Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:21 AM Jun 2014

Shooter at SPU, Aaron Ybarra, had two involuntary hospitalizations for mental illness.

Thank goodness he was only able to get his hands on a shotgun -- not an assault weapon.

*The vast proportion of mentally ill people are not violent.*

But "delusional" people with rage issues shouldn't be be able to access guns, much less assault weapons.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-seattle-university-shooting-mental-illness-20140606-story.html

Ybarra called 911 in October 2010 and told authorities he wanted to “hurt himself and others” because he “had a rage inside him,” according to a Mountlake Terrace Police Department incident report. Ybarra, who was 23 and said he worked at a gun range, was involuntarily committed at a mental health hospital by police.

In July 2012, authorities caught Ybarra driving on a sidewalk and charged him with driving under the influence of alcohol. In October of that year, he was given two years of probation, according to Edmonds Municipal Court administrator Joan Ferebee. Ybarra was told that if he completed a treatment program, the charge would be lowered to reckless endangerment and he would be off probation by Halloween of this year.

In October 2012, neighbors called police because Ybarra was inexplicably lying in the middle of the street “very intoxicated.” A police report says Ybarra told officers that he wanted to die, specifically that “he wanted SWAT team to get him and make him famous” because “no one cares about him.” Again, he was taken temporarily to a mental health facility.

http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2014/06/06/aaron-ybarra-alleged-seattle-pacific-university-shooter-appears-in-court

When a prosecutor announced charges of one count each of first degree assault and first degree murder—which she said was pre-meditated and involved a statutory maximum penalty of life in prison without parole—Ybarra didn't visibly react. His public defender, Ramona Brandes, did not contest a move to deny bail. Ybarra let himself be guided by two court security personnel to a stand where he signed papers, before being returned to the jail.

Brandes then emerged into the cramped hallway outside. She cast her client in a deeply sympathetic light, explaining that he "suffers from significant and longstanding mental health issues including delusions that were in play during yesterday's tragedy." She said he'd been treated for these issues in the past, though she hadn't seen his medical records yet. And she had no information about why Ybarra wound up at Seattle Pacific University yesterday with a shotgun. One wonders, too, how the question of pre-meditation will be reconciled with claims that he was deluded.

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Shooter at SPU, Aaron Ybarra, had two involuntary hospitalizations for mental illness. (Original Post) pnwmom Jun 2014 OP
If he passed the background check for a shotgun Duckhunter935 Jun 2014 #1
Is it known how he acquired his weapon? Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #2
The article says he was working at a gun range. Shouldn't he have to pass a check for that? pnwmom Jun 2014 #3
Ahhhh, that makes sense. Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #7
At least he didn't have an assault weapon. The student could disable him pnwmom Jun 2014 #9
If we can't ban all guns, that's a place to start Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #12
is this an assalt weapon? Duckhunter935 Jun 2014 #13
Yes, it's an assault weapon with wood furniture Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #14
At least you are Duckhunter935 Jun 2014 #16
Several things Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #17
work to get it passed Duckhunter935 Jun 2014 #18
Why not? Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #19
Because it's a stupid idea, mostly Recursion Jun 2014 #20
I see a handgun ban as the icing on the cake Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #24
How is 90% of gun deaths "the icing on the cake"? That's the whole cake. Recursion Jun 2014 #30
Because if we go for handguns first, we are shooting ourselves in the foot Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #31
Alternately, as 1994 suggests we get exactly one chance, which we pay for Recursion Jun 2014 #34
Hence the chipping away Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #35
Right, but the opposite has happened since 1994 Recursion Jun 2014 #36
because they Duckhunter935 Jun 2014 #26
Well tough shit! HERVEPA Jun 2014 #27
Thats nice Duckhunter935 Jun 2014 #28
Sick of rights of gunners trumping everything else. So, yes, tough shit. HERVEPA Jun 2014 #29
Fuck the bill of rights, eh? X_Digger Jun 2014 #40
That would mean he's had a hunting license since he was 11? theHandpuppet Jun 2014 #10
Got my first one at 9 or 10. Think it was $2. Fishing free. Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #21
link says police say legal Duckhunter935 Jun 2014 #4
He worked at a gun range? That's interesting and there is no information yet to speak to Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #5
He used to work at the Kenmore Gun Range. His employers are clamming up. pnwmom Jun 2014 #6
Thanks for the info. There should be a great deal to learn about from this latest horror. Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #8
His manifesto reads like the ravings of a paranoid schizophrenic pnwmom Jun 2014 #11
There is a homicide investigation going on and with that, we'll learn if the family had Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #15
"mass shooting" or mass knifing? Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #22
Eleanor, please don't do that. I don't think I need to link you with the number of mass shootings Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #33
Jefferson, please don't tell me what not to do. Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #37
It was not my intention to demand anything Eleanor...it was a plea to reasoning. Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #41
I think there is room for reason. A good start is to... Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #43
What's really sad is as I was reading through this thread.... Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2014 #25
I believe you, there are too many incidents..horrific the direction these types of crimes Jefferson23 Jun 2014 #32
I'm for preventing buy of and removing of guns from the mentally ill who aikoaiko Jun 2014 #23
There seems to be a division over the rights of the mentally ill... Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #38
all people who have had an involuntary admission? cali Jun 2014 #39
In b4 ssristories...nt SidDithers Jun 2014 #42
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
1. If he passed the background check for a shotgun
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:29 AM
Jun 2014

