitution is unconstitutional

Law professor tells senators: If money is speech, outlawing prostitution is unconstitutional

By Eric W. Dolan at the Raw Story

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/06/04/law-professor-tells-senators-if-money-is-speech-outlawing-prostitution-is-unconstitutional/?onswipe_redirect=no&oswrr=1

"SNIP......................


An American law professor told senators on Tuesday that outlawing prostitution was a violation of the First Amendment if spending money was a form of free speech.

“Your other point though about money not equaling speech is a critical point for people to understand,” American University professor Jamie Raskin said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. “There are lots of forms of purchase and exchange that we criminalize, for example, buying sex. We don’t say if someone wants to purchase the services of a prostitute, well that is just an expression of their speech.”

In its 1976 Buckley v. Valeo decision, the Supreme Court ruled that limits on political spending violated the First Amendment. The court held that spending money to influence elections was a form of constitutionally protected speech.

The decision was later followed by similar rulings in the Citizens United and McCutcheon cases, further eroding limits on political spending and contributions. The Supreme Court rulings have led to an unprecedented amount of money being spent to influence the outcome of elections.




.....................SNIP"
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Law professor tells senators: If money is speech, outlawing prostitution is unconstitutional (Original Post) applegrove Jun 2014 OP
I admire this guy TlalocW Jun 2014 #1
! applegrove Jun 2014 #3
he did!... didn't he! tk2kewl Jun 2014 #4
ha! frylock Jun 2014 #5
Prostitutes give me happy endings adieu Jun 2014 #9
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #2
In that case, so is buying crack. He should have taken it a step further, though. hughee99 Jun 2014 #6
K & R nt okaawhatever Jun 2014 #7
Damn straight but it goes straight over their heads KurtNYC Jun 2014 #8
Oh, wow, this looks interesting. Jamastiene Jun 2014 #10
"Come here, sweetie, I just want to have a word with you!" DireStrike Jun 2014 #11
is it just me? airplaneman Jun 2014 #12
Does the "money is free speech" interpretaition of First Amendment rights... AdHocSolver Jun 2014 #13
Bit of an insult to prostitutes smallcat88 Jun 2014 #14

TlalocW

(15,373 posts)
1. I admire this guy
Fri Jun 6, 2014, 06:24 PM
Jun 2014

Because I think he just told lawmakers to their faces in an official hearing that they're no different than prostitutes.

TlalocW

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
6. In that case, so is buying crack. He should have taken it a step further, though.
Fri Jun 6, 2014, 07:33 PM
Jun 2014

When the government takes taxes, it is infringing on my ability to spend money, and therefore my first amendment rights.

airplaneman

(1,239 posts)
12. is it just me?
Fri Jun 6, 2014, 09:02 PM
Jun 2014

It seems to me that anyone buying all the politicians they can would also be just as interested in buying all the sex they can. Outwardly it doesn't sound cool but inwardly it must get them excited.
-Airplane

AdHocSolver

(2,561 posts)
13. Does the "money is free speech" interpretaition of First Amendment rights...
Fri Jun 6, 2014, 09:08 PM
Jun 2014

...making the outlawing of prostitution unconstitutional apply only to oral sex?

smallcat88

(426 posts)
14. Bit of an insult to prostitutes
Fri Jun 6, 2014, 09:31 PM
Jun 2014

Since those in favor of Citizens United have morals far below that of whores.

I thought his most important point was that money is not speech, it's property! If the Koch's money actually started talking and said we don't like you, don't like being used by you - would they let it leave?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Law professor tells senat...