Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 02:19 PM Jun 2014

I am an older white woman, a retired teacher.

There are now two threads up going with the theme of how "older white men" and older people at DU in general are keeping the board from being progressive enough for the younger folks. Some even say that when we are all gone it will be more liberal.

Way to make seniors feel part of things.

Some of us "older" people have been here for many years. It's been 12 almost 13 for me. Some have been here since the inception in 2001. Many of us are criticized for being more liberal than our present Democratic party.

I want to say that I don't think there are many here who deserve the denigration going on in those two threads. There are always some, and I probably don't run into them because I am concentrating on other issues. Mostly education for me.

It's going to tear the forum apart if it keeps up.

Most of us older people here post about issues that are important to us, and the ones I read don't get into the race issue.

If I differ with President Obama, it is on policy matters like education and Social Security cuts.

I think there needs to be some moderation here.

485 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am an older white woman, a retired teacher. (Original Post) madfloridian Jun 2014 OP
Rec for exposure. bravenak Jun 2014 #1
I had to check the OP's opening sentence to see if I had roguevalley Jun 2014 #29
My exact same status here makes us triplets. ancianita Jun 2014 #35
triplets are good. :D:D:D roguevalley Jun 2014 #67
Another sister here Hekate Jun 2014 #88
For all that it is informed by heartbreak, I simply love your post... CBHagman Jun 2014 #98
BRAVA!!!! I'm exactly there with you!!! calimary Jun 2014 #117
Amen, sister Hekate Jun 2014 #127
^^^ calimary Jun 2014 #133
another Amen to you and Hekate. BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #136
I think I first became a feminist while sitting in catechism class with Father Flanagan as guest calimary Jun 2014 #154
HA! I too remember sitting in religion class and having the priest napi21 Jun 2014 #181
I am stlll Catholic too yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #242
Honestly, if she believed that, it may have influenced her career choice Maeve Jun 2014 #268
I was never subjected to that stuff. BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #358
your cat, blanche, is AWESOME! roguevalley Jun 2014 #170
lol! that's somebody's cat I found on the innertoobz. BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #178
I want. LOL! What a great cat. Thanks for putting it here. :D:D:D roguevalley Jun 2014 #196
you're most welcome! BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #356
who is the lady with the little witch doggie? That is a hilarious dog :D:D:D roguevalley Jun 2014 #400
dat's me and Shrimpybooboobaby BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #401
Oh my god, Blanche. How cute you two are. I will have to try this sort of roguevalley Jun 2014 #402
Awwwwwwwww, tanks! BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #403
+ about a million! Or so. BlueMTexpat Jun 2014 #205
I worked for McCarthy too Madam Mossfern Jun 2014 #130
Love your description, freckles and all. madfloridian Jun 2014 #141
I adored Harry Truman and have a pin of a shoe with a hole in it roguevalley Jun 2014 #171
Wish I could recommend this, Hekate. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2014 #291
Yes we have actually been in the fight to save our democracy; some intense fighting on saving our DhhD Jun 2014 #69
Who said this? Number23 Jun 2014 #91
The way I took it was that bravenak was talking about society in general davidpdx Jun 2014 #120
I am a she. madfloridian Jun 2014 #135
Oophs sorry davidpdx Jun 2014 #140
Thanks, me, too. madfloridian Jun 2014 #142
(((HUG))) nt Mojorabbit Jun 2014 #190
Hugs back. madfloridian Jun 2014 #191
It has been really rough Mojorabbit Jun 2014 #195
Old white conservative leaning men. bravenak Jun 2014 #236
there has to be a way to discuss this fact noiretextatique Jun 2014 #283
That was my basic point. bravenak Jun 2014 #287
I agree...actually it is ridiculous noiretextatique Jun 2014 #299
Those who know what's up, know what's up here (as in this thread) too Number23 Jun 2014 #344
Thank you. bravenak Jun 2014 #346
Perhaps it is a good idea, especially for Liberals, to drop the labels and broadbrushing of sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #353
I will work hard for Crist, but that's about it for me. No other Dems to vote for anyway. madfloridian Jun 2014 #363
It matteers, Madfloridian, and you have no need ever to defend yourself against such bile. You are sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #366
And also I am at Dkos as floridagal... madfloridian Jun 2014 #369
You will have plenty of support if you decide to stay here. We are targets of a certain group sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #371
you are correct, however the GOP noiretextatique Jun 2014 #408
Of course, in fact we've always been able to discuss it. We have shamed them into accepting women sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #411
WOW, now I'm thrilled that I waiting to post my first response.. OLDMADAM Jun 2014 #422
Powerful first post. madfloridian Jun 2014 #424
Hello OLDMADAM. Baitball Blogger Jun 2014 #425
The "white female poster" fully understood connotations. I tried to be tactful.... madfloridian Jun 2014 #426
In the end, this is all probably a good thing. Baitball Blogger Jun 2014 #428
This thread is about me. bravenak Jun 2014 #429
Oh my.. I don't know how to respond to your request.. OLDMADAM Jun 2014 #437
Irony: redqueen Jun 2014 #438
I felt the same way when i joined and did not join the AA group until later. bravenak Jun 2014 #440
Hang in there, bravenak. Baitball Blogger Jun 2014 #447
Oh my god that is so sad. bravenak Jun 2014 #448
Don't get discouraged. Baitball Blogger Jun 2014 #449
Ok. bravenak Jun 2014 #452
Beautiful statement, OLDMADAM. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #434
Agreed The Road Runner Jun 2014 #435
There were actually generalizations on the makeup of DU that came first... countryjake Jun 2014 #156
Others still see it when the thread is trashed or ignored. madfloridian Jun 2014 #175
But there are tons of things that are left standing here... countryjake Jun 2014 #200
I know in my heart you are exactly right. madfloridian Jun 2014 #201
This ^^^^^^^ treestar Jun 2014 #294
Did you read the subthread between bravenak and me? msanthrope Jun 2014 #174
I can answer that JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #203
This whole thing has been so illuminating/mortifying/predictable Number23 Jun 2014 #204
Let's talk about mischaracterisation... Violet_Crumble Jun 2014 #208
In defense of me. bravenak Jun 2014 #211
And that's the bravenak I like seeing... Violet_Crumble Jun 2014 #214
I never got mad at her. bravenak Jun 2014 #215
I am going to chime in here once. PowerToThePeople Jun 2014 #251
Violet...mirt does not see who alerts, right? nt msanthrope Jun 2014 #220
No, only the admin know who alerts on what n/t Violet_Crumble Jun 2014 #221
So....unless the alerter clearly states who they are, you don't know if someone is alert stalking? msanthrope Jun 2014 #222
I'm going on what Skinner said a while back about alert stalking... Violet_Crumble Jun 2014 #232
I think the situation you described regarding yourself is alert stalking. You shut it down msanthrope Jun 2014 #234
No, it wasn't. I think claims of alert stalking are way overdone... Violet_Crumble Jun 2014 #282
Madfloridian got upset so that explains and justifies all of this? Number23 Jun 2014 #337
Yes, Madfloridian is still upset at being called a serial stalker and Repub. troll. madfloridian Jun 2014 #350
Your indignation started before you were accused of being a Repub troll (and I have no idea Number23 Jun 2014 #357
There was another post going on at the same time. madfloridian Jun 2014 #359
You jumped up to attack bravenak. And you announced to the world that you'd alerted on her post Number23 Jun 2014 #360
Here is my post about what I am not, a link to one of her posts, and a link to the ongoing AA post. madfloridian Jun 2014 #368
"I never realized there was such anger toward those of us who are white in this forum." Number23 Jun 2014 #380
Here's my whole post in my defense. Perhaps you did not read all of it. madfloridian Jun 2014 #383
But what does that have to do with my post or anything that I've written? Number23 Jun 2014 #385
Oh, I did visit there today. madfloridian Jun 2014 #387
I'm not worried about the alert stalker stuff. I realize that is important to you Number23 Jun 2014 #390
I just posted one of the posts here in entirety. madfloridian Jun 2014 #391
In what way did madfloridian mischaracterize what bravenak said? countryjake Jun 2014 #370
Wow, I guess I missed that or did not read completely madfloridian Jun 2014 #405
In fact here is my whole post in my defense. madfloridian Jun 2014 #372
I did not know i was flagged until about an hour before i posted in AA. bravenak Jun 2014 #212
You might find this subthread of interest to you.... msanthrope Jun 2014 #224
I see that our AA group was already known about. bravenak Jun 2014 #229
Yes. Note that exchange happened a week before yours. FYI...when you get a hide, the admins msanthrope Jun 2014 #230
I am enjoying how easily people have fallen into the trap of believing i called her any names. bravenak Jun 2014 #235
You didn't call any DUer names. And I hope that the links I gave you give a little context msanthrope Jun 2014 #238
Well i feel like i should stay off of here and let this thing die. bravenak Jun 2014 #239
I think that was a very gracious apology to madflo in the prior thread, and I respect msanthrope Jun 2014 #241
Bravenak, I really don't think most of the posters replying here... countryjake Jun 2014 #269
I was just going by the DU polls. bravenak Jun 2014 #270
I don't see what is so outrageous about that post BainsBane Jun 2014 #323
Very interesting subthread you posted, msanthrope. Number23 Jun 2014 #338
Wow. nt Bobbie Jo Jun 2014 #347
Indeed..I cannot believe she was flagged. My post #224 above msanthrope Jun 2014 #226
I've seen enough posts here that are ageist. WCLinolVir Jun 2014 #225
I am not sure what is going on, but bravenak is one of my fave people here so, i will say this randys1 Jun 2014 #279
Randy i love you too. bravenak Jun 2014 #281
"...kill Wall Street"... really? WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #328
98% of All the problems in America are from stupid fucking fundies snooper2 Jun 2014 #420
Yes, it is not ageism to recognize that older white people treestar Jun 2014 #293
I think I already responded here but I will again, bravenak is NOT an ageist randys1 Jun 2014 #427
Proud to be progressive ... GeorgeGist Jun 2014 #134
I never called anyone lazy, stupid or selfish. bravenak Jun 2014 #233
I already defended you on that. madfloridian Jun 2014 #430
I posted that as a response to this. bravenak Jun 2014 #432
Do you really have the nerve Waiting For Everyman Jun 2014 #439
No. I expect exactly this. bravenak Jun 2014 #441
"Scared"? LOL, yeah right -- DUers didn't just fall off the turnip truck. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #446
So you think the Dem Party doesn't need 'old' voters? Is that the position of the Party, or just sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #164
Careful Sabrina, that poster is busy telling everyone that she is being stalked by those Dragonfli Jun 2014 #172
Thanks Dragonfli, I've never seen such drivel, even on some of the Right Wing forums I used to post sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #367
I never said any of that Sabrina. bravenak Jun 2014 #217
I have read the post you wrote bravenak. But I don't think the problem is just that post. Apparently sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #373
Thank you Sabrina. bravenak Jun 2014 #374
Thank you for listening. I appreciate that. I know we all say things the wrong way sometimes, sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #377
No problem. I am lacking a filter. bravenak Jun 2014 #378
That's true, I guess we all get sensitive because we feel passionately about things and on a forum sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #379
Yes, they are my sweeties. bravenak Jun 2014 #381
Then I'll say it again, they are adorable! sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #382
Thanks! bravenak Jun 2014 #384
I will post it again. bravenak Jun 2014 #219
+10,000 WCLinolVir Jun 2014 #228
It's getting silly. Just remember that the extremists are a fringe. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2014 #2
And get far more attention than they deserve from the media. maddiemom Jun 2014 #70
Seems to me that most of the progressives on this board are the people over 50 BuelahWitch Jun 2014 #3
No definitions given. madfloridian Jun 2014 #8
Yes, this. We remember a time when the Democratic Party actually stood up for working people, kath Jun 2014 #11
Good point. madfloridian Jun 2014 #12
And in the next generation, Jesus and JFK, with FDR still up there ideally. maddiemom Jun 2014 #57
Agreed. progressoid Jun 2014 #15
What is the detractors' definition of "progressives" and "liberals"? Maedhros Jun 2014 #43
Or very close to 50 - TBF Jun 2014 #129
My political steering wheel is turned so far left defacto7 Jun 2014 #202
Some Of the Most Radical Here, Ma'am, Are Among The Oldest The Magistrate Jun 2014 #4
It's a very broad brush, and it's not needed. madfloridian Jun 2014 #5
Well said and I fully agree. justhanginon Jun 2014 #25
I, too... awoke_in_2003 Jun 2014 #72
I'm among the younger "older white men." hunter Jun 2014 #47
This black man thanks you for telling the truth!-nt Anansi1171 Jun 2014 #100
I am speaking of the DU community. I know what it's like to live in a RW community. madfloridian Jun 2014 #106
I appreciate your comments. Baitball Blogger Jun 2014 #340
maybe because the left's biggest victories and most outspoken times were back then. alp227 Jun 2014 #95
Perhaps we should just speak about people as people, criticize them if we think they are wrong, as sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #157
Well, durn... chervilant Jun 2014 #223
I didn't say they were very influential, I said they claim to represent women. Those are two sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #351
It's really amusing to watch you accuse others of claiming they speak for all women while seaglass Jun 2014 #419
Absolutely, sir. (nt) Heidi Jun 2014 #176
Exactly! scarletwoman Jun 2014 #246
R#6 & K for, KKKarl's strategy has been to pit Dem constituencies against one another. n/t UTUSN Jun 2014 #6
good heavens, have I been missing something? a VERY cranky, radical old white woman niyad Jun 2014 #7
What threads? Where? Le Taz Hot Jun 2014 #9
I too am an older white woman, a retired teacher... FLyellowdog Jun 2014 #10
I'm sorry shenmue Jun 2014 #13
Another older, retired, white woman here. SheilaT Jun 2014 #14
I like older white women. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #23
..... madfloridian Jun 2014 #26
Mine too LeafsFan17 Jun 2014 #37
I've known a few Peace Corp people, so know what you're saying. maddiemom Jun 2014 #63
im 55 MFM008 Jun 2014 #206
An RPCV from BlueMTexpat Jun 2014 #207
I am a former educator too, MissDeeds Jun 2014 #16
You are appreciated voteearlyvoteoften Jun 2014 #17
Guess who started this generation divide battle? The Third Way...in the 90s. madfloridian Jun 2014 #18
when I taught as an old geezer, I had youngers ask me to get roguevalley Jun 2014 #30
If you want to know why America has a deficit, look into the tax returns of the very wealthy JDPriestly Jun 2014 #167
Those affiliated with Third Way should be purged from the party. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #266
K&R. They've been so destructive. Overseas Jun 2014 #302
Yes. They employed an elaborate ruse to hand over control of the party to corporations. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #303
Agreed. Overseas Jun 2014 #306
Yep. The big red Trojan Horse you see in the middle of the Democratic Party is the Third Way. nt Zorra Jun 2014 #332
I couldn't agree more. They have their own party, they are only in this party because the other one sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #361
They have been so old-fashioned while pretending to modernize. Regressive. Overseas Jun 2014 #305
exactly. The "people" are asked to sacrifice for the common good. Where is the sacrifice for the liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #450
Its more than that and its sad and pisses me off to to levels of rage. MANY of us grew up in Drew Richards Jun 2014 #19
Good rant. Lifelong Protester Jun 2014 #55
I'm over 60, been on du since very near the beginning.... tomp Jun 2014 #249
+1! Enthusiast Jun 2014 #267
if anything DonCoquixote Jun 2014 #20
Many of us consider you to be an example of the very best DU has to offer. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #21
I'll second that. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #99
Links please Andy823 Jun 2014 #22
I have the old DU habit of not linking to posts when I am being critical. madfloridian Jun 2014 #24
Call it out LeafsFan17 Jun 2014 #38
Yes isin't strange that that used to be the policy...and I agree with..not linking..but others do it Drew Richards Jun 2014 #81
Recommended. H2O Man Jun 2014 #27
Well said! Drew Richards Jun 2014 #87
Amen to that. madfloridian Jun 2014 #143
I'm an old-timer here..... Uben Jun 2014 #28
Recommended Marrah_G Jun 2014 #31
They're characterized by Their willingness to throw people under their bus, not just by WHO They MisterP Jun 2014 #32
Certain forms of bigotry are allowed, for example DrDan Jun 2014 #33
It is simply human nature and our culture to blame "others" for problems. goldent Jun 2014 #34
That is terrible, so sorry you felt that way LittleBlue Jun 2014 #36
All older people are not the same. Stellar Jun 2014 #39
Yes.... Grey Jun 2014 #40
Ageism is as bad as sexism I say... Helen Borg Jun 2014 #41
Excellent thread. K&R Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #42
let's be honest here - is this the Tiger Beat club again? Skittles Jun 2014 #44
Of course it is. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #101
LOL Skittles Jun 2014 #103
LOL WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #110
uh yes, really Skittles Jun 2014 #152
Yes. bravenak Jun 2014 #237
No, it is the Golden Girls snooper2 Jun 2014 #421
what madfloridian said bigtree Jun 2014 #45
Another older white woman here, and I will be damned if I will apologize hamsterjill Jun 2014 #46
Amen sister! StarryNite Jun 2014 #60
The young folks are one pregnancy scare away from getting it. Both sexes. Warpy Jun 2014 #79
Right On! Drew Richards Jun 2014 #85
I agree. hamsterjill Jun 2014 #114
A post referencing Swift and baby-eating was once hidden... WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #123