He would have passed it for a semi-automatic rifle also.

 

Michigander_Life

(549 posts)
2. Is it known how he acquired his weapon?
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:38 AM
Jun 2014

Legal purchase with background check failure? Legal purchase without background check (thanks, gun shows)? Illegal black market purchase? Or theft?

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
3. The article says he was working at a gun range. Shouldn't he have to pass a check for that?
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:41 AM
Jun 2014

Another article says he had a hunting license till 2010.

http://www.kirotv.com/news/news/seattle-pacific-university-shooting-suspects-frien/ngFt6/

Capt. Chris Fowler of the Seattle Police Department confirmed Friday, “We can say Mr. Ybarra did legally obtain the shotgun several years earlier.”

KIRO 7 is working to find out where and when Ybarra got the weapon.

Records show Ybarra had a hunting and fishing license from 2001 until 2010.

 

Michigander_Life

(549 posts)
7. Ahhhh, that makes sense.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:00 AM
Jun 2014

He bought it before the mental health issues arose. I wonder if we shouldn't raise the minimum age to buy a weapon? I think it's 18 for long guns and 21 for handguns. Isn't it common for schizophrenics to begin showing symptoms several years into their 20s?

Maybe the involuntary commits prevented him from purchasing additional weapons..?

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
9. At least he didn't have an assault weapon. The student could disable him
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:02 AM
Jun 2014

with pepper spray while he reloaded the thing.

This could have been so much worse. I think we should reinstate and strengthen the assault weapons ban.

 

Michigander_Life

(549 posts)
12. If we can't ban all guns, that's a place to start
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:07 AM
Jun 2014

And limit magazine capacity to 5 rounds. And make possession of current era extended round magazines a felony if not turned in by 1/01/2015.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
13. is this an assalt weapon?
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:16 AM
Jun 2014


You willing to pay market value for the near a billion magazines over 5 rounds? That would be most all magazines ever sold and the really do not go bad. Some may have been damaged over the last 100+ years.
 

Michigander_Life

(549 posts)
14. Yes, it's an assault weapon with wood furniture
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:20 AM
Jun 2014

I would consider an exemption for a .22 LR, such as a Ruger 10/22, but the 9mm, detachable magazine rifle you posted is definitely an assault weapon.

And I'm not suggesting we pay for (buy back) the extended capacity magazines. I'm suggesting we make them illegal and make possession of them illegal after a certain date: 1/1/2015.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
16. At least you are
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:27 AM
Jun 2014

consistent. Any semi-auto rifle with a removable box magazine.

