Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 06:37 AM Jun 2014

GOP’s firing squad idiocy: The hypocrisy of “humane executions”

http://www.salon.com/2014/06/07/gops_firing_squad_idiocy_the_hypocrisy_of_humane_executions/


The execution chamber at the Utah State Prison after Ronnie Lee Gardner was executed by firing squad Friday, June 18, 2010. (Credit: Reuters/Trent Nelson)

When Utah Republican congressman Paul Ray recently announced a proposal to bring back firing squads, it was a response to the infamous “botched” execution of Clayton Lockett in the state of Oklahoma. A few days later, the state of Tennessee approved the reinstatement of the electric chair in case it runs out of drugs for lethal injection (the drugs are made in Europe, where manufacturers refuse to sell them to anyone who would use them for that purpose).

Whether or not these alternatives get traction, they are important indicators of the political state of play in matters of capital punishment. Lockett’s 43-minute ordeal has already prompted the suspension of two other executions, and made lethal injection seem unsustainable.

Let’s backtrack to what might have been a historical turning point.

According to the official timeline, on the day of his execution Clayton Lockett struck a defiant note, refusing to submit to an X-ray until officers shot him with a stun gun (he also declined to see his lawyers, and turned down his last meal).
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP’s firing squad idiocy: The hypocrisy of “humane executions” (Original Post) xchrom Jun 2014 OP
Execution is made "humane" for us, not the criminal quaker bill Jun 2014 #1
If the USA continus its love affair with the death penalty then ... intaglio Jun 2014 #2
'thou shalt not kill' spanone Jun 2014 #3

quaker bill

(8,224 posts)
1. Execution is made "humane" for us, not the criminal
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:35 AM
Jun 2014

We have made it appear "humane" to please "modern sensibilities". It is essentially an inhuman act, regardless of how it is done. Hanging pretty curtains in the death chamber will not make it more "humane".

The article is correct, none of this is about the rights of the convicted, it is all about what we will give ourselves permission to do. "Humane executions" is a fantasy we have invented to give ourselves the permission to execute someone.

It does seem to potentially be time to stop fooling ourselves. This does likely mean that a small group of the convicted will be put to death in markedly more gruesome and gory manners at first. It also likely means that the practice will stop not long after that, when the modern sensibilities are sufficiently offended.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
2. If the USA continus its love affair with the death penalty then ...
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:48 AM
Jun 2014

... shooting is the best method - but not by f'n firing squad; the heart is not where life resides, ffs, and that's been known for 150 years or more. A helmet with 3 or 4 shotgun cartridges set off remotely would ensure immediate and probably painless extinction of awareness.

A better solution is not to f'n well execute.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP’s firing squad idiocy...