I know, sometimes the ignorance here is astonishing Warpy Jun 2014 #169
True. It's the rudeness and doubling-down when one is so clearly wrong...` WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #297
Sheesh. That's pathetic. kath Jun 2014 #192
That's a good point. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #289
Many of us remember... onyourleft Jun 2014 #82
I remember girl friends suddenly gone for a whole school year. madfloridian Jun 2014 #153
Here Here KauaiK Jun 2014 #48
As an old woman/mother/grandmother/great-grandmother and one time activist GoldenOldie Jun 2014 #65
Hooray. Another golden geezer here, and here close to the start elfin Jun 2014 #49
I, too am an older white woman and retired teacher. I'll hit seventy in 2015. maddiemom Jun 2014 #50
My family were mostly Republicans. They believed basically the same as we did. madfloridian Jun 2014 #56
In a nutshell. The Southern Strategy and then the "Christian" Right." maddiemom Jun 2014 #68
After giving it some thought, I realized that the blame goes to Karl Rove; maddiemom Jun 2014 #250
I'm an Old White Guy and here is what I believe in..... zwyziec Jun 2014 #51
Great post. madfloridian Jun 2014 #52
Wonderful! You are are defnitely 75. I've got a half dozen years to go, but agree maddiemom Jun 2014 #76
I forget why I clicked on this thread... Gidney N Cloyd Jun 2014 #53
..... madfloridian Jun 2014 #58
Right on, Sister! I'm an old, liberal white guy! LongTomH Jun 2014 #54
I put a lot heaven05 Jun 2014 #59
I am an old woman, named after my mother... KG Jun 2014 #61
When I used to sing professionally, Le Taz Hot Jun 2014 #83
I saw some of the comments on one thread yesterday. historylovr Jun 2014 #62
Seems like a certain set wants to move forward past what made us Democrats. Octafish Jun 2014 #64
That is what I see also. nt laundry_queen Jun 2014 #71
Me too. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #168
I totally agree with you! nikto Jun 2014 #108
+1. It does seem that way, doesn't it. nt historylovr Jun 2014 #122
Wonderful post, MadFlo Blue_In_AK Jun 2014 #66
Thanks, Blue madfloridian Jun 2014 #145
Sure. Blue_In_AK Jun 2014 #149
I, too, am an older woman--I'll asjr Jun 2014 #73
You sound like an amazing person. madfloridian Jun 2014 #183
Sorry you have to feel that way on DU, asjr. But you're not alone, there is a nasty trend going on sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #348
Thanks Mad.... SomethingFishy Jun 2014 #74
^^^THIS!^^^ scarletwoman Jun 2014 #240
Who are the idiots making such asinine judgments?! I, for one, am a 64-yr-old FLAMING Liberal. WinkyDink Jun 2014 #75
This older white man is definately pulling this board to the left. Scuba Jun 2014 #77
And thank you for that. madfloridian Jun 2014 #461
I agree with you on this. AverageJoe90 Jun 2014 #78
Thanks for... onyourleft Jun 2014 #80
To all those who are wishing we would all just hurry up and die off: Le Taz Hot Jun 2014 #84
Any of you kids think you're more progressive than me, but weren't out protesting with Occupy, Zorra Jun 2014 #86
Love it! scarletwoman Jun 2014 #245
+10000000000000000000000 QC Jun 2014 #290
KnR, madfloridian Hekate Jun 2014 #89
I haven't seen the threads, but don't mind them. Beacool Jun 2014 #90
Absolutely agree jopacaco Jun 2014 #92
Hi! I also come from blue collar roots in the Pgh area. Welcome to DU! kath Jun 2014 #194
Welcome to DU, from a native Johnstowner. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #330
Welcome to DU, jopacaco! femmocrat Jun 2014 #341
Me, too, liberal that is. The older I get the more liberal. madfloridian Jun 2014 #389
retired librarian, old white southern male, progressive side of every intraparty divide carolinayellowdog Jun 2014 #93
instead of making it iamthebandfanman Jun 2014 #94
You were here before they were and, if you choose, you'll be here long after they've gone.... Rowdyboy Jun 2014 #96
I may have been clueless when younger, but I don't remember being rude. madfloridian Jun 2014 #97
Hey madflo. I agree with you and have never thought about age here... Violet_Crumble Jun 2014 #109
I should have bitten my tongue last night instead of responding. madfloridian Jun 2014 #116
I really believe part of it is the anonymnity granted by the keyboard... Rowdyboy Jun 2014 #180
I, too, am an older (71) white woman AND A PROGRESSIVE. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #102
, blkmusclmachine Jun 2014 #104
Still at it in the trenches in downtown tpa. cachukis Jun 2014 #105
Hi there, haven't seen you post in ages. madfloridian Jun 2014 #197
Thank you. I've been here since 2002, and tired of being ripped to shreds. Faygo Kid Jun 2014 #107
I am also an oldie and wish to express a couple things to the youngsters onboard. Frustratedlady Jun 2014 #111
As an old white woman, I just assume that those here who stupidly broad-brush djean111 Jun 2014 #112
I get the distinct impression that DU is primarily made up of "older" people redruddyred Jun 2014 #113
Right on! FloriTexan Jun 2014 #115
Thank you, from an old fart who's been here since the start of this place. GoneOffShore Jun 2014 #118
Another almost-retired teacher and white female. femmocrat Jun 2014 #119
My daughter says I have an "inner hippie". madfloridian Jun 2014 #121
MF, most people ignore those who are here to divide people. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #124
Ad hominem arguments are distractions I hate liars Jun 2014 #125
PS: I'm not criticizing this thread... I hate liars Jun 2014 #126
MF is responding to some pretty nasty comments about 'old people' on this forum. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #166
You are right though, Sabrina. madfloridian Jun 2014 #185
No, I don't think you should lie low, MF. Liberals need to stand up more. It's because they often sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #393
Keep up the good fight madfloridian! neverforget Jun 2014 #128
I'm an older white man OldRedneck Jun 2014 #131
Love your post. Thanks for sharing. madfloridian Jun 2014 #187
That is an incredible story. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #271
The account of the person who thinks "old white men" are... SMC22307 Jun 2014 #132
Thank you. I usually stay out of stuff. This is twice in two weeks... madfloridian Jun 2014 #137
My pleasure. SMC22307 Jun 2014 #144
Some of us progressives grew old here! Generic Other Jun 2014 #138
Rec 840high Jun 2014 #139
I really value your input and that of older DU'ers steve2470 Jun 2014 #146
Thanks a lot for that. madfloridian Jun 2014 #148
"Who let all these old people in here?" NBachers Jun 2014 #147
Old memories...bet I could list more. madfloridian Jun 2014 #150
Yes, I was a little restrained with my entries. We all could fill in a lot of memories, couldn't we? NBachers Jun 2014 #151
There are people here who were involved in the civil rights, environmental, anti-war, etc. movements G_j Jun 2014 #155
Amen to that. madfloridian Jun 2014 #158
I am an older white woman also, and I agree. Thanks. nt babylonsister Jun 2014 #159
I've been here since 2001. Triana Jun 2014 #160
It's been OK for a long time to "hate old white guys", if we're being blunt Corruption Inc Jun 2014 #161
I am not old, only 62, and JEB Jun 2014 #162
me too. ellenrr Jun 2014 #227
When did Democrats start demeaning the elderly? Oilwellian Jun 2014 #163
In the 2008 primary. DURHAM D Jun 2014 #253
Madfloridian, you have always been advocating for education akbacchus_BC Jun 2014 #165
I have been retired for a while. I see what is happening by contact and research. madfloridian Jun 2014 #177
Well said, Mad.... paleotn Jun 2014 #173
Just try real hard not to take it to heart, madfloridian... countryjake Jun 2014 #179
the FUD looking for fissures has been extremely strong this past year NuttyFluffers Jun 2014 #182
Yay! Tell 'em, girl! Duppers Jun 2014 #184
If we are dragging those "younger folk" down, I think they ought to take their young asses, MADem Jun 2014 #186
......... madfloridian Jun 2014 #188
Some of my favorite people davidthegnome Jun 2014 #189
no room for racism on du. glad to be the 200th rec of this thread Liberal_in_LA Jun 2014 #193
K&R LiberalElite Jun 2014 #198
do not be fooled DonCoquixote Jun 2014 #199
I'm a middle-aged feminist BainsBane Jun 2014 #209
Dear Mad ... hang in there! BlueMTexpat Jun 2014 #210
Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #213
Little old 60+ woman here,not yet retired, but wannabe. raccoon Jun 2014 #216
What so many younger people tend to forget is that too will someday be older justiceischeap Jun 2014 #218
That sort of stuff is why I barely ever post here any. 99Forever Jun 2014 #231
Much empathy with your words. madfloridian Jun 2014 #396
You're not the only one reconsidering your party affiliation. If the party doesn't want 'old white sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #409
Sabrina, question. I swear I must be stupid. madfloridian Jun 2014 #410
Look at the top of this page. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #412
Thanks, after this I better fill one out. madfloridian Jun 2014 #413
It's definitely a good idea. I filled it out a while ago, still have a few spaces though which sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #414
It helps a lot PowerToThePeople Jun 2014 #417
I have always been a registered Democrat, and a two-time Obama voter. madfloridian Jun 2014 #243
Per more stuff in this thread....I ALERTED ONCE. madfloridian Jun 2014 #244
OK, I'm a white male, 71. rogerashton Jun 2014 #247
I am an older white women, retired school nurse mgardener Jun 2014 #248
People should know what this is about BainsBane Jun 2014 #252
Okay, here goes. Here's the text since you keep pushing it. madfloridian Jun 2014 #255
If you wanted to "be in this together" BainsBane Jun 2014 #257
I did try to discuss. madfloridian Jun 2014 #258
You didn't respond to her apology BainsBane Jun 2014 #259
At least she didn't say 'I really don't care about her apologies.' Violet_Crumble Jun 2014 #260
That is what you single out as nasty? BainsBane Jun 2014 #261
It was an example of a really nasty response to a genuine and heartfelt apology... Violet_Crumble Jun 2014 #262
This message was self-deleted by its author boston bean Jun 2014 #285
Oh please. RiffRandell Jun 2014 #325
I've seen her apologize several times BainsBane Jun 2014 #333
Forget it, Baines. Thanks for trying, though. Peace to all. Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #336
She never apologized to me. RiffRandell Jun 2014 #342
I never mentioned the name, never gave a link until just now when you pushed it. madfloridian Jun 2014 #265
I guess we had it coming to us. Baitball Blogger Jun 2014 #278
I think it was a good post. bravenak Jun 2014 #256
It was an EXCELLENT post. redqueen Jun 2014 #274
Not ALL men!! bravenak Jun 2014 #276
It is SO clear in your post which segment of society you were talking about. redqueen Jun 2014 #277
Because that is not how it was stated PowerToThePeople Jun 2014 #280
Bullshit. Find me some bellyaching about this redqueen Jun 2014 #295
To be honest, it made me do a second and third read. historylovr Jun 2014 #286
+1000... SidDithers Jun 2014 #263
Well said. redqueen Jun 2014 #275
This thread is about posters Union Scribe Jun 2014 #386
I would think if people were tired of division BainsBane Jun 2014 #394
anytime any1 says questionseverything Jun 2014 #254
Thanks for the post. ctsnowman Jun 2014 #264
I see all my friends are under the transparency tab libodem Jun 2014 #272
Another old broad checking in Maeve Jun 2014 #273
frankly, I do not believe age is the issue noiretextatique Jun 2014 #284
There's been an attempt generally to divide the young from the old(er) in the media. alarimer Jun 2014 #288
Noticed the "old" meme crop up, which is generally applied to anyone middle-aged or older... villager Jun 2014 #292
I am often seen as too liberal here. madfloridian Jun 2014 #296
Exactly. villager Jun 2014 #298
as though the party's problem is rigid, doctrinaire lefties rather than glib corporate spokesmodels MisterP Jun 2014 #329
Exactly, redux villager Jun 2014 #334
Jeane Kirkpatrick/Scoop Jackson playbook? that's an OLD one nt MisterP Jun 2014 #335
If there is honest sincerity about not wanting to disparage older people here... madfloridian Jun 2014 #300
nailed it. djean111 Jun 2014 #301
I am serious. madfloridian Jun 2014 #309
I know you are. And yes, it is being doubled-down on. djean111 Jun 2014 #311
It's interesting to me that there was no similar angst about 'the dividing' when this came out redqueen Jun 2014 #310
That was published in 2001. madfloridian Jun 2014 #315
Are you talking about the thread where bravenak talks about being alert stalked? redqueen Jun 2014 #317
It reads like the future of DU to me. madfloridian Jun 2014 #320
The title does not bother me. It also doesn't bother me when women complain about white feminists. redqueen Jun 2014 #321
Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #304
Why does the older white demographic vote Republican in large numbers? YoungDemCA Jun 2014 #307
Older DUers do not likely vote Republican in large numbers. madfloridian Jun 2014 #308
Some people here don't want to talk about what bravenak ACTUALLY WROTE, redqueen Jun 2014 #312
racism and sexism often go hand in hand. A lot of overlap there ... Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #339
+10000000 reality sucks noiretextatique Jun 2014 #314
older white people are the GOP demographic...period noiretextatique Jun 2014 #313
Wrong, there are many older and elderly white Democrats in America. quinnox Jun 2014 #316
who votes for republicans? noiretextatique Jun 2014 #318
And many of those elderly white Democrats are Southern style Democrats. Baitball Blogger Jun 2014 #327
I am tired of qualifying...it is privilege to demand that noiretextatique Jun 2014 #407
. Baitball Blogger Jun 2014 #415
okay...who the fuck is the GOP demographic? noiretextatique Jul 2014 #474
Yes. Number23 Jun 2014 #343
wtf...you would think i said all white americans are fascists or something noiretextatique Jul 2014 #477
I'm not perplexed at all nor am I perplexed by the responses you got from particular posters Number23 Jul 2014 #482
Joe Biden is an old White Man. So is Sen Sanders and Reid and every old Democrat I know sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #392
that does not change the reality of the GOP's demographic noiretextatique Jul 2014 #476
So your point is to drive all older white people Jakes Progress Jun 2014 #442
my point is not controversial...at all. it is a FACT noiretextatique Jul 2014 #475
Your facts are the republicans dream. Jakes Progress Jul 2014 #479
how absolutely ridiculous...you can continue to deny reality all you like noiretextatique Jul 2014 #480
Still missing the point, Jakes Progress Jul 2014 #484
Not older Democrats of any shade, though. merrily Jul 2014 #473
duh...of course not. real democrats typically do no fall for the GOP's bullshit noiretextatique Jul 2014 #478
I agree on both points. merrily Jul 2014 #483
I Was More Conservative When I Was Younger Liberal_Dog Jun 2014 #319
Older, white retired widow agreeing with you, MadFlo. Waiting For Everyman Jun 2014 #322
279 recs. nt Zorra Jun 2014 #324
It's more threads than that now, they just keep coming Corruption Inc Jun 2014 #326
And the jury results are in.... aikoaiko Jun 2014 #345
Recommended, thanks for saying what needed to be said. Autumn Jun 2014 #331
NO, I am not an "alert stalker", not an ex Repub troll stalking. Defending myself... madfloridian Jun 2014 #349
I am trying to decide which one is the drama queen Skittles Jun 2014 #352
I am defending myself against those attacks. If you call that drama queen so be it. madfloridian Jun 2014 #354
I never said it was you Skittles Jun 2014 #362
You know what? I don't give a damn what anyone says here anymore. madfloridian Jun 2014 #364
do what I do - put those folk on Ignore Skittles Jun 2014 #365
+1000 - I support you, I have read your posts for over a decade now. Dragonfli Jun 2014 #375
Thank you. madfloridian Jun 2014 #376
There are many sincere people here Union Scribe Jun 2014 #388
Good 1st paragraph, very true. madfloridian Jun 2014 #398
Now I'm a drama queen. madfloridian Jun 2014 #355
No, you're no drama queen. historylovr Jun 2014 #395
Again for visibility..my defense of me and some links I didn't post before trying to be nice. madfloridian Jun 2014 #397
I already feel like I'm not wanted here, or as a Democrat. ladyVet Jun 2014 #399
I am amazed at how far left I am heading. madfloridian Jun 2014 #404
Just remember, you are in very good company. Those few who are slamming Democrats on this forum have sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #406
FDR said, "I welcome their hatred" Waiting For Everyman Jun 2014 #436
Yeah, me too. Le Taz Hot Jun 2014 #416
+1. historylovr Jun 2014 #444
I updated the post in which I defend myself and give examples of why I posted. madfloridian Jun 2014 #418
AND madfloridian Jun 2014 #423
They are being myopic and working from a tiny world. Jakes Progress Jun 2014 #443
I've been watching this thread and I feel a need to comment.... Sancho Jun 2014 #431
Thanks so much for your post. Lots of wisdom as usual. madfloridian Jun 2014 #433
I tried reading all this crap. Jakes Progress Jun 2014 #445
K&R! Almost 300 recs! Rex Jun 2014 #451
300th rec... Upton Jun 2014 #453
Thanks for linking the two original posts which mention the WHITE MEN on DU ... slipslidingaway Jun 2014 #454
In my journal I put two posts with what was said. madfloridian Jun 2014 #455
Old rules seem to no longer matter ... slipslidingaway Jun 2014 #456
A couple of months ago kiva Jun 2014 #457
I've decided not to use it. madfloridian Jun 2014 #459
I respect your decision. kiva Jun 2014 #460
I just heard through the grapevine that I am still being accused of serial stalking and trolling. madfloridian Jun 2014 #458
This message was self-deleted by its author MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #485
The theme of *white liberals are racists* continues... Waiting For Everyman Jun 2014 #462
Bigoted? Reverse bigoted hooey? JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #463
If that's the reason for ditching FDR, it's a lame one. Waiting For Everyman Jun 2014 #464
It's not ditching FDR JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #465
Wow. Waiting For Everyman Jun 2014 #466
And I can appreciate that JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #467
Do you really think Waiting For Everyman Jun 2014 #469
And I can appreciate that JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #470
Everybody's experience is valid, I do believe that wholeheartedly. Waiting For Everyman Jun 2014 #472
Here's a good book that will help you understand us JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #468
Thanks, JAG. Waiting For Everyman Jun 2014 #471
anti seniorism is stupid DonCoquixote Jul 2014 #481

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
29. I had to check the OP's opening sentence to see if I had
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:40 PM
Jun 2014

written it. You and me are twins.