Pump action?

To take a possession from someone that was legally purchased and removed from possession by government action without just compensation would violate the 5th amendment.

 

Michigander_Life

(549 posts)
17. Several things
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:26 AM
Jun 2014

The 5th amendment has been held to require just compensation for property taken by the government for public use. This wouldn't be for public use - it would be for destruction.

The courts have found public safety exemptions to other constitutional protections time and time again.

Worst case scenario, simply make possession of the extended magazine a felony and leave it up to the people to dispose of them. Anyone who doesn't would lose their gun rights (felons) -- win/win!

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
20. Because it's a stupid idea, mostly
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:51 AM
Jun 2014

You're reacting to the absolute corner case of murders, random mass shootings, and even then a majority of them are done with handguns, the one type of gun nobody seems to be in any hurry to do anything about (except me, I guess; I don't see nearly as much constitutional protection for handguns as for rifles and shotguns, personally). The vast majority of gun murders just use the first bullet. The even vaster majority of gun deaths (since 2/3rds of them are suicides) just need the first bullet.

I do appreciate that you at least want to ban all semi-automatics that accept a detachable magazine. That's a position I don't take but it at least accomplishes what you intend to accomplish, unlike nebulous "assault weapons bans".

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
30. How is 90% of gun deaths "the icing on the cake"? That's the whole cake.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 01:00 PM
Jun 2014

Handguns are what's actually killing people. That's not icing.

 

Michigander_Life

(549 posts)
31. Because if we go for handguns first, we are shooting ourselves in the foot
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 01:07 PM
Jun 2014

We have to chip away at the 2A until a handgun ban is within reach.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
34. Alternately, as 1994 suggests we get exactly one chance, which we pay for
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 01:57 PM
Jun 2014

and throwing it away on laws that keep rifles from having bayonet lugs is a colossal waste of political capital.

(There's no definitive proof for your position or mine; I just wanted to get the contrary view out there.)

 

Michigander_Life

(549 posts)
35. Hence the chipping away
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 02:00 PM
Jun 2014

Look how the anti-choice movement has eroded Roe vs. Wade. They chipped away at abortion rights piece by piece, over years and years. I find it despicable because I am pro-choice, but their tactics and effectiveness should acknowledged utilized for gun control.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
36. Right, but the opposite has happened since 1994
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 02:07 PM
Jun 2014

When the original AWB was passed, military-styled rifles were a fringe thing. I remember at the range (I shot competitively in high school) we would laugh at people who brought them in. Now they're the most popular form of long gun in the country. When the 94 ban was passed, gunmakers filed down the bayonet lugs (or in some cases, literally just changed the brand name) at which point the guns were perfectly legal again and they immediately started selling like hotcakes*.

Now, it's not fair to blame all of that on the AWB; part of it was that the Gulf war era vets trained on guns like them rather than on more traditional looking guns, and people tend to prefer a gun they already know how to maintain. But it's ludicrous to say that wasn't a large part of the huge increase in popularity in the past 20 years of military-styled rifles.

* I often hear, "well, we need to write a better law without loopholes". Fair enough; but that better law that actually does what supporters think the original AWB did would have to ban all semi-automatics with detachable magazines, which is something like 85% of all guns out there now. It wasn't that the AWB was a decent idea with poorly-crafted loopholes, it was a fundamentally dishonest law that claimed to do something it didn't.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
4. link says police say legal
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:45 AM
Jun 2014

if bought from an FFL to include at a gunshow a background check would have been passed for transfer. It is possible it was an intrastate private transfer and that would be a state issue as to whether a background check is required.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
5. He worked at a gun range? That's interesting and there is no information yet to speak to
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:46 AM
Jun 2014

the details of his involuntary hospitalizations. Who/where he was treated, how long, was
there follow up care.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
8. Thanks for the info. There should be a great deal to learn about from this latest horror.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:00 AM
Jun 2014

We have so many mass shootings now....we're still waiting to hear about Elliot Rodger.

