Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEscalating wages of the top 1% (Also: How Much Should You Be Making?)
Escalating wages of the top 1%
http://www.epi.org/publication/wages-for-top-1-percent-grow-faster/
The chart at the link is interactive. Note:
Wages for the top one percent climbed to a peak in 2007, up 156.2 percent from 1979. It regained much of that after the recovery, but is slightly below the peak at 153.6 percent.
Prior to the recession the peak for the 95 percent to 99 percent group was 55.4 percent (2007). It's currently at 61.6 percent. For the 90 percent to 95 percent, the peak was 34.2 percent (2008). It's currently at 39.2 percent. For the bottom 90 percent, the pre-recession peak was 16.7 percent (2007). It's currently at 17.1 percent.
Why isn't there more focus on shareholders' say on executive pay?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024877216
How Much Should You Be Making?
by Elise Gould
In honor of EPIs new initiative, Raising Americas Pay, we updated our wage calculator, which shows how much you would be making if wages had kept pace with productivity. Having wages for the vast majority of American workers keep pace with productivity is a key indicator of an economy that is working for all.
Economic inequality is a real and growing problem in America, but the discussion around addressing inequality too frequently sidesteps a crucial component: the key to shared prosperity is to foster wage growth for the vast majority of Americans who rely on their paychecks to make ends meet. In fact, raising the pay for most Americans is the central economic challenge of our timeessential to ameliorating income inequality, boosting living standards for the broad middle-class, reducing poverty, and sustaining economic growth.
Crucially, the large and growing wedge between productivity and typical workers pay is not inevitable. For example, in the three decades following World War II, wages did rise with productivity and living standards improved throughout the income distribution. Since then, however, the rewards to a growing economy over the last three-and-a-half decades have primarily accrued to those at the top (except for the period of tight labor markets in the late 1990s). Since 1979, the workforce is more educated, is working more, and produces more goods and services in every hour worked. And yet the vast majority of workers are not reaping the rewards of their increased productivity.
<...>
What would your paycheck be if wages had kept up with productivity? Take a look, and share with your friends. And remember that the vast majority of American workers should be earning more than they are. To learn more about what has happened and what we can do about it, visit the website for the latest EPI project, Raising Americas Pay.
- more -
http://www.epi.org/blog/making/
by Elise Gould
In honor of EPIs new initiative, Raising Americas Pay, we updated our wage calculator, which shows how much you would be making if wages had kept pace with productivity. Having wages for the vast majority of American workers keep pace with productivity is a key indicator of an economy that is working for all.
Economic inequality is a real and growing problem in America, but the discussion around addressing inequality too frequently sidesteps a crucial component: the key to shared prosperity is to foster wage growth for the vast majority of Americans who rely on their paychecks to make ends meet. In fact, raising the pay for most Americans is the central economic challenge of our timeessential to ameliorating income inequality, boosting living standards for the broad middle-class, reducing poverty, and sustaining economic growth.
Crucially, the large and growing wedge between productivity and typical workers pay is not inevitable. For example, in the three decades following World War II, wages did rise with productivity and living standards improved throughout the income distribution. Since then, however, the rewards to a growing economy over the last three-and-a-half decades have primarily accrued to those at the top (except for the period of tight labor markets in the late 1990s). Since 1979, the workforce is more educated, is working more, and produces more goods and services in every hour worked. And yet the vast majority of workers are not reaping the rewards of their increased productivity.
<...>
What would your paycheck be if wages had kept up with productivity? Take a look, and share with your friends. And remember that the vast majority of American workers should be earning more than they are. To learn more about what has happened and what we can do about it, visit the website for the latest EPI project, Raising Americas Pay.
- more -
http://www.epi.org/blog/making/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 677 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Escalating wages of the top 1% (Also: How Much Should You Be Making?) (Original Post)
ProSense
Jun 2014
OP
ProSense
(116,464 posts)1. Kick! n/t
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)2. DU Rec.
Lugnut
(9,791 posts)3. K&R! n/t
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)5. Best post you ever posted, ProSense. Thanks.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)6. +1