I would say that I loathe the word progressive even as I get why it is used.

I am a liberal. I am a leftie liberal without a shred of hesitation about it. Stereotyping older people is the same as stereotyping any group. Idiot youth who do need to move out of our houses now.

How does that feel, youngsters who do this sort of thing? How about the rest of your stereotype? You are lazy, stupid, selfish.

We could do this for everyone. Don't do it to us. Some of us have scars to prove our bonafides. Where are yours?

ancianita

(36,013 posts)
35. My exact same status here makes us triplets.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:51 PM
Jun 2014
I am way more progressive than many here and have liberal work to back it up.

I say no more purity tests around DU. The party seems to be a bigger tent today than is DU.

We're heading into campaign season, and need to stop the confrontations and unite behind support for the party no matter our differences.

We can squabble after we WIN.

Hekate

(90,617 posts)
88. Another sister here
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 06:22 PM
Jun 2014

I worked hard for Senator Eugene McCarthy for president when I was a college kid still living in California. The death of RFK and then the Chicago Democratic Convention just ripped my guts out.

Nobody should ever try to tell me what journey I've taken or try to co-opt the things I remember. No one should dare to tell me what kind of a Democrat I've been or am. The fact that I admire this President is not a sign of cultish adoration but hard, hard experience of having lived through Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Bush the Elder and Bush the Lesser, as well as the trashing of Jimmy Carter and the entirely unwarranted impeachment of Bill Clinton. I know who the bastards in this political system are, and Barack Obama is not one of them.

Solidarity! Solidarity or we all fail.


Edited to add, since it was so prominently brought up in those other OPs: Yes, I surely am white; my Irish ancestry shows all over my face and freckled hide.

CBHagman

(16,984 posts)
98. For all that it is informed by heartbreak, I simply love your post...
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:11 PM
Jun 2014

...but maybe that's why I love it. You've done the work. You've got the perspective.

calimary

(81,179 posts)
117. BRAVA!!!! I'm exactly there with you!!!
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:15 PM
Jun 2014

My first real activism efforts were in the Student Coalition for Humphrey/Muskie, and the first (unsuccessful) campaign of Tom Bradley for L.A. Mayor. He lost that one, but came back in the next round to win!

LOVE THIS that you wrote, Hekate!

"Nobody should ever try to tell me what journey I've taken or try to co-opt the things I remember. No one should dare to tell me what kind of a Democrat I've been or am. The fact that I admire this President is not a sign of cultish adoration but hard, hard experience of having lived through Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Bush the Elder and Bush the Lesser, as well as the trashing of Jimmy Carter and the entirely unwarranted impeachment of Bill Clinton. I know who the bastards in this political system are, and Barack Obama is not one of them.

Solidarity! Solidarity or we all fail."


I wrote something along those lines in another thread celebrating the long-awaited arrival of marriage equality in Wisconsin. Looked at all those very moving photos of loving couples who'd yearned to make their commitment to each other official under the law. It was wonderful to see and to savor. HOWEVER, it was with a little trepidation. If some of those people stay home, or roll over and go back to sleep, or assume the problem is now solved and the coast is clear now and this is settled - just look at any woman you see, who's of childbearing age. OUR rights to have the last word over our own personal bodies are ON THE ROPES!!!! Because we figured that once Roe v Wade was settled, that was that.

Well, I fear for all those couples in Wisconsin. How soon will THEIR rights be rolled back and snatched away from them? How soon will they forget and become complacent and just assume that everything's okay now and the enemy is vanquished? How soon will they not bother, and just shrug it off because their "perfect" candidate isn't running but just a pretty good candidate is? How soon will they give up and figure there's no use? How soon will enough people be railing against our President and calling him awful names and goddamn used car salesman and whatever other crap they come up with - WHICH ONLY DISCOURAGES OTHERS FROM GIVING A DAMN AND TRYING TO STAY INVOLVED AND HELPING TO FURTHER THESE CHANGES WE NEED????? That crap only discourages people from bothering, and encourages them to throw up their hands and just assume there's no use.

If you DO NOT stand for the likely nominee, and the candidate with the D after their names, because it might not be the D you wanted, then you might as well pull the lever for the R. Because that's what YOU will personally guarantee that the rest of us get stuck with.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
136. another Amen to you and Hekate.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:05 PM
Jun 2014

So well said. Thanks to you both.

(I was 4 when JFK was killed. Didn't really get political until shrub, but I was a feminist from a very young age. )

calimary

(81,179 posts)
154. I think I first became a feminist while sitting in catechism class with Father Flanagan as guest
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:31 PM
Jun 2014

teacher. One of the priests would come over from the church-side to conduct religion class or catechism class, and Father Flanagan took this one particular 5th grade class. And I remember so clearly sitting there quietly as he lectured about the roles of husbands and wives and kids and took questions, and it was like having an out-of-body experience. There was a me who sat there and started getting a little annoyed. I remember looking at him and thinking "hey, Father, how can you possibly weigh in on any of this? You don't have a wife. You don't have kids. You don't have to get a job to support a family. How the heck can you pontificate like this? How can you possibly know what it's like for families and husbands and wives and moms and dads? Since when do YOU get to decide for all of us out here in the secular world? And you're certainly not a woman so you can't be a mom, and you can't get pregnant and have kids, so how can you tell us girls how it's supposed to go? How can you possibly say? How can you possibly know?" I just sat and mulled that one over and over and over in my mind while he was yammering away. It was the first time I realized that THIS was NOT speaking for ME, or to me, either, and that whatever he was decreeing as a kind of civilian "gospel" could NOT be weighed on the same scale with conditions in reality outside the nice insular rectory where he and the other parish priests lived. It struck me that what he said was certainly interesting and curious enough, but could not serve as much of a practical guideline in MY life.

Many years later, I heard another speaker on subjects of Catholic life for the laity reveal that whenever he had questions about something in his marriage or involving his wife and kids, he never sought out the advice of his parish priest. He went down the street to talk to the local rabbi, who had a wife and kids, too. He thought that was a FAR more relevant source of wisdom for him, personally, than consulting a celibate would offer.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
181. HA! I too remember sitting in religion class and having the priest
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:29 AM
Jun 2014

who taught our class once a week talking about the importance of husbands, and in later classes, having the nun tell us "you can never tell your husband NO, no matter if you're sick or just don't feel like sex. I'm 71 now, and I still remember those ramblings. from so many years ago. I'm still a Catholic, but I've disagreed with some of their teachings and debasement of women.

BTW, I've always been a Liberal, and still am. When I see some younger folks dissing the oldersters, I just dismiss it as youthful ignorance. Just because there are so many "OLD WHITE MEN" in the vocal part of the pub party doesn't mean that ALL oldsters are even a little bit like them!

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
242. I am stlll Catholic too
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:20 AM
Jun 2014

but sometimes I want to hit the wall with my head at some of the thing they say and do especially 30-40 years ago.

Maeve

(42,279 posts)
268. Honestly, if she believed that, it may have influenced her career choice
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:34 AM
Jun 2014

If I thought marriage was the kind of life so many of the nuns taught, I'd have entered the convent, too!

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
358. I was never subjected to that stuff.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:43 PM
Jun 2014

We were Jewish, but only went to temple on a few occasions. We did do passover with the very few relatives that were around, when I was little.


I came by my feminism because the ads for girls stuff on the kids shows were SOOOOOO insulting. Didn't take long to see that same attitude in other places, everywhere.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
402. Oh my god, Blanche. How cute you two are. I will have to try this sort of
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 08:38 PM
Jun 2014

thing with the rescue chihuahua. LOL!

Madam Mossfern

(2,340 posts)
130. I worked for McCarthy too
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:49 PM
Jun 2014

but from NYC. It seems that there are many of us here. To tell you the truth, I haven't been here for a couple of weeks, so I'm going to look for the offending posts before I comment any further.



madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
141. Love your description, freckles and all.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:10 PM
Jun 2014


I have several lines from Ireland, but no freckles. Got blue eyes though. All of my mom's family had blue eyes. Sensitive skin, burns easily.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
171. I adored Harry Truman and have a pin of a shoe with a hole in it
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:06 AM
Jun 2014

for Adlai Stevenson. A tie tack. It is so cute. FDR style dem here.

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
69. Yes we have actually been in the fight to save our democracy; some intense fighting on saving our
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:16 PM
Jun 2014

children, would be Madfloridian in my belief.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
91. Who said this?
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 06:42 PM
Jun 2014
You are lazy, stupid, selfish.

Because bravenak did NOT.

You got to realize that power is shifting towards a more liberal society and that it is the old white men who are standing in the way of progress, passing shit laws and fighting against womens rights. The kids growing up see their congressmen screeching about illegals, urban youths, thugs, wetbacks and more. They will not be voting for Republicans. And Democrats better get our shit together and start bringing in the next generation quickly before Republicans decide to get smart, steal our platform, and out voters.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025060206#post32

This entire OP seems to be based on the fact that the OP alerted on bravenak's post for "ageism" and the jury disagreed.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
120. The way I took it was that bravenak was talking about society in general
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:43 PM
Jun 2014

I can only speak to the conversation in that thread since I have seen it. While MadFlordian is a great poster, I think he took it way too personally.

As for a change in demographics, it has begun to happen and there is no doubt it will help our party. We do need to embrace minorities and consider policies that will help them.

Disclosure: I am also a older white teacher (that is if you think early 40's is old) and I teach abroad.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
135. I am a she.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:04 PM
Jun 2014

Actually it wasn't so much that I took it personally.....it's that the posters were saying that "old white men" were holding the party back from being progressive.

That is just not true. I jumped into the fray. They were lying about the rights and the place of seniors here at DU.

I was not referring to the change in demographics, that is happening and a good thing. I am speaking of the rude and insulting posts there toward seniors. It was way out of line.

Sometimes it's time to speak up.

I have some stalking me lately. Alerting does no good. I have to either stop posting a while or take a stand sometimes.

It was the poster here who said that, there was too much ugly stuff from the other threads to copy here. The "lazy stupid foolish" was an opinion here.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
140. Oophs sorry
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:10 PM
Jun 2014

I should have known that. I agree there is no reason to be disrespectful of seniors. I hope whomever is stalking you will leave you alone.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
191. Hugs back.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:58 AM
Jun 2014


How are you doing as time goes on? Probably good and bad days, but you never know which it will be. Am I right. Been a year, I still have them unexpectedly.

Best to you.

And another

Mojorabbit

(16,020 posts)
195. It has been really rough
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:08 AM
Jun 2014

It will be six months in a week or so. I had so many distractions and stressors eg
(selling business) and tons of paperwork but now that is almost done. The past few weeks things finally settled down and now I am really feeling it. Taking it hour by hour. <3

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
236. Old white conservative leaning men.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:59 AM
Jun 2014

I said as the demographics go up in age, the people get more conservative. Especially men. And most especially white men. I based that off of the 2012 exit polls. If you want i can go get a graph and show you. I also said that it is that group who legislates my womb and tries to limit my voting.
She was never ever included in that group. I told her so and explained and apologized for hurting her feelings. She responded with this thread to my apology. I was not disrespectful to her.

bravenak (4,322 posts)
139. I am sorry for that truly.

I am sorry you are hurt by my words and i want you to know that i have never seen you post anything harmful or hurtful to me. We all suffer the sins of others in our nation.
The woman's burden. It's a shame really, white women just barely got the right to vote and own themselves and now we lump them in with their former oppressors. I do feel bad that i hurt you.
I just cannot think of another way to express what i see.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
283. there has to be a way to discuss this fact
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:43 AM
Jun 2014

Last edited Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:56 PM - Edit history (2)

Without people taking it personally. Older white males ARE the GOP demographic...period. That is a fact. It does not mean that ALL white people are horrible. It means the GOP demographic is trying to hold on to its power and privilege...and to hell with everyone else, including white people who do not believe as they do. it is pretty simple.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
344. Those who know what's up, know what's up here (as in this thread) too
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:29 PM
Jun 2014

You know I applaud and support you (to borrow from my girl noire) as well. Always will.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
346. Thank you.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:37 PM
Jun 2014

This showed me that we have much more work to do than i previously thought. If common knowledge upsets people, and makes them uncomfortable, it is not my fault they feel that way. They should peer outside of their bubble and read black and hispanic and other publications. And see what the youth are talking about and incorporate their ideas into the platform, not just keep waxing nostalgic about what they did in the 60's and pushing that as the only way to do things. We have great ideas if they would just listen and stop trying to do it the old way. It gives some of us flashbacks and nightmares of lunch counters and police dogs. We need to be innovative and think far forward.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
353. Perhaps it is a good idea, especially for Liberals, to drop the labels and broadbrushing of
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:28 PM
Jun 2014

people which appears to be becoming more prevalent here on DU, which is shameful imo.

There are old White Men in the Dem Party also, millions of them. WW11 Vets, Korean, Vietnam Vets, my step FIL was one, he voted for Dems all his life, I can only imagine what he would have felt had he seen that post.

Perhaps it might be wise to understand that any kind of broadbrushing of ANY demographic is bigotry.

If someone wants to point out the people in the Republican Party who are holding things back in this country, then it isn't hard to do that without using the phrase 'old white men'.

Clinton is an 'old white man', so is Bernie Sanders and many of our best Dem Members of Congress.

I used to think we Dems who scream so loudly about bigotry, would be the ones to condemn ALL labeling of groups of people.

I know I do not wish to be associated with any political party that places labels on anyone.

It is really shocking to read what is posted on this forum lately and it has hurt a lot of people, good people who are needed to win elections but frankly, I wouldn't blame them if they decided this is not the party for them after reading DU lately.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
363. I will work hard for Crist, but that's about it for me. No other Dems to vote for anyway.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:06 AM
Jun 2014

I am finding that the last two days after all the attacks on me have left me stunned.

I am known here for not being hostile and not attacking people.

But now I see the race card being played.

There is nothing we can say or do, nothing is good enough.

This may have been a turning point for me about politics.

I am taking part as best I can in Crist's campaign, first time I have donated since 2012.

That's about all I intend to do. Being a lifelong Democrat doesn't matter, being kind to others here for 12 years doesn't matter. Cross the wrong people...you might as well leave.

My defense of myself as if it mattered.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5067681

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
366. It matteers, Madfloridian, and you have no need ever to defend yourself against such bile. You are
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:29 AM
Jun 2014

one of the nicest people on DU and the past few days here, seeing these attacks on YOU of all people, has had a profound effect on many of us.

I am used to being attacked here, to being called a liar, and when that got hidden, the word 'dishonest' was used. I am told there are places where people go to 'target' people on DU. I have no idea if that is true or not, but if it is, this is not the place I want to be either.

I saw willy being attacked, many others, good Democrats, mostly like you, people who never attack others here, simply disagree with some of the policies of this administration. THAT appears to be unacceptable to certain people here.

A lot of good Dems HAVE left this forum because they have better things to do and in RL would never waste a minute on people whose only mode of discussion is to attack and label people.

I am deeply sorry for the hurt you have been subjected to. It disgusts me and clearly a majority of DUers.