We're not going to be able to keep up.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
11. His manifesto reads like the ravings of a paranoid schizophrenic
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:05 AM
Jun 2014

with delusions of grandeur ("I am god&quot . He was prescribed anti-psychotics that he refused to take, and a family friend was quoted as saying he heard voices.

That might be all we ever hear about him, unless his family decides to go public.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
15. There is a homicide investigation going on and with that, we'll learn if the family had
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:26 AM
Jun 2014

conservatorship..I don't think they did. The therapists may fight not cooperating but
with that said, their records even their session notes can be under subpoena read
by a judge who can review them and make a determination without disclosing their
content to the public. In Newtown, the school systems lawyers have been fighting
the release of their internal documents on Lanza...it is an interesting fight to CYA.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
33. Eleanor, please don't do that. I don't think I need to link you with the number of mass shootings
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 01:29 PM
Jun 2014

for just this year alone.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
37. Jefferson, please don't tell me what not to do.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:23 AM
Jun 2014

The reference was to the I Vista mass murder which has morphed into a "mass shooting" since that locks into a MSM-driven Narrative. I do not like blatant inaccuracies like this, and will continue to point them out. Here's another: The great attention to that idiot's misogynistic beliefs (he certainly had them), but with scant reference to his hatred of men who got along well with women. In the event, the punk was maliciously equitable in whom he killed.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
41. It was not my intention to demand anything Eleanor...it was a plea to reasoning.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:51 AM
Jun 2014

Clearly, we do not agree.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
43. I think there is room for reason. A good start is to...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:32 PM
Jun 2014

drop gun control/prohibition as an approach to social problems, and get serious about defining social problems, and deal with them in a progressive manner. Taking a narrow prohibitionist approach to a cluster of ill-defined problems is an admission that we have given up on our own progressive beliefs.

Frankly, I think progressives, liberals, and leftists are lost in the woods, without a party, without leadership, without a coherent belief system, without even a way to Communicate seriously with each other. So we turn to controls & bans, point at a hated group, condemn a race or region, attack each other. The people in charge of this country want exactly that.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,311 posts)
25. What's really sad is as I was reading through this thread....
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 12:02 PM
Jun 2014

....... I got to this post and got confused and forgot which massacre we were discussing. I had to scroll back to the top.

aikoaiko

(34,162 posts)
23. I'm for preventing buy of and removing of guns from the mentally ill who
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:55 AM
Jun 2014

have had due process such as the case of involuntary commitment.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
38. There seems to be a division over the rights of the mentally ill...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:30 AM
Jun 2014

even more pronounced among gun-controllers than among 2A defenders. Due process is a tough one to handle, which is why 5A suffers slippage so often in these debates.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
39. all people who have had an involuntary admission?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:53 AM
Jun 2014

Like this woman?

-- There was no legal basis for holding an Essex woman against her will for 5 1/2 weeks at a psychiatric ward after her estranged husband killed their son and then hanged himself, a Vermont Superior Court judge ruled Friday.

Judge Kevin Griffin ordered that Christina Schumacher, 48, be allowed to leave Fletcher Allen Health Care in Burlington at once.

"The Application for Involuntary Treatment is DENIED. The Court ORDERS respondent released immediately," Griffin wrote.

Schumacher was hospitalized involuntarily Dec. 19, one day after the bodies of Gunnar Schumacher, 14, and Ludwig "Sonny" Schumacher, 49, were found in an Essex apartment.

<snip>

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/01/24/christina-schumacher-gunnar-ludwig/4851231/

Having worked for the federal Protection and Advocacy program here in Vermont, I can tell you that the majority of people committed (at least here) are not a threat if they are in possession of a fire arm. Sweeping laws such as you suggest, are a very bad thing. Cases should be looked at one at a time.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Shooter at SPU, Aaron Yba...