There is a nastiness here now that equals and even surpasses the nastiness I experienced on a right wing dominated forum during the Bush years, before I discovered Dem forums.

If this is how they think they are going to win, they need to look back at what happened in 2010. People will not tolerate this kind of nastiness from their own party.

I am with you, I have asked if this is the position of the Dem Party now, that they don't want 'old people' or view anyone who disagrees with the President as a 'racist'. I WANT to know the answer to that before doing a single thing more for this party.

All I can say to you is, I am sorry but it IS just a small minority who are on the ignore lists of most DUers, because of their behavior here. But with more good Dems leaving DU, that poster may be right, they will be the majority HERE after everyone else leaves.

Take care and keep up the good work YOU are doing. I will continue to look for tweets on Twitter where you can reach so many more people than here anyhow, and you do.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
369. And also I am at Dkos as floridagal...
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:48 AM
Jun 2014

Not sure if I will continue here or not. But I know I have sort of lost heart about the party. Since I have no one to vote for here anyway except Crist...how I feel doesn't matter to the local party.

But when it say you really matters....no it really doesn't. It's such a large forum, and the loudest are the ones who win...that it really doesn't matter. I'm not loud or catchy or anything like that.

I see some very uncomfortable days ahead here now, just not sure if it's worth it after the year I've had.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
371. You will have plenty of support if you decide to stay here. We are targets of a certain group
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:55 AM
Jun 2014

here, you cannot disagree with them. And you are wrong, your voice is much more important than theirs, which is why your OP struck such a chord with so many people. The louder they are the less people hear them. But you were heard and appreciated far more than their divisive nonsense which will do nothing other than drive people out of the party, which may be the goal I have often thought.

Take care, I know what you mean about having people to vote FOR. I'm not seeing much where I am either, but I'll wait and see who we get. We have only been here a year so I don't know much about the party here yet.

Take care, and don't let them keep you from being here.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
408. you are correct, however the GOP
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:44 AM
Jun 2014

Consists of mostly white and mostly older and mostly male Americans. Is there a way to discuss that reality? It seems not.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
411. Of course, in fact we've always been able to discuss it. We have shamed them into accepting women
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 02:10 AM
Jun 2014

and minorities into their party BY discussing it and pointing it out repeatedly.

Dems are not shy generally about talking about bad policies including in our own party. We are now told that doing so when it comes to our party means we are 'racist'. I suppose they think that this will intimidate people into remaining silent about bad policies. Nothing could be further from the truth which if they ARE Dems they should know. It's impossible to silence the left when it comes to issues that are important to them.

Iow, what is happening here is very different from pointing out facts about the Republican Party. It is familiar though. But not expected on a Dem Forum.

OLDMADAM

(82 posts)
422. WOW, now I'm thrilled that I waiting to post my first response..
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 10:43 AM
Jun 2014

This is a statement to the whole board, and not to you sabrina..

This hits a nerve with me.. I am an OLD black woman, and I speak for my Old White husband, and WE are MAD, and have the scars to prove OUR loyalties to the cause of Freedom for ALL..

Why would anyone paint with such a broad brush that the freedoms we have today would not be here unless We fought for those Freedoms when it wasn't fashionable.. We met in the 60's, while we both were fighting the forces of evil during the war protests..

So STOP THE BS about one generation against another, WE must work together to WIN.. If you have a problem with someone or something direct it at those people or things, not an entire group..

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
424. Powerful first post.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 10:51 AM
Jun 2014

You are right, we can not do the generational battles. It will do so much harm. Welcome to DU. I usually post about education problems, so I don't usually get this upset.

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
425. Hello OLDMADAM.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 11:22 AM
Jun 2014

It's hard to follow the origins of where this disagreement started. I can only tell you what I have derived from it. In this political struggle, many of us see the policies and traditions that we're fighting against as those that are favored and promoted by autocratic, conservative white males. For many of us who have minority viewpoints and other liberals like Michael Moore and John Oliver, that term often gets shorten to "Old white men." Though in Michael Moore's terms, it's "Stupid White Men" and I think John Oliver used the term, "old white dick."

The term offended a white female poster, who may not have understood the political connotations of the term.

Given that this is a discussion group with wide appeal, today we were provided with a thread that widens the field of thought. It includes a history of unflattering liberal history when it comes to race issues. I think it's a good perspective to see, if only because it's an important reference point to understand if we have any hope of coming together.

Here's that other thread, in case you would like to add your views.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5072693

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
426. The "white female poster" fully understood connotations. I tried to be tactful....
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 11:27 AM
Jun 2014

and look where that got me.

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
428. In the end, this is all probably a good thing.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 11:30 AM
Jun 2014

It had to happen eventually. Today I am a student, just listening and learning.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
429. This thread is about me.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 11:46 AM
Jun 2014

My photo is at the bottom. I never said anything to this poster, i was referring to old, white, conservative leaning males who stand in the way of progress.
I apologized to the poster for hurting her but explained that i did not know her and was not referring to her at anytime. She responded with this thread.
I invite you to come to the AA forum to get a better picture of this situation.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1187&pid=7313

I hope to see you around, we have very few AA posters and we get a lot of negative attention and we go to the protected AA forum to support each other.

OLDMADAM

(82 posts)
437. Oh my.. I don't know how to respond to your request..
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:59 PM
Jun 2014

My first reaction may be why my husband and I are still together, and happy, most of the time.. lol

"I hope to see you around, we have very few AA posters and we get a lot of negative attention and we go to the protected AA forum to support each other. "

Please don't take this as a criticism, unless it fits.. I have to ask, why would I want to join a group that feels the need to seclude themselves in a protected environment in My America? This is still America and as I told my students since I walked into my first class, in a Black Chicago ghetto, is everyone makes their own path in life.. It is entirely up to you to be defensive, or included in any group by proving you belong. This is accomplished by your actions and self confidence..

I couldn't give a shit what some jackass thinks of me when they first meet me, because if they are going to be exposed to me long enough, they will either love me, or fuck off.. I have never been the one to leave, or had to conform to anything other than to be myself..

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
440. I felt the same way when i joined and did not join the AA group until later.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 02:10 PM
Jun 2014

The invitation is open and we have many posters that are not of color who post there. I will not feel insulted if you decide not to visit.
I have several thread going about me from several posters with hundreds of responses attacking me right now so yes, i am hanging out in other threads to try to let this die down. Thanks for responding.

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
447. Hang in there, bravenak.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 04:02 PM
Jun 2014

It was a short two years ago when posters were getting PPR'd for expressing views like yours. We have made progress on this website, even if people aren't able to recognize that.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
448. Oh my god that is so sad.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 04:13 PM
Jun 2014

I learned this stuff from reading when i was a small child. That is terrible. No wonder this place has so few of us.

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
449. Don't get discouraged.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 04:18 PM
Jun 2014

Just remember, in the end we are sharing our experiences for the purpose of being included in the discourse. This is what diversity is all about.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
434. Beautiful statement, OLDMADAM.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:14 PM
Jun 2014

I'm so happy for you and your husband, your post touched me deeply. To have gone through such an historical period, together, and still be working to make this world a better place for everyone, and there is still so much work to do. So yes, the divisive tactics we are seeing within our own party seem to me to be so counterproductive it raises questions as to the purpose.

Welcome to DU, and I'm sorry you arrived here at this low point in DU's history. It wasn't always like this and I hope you will continue to post, in fact I think your post would make an excellent OP as you are a teacher and it seems we need older, wiser teachers here.

Great first post, and thank YOU and your husband for all you have done for this country. You are heroes in my eyes!

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
156. There were actually generalizations on the makeup of DU that came first...
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:44 PM
Jun 2014

and while bravenak may have not intentionally meant her first comment as a sweeping indictment of those members who are older and much further left than she, I can certainly understand why a woman with the experiences that madfloridian has under her belt might read what bravenak wrote as inappropriate and highly insulting. Instead of furthering that conflagration, some sort of understanding could be reached to find peace.

I myself have been accused here of "hating" our Prez, having that capital-L Libertarian bent, compared to a Republican, siding with an accused rapist, and being an obstacle to feminism. None of those could be any further from the truth, but after twenty years of using the Internet, I know better than to consider such anonymous personal attacks as serious matters that I need to take to heart (or go to battle over). A political discussion board such as DU is bound to attract those who would love to destroy any semblance of solidarity within our community, and during the thirteen years I've been here, those types have come and gone many many times, no big deal, ignore such petty tactics and move on.

It's when that sliming strategy is practiced out in our real lives that we must be concerned and act to deflate deliberate divisiveness. Here, as I haven't a doubt Skinner might say, we have the "Ignore" option and the "Trash Thread" feature. Myself, I prefer huge grains of salt with a dab of popcorn and a cupa tea while I observe the various wars that occur on this site that I love.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
175. Others still see it when the thread is trashed or ignored.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:12 AM
Jun 2014

I haven't used the options in years. I usually take it with a grain of salt or consider the source. But there was too much going on last night, actual lies about the elderly.

She did apologize at one point for upsetting me, and I said thank you. But others had jumped in by then and it kept on.

I quit posting here for a year rather than confront anyone. I got notes in emails telling me that the admins had decided that because of my stances on issues I would never see front page again. True or not, the word was out.

I established myself at Dailykos as floridagal, and madfloridian at Twitter. I left here a year.

I came back. Almost ready to give it up here, but the education battle is too important. My posts get ignored but they often get lots of tweets which means they do get read.

Twice lately I have taken part in things I usually ignore. Am I sensitive, yes. I am actually proud that I am, there is nothing wrong with that in this age of tough.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
200. But there are tons of things that are left standing here...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:22 AM
Jun 2014

that are equally outrageous and we can snort and stomp til we're limping blue in the face, but it will not make them disappear. And worse yet, often, the more a person tries to sensibly object, the more outrageous the crap being tossed around becomes. Maddie, I've watched it happen too many times since our new and improved DU was introduced and in the end, it's just not worth the aggravation.

You know, just this week I read a DUer who wrote that he hopes that the newly-released captured soldier will be facing a firing squad upon his return. I must have typed a dozen responses to that since I first saw it, was drawn to re-read such a comment every day I logged in, but I deleted each set of thoughts I'd had and never posted a thing.

I'm tickled that this thread is a good one and I've been really glad to see that you decided to come back to DU.

Again, to you!

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
201. I know in my heart you are exactly right.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:28 AM
Jun 2014

It frustrates me, annoys them, and doesn't make a bit of difference. Been a while since I've let myself get involved in two threads. Maybe I will back off for a while.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
174. Did you read the subthread between bravenak and me?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:12 AM
Jun 2014

The threads I referenced are pretty illuminating.


JustAnotherGen

(31,798 posts)
203. I can answer that
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 04:12 AM
Jun 2014

Nope - because madfloridian would be appalled if she saw what has been going on around here.

She also clearly stated UN the other thread that she only goes to certain groups at DU - as we all do.

But if you aren't aware of the AA group - as she stated she wasn't -

Then young black America's issues and concerns and perspective as represented at DU - are of zero concern.

I read through this and another thread in the wee small hours of this morning . . . I'll save what I want to say for an online group of progressive black women I belong to. Something about back slapping and high fiving when black folks in America - we aren't feeling all shiny happy about so called sucker punch progress.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
204. This whole thing has been so illuminating/mortifying/predictable
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 04:30 AM
Jun 2014

I am just glad that bravenak is back and posting already. That was the quickest "flagged for review" I've ever seen. I don't even think it was 24 hours. Makes me wonder if even the admins know what was happening, particularly the really stunning and blatant mischaracterization of her posts.

And yes, I did read the posts you linked to. That would be the 'PREDICTABLE' bit in the illuminating/mortifying/predictable.

Violet_Crumble

(35,961 posts)
208. Let's talk about mischaracterisation...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 04:52 AM
Jun 2014

Firstly, I've been on MIRT and there was nothing particularly rapid about that reinstatement. That tends to happen more often than not.

Do you know what the really blatant mischaracterisation was that I saw? That madflo is an alert stalker. Sorry, but that's complete nonsense. Someone in one thread who's upset, has made it clear why they're upset, and informs the person who's posted the thing that's upset them that they've alerted on the post/posts isn't an alert stalker. Nor is madflo 'uncomfortable' with any 'truths'. You know why? Because what I saw happen had nothing to do with racism, nothing to do with gender, and everything to do with madflo being offended by comments about old people. And peppered through that thread, and another thread, and this thread, and another thread off in the groups, I sense there's an undercurrent of those who really, really like Obama a real, real lot all of the time, vs those who don't think all that much of him and sometimes say it a real, real lot. Which in most cases is probably just a misunderstanding between people on what constitutes criticism. I find it hard to keep track of who's who in all that sort of thing, but even I kind of noticed it bubbling away...

Things could have been handled better. One or both walking away from a rapidly escalating exchange would have saved any future posts being hidden. The times I've found myself in situations like that I either walk away or if it's a DUer I've got no beef with and have agreed with on other things, sometimes I've gone to PM and worked it out with them in a less confrontational environment.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
211. In defense of me.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:44 AM
Jun 2014

I apologized for hurting her feelings and told her i could not find another way to express what i wanted to say.

Violet_Crumble

(35,961 posts)
214. And that's the bravenak I like seeing...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:59 AM
Jun 2014

Cranky bravenak, not so much.

There's two things I know from reading all this:

1. Madflo isn't racist or an alert stalker
2. You aren't ageist

Which is good, coz I like both of you

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
215. I never got mad at her.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:03 AM
Jun 2014

I got mad at pttp. I was trying to explain what i meant and i was only hurt because when i apologized her response was to write this thread and the someone started alerting me again. She told me straight up when she did it. I recieved 2 more failed ones after hers and then two on posts where i got pissed at pttp. I do not know who did the other ones and i do not really care.
The things i was expressing concerned demographics amd how conservative different groups run. I was basing it off of the exit polls from 2012.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
251. I am going to chime in here once.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:22 AM
Jun 2014

Last edited Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:54 AM - Edit history (1)

Sorry you got mad. I was pretty upset too. I just reread that thread again before posting here. Your initial post, your threads with madfloridian, and you back and forth with Armstead are still coming across to me (and others by the looks of it) as ageist, sexist, and racist.

I normally stay away from such threads, but decided to jump in because the shear audacity of the calling out of vast swaths of the population as "evil suppressors" really got under my skin. I am not your enemy, either are millions upon millions of other old white men. There are some old oligarchs of Caucasian decent that are looking to and currently taking advantage of both of us. There are also non-caucasian oligarch's looking to do the same thing, think Herman Cain.

I wish you well and hope that any future back and forths between us are more cordial.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
222. So....unless the alerter clearly states who they are, you don't know if someone is alert stalking?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:55 AM
Jun 2014

But....if someone were to state that they were alerting on a post in a thread they started, you'd have a pretty good idea on who alerted, right? You'd assume it would be the OP?

Violet_Crumble

(35,961 posts)
232. I'm going on what Skinner said a while back about alert stalking...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:36 AM
Jun 2014

Which was that it wasn't happening. When two people clash in a thread and haven't clashed before, and one tells the other that they've alerted on post or posts all in the one thread that have upset them, that's not going after someone or stalking them. It happened to me back in Meta. I said something that another DUer got angry about and they told me they were alerting on my posts. I thought to myself Oh-kay then, and decided to bail out of the thread rather than have things escalate. I doubt very much I'd even been on their radar before or after that thread. It was just one of those moments and it kind of reminds me of what happened here...

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
234. I think the situation you described regarding yourself is alert stalking. You shut it down
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:47 AM
Jun 2014

but that's not always an option when you might have several posts out there, and you've been flagged.

I've found the alert function on alerts to be a useful tool.

Violet_Crumble

(35,961 posts)
282. No, it wasn't. I think claims of alert stalking are way overdone...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:43 AM
Jun 2014

For example, I don't often alert on posts. But twice that I can remember, I've been greeted with howls from one juror, and once when the jury outcome was posted of being an alert-stalker. The reality was in both cases that I saw a post that I thought was way over the line and alerted on it. I didn't give a shit who the person I was alerting on was, as its what they said that I was alerting on. And in both cases, I'd never alerted on that person before, and haven't since...

Number23

(24,544 posts)
337. Madfloridian got upset so that explains and justifies all of this?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:11 PM
Jun 2014

Never mind the myriad people that responded to bravenak that also identified as white, as older and who said point blank they completely agreed with her assessment and supported her 100%.

I am not white and I am a few years older than bravenak so I didn't feel my oxe had been gored by bravenak's responses. And the fact that Madfloridian was so "upset" by the comments in that thread that she must have gone back and responded another half dozen times directly to the OP was something.

Things could have been handled better. One or both walking away from a rapidly escalating exchange would have saved any future posts being hidden. The times I've found myself in situations like that I either walk away or if it's a DUer I've got no beef with and have agreed with on other things, sometimes I've gone to PM and worked it out with them in a less confrontational environment.


I agree with you. I saw that bravenak apologized to Madlfloridan and yet, this thread was still created. Personally, I didn't feel she had one damn thing to apologize for. She has a right to her a opinion and the fact that so many agree with her (particularly the less than handful of posters of color that still bother to post here) should mean something to somebody. But DU is just another place where being a minority means that your thoughts/opinions/beliefs get ignored, shit on or discounted altogether.

Edit: And as for your point that the conversation went downhill because someone accused Mad of being a serial alerter, that doesn't seem to reflect that conversation in the least. She became incensed when she felt that bravenak had insulted all old white people (which she did NOT) and then got pissed at the entire OP, going back to respond to sheshe about five other times.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
350. Yes, Madfloridian is still upset at being called a serial stalker and Repub. troll.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:01 PM
Jun 2014

I just posted this. AND maybe someone could share it with the posters still writing about me and others in the AA forum. Just say it's a defense of myself.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5067681

This thread is still going strong.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1187&pid=7313

Number23

(24,544 posts)
357. Your indignation started before you were accused of being a Repub troll (and I have no idea
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:40 PM
Jun 2014

who is saying that about you). It is abundantly clear that you saw "old white men" in bravenak's post and became upset, regardless of the veracity or context of her post.

Bravenak apologized to you for your misinterpretation of what she'd written in sheshe's thread. It seemed to be a very heartfelt apology. And you still decided to call her out with this thread. So surely you are not in a position to complain that she would start out a thread of her own to defend herself?

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
359. There was another post going on at the same time.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:46 PM
Jun 2014

With the same theme.

Oh, yes, when I see a post about older white men not being progressive enough, and I see it at this forum....then I think it means here.

But I must admit I was not aware of the racial tensions, and that is too bad it is going on.

Yeh, I know I was attacked for not knowing what someone meant when they told me to go to the AA forum and read it. I was accused of not telling the truth, that everyone knew of it. NO, I did not.

As long as that thread is going on in that forum then I don't feel the sincerity .

I am talked about there just like I am someone who just happened along to make you guys mad. I have been here since 2002, and I do not attack people.

But I will damn sure defend myself when others continue to do so to me.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
360. You jumped up to attack bravenak. And you announced to the world that you'd alerted on her post
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:51 PM
Jun 2014

got angry when it wasn't hidden and then posted this 360 post behemoth to call her out and whatever the other post was that had the "old white men" meme that seems to be so upsetting to you.

So you say that you will "defend yourself" but seem to have an issue that bravenak, who YOU attacked and mischaracterized with this thread, is doing the same. How interesting.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
368. Here is my post about what I am not, a link to one of her posts, and a link to the ongoing AA post.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:42 AM
Jun 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5067681

I am really glad overall that I posted this OP.

My OP mentioned no names, just expressed my concerns. I attacked no one. The vitriol is getting bad now, maybe it's best to see it out in the open.

I never realized there was such anger toward those of us who are white in this forum. I have never stepped into the fray about that, so maybe I am no longer naive about it.

In the link is the post saying when "we are gone"...not a happy thought you know.

I am immune now to the attacks. I had my say, and it was important.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
380. "I never realized there was such anger toward those of us who are white in this forum."
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:53 AM
Jun 2014

Wow. And your comment about being naive about race relations... wow, again.

You mentioned no names in this OP but it was obvious to everyone on this board what you were trying and are STILL trying to do.

I am immune now to the attacks. I had my say, and it was important.

And bravenak has had her say as well. And contrary to what you seem to believe, HER say is no less important than yours.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
383. Here's my whole post in my defense. Perhaps you did not read all of it.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:58 AM
Jun 2014

In this very thread I was several times said to alerting on everything just about. In the threads last night I alerted one time only. I even let the person know I did so. I seldom alert. Maybe 3 times in DU3. I resent being called a serial alerter.

I have always been a Democrat since the day I first registered. I have always voted Democratic. I supported Obama both elections as did my late hubby. We kept our community supplied with yard signs for Obama, and before that for Kerry. I resent being called a Republican stalker. I have been here too long for that.

I did not link to one of the posts that bothered me when I started this thread. It still doesn't feel right. But now I will link to a post. Since I am still being talked about like I am not even here, I will do so.

Most of the elderly folks here are more liberal than President Obama is. Yes, old white men tend to be in the Republican party. BUT..if you are posting this at a Democratic forum with many many good elderly folks....it should be made clear what is meant. I really don't like people waiting with bated breath for me to be gone. Gives me chills. And angers me.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5060383


After you old guys are gone the rest of us will make up the new majority.

I think it will take much less time than the estimates project. I have two children, he has four, i expect to have two more and that will still mean i will have the least amount of children for a Lady in my family. My grandmother had ten. Most of my friends have several already and are continuing to procreate. Many of my white friends are in mixed marriages and have several children who identify as asian or black or hispanic not white. Minorities are not cozy with wall street for the most part, and women especially single one are less likely to vote Republican. So in twenty years we will not have 2 Parties run by Old white Dudes who service the rich. We will be voting ourselves a right good part of their money, praise R'hllor.

You got to realize that power is shifting towards a more liberal society and that it is the old white men who are standing in the way of progress, passing shit laws and fighting against womens rights. The kids growing up see their congressmen screeching about illegals, urban youths, thugs, wetbacks and more. They will not be voting for Republicans. And Democrats better get our shit together and start bringing in the next generation quickly before Republicans decide to get smart, steal our platform, and out voters. Because sorry to tell you, the youth is not interested in the NSA all day everyday, they post every private thought they have on Tumblr, facebook, etc.

They will kill wall street when they get their time. I'll be right here helping them find the means. And we need their help to do it because the old party bosses still control the legislature, for now.
The only way to get the votes is to get the voters engaged. And horror stories about how much you hate Obama is not a good lure when you are fishing in a pond of Obama supporters, and the youth , women, lgbt's, and minorities are supporters of this President. You are driving them away and losing us votes
.

And also, since I am also above being accused of not accepting an apology....perhaps the fact that this thread is still going strong in the AA forum makes me doubt the sincerity of it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1187&pid=7313

We have a long road to hoe before the elections this year. Angering any group is harmful. There is no need for it.

If the future of DU is going to be like this, many of us will not be welcome. That's a shame.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
385. But what does that have to do with my post or anything that I've written?
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:09 AM
Jun 2014

And bravenak's thread in the AA forum was posted AFTER you ignored her apology and AFTER you posted this thread where you mischaracterize her as attacking all old people or all white people. She did NEITHER.

If you get a chance, I'd like you to rethink your role in this entire thing. It is my personal opinion that you have either mischaracterized or misinterpreted bravenak's post. This entire thing is absolutely ridiculous and it doesn't surprise me in the least that you have a slew of folks that many of us in the AA forum have identified as some of the most hostile here to black posters rec'ing, participating and egging all of this on. They are here and on Discussionist posting the most laughably stupid things about the handful of black posters here as if WE are the problem, as if WE are the ones creating the hostility that is on full display here almost daily.

When things calm down, it would be nice if you visited the AA forum. I have disagreed with many, many things you've written over the years but have not found YOU to be all that disagreeable. As for a few recognizable names here egging this on and pretending to support you, this invitation won't be extended to them. Not from me.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
387. Oh, I did visit there today.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:25 AM
Jun 2014

That's enough about the "ignored" apology. I didn't even see it until I posted this thread. I saw it later in the evening.

But reading that thread in AA today is discouraging. I don't like that you use the word hostile in the same post where you mention me. I think you know better. And yes, I see the names here that are posting quite different stuff there. But I have few friends here anyway, so it is not surprising.

We all post stuff we later wish we hadn't, but blaming someone else for misunderstanding is not right.

There are undertones there that make me squirm. I have never said or done anything to deserve that discomfort I felt.

There is just no excuse in folks calling me an alert stalker or troll. It's ridiculous. I post serious stuff here and don't do stuff like that.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
390. I'm not worried about the alert stalker stuff. I realize that is important to you
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:40 AM
Jun 2014

but my issue is the way that you have mischaracterized bravenak and her posts.

And her comments about the hostility many posters of color here feel DAILY would seem to be far more important than your "discomfort" over being called an alert stalker. One is a comment on an individual poster; the other is a comment on the overall environment of this place for posters representing groups that have been marginalized, oppressed, minimized and ignored since this country was born. Groups that soooo many here would have everyone believe they support -- until the milisecond someone from one of those groups starts speaking some extremely uncomfortable truths.

But you do as you see fit. I won't kick this thread again.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
391. I just posted one of the posts here in entirety.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:49 AM
Jun 2014

So I think that there is nothing more I need to say.

I don't think she meant it personally toward me, but the general tone worries me about how many more people feel that way seniors here...and we don't know it.

It did not sound like she was referring to Republicans. If so, maybe more explanation is needed.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
370. In what way did madfloridian mischaracterize what bravenak said?
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:52 AM
Jun 2014

If you agree with the smear of DU and our membership in this, bravenak's very first comment she made in sheshe2's thread on Obama bashing, an OP that had absolutely nothing at all to do with race or sex or age (and was the source of this entire conflagration), why don't you just go ahead and say so, instead of continuing to throw fuel on this mess?

bravenak Response to sheshe2 (Original post) Fri Jun 6, 2014, 06:51 PM

12. I believe i read last night that the reason some can't give him any credit is because.......

Anti Obama posts get more recs. I believe thats was the jist of it.

My best explanation for the lack of support he receives here as opposed to the broad support he receives from the party as a whole is because the make up/demographics of DU is not representative of the party's demographics nationally. The base of the party is women, Blacks, Asians and Latinos/Hispanics along with LGBT and young people. The make up of DU skews heavily older, whiter, and more male than the Democratic party and has a heavy streak of Libertarianism. We have been seeing a bit of a xenophobic attitude lately, a coldness towards AA's, some homophobia and a nice tasty dash of sexism to round out the course. And those posts can go to jury and stand.

Why would anyone who isn't already here who is of the base as i described above want to join and engage with us just to be called a Obamabot or a reverse racist or a screeching feminist or told to speak english or go away by democrats?

Our democratic board has so much in common with republican boards i like to read and compare us to them and sometimes i LOL at the similarities between their posters and ours.

I have read too many times here that we need to try to reach out to... Drumroll please...... WHITE MEN! Not our base, and our voters, but we need to reach out to old white males and not say stuff that might make them anxious. Why? Because the board is full of them and some of them think that the nation is not paying attention to their problems.

That's my tldr explanation of the sickness that we suffer from.



madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
372. In fact here is my whole post in my defense.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:11 AM
Jun 2014

In this very thread I was several times said to be alerting on everything just about. In the threads last night I alerted one time only. I even let the person know I did so. I seldom alert. Maybe 3 times in DU3. I resent being called a serial alerter.

I have always been a Democrat since the day I first registered. I have always voted Democratic. I supported Obama both elections as did my late hubby. We kept our community supplied with yard signs for Obama, and before that for Kerry. I resent being called a Republican stalker. I have been here too long for that.

I did not link to one of the posts that bothered me when I started this thread. It still doesn't feel right. But now I will link to a post. Since I am still being talked about like I am not even here, I will do so.

Most of the elderly folks here are more liberal than President Obama is. Yes, old white men tend to be in the Republican party. BUT..if you are posting this at a Democratic forum with many many good elderly folks....it should be made clear what is meant. I really don't like people waiting with bated breath for me to be gone. Gives me chills. And angers me.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5060383


After you old guys are gone the rest of us will make up the new majority.

I think it will take much less time than the estimates project. I have two children, he has four, i expect to have two more and that will still mean i will have the least amount of children for a Lady in my family. My grandmother had ten. Most of my friends have several already and are continuing to procreate. Many of my white friends are in mixed marriages and have several children who identify as asian or black or hispanic not white. Minorities are not cozy with wall street for the most part, and women especially single one are less likely to vote Republican. So in twenty years we will not have 2 Parties run by Old white Dudes who service the rich. We will be voting ourselves a right good part of their money, praise R'hllor.

You got to realize that power is shifting towards a more liberal society and that it is the old white men who are standing in the way of progress, passing shit laws and fighting against womens rights. The kids growing up see their congressmen screeching about illegals, urban youths, thugs, wetbacks and more. They will not be voting for Republicans. And Democrats better get our shit together and start bringing in the next generation quickly before Republicans decide to get smart, steal our platform, and out voters. Because sorry to tell you, the youth is not interested in the NSA all day everyday, they post every private thought they have on Tumblr, facebook, etc.

They will kill wall street when they get their time. I'll be right here helping them find the means. And we need their help to do it because the old party bosses still control the legislature, for now.
The only way to get the votes is to get the voters engaged. And horror stories about how much you hate Obama is not a good lure when you are fishing in a pond of Obama supporters, and the youth , women, lgbt's, and minorities are supporters of this President. You are driving them away and losing us votes
.

And also, since I am also above being accused of not accepting an apology....perhaps the fact that this thread is still going strong in the AA forum makes me doubt the sincerity of it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1187&pid=7313

We have a long road to hoe before the elections this year. Angering any group is harmful. There is no need for it.

If the future of DU is going to be like this, many of us will not be welcome. That's a shame.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
212. I did not know i was flagged until about an hour before i posted in AA.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:48 AM
Jun 2014

I had left my house to visit my mom. The posts that got hidden were not to the poster who got so angry. She told me she was alerting my posts and i got emails from 2 people and then finally the 2 posts they hid. Thats at least five alerts.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
224. You might find this subthread of interest to you....
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:13 AM
Jun 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5028882

To the jury.....it is not against the TOS to use blue links to prior discussions. Admin has given us "advanced search" in order to facilitate this.
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
229. I see that our AA group was already known about.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:27 AM
Jun 2014

Yes, thank you that exchange was very enlightening. As were the ones from earlier.








As for the people who are saying i am lying about being alerted on, i will let them know that i do not care if they think i am lying.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
230. Yes. Note that exchange happened a week before yours. FYI...when you get a hide, the admins
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:33 AM
Jun 2014

give you a nifty little function....you can alert on the hide. It works.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
235. I am enjoying how easily people have fallen into the trap of believing i called her any names.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:48 AM
Jun 2014

I was not even talking to her when she popped up angry because i said old white men skew more conservative than the party as a whole.

If one were to just read this without checking to see what really happened, they would accuse me of calling Madfloridian old, stupid and lazy. I feel bad that she is implying i said that because it is not true and i am not a self deleter and anyone could go and see for themselves that she was never included in the group i was discussing. As a WOMAN, there is no way she could be. And anyone could read that i was speaking of older white CONSERVATIVE males of which there are a few in the DEMOCRATIC party. Like Bart Stupak. Those who will work with republicans to pass laws to legislate my womb and steal my vote. Some more conservative types do actually post here.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
238. You didn't call any DUer names. And I hope that the links I gave you give a little context
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:03 AM
Jun 2014

into the genesis of this issue....

The admin here have given us a wonderful, wonderful gift. It is called the advanced search function.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
239. Well i feel like i should stay off of here and let this thing die.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:11 AM
Jun 2014

I have some reading to do and i just want to say thank you for your help. You have been very kind to me and helpful and thanks for reading my words and not just jumping on the bandwagon.

And thank you to the people who did not just rush to believe i attacked someone personally or called them names.


Oh and one more time for the record: bravenak (4,322 posts)
139. I am sorry for that truly.

I am sorry you are hurt by my words and i want you to know that i have never seen you post anything harmful or hurtful to me. We all suffer the sins of others in our nation.
The woman's burden. It's a shame really, white women just barely got the right to vote and own themselves and now we lump them in with their former oppressors. I do feel bad that i hurt you.
I just cannot think of another way to express what i see.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
241. I think that was a very gracious apology to madflo in the prior thread, and I respect
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:17 AM
Jun 2014

your decision to simply note it and move on. Be well.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
269. Bravenak, I really don't think most of the posters replying here...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:36 AM
Jun 2014

fell into any trap.

I can see why you would be feeling bad, at this point; if it were me that had sparked this, I'd be at a loss on what to do, but blaming Madfloridian further for what appears now to be a simple misunderstanding is definitely NOT a tack that I'd take. As I read thru sheshe2's thread on Friday evening, I had a "WTF" moment myself, when I arrived at your first comment:

bravenak Response to sheshe2 (Original post) Fri Jun 6, 2014, 06:51 PM

12. I believe i read last night that the reason some can't give him any credit is because.......

Anti Obama posts get more recs. I believe thats was the jist of it.

My best explanation for the lack of support he receives here as opposed to the broad support he receives from the party as a whole is because the make up/demographics of DU is not representative of the party's demographics nationally. The base of the party is women, Blacks, Asians and Latinos/Hispanics along with LGBT and young people. The make up of DU skews heavily older, whiter, and more male than the Democratic party and has a heavy streak of Libertarianism. We have been seeing a bit of a xenophobic attitude lately, a coldness towards AA's, some homophobia and a nice tasty dash of sexism to round out the course. And those posts can go to jury and stand.

Why would anyone who isn't already here who is of the base as i described above want to join and engage with us just to be called a Obamabot or a reverse racist or a screeching feminist or told to speak english or go away by democrats?

Our democratic board has so much in common with republican boards i like to read and compare us to them and sometimes i LOL at the similarities between their posters and ours.

I have read too many times here that we need to try to reach out to... Drumroll please...... WHITE MEN! Not our base, and our voters, but we need to reach out to old white males and not say stuff that might make them anxious. Why? Because the board is full of them and some of them think that the nation is not paying attention to their problems.

That's my tldr explanation of the sickness that we suffer from.



Much of what you said there is stuff that I would have to agree with (which is why I had to read your post several times to make sure I was understanding you), but your line about the makeup of DU was simply off. Back in the days when posters would gladly respond to any DU poll without suspecting ulterior motives, the balance often fell to older women being the majority here. Not Libertarian and not Republican, but genuine open-minded, dynamic, forward-moving women...people who were working hard to bring an end to everything you mention in the next sentence of that first paragraph, out in our 3-D lives.

Nowadays, I know much has changed, and there are nefarious trolls doing their damnedest to disrupt our community every chance they get, but I do not believe that the older "base" of DU is even remotely conservative. We're the same as we ever were, with kids and grandkids who are your age and older, and we're still fighting like hell to make things better for everyone.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
270. I was just going by the DU polls.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:44 AM
Jun 2014

And by what people say, and by the things that are spoken of. Much of what is said here is about times that i was not born for, many people wax nostalgic for times that would be terrible for me to live in. Those times were not good for people who looked like me.
I had been reading this article and a few others before i made that post.http://colorlines.com/archives/2011/05/changing_demographics_policylink_map.html
http://colorlines.com/archives/2011/04/americas_changing_demographics.html

And then i was at Huffpo, reading this:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/13/changing-racial-makeup-_n_5142462.html

I try to read as many posts as i can and i see something different than you see. It's a good thing if i tell you what i see happening so that it is not a surprise.

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
323. I don't see what is so outrageous about that post
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:49 PM
Jun 2014

If she is off about the make up of DU, it is only slightly. It is definitely far older and whiter than the population in general and certainly more so than the Democratic Party. As for more women than men, I can't say, but is it very clear that feminists and people of color are targeted here.

Conservative is relative to one's experience. If one lives in a red state, DU may seem more liberal to you. I find this board far more conservative than people I encounter in my life, in my community and at work. I live in a far more diverse community, and the people I work with understand the importance of racial diversity. The hostility toward voices of people of color and feminism on this board is indeed conservative. Some people think being liberal is measured by one's opposition to the Democratic Party and the President, and if one diverges from that they are called "authoritarian."

Basically, I agree with just about everything she says.

Additionally, nothing there mentions the OP, whom she has been accused of insulting.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
226. Indeed..I cannot believe she was flagged. My post #224 above
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:17 AM
Jun 2014

highlights a subthread that took place a week ago.

Contrast it with the subthread we are discussing, a week later, and what I assume was part and parcel of the mess that got bravenak flagged.....

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025060206#post130


TO THE JURY: It is not against the TOS to refer to prior threads. The admin facilitate this by providing a very handy advanced search function.

WCLinolVir

(951 posts)
225. I've seen enough posts here that are ageist.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:16 AM
Jun 2014

"After you old guys are gone the rest of us will make up the new majority." Reply title from her post. Tired of the ageism.
It's stupid, and insulting. I would have alerted on it also.
Funny how you did not see that part of the post.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
279. I am not sure what is going on, but bravenak is one of my fave people here so, i will say this
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:14 AM
Jun 2014

98% of ALL problems in America, and maybe on the planet, are from Older white, right-wing protestant str8t males and some Women...in my opinion

Now I know I am older than bravenak, and while I am not on social security yet, I am close.

And I am white, and I am str8t and, well I am atheist so 3 out of 4 aint bad.

Are there TONS AND TONS of AWESOME older white people, yes, I think I am one of them

Sounds like the OP of this thread may also be, dont know, dont know her or him...

For instance, Black people are NOT backers of ALEC, Gay people are NOT contributors to the Heritage Foundation, on the whole anyway, the people who are in the teaparty and these other rightwing fascist organizations are almost EXCLUSIVELY white, and most are older and most are men, though many Women too.

I dont want to tear apart our party or group, but as a white, str8t male in America, I havent a clue, not one, about discrimination or prejudice or racism, I know others live it but I dont, so if someone from a group tells me an issue exists, I listen.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
281. Randy i love you too.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:33 AM
Jun 2014

I was never speaking about the op at all. I was explaining that the ones standing in the way of my progress were male, not of color, and older. I was stating my opinion on why DU lacks support for Obama. I believe it is because the groups that comprise his base are not here in force and that the site skews older, male, straighter, and whiter that the party as a whole. The op did not like that at all and decided i was talking about her. She is not male and not included in the group i was speaking of.
Then i waded into my imaginings of a dream of a progressive future and made my prediction that demographic changes are going to enable us to kill wall street. I also stated the the constant bashing of Obama is not helping us fish in the big pond of Obama voters. I think it will depress turn out and will not get us one vote.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
328. "...kill Wall Street"... really?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:41 PM
Jun 2014

Wall Street wasn't killed after the excesses leading up to the housing market collapse and "Great Recession," and you can thank Bush, and Obama, for their support.

What EXACTLY is your plan besides more black and brown people? If they don't vote in the midterms when Obama, a black man, is president, when are they going to vote?

Obama blames lack of African American, Latino turnout for Democrats’ midterm woes

I mean, Christ Almighty, what does it take to get people to the polls, especially after Iraq, Afghanistan and economic collapse?

Yasir Arafat claimed the wombs of Arab women were weapons for the cause. It hasn't worked out so well for Palestinians.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
420. 98% of All the problems in America are from stupid fucking fundies
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 09:58 AM
Jun 2014

Every Teabagger is a fundie--


Remember the black churches in California voting against marriage rights?




Fundies are the problem and they come in all sizes shapes ages and colors

treestar

(82,383 posts)
293. Yes, it is not ageism to recognize that older white people
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:27 PM
Jun 2014

are more conservative in general. There are a minority who are liberals. Some very liberal. Older white men of DU are liberals. There's no reason for them to understand it doesn't mean they are conservative to admit a majority of white men vote more conservatively. Or a majority of whites.

Sheesh I am white middle class and know not to take offense at this or take it personally. I'm a liberal and will be even if 99% of white middle class people become conservative overnight.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
427. I think I already responded here but I will again, bravenak is NOT an ageist
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 11:29 AM
Jun 2014

ow whatever that word is...

Unless someone can link me to a post of hers that says all old people are bad, then what is going on here?

The VAST majority of white men over the age of about 50, are rightwingers and idiots and real problems, some Women too fall into that category, but it is their politics that is the problem, NOT their age.

Their age does contribute to racist attitudes in that the younger generation seems to be dealing with that way better than we did.

Now, if you are an older white democrat who still holds some racist shit and you cant cop to it, then you have the problem, not the young Black Woman pointing it out.

I am not saying anyone here has this problem, because specifically I cant know that at this time...

But if you are defensive and it runs along race lines, then you can figure it out for yourself.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
430. I already defended you on that.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 11:50 AM
Jun 2014

Several times.

It was one of the very first posters here who said it, not you.

I did not see your apology until after this was posted, but as long as the thread in AA goes on with so many things being said that are hurtful to all....then it is hard to accept it wholeheartedly.

I don't think you directed anything toward me personally.

But there are undertones that include so many many people who are good people and good Democrats no matter their color.

I will be frank. I disagree with President Obama on the NSA privacy issues, the TPP which will harm our country badly, his proposed cuts to Social Security in the name of Chained CPI, and his education policy which is destroying America's public education system. But if I were upset because of his color, my late hubby and I would not have keep our area supplied with yard signs for him...a real job because they kept getting stolen in the right wing area where I live.

I have finally decided that I needed to defend why I posted, and as you said in the AA forum I was told to read (and then accused of lying by someone else who said of course I knew where it was)...I put it in my journal just as you said were doing with your posts.

I see a post from a week or so ago was posted in the AA forum to prove that I knew about the AA forum. No, I didn't. Someone mentioned it but I was not aware. To those who want to drag up all my old posts, just go to my username in any post, click it, and there's my journal. If you want individual posts you have to search on them I guess. I am proud of what I posted through the almost 13 years I have been here. It's been an evolving journey in some ways, and it shows in my posts that I am more liberal than ever.

There is nothing I can say to convince you that though I am a Southerner I am not a bigot. I believe that nearly all the old white men and women here at DU are more liberal than the president.

SO...I am left defending myself while knowing that it is useless to do so.



 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
432. I posted that as a response to this.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:09 PM
Jun 2014

After this blows over we should try again later. The things i was saying about white men standing in the way referred to conservative leaning men. As you are a woman i had no idea why you thought it referred to you. It did not. I kept repeating that it was not about you or really DU in particular and the only democrat i mentioned was Bart Stupak because that was the type of democrat i was talking about standing in the way. There are not many like him here. The thing about DU being older and whiter referred to the fact that the groups that are the Presidents strongest supporters are minorities and women and younger voters who view him very positively and are less critical of his policies and DU skews older and more male which are the 2 groups of democrats that are more critical of his policies. Maybe it's because you have more experience. I never said or thought it was because he was black and never said you were racist or anyone else was in particular. I was called racist many many times and ageist and got a long thread about how horrible i am with hundreds if recs and got nasty messages and followed around and am still getting alerted on for nothing. It looks bad when a whole bunch of people gang up on one person and call them names even after they apologize. It is making me rethink whether i am welcome here and if i should just leave so i can stop getting hate posts that call me vile names from all of these older white liberals who i really respected.
I have been called racist so many times it looks like a parody. 1 black woman says something, apologizes, and then is attacked by hundreds of white liberals. It scared me. I got a real eye opening experience. Those same people who denigrated me for the last two days have never shown up and assisted me when i was dealing with racist posts against black people. They never even notice them, but they notice mine and group attack me.
There it is.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
439. Do you really have the nerve
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 02:07 PM
Jun 2014

to expect white liberals to defend you after what you've written recently? And don't bother to tell me you're misunderstood, because I read it all. "Scared" isn't the word I would use to describe how you came off in the AA forum. From what I saw, you seemed to be enjoying the attention from your supporters. They're giving you lots of great compliments, and it's pretty heady I'm sure.

I would caution you to think hard about some of those supporters though, and what their intentions might be. That's for you to decide.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
446. "Scared"? LOL, yeah right -- DUers didn't just fall off the turnip truck.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 03:42 PM
Jun 2014

You post with glee that old whiteys are dying off, get called on it (rightly so), then play the victim.

My guess is no one, but your coterie in AA, believes you were "scared."

You're thriving on the attention. There, I just gave you more... happy?

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
164. So you think the Dem Party doesn't need 'old' voters? Is that the position of the Party, or just
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:39 PM
Jun 2014

yours. I'd like to know before we start campaigning. I certainly wouldn't want to lie to long time democrats just to get their votes. I am a believer in being honest with people.

So, are you speaking for the Dem Party when you say that as soon as we get rid of all the 'old people' everything will be just dandy?

Btw, that is such OLD rhetoric. There have always been pathetic people who don't realize that everyone grows older, who are stuck in a moment in time and think they will be there forever. I could give you thousands of examples of people who mirror your sentiments, or did. But they are all very old now and none have accomplished enough to even be remembered.

Maya Angelou was old. Obama is old. Bernie Sanders is old.

Personally I LOVE old people, I find them to be far more thoughtful, intelligent and most of all, compassionate. I learn from them, I have learned nothing from you eg, no offense, just a fact.

So back to my question, does the Dem Party believe it doesn't need its old voters, because if that is the case, I will feel compelled to tell them that, as I have difficulty lying to people.

Thanks in advance.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
172. Careful Sabrina, that poster is busy telling everyone that she is being stalked by those
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:07 AM
Jun 2014

that do not agree with her that old white people are the biggest problem within the party.

She has written an op complaining about all the stalking of her; they have so far concluded people don't like her views because "racism" and her truth makes all us racists "uncomfortable". I don't want to see you get kicked off the site after the witch hunt begins, and it will lead to that. Not to mention the grief I am sure will be inflicted on Madflo before this drama has been fully used for it's likely intended purpose.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
367. Thanks Dragonfli, I've never seen such drivel, even on some of the Right Wing forums I used to post
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:39 AM
Jun 2014

on where I thought the hatred for the left was as bad as it could get. But what I've seen here has surpassed anything I ever saw there aimed at Democrats.

The attacks on Madfloridian though are a new low and are having a profound effect on people here from what I'm hearing, as to whether this party is where they belong when good Democrats, and there in no better Dem here than she imo, are being so viciously attacked and lied about.

We will be there to defend her if anyone tries to subject her, who has worked all her life for this party, to any more grief.

And I would hope the admins would intervene at that point should it continue. She is one of the nicest people here and no decent person would say otherwise.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
217. I never said any of that Sabrina.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:27 AM
Jun 2014

I apologized for hurting Madflo's feelings and tried to explain that i was basing what i was saying off of demographics. I never recieved a resopnse to the apology, she responded with this thread so i just rec'd her thread and promised not to troll. If you want more of an explanation read my journal or come to AA and i will answer there or PM me.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
373. I have read the post you wrote bravenak. But I don't think the problem is just that post. Apparently
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:20 AM
Jun 2014

there have been other comments and OPs attacking people here who dare to criticize some of the policies of this president. Calling people racists for disagreeing with a POTUS??? This is insane and then your post sounded like all 'old white men' we can't wait for them die'.

Maybe it was the label, 'old white men'. That is called painting with a broad brush and is as bad as any other kind of labeling which Liberals especially have always been opposed to.

There are millions of 'old white men' in the Dem Party and always have been. If they were not Dems would lose.

I know so many of them and it breaks my heart to think how they would feel if they saw that. Many fought in the Civil Rights Movement, in WW11, in Korea and Vietnam and have vote for Dems their whole lives. I WANT THEM IN OUR PARTY. I want them to live to be 110 if they can.

And if it's racist to criticize a president and people get that idea shoved down their throats, then they will think twice about voting for someone they CANNOT DISAGREE WITH in the future.

Fortunately of course, that is HOGWASH and most intelligent people are disgusted by such garbage.

Maybe drop the labels, of everyone, and you won't be misunderstood. If you want to point out that there are 'old men' in the Republican Party who we would be better of without, then name them. Because in the Repub Party it isn't just 'old people' is it? So I still don't get the label. The party is being forced now to accept African Americans and Gays thanks to all the work done by the old white and black and others in the Dem Party for DECADES.

There were three, once young, men back during the Civil Rights Movement, who if they were alive today, would Old White Men, but sadly they were murdered for trying to help African Americans vote.

The broadbrushing of any group is bigotry. Liberals generally don't engage in labeling others, they are capable of being clear as to who they are talking about.

All these recent attacks on anyone who dares to criticize this president is creating a hateful atmosphere here. But it won't stop anyone from speaking out against policies they disagree with.

I imagine a few people got together and thought it would be 'brilliant' to accuse everyone who does their duty as citizens and speaks out against policies that are not in line with the Dem Party platform. I guess they thought it would be enough to silence them.

It was a rotten idea, for two reasons, it won't stop Dems who are notoriously unwilling to be bullied, emotionally manipulated or coerced into remaining silent. So it is a failed tactic. And two, because it gives the impression that this may be coming from the Dem Party in which case, it will get around and already people are beginning to feel that any party that acts like the Republican party towards those who have genuine concerns, is not the party for them.

As for the apology you made to MF, it was a very nice, heartfelt apology.

She may not have seen it, or maybe she was so hurt after being attacked by others, which is SHAMEFUL as she is one of the most loved and respected and kindest people here, she may not have the heart to respond.

However, I think you did the right thing by apologizing and that is what matters.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
374. Thank you Sabrina.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:24 AM
Jun 2014

I will think about what you wrote and take it into account in the future. I appreciate your effort to understand me and know that i was not trying to cause anyone pain. I do know that it's not all old men and in the future i will add the qualifier i left out in some posts to any posts like that in the future. I will remember to write the word CONSERVATIVE so that all here will know that they are not included among those who i think are standing in the way of progress. Thanks for responding.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
377. Thank you for listening. I appreciate that. I know we all say things the wrong way sometimes,
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:36 AM
Jun 2014

and I appreciated your trying to explain what you meant rather than just react which is so easy to do, much harder to try to explain. So thanks for doing so. It got my attention and I realized I may have misunderstood you.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
378. No problem. I am lacking a filter.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:42 AM
Jun 2014

I really do try though. I'm working on trying to read the words and not take things personally. I think we all here agree on about 80% of things and thats why we have such big fights over the rest. But we will all show up in november and do our duty. I will get out and work on our august vote and the midterms and stop being so down and be more positive. Post less and engage voters more.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
379. That's true, I guess we all get sensitive because we feel passionately about things and on a forum
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:53 AM
Jun 2014

like this where all you have are words to read, it's easy to misinterpret people. But you're right, in the end, I am certain that almost everyone here will be working to get a good Dem Congress in November.

Are those your children in your sigline? If so, looks like you have a lot to be happy and positive about, they are adorable.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
381. Yes, they are my sweeties.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:54 AM
Jun 2014

Thank you for the compliment. I'll pass it on they love hearing that they are cute.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
219. I will post it again.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:43 AM
Jun 2014

bravenak (4,322 posts)
139. I am sorry for that truly.

I am sorry you are hurt by my words and i want you to know that i have never seen you post anything harmful or hurtful to me. We all suffer the sins of others in our nation.
The woman's burden. It's a shame really, white women just barely got the right to vote and own themselves and now we lump them in with their former oppressors. I do feel bad that i hurt you.
I just cannot think of another way to express what i see.


I will just leave it at that.

BuelahWitch

(9,083 posts)
3. Seems to me that most of the progressives on this board are the people over 50
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 02:32 PM
Jun 2014

The ones who remember a different Democratic Party. What is the detractors' definition of "progressives" and "liberals"? "Progressing" to a time where the social safety net will be in tatters?

kath

(10,565 posts)
11. Yes, this. We remember a time when the Democratic Party actually stood up for working people,
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 02:57 PM
Jun 2014

Both my grandfathers were union organizers in the 30s and 40s. In my dad's house when he was growing up( both his parents Irish immigrants), there was a picture of the Sacred Heart of Jesus on one wall of the living room and a photo of FDR on another.

I rmember LBJ's War on Poverty.

The Dem Party has gone soooo far to the right since those days.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
12. Good point.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:00 PM
Jun 2014

When the DLC formed in the late 80s to get more money from corporations, they openly stated they did not want to depend financially on the "traditional constituents" of the party....meaning the little people like union members, minorities.

progressoid

(49,961 posts)
15. Agreed.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:16 PM
Jun 2014

I'm barely over 50 but I remember the liberal Democrats of my youth. That's the party I joined.

Sadly, we are denigrated as the extremists now.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
43. What is the detractors' definition of "progressives" and "liberals"?
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 04:21 PM
Jun 2014

Right now, it seems to be those who oppose the "go along to get along, because eventually good things MIGHT happen (but don't complain when they don't)" argument.

TBF

(32,032 posts)
129. Or very close to 50 -
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:49 PM
Jun 2014

As a kid in the 70s I painted strike signs with my dad ... but those good union jobs are gone now. In the 70s there was also a lot of civil rights, women's rights and environmental concerns. The clock has been turned backwards on all that.

There are some definite problems on DU but it is not the baby boomers imo. Rather it's a generation that has been raised on reality shows and idolize their president in the same fashion that they do an "American Idol" - policies thrown to the wayside.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
202. My political steering wheel is turned so far left
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:08 AM
Jun 2014

It's been rusted there for aye-on to 50 years. I couldn't budge it right if I wanted to. I'd even twist the hell out of it if it would break more left.

Dear little bravenac, I'm further left than you probably will ever be, but I'll give you time to catch up.

The Magistrate

(95,244 posts)
4. Some Of the Most Radical Here, Ma'am, Are Among The Oldest
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 02:33 PM
Jun 2014

Both chronologically, and in length of membership.

There is something to be said for the proposition that, taking the country at large, older white people are more likely than not to hew to reactionary views, but that is hardly the same thing as saying older members here are not progressives, or even the same thing as saying all older white people are not progressive.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
5. It's a very broad brush, and it's not needed.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 02:36 PM
Jun 2014

I guess the ones I read and pay attention to are more liberal. I know I am way way more liberal than when I came here from the Southern Baptist culture in which I was raised.

justhanginon

(3,289 posts)
25. Well said and I fully agree.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:31 PM
Jun 2014

I find as I age into my seventies I become more and more liberal in my thinking and I would hope use a bit more rationality in some of my thoughts.

hunter

(38,309 posts)
47. I'm among the younger "older white men."
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 04:29 PM
Jun 2014

Yes it's true, many of the white men of my generation are impeding progress.

I grew up in an Ivory Soap white community kept that way by police harassment and covert real estate, lending, and hiring practices, even after equal opportunity legislation.

I'd wager more than half my high school classmates are Tom McClintock style California Republicans. I quit high school and fled that world, burning all my bridges, and throwing a few ink bombs back for good measure.

I've now lived most of my life in communities where white guys are a minority. I actually feel very uncomfortable anyplace the old white "Christian" guys dominate politics.



madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
106. I am speaking of the DU community. I know what it's like to live in a RW community.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:32 PM
Jun 2014

So no, I am not referring to the neighbors around me...I am referring to this forum.

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
340. I appreciate your comments.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:30 PM
Jun 2014

It's obvious you get it. I can't, for the life of me, understand why this discussion is even necessary on a progressive website. Liberals who are on board to tackle race issues should know already where the root of the problem exists.

alp227

(32,013 posts)
95. maybe because the left's biggest victories and most outspoken times were back then.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 06:57 PM
Jun 2014

Like the Civil Rights Movement, War on Poverty, and the Summer of Love...all products of the '60s. Nothing in the new millennium will ever compare to those, ever. And I'm speaking as somebody who came of age in the Dim Son regime. Unfortunately, changing times meant that public affairs became second fiddle to personal pleasure for the masses. Which is why getting heavy support for progressive movements is way complicated even with a TMI world of social media!

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
157. Perhaps we should just speak about people as people, criticize them if we think they are wrong, as
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:49 PM
Jun 2014

people, appreciate them when they do what is right, as people.

There is a small faction here that insists on attempting to put people in boxes, the watch as they fight among each other. There women who claim to represent all women here, who try hard to get other women here fighting among themselves over trivia. As a result the majority of DU women do not paricipate in what should and could have been a vibrant forum for discussion of actual issues, such as economics, equal pay etc. Women globally, the affect of our wars on women around the world. But all DU is known for regarding women's issues, is whether we should reach for the smelling salts if a 'nefarious MAN' dares to pay us a compliment or open the door for a woman. Iow, DU is not the place serious women go to, to discuss serious issues regarding women.

That is just one example of a 'faction' that has driven people away from this forum. Some people have better things to talk about, to do than spend their time arguing with disrupters.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
223. Well, durn...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:12 AM
Jun 2014

I encourage you to read back over your post, and ask yourself if it's any different than the one madfloridian is addressing in this important OP.

For example:

There is a small faction here that insists on attempting to put people in boxes, the watch as they fight among each other. There women who claim to represent all women here, who try hard to get other women here fighting among themselves over trivia. As a result the majority of DU women do not paricipate in what should and could have been a vibrant forum for discussion of actual issues, such as economics, equal pay etc. Women globally, the affect of our wars on women around the world. But all DU is known for regarding women's issues, is whether we should reach for the smelling salts if a 'nefarious MAN' dares to pay us a compliment or open the door for a woman. Iow, DU is not the place serious women go to, to discuss serious issues regarding women.


I don't know this "small faction" of apparently extremely influential women (what with controlling DU dialogue about women's issues), but I do recognize when someone is relentlessly denigrating DU feminists, and trivializing our concerns -- someone who presumes to speak for "the majority of DU women."

(Please don't bother to respond. I've returned you to my IL, since I find rhetoric like yours tiresome and irrelevant.)

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
351. I didn't say they were very influential, I said they claim to represent women. Those are two
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:17 PM
Jun 2014

different things.

I will respond to any post I feel like responding to. This response is for those reading.

I recognize also when someone and/or a group of people are continually denigrating Women who make choices they don't like and who continually denigrate Women AND men who dare not to agree with them.

I represent only me and I know for a fact due to the many emails etc from other women here, that a majority of DU women go elsewhere to discuss women's issues that they are concerned about and where they won't be attacked for disagreeing but rather can engage in discussion when there is a disagreement.

And yes, that is not the only faction causing divisions here. Just one example.

seaglass

(8,171 posts)
419. It's really amusing to watch you accuse others of claiming they speak for all women while
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 09:49 AM
Jun 2014

you of course know what a majority of DU women think and do. Did you take a poll?

niyad

(113,213 posts)
7. good heavens, have I been missing something? a VERY cranky, radical old white woman
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 02:43 PM
Jun 2014

here (for nearly 11 years), and if I have missed that sort of slight, whoever said it can go straight to fauxland.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
14. Another older, retired, white woman here.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:15 PM
Jun 2014

And the older I get the more liberal I get.

I remember when the Democratic party was a huge supporter of unions, among other things. And that it's the Democratic Party that gave us Social Security, then Medicare, and it now seems to be on the edge of abandoning those.

And honestly, the most liberal people I know are at least as old as I am.

If you've never met an ex Peace Corps Volunteer, especially one from the early days, you have no idea what an old liberal can really look like.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
63. I've known a few Peace Corp people, so know what you're saying.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:02 PM
Jun 2014

I interviewed for VISTA back in the day and had been encouraged to do so. I lost out to the other final candidate because she had taught on an Indian reservation.

 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
16. I am a former educator too,
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:17 PM
Jun 2014

first as a public school teacher, then as a professor of history and philosophy of education. I noticed the ageism in the other threads and was disheartened. I thought those who ascribe to a liberal political ideology did not tolerate, let alone practice ageism and other forms of discrimination. Although I am all for freedom of expression, I am not in favor of hatred and intolerance.

K&R

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
18. Guess who started this generation divide battle? The Third Way...in the 90s.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:21 PM
Jun 2014
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/7856

Dear Grandma and Grandpa:

We write to ask for your help. We're in a financial mess, and unless everyone in our family gets together to fix the problem, we're heading for "economic and fiscal catastrophe." That's not a phrase we picked up on MTV-it's from a recent U.S. government report on the budget deficit.

This year alone America's budget deficit will be nearly $300 billion, which means we're spending $300 billion more than we take in. That's $300 billion on top of the $4.2 trillion debt we've already built up, enough to pay basketball star Michael Jordan's salary for almost a million and a half years.

The truth is, today's retirees get their benefits directly out of the paychecks of working Americans, the majority of whom are less affluent than those they support. True, you paid into the system. But so do we. And right now, we're paying FICA taxes at rates 20 times (inflation adjusted) what you paid as a young worker.

And there's no end in sight.



And here's the real kicker:

We are not ungrateful. We respect and value the sacrifices you've made for our country and have no desire to take money away from those in need. But our generation is in trouble. We were educated in a collapsing school system. Our incomes and skill levels are lower than any previous generation-by the year 2000 over one-third of younger Americans will be living in poverty. And we will be the first Americans to inherit a lower standard of living than our parents. We're not asking that your generation solve all our problems. And there certainly are many other programs that also must be cut to get the deficit under control. But Social Security must be considered, just like everything else in the budget.



Really. Jon Cowan is now prez of the Third Way, and he's still a jerk.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
30. when I taught as an old geezer, I had youngers ask me to get
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:42 PM
Jun 2014

out of the way, it was their turn. I didn't come to hate youngsters then and I don't want to now. They will miss us when we're gone.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
167. If you want to know why America has a deficit, look into the tax returns of the very wealthy
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:53 PM
Jun 2014

and the mega-corporations like Exxon and Apple who sell products here but take their profits in tax-shelter countries like the Caymans, the Bahamas or the many other tax shelter havens in the world.

Overseas

(12,121 posts)
302. K&R. They've been so destructive.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:03 PM
Jun 2014

Pretending Democrats needed to modernize and support deregulation of the media and financial markets, and believe in the myth that privatization would be more efficient.

They pretended to be modern when they were really pulling us back to The Gilded Age of inequality and corporate monopolies.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
303. Yes. They employed an elaborate ruse to hand over control of the party to corporations.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:07 PM
Jun 2014

They did irreparable damage. And they should receive universal condemnation.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
361. I couldn't agree more. They have their own party, they are only in this party because the other one
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:59 PM
Jun 2014

has been taken over completely now, and they want OUR Party to make sure they never have to worry about losing control.

Overseas

(12,121 posts)
305. They have been so old-fashioned while pretending to modernize. Regressive.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:21 PM
Jun 2014

Pretending all the way. Just to get the millions of dollars of campaign funding needed because Democrats couldn't push hard enough for solid campaign finance reform.

Resulting in conditions that have made getting campaign finance reform even more difficult.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
450. exactly. The "people" are asked to sacrifice for the common good. Where is the sacrifice for the
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 04:25 PM
Jun 2014

common good from the banks, corporations, and 1%ers of this country?

Drew Richards

(1,558 posts)
19. Its more than that and its sad and pisses me off to to levels of rage. MANY of us grew up in
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:23 PM
Jun 2014

The 50's 60's and 70's...

We've fucking been there and felt the club and tear gas of conservative oppression and fucking third way centrist corporate enabling of the destruction of the 60's and 70's revolution of equality for all.

And that's why we still identify ourselves as LIBERALS first democrats second.

Many of us were forced to fight for our county while others got deferments through wealth and connections.

Many of us were neck deep politically in sweeping changes we publicly demanded from our and institutions and put our lives in jeopardy doing it.

WE HAVE EARNED THE RIGHT TO QUESTION EVERYTHING...!

What these little piss ant punks can't see or choose to ignore...is that history is repeating itself...

It is as if the fucking government and corporations have merged again like the 50's to the detriment of society as a whole and BABY if its not oppressed worse than they tried in the 60's LIBERALISM and the demand for rights and freedoms will rise exponentially again!

What these little "know it alls" believe is WE have had our time grandpa and grandma and that we are stupid and in the way...at least that is how they come off to me...

I have news for these kids...we know more about what is happening in the world and the politic of today than they EVER could...they are babies in the world crying "look at me look at me I once took a class in polysci so I'm smart"

Horse shit...

Go stand on the ellipse with a picket sign demanding change and see if you can get others to join you to change our government and the world...if not...

Well their opinions are no more worthy than our own and some may be worth a bucket of piss and no more...

Until the time they decide to purge us "old folks" I will continue to voice my opinions and proceed to ignore the ignorant.

 

tomp

(9,512 posts)
249. I'm over 60, been on du since very near the beginning....
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:00 AM
Jun 2014

....and i have yet to find anyone significantly to my left.

i spent decades in political activism, long after many of my cohorts had gone on to feather their nests.

i don't claim to be the most knowledgeable person on this board, but i've been around and paid attention, and some things are just plain obvious.

The U.S. has been in crisis for most of the 20th century and all of the 21st, but especially following the JFK assassination. To my knowledge there has never been a time since the turn of the 20th century when business and government were not working hand-in-hand. there has been a gradual increase and consolidation of corporate power over many years, but the real difference of late is the blatantness of it all.

We should have had peace 50 years ago. We should have had equal rights for all 50 years ago. We should have had environmental safety 50 years ago. We should have had fair compensation for work 50 years ago. If not a hundred.

Obama is not the man for this time but is 50 years behind the times and is throwing bones and crumbs to the masses while further entrenching corporate control of the government. AND he is fooling a lot of people, but then, that is his job, and he is very good at it, as is the democratic party.

We need radical change NOW. the two-party system is not able to provide that, the darling mr. obama notwithstanding.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
20. if anything
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:24 PM
Jun 2014

You are one of the last liberals here.

I think what is happening is that people are gearing up for the great Hillary is inevitable vs we need warren now debates, and while you have stayed above this, some on both sides have resorted to insult. Meanwhile, the GOP laughs because, as usuall, we do about 40 percent of the work for them.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
24. I have the old DU habit of not linking to posts when I am being critical.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:31 PM
Jun 2014

They used to forbid it here, calling it "calling out". Someone follows me around posting old posts of mine, and it is disappointing to see it done negatively. I am proud of my old posts, but old habits die hard.

LeafsFan17

(31 posts)
38. Call it out
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 04:03 PM
Jun 2014

Sounds like others have no reservations about calling you out.

Many here would appear to share your frustration.

Drew Richards

(1,558 posts)
81. Yes isin't strange that that used to be the policy...and I agree with..not linking..but others do it
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:50 PM
Jun 2014

As well as constantly repeating cut and past walls of text and are able to get a pass from the board...

This goes back to how much this board has changed from DU 2....and somewhat of 3.

There used to be more debate and respect of differing "liberal/democratic" opinions...now it sounds more like a turd way echo chamber.

If this is to stay Democratic Underground perhaps there should be more push back against "third way" political views and more of a push for the old Democratic platform...

Equal rights for all
Equal pay for all
Government accountability to the people.
Free love...
fair taxation

H2O Man

(73,524 posts)
27. Recommended.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:33 PM
Jun 2014

I'm the oldest person on DU (or in the history of the human race). I'd be happy to compare my history of accomplishments -- and current projects -- with anyone. Being "liberal," "progressive," and/or "radical" isn't defined by what a person says on an internet discussion forum. It's entirely a matter of actions taken, and missions accomplished.

Uben

(7,719 posts)
28. I'm an old-timer here.....
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:36 PM
Jun 2014

...I just don't read those threads! Ha! I don't really give a shit what they think, their youth and inexperience....wait, I better not go there.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
32. They're characterized by Their willingness to throw people under their bus, not just by WHO They
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:45 PM
Jun 2014

throw under it: EVERYONE goes under it, always for for defending Dem principles against those who're supposed to be the torchbearers of those principles, or anyone escaping what They literally call the "Veal Pen"

at the same time we're mollified with revolutionary language and excuses, as the squirming diesel-choked heap of 320 million people gets bigger and bigger

fie on Them and Their slippery tongues

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
33. Certain forms of bigotry are allowed, for example
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:47 PM
Jun 2014

That related to age, religious beliefs, and the state where one resides

goldent

(1,582 posts)
34. It is simply human nature and our culture to blame "others" for problems.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:48 PM
Jun 2014

That is why criticism like you describe never bothers me.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
36. That is terrible, so sorry you felt that way
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:57 PM
Jun 2014

I can't see the threads in question, just wanted to say that you and the other elder DUers are totally welcome (as far as I'm concerned).

Despite my age (31) I feel the same way about the things you mention here.

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
39. All older people are not the same.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 04:04 PM
Jun 2014

It 'sometimes' appears that the youth here feel we need to be bumped off so that their life can be better. As a black woman and part of the 'burn your bra' generation of the 1960's, we faught for some of the same things that we're still fighing for such as ... education and unionization of the work place. But your message is valid...because we are liberal/democrats, we are all not the same and deserve respect for out opinions.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
101. Of course it is.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:23 PM
Jun 2014

And on behalf of every older, Democrat-voting, white man in my family, I'll second your sentiments.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
237. Yes.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:59 AM
Jun 2014

F*** me.

bravenak (4,322 posts)
139. I am sorry for that truly.

I am sorry you are hurt by my words and i want you to know that i have never seen you post anything harmful or hurtful to me. We all suffer the sins of others in our nation.
The woman's burden. It's a shame really, white women just barely got the right to vote and own themselves and now we lump them in with their former oppressors. I do feel bad that i hurt you.
I just cannot think of another way to express what i see.

hamsterjill

(15,220 posts)
46. Another older white woman here, and I will be damned if I will apologize
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 04:28 PM
Jun 2014

I've been around since 2001 but didn't officially join and post until Shrub was re-elected in 2004.

I remember a time before Roe v. Wade, and I will be damned if I will be condemned for supporting aggressively a woman's - ANY woman's - right to choose.

I see that issue discussed sometimes on DU with what I believe are younger posters getting the situation all convaluded as to who should be able to choose and at what time/length of pregnancy, etc. There is no convalusion in my mind. It is a woman's right to choose for her individual situation. There should be no discussion of her right because her decision should be private. Not public.

I'm not sure that some of the younger Democrats truly get just HOW critical this point is to our democracy. And that saddens me greatly.

StarryNite

(9,442 posts)
60. Amen sister!
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 04:58 PM
Jun 2014

We lived during the time when our 'sisters' were dying in alleys from coat hanger abortions. Never again!

Warpy

(111,222 posts)
79. The young folks are one pregnancy scare away from getting it. Both sexes.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:37 PM
Jun 2014

I think there's a language barrier. There are a few words that we as a culture have determined are unacceptable in polite company because they are the result of centuries of degradation and humiliation. The younger crowd wants to add more words every day and condemn people who won't go along with Modern Bowdlerism.

I've seen too many useful discussions here derailed by some puckerbutt who objects to a word here or there and throwing a snot slinging hissy fit over it. It seems to be breaking along generational lines, and that's sad.

hamsterjill

(15,220 posts)
114. I agree.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:48 PM
Jun 2014

I've seen that, too, Warpy. The whole discussion goes south because some person got their undies in a wad over a phrase, a spelling error, a personal pet peeve - the list goes on.

I've had posters (and I doubt I'm alone on this) who obviously not only didn't understand one of my posts, but hadn't even really read the post before firing off some condemnation.

I'd like to see DU go back to substantive discussions instead of pettiness.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
123. A post referencing Swift and baby-eating was once hidden...
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:31 PM
Jun 2014

by satire-challenged DUers. It was rather pitiful.

Warpy

(111,222 posts)
169. I know, sometimes the ignorance here is astonishing
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:00 AM
Jun 2014

but then I remember how witless I looked to my elders when I was in my 20s and mostly they were right.

It's still light years away from the total ignorance on conservative sites.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
297. True. It's the rudeness and doubling-down when one is so clearly wrong...`
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:30 PM
Jun 2014

that I find fascinating about some online discussions. I guess our interactions back in the dark ages were more personal -- no *hiding* behind keyboards.

kath

(10,565 posts)
192. Sheesh. That's pathetic.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:59 AM
Jun 2014

us oldsters grew up reading Swift in school. The younguns not so much, I guess -probably got censored from the curriculum.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
289. That's a good point.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:04 PM
Jun 2014

But based on the 20-somethings I see at work -- a healthcare system that employs over 8,000 -- they're not reading Swift either. It's sports, comic books, action films, reality TV, and YouTube videos 24/7. Corporate America *is* successfully dumbing down the masses. Although I worked with a patient the other day -- English major, student teacher -- and had a thoroughly enjoyable discussion about our AP English classes. I almost wanted to hug him.

onyourleft

(726 posts)
82. Many of us remember...
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:52 PM
Jun 2014

...when women could not get birth control pills unless married and then with your husband's permission. Never again should be the cry of all women.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
153. I remember girl friends suddenly gone for a whole school year.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:31 PM
Jun 2014

With no explanation. We only ever learned about one who had a baby put up for adoption. I agree, I don't think either party takes women's rights seriously enough. They should not be controlling any part of a patient/doctor decision.

KauaiK

(544 posts)
48. Here Here
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 04:32 PM
Jun 2014

We "older people" have been on the front lines for years. Younger folks are enjoying the benefits from our efforts 40-50 years ago.

GoldenOldie

(1,540 posts)
65. As an old woman/mother/grandmother/great-grandmother and one time activist
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:09 PM
Jun 2014

The "younger folks," are enjoying the benefits of efforts of over 100 years ago. The problem is that they have not been taught about the efforts and battles to attain these rights. The old adage of "you don't know what you have lost, until you lose it," holds true, as never before.

I have brought my children with me, when possible, to every march, protest, townhall meetings, discussions, etc., to let them learn first hand. We sat together viewing movies and TV programs on subjects that could affect their lives. My children in-turn with their children.

I was so proud and happy when my Granddaughter called me from college during her freshman year of International Studies and told me her Professor was discussing the failure of the elderly to know and comprehend World Events. Apparently his statement riled my Granddaughter and she immediately put him to task for labeling all elders as being ignorant of world affairs and proceeded to tell him about her grandmother....well into her 70's. I am blessed as all of my grandchildren now help to keep me well informed.

elfin

(6,262 posts)
49. Hooray. Another golden geezer here, and here close to the start
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 04:37 PM
Jun 2014

I keep wondering if my favorite site has changed, or is it I who have changed?

It seems that in earlier years, vitriol was directed at Dumbya, not at other DUers.

It seems to be a harsher climate overall.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
50. I, too am an older white woman and retired teacher. I'll hit seventy in 2015.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 04:44 PM
Jun 2014

I was raised in a very liberal home. My mom introduced JFK to my very Republican hometown when he was barnstorming the country. She was irritated by her Republican friends who crowded around to be introduced to him when she knew they'd vote for Nixon. That's the thing, however, there used to be some good Republicans. No Democrats were surprised when "Tricky Dick" turned to dirty tricks. In retrospect Nixon did a few good things that would brand him a flaming liberal today. Today's Republicans are increasingly vicious and...and trying to come up with a word less dramatic than "evil"... I agree that older posters are starting to be denigrated. My experience seems to be more that more and more DUers seem to be lost to subtle remarks, irony, and any sense of history. They are tending to attack rater than debate. As we were both teachers, I'm sure, you, as did I, tried to introduce our kids to critical thinking and thoughtful debate. Sadly, we seem to be losing.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
56. My family were mostly Republicans. They believed basically the same as we did.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 04:55 PM
Jun 2014

Politics was never an issue until Bush used the right wing and the churches to win the elections. Then both religion and politics became big issues.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
68. In a nutshell. The Southern Strategy and then the "Christian" Right."
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:15 PM
Jun 2014

Many of my reasonable Republican friend have been really floundering in recent years.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
250. After giving it some thought, I realized that the blame goes to Karl Rove;
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:05 AM
Jun 2014

Dubya could never have thought it up.

zwyziec

(173 posts)
51. I'm an Old White Guy and here is what I believe in.....
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 04:46 PM
Jun 2014

I believe in the New Deal, the Fair Deal and the Square Deal

I believe in Social Justice

I believe in Liberation Theology

And I believe in four of the ten commandments.....which four depends on the situation.

I have grown more progressive as I got older, now pushing 76, which I believe is due to the following factors:

1. The dumbing down of America
2. The attack on Science
3. The Climate Change Challenge
4. Citizens United
5. Racism in the name of Christianilty
6. Extremism on the right
7. Loony Tunes republicans
8. The growing Wealth gap
9. Wall Street and Big Banks
10. and so many more challenges too numerous to mention..

All of which will be the destructive forces that my grandsons will soon face.

It is time for a French style revolution...and an Enlightenment era.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
76. Wonderful! You are are defnitely 75. I've got a half dozen years to go, but agree
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:34 PM
Jun 2014

completely. (You lost me a bit in explanation). Are you single? Joshing of course, but you aren't any older man I've ever met. Peace to you!

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
54. Right on, Sister! I'm an old, liberal white guy!
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 04:53 PM
Jun 2014

I'll be 70 my next birthday, and I'm more liberal now that I was 20-30 years ago, and more active. I walked precincts in 2010 and 2012. This spring I've been in rallies and marches for higher wages for fast-food workers, against the KXL pipeline and against Monsanto. I've spent a lot of time manning tables and gathering signatures to support a resolution calling for an amendment to the US constitution to end corporate personhood.

This generational warfare meme is, as others have pointed out, is a creation of the right and our big-money ruling class. No one should talk about the need to balance Social Security and Medicare against education while our military spending is still above Cold War levels and taxes on corporations and the mega-rich are lower than any time since the 1920s.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
59. I put a lot
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 04:58 PM
Jun 2014

of the"denigration" off to youthful exuberance and typical youthful disrespect for those of us who have been around the block a few times. If they stop just think and in person listen to some of our experience(s), maybe, just maybe they'' will not make the same mistakes ect. We are still a force to be reckoned with. I love ya!

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
83. When I used to sing professionally,
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:57 PM
Jun 2014

that was a favorite, both of mine and the audience. I still sing it but only in the privacy of my own closet nowadays. And kudos for the twofer, Bonnie Raitt AND John Prine -- both favorites of mine.

historylovr

(1,557 posts)
62. I saw some of the comments on one thread yesterday.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:02 PM
Jun 2014

I was flabbergasted, that's for sure, and I'm just on the south side of 50.

It does make me think the DLC New Dem party has been the primary political influence of those who criticize older liberals and Democrats. Sadly, I don't think it will be more liberal when older posters are gone, or older citizens in general, with that dynamic in play.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
64. Seems like a certain set wants to move forward past what made us Democrats.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:03 PM
Jun 2014

So that the new Democrats resemble more what Reagan was like than these guys:



Why would they want to do that? Is progress too expensive? Is the cost of civil society too steep? Does money trump peace?

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
66. Wonderful post, MadFlo
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:12 PM
Jun 2014

and thank you for your courage in speaking out. I mostly bite my tongue, but I couldn't agree with you more.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
145. Thanks, Blue
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:16 PM
Jun 2014

That's twice lately I have let myself be dragged into conflict. I don't regret it though. I have bit my tongue so often, just had to stop it for while.

I either have to stop posting or defend myself...hard to decide sometimes.



PS I need a link to your Smug Mug pictures. I have it on my other computer. I don't go there as often as I did at Webshots.

asjr

(10,479 posts)
73. I, too, am an older woman--I'll
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:24 PM
Jun 2014

be 82 this year. I joined in 2002 when I received a gift of a computer from my baby sister. I knew DU was for me because of its liberal bent. I was able to call GWB many ugly names and feel good about it. More than anything I could write and not be called names myself. I have been slowing down in recent years as I do not feel as accepted as before. So many on DU that I knew have left and now I sometimes am hesitant to start a new op. There is much name-calling now in
some messages and some ops consist only about two people arguing about something. I see too many of those and skip to some other presentation. DU could probably render news of the U.S. and the rest of the world because it seems to be more thorough. That is why I still hang around.
Could be I simply have no patience with anyone blasting others over who or what is right.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
183. You sound like an amazing person.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:30 AM
Jun 2014

You are so right. I remember finding this place in the lead up to the illegal invasion of Iraq. It was the only area of truth I could find anywhere.

Through the years I have become more and more liberal.

Thanks for your post.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
348. Sorry you have to feel that way on DU, asjr. But you're not alone, there is a nasty trend going on
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:38 PM
Jun 2014

here that is driving people away. Who needs to be around this kind of nastiness when in RL they wouldn't find themselves anywhere near the kind of thing Madfloridian just wrote about.

I have stayed around because of the people I respect who are still here, but they are getting fewer and fewer all the time.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
74. Thanks Mad....
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:26 PM
Jun 2014

I wrote 3 or 4 posts in response to this "topic" and deleted them all before I posted them. Most of them just asked about throwing the baby out with the bath water, or about why someone would want to disenfranchise people who are on their side.

But after reading the threads I realized that it was pointless. My experience as a liberal is completely different than theirs. I come from a time when being a liberal meant standing up for what you believed in, not what the party believes in.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
240. ^^^THIS!^^^
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:16 AM
Jun 2014
I come from a time when being a liberal meant standing up for what you believed in, not what the party believes in.


Amen to that!!!
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
78. I agree with you on this.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:37 PM
Jun 2014

Although, honestly, based on my prior observations, I truly can't help but suspect that some of the loudest posters on the "race" issue, aren't necessarily being entirely altruistic about this.....but rather, may actually have a rhetorical axe to grind.....or perhaps worse, with B.S. like "all white people are responsible/at fault for racism&quot yes, I've actually seen this written very recently. I won't reveal the screenname of said culprit publicly, however.), or attacking those who don't agree with them, etc.

(P.S. Do keep in mind that I only said some, and not all. There are others who do have a legitimate stake in these things, just that they happen to take things too far sometimes. And for those of you out there, who don't play the extremist game["all whites are at fault for racism", "PoC can't be racist", etc.], or attack those you disagree with you, just relax, because this isn't about you. )


onyourleft

(726 posts)
80. Thanks for...
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:46 PM
Jun 2014

...posting. I'm an old, white woman (70) with an old, white husband. My parents were both Republicans while my two sisters and I all turned out to be Democrats. There are not many older Democrats who deserve what has been said. Usually, I read threads like those and choose not to respond. I believe more and more of us are choosing not to respond because of labels that will be unfairly attached.

Again, thanks for all you do here.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
84. To all those who are wishing we would all just hurry up and die off:
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 05:59 PM
Jun 2014

FUCK YOU! I'm living forever! Bwahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
86. Any of you kids think you're more progressive than me, but weren't out protesting with Occupy,
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 06:04 PM
Jun 2014

you need to get the fuck off my lawn right now.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
245. Love it!
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:41 AM
Jun 2014
Any of you kids think you're more progressive than me, but weren't out protesting with Occupy, you need to get the fuck off my lawn right now.

Woot!

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
90. I haven't seen the threads, but don't mind them.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 06:35 PM
Jun 2014

Only someone who is not well informed wouldn't know that many of the rights we enjoy today were fought by those older people they disparage. What generation laid it all on the line for civil rights and women's rights? It's not the entitled young, that's for sure. I for one, am grateful for previous generations. They opened doors that I was able to walk through.



jopacaco

(133 posts)
92. Absolutely agree
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 06:45 PM
Jun 2014

I am an unapologetic liberal (sorry I've never really liked the term progressive). My first vote was for George McGovern. I was raised in a blue collar family in Pittsburgh. My father was president of the local railroad union. In school, I was taught about the Homestead Strike and the robber barons. I don't think that I have ever voted for a Republican.
This old, white, not quite retired educator, is certainly more liberal than very many on this board.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
330. Welcome to DU, from a native Johnstowner.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:07 PM
Jun 2014

I know seeing those steel mills as a kid shaped my politics. As did learning about the 2,200+ wiped out in the Johnstown Flood.

carolinayellowdog

(3,247 posts)
93. retired librarian, old white southern male, progressive side of every intraparty divide
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 06:49 PM
Jun 2014

A couple of things not appreciated by those who regard public sector retirees as a total drag on the economy. 1) We opened up a job for a younger person when we retired. 2) "Full" retirement is about 60% of what was already short of median income, and that is for the lucky ones. So we got out of your way and are barely surviving. NOT THE ENEMY. (As a librarian, I must say that the jury system, allowing censorship of political speech based on online gang warfare among irreconcilable factions, is such a violation of my professional conscience that it makes it hard to be here.)

iamthebandfanman

(8,127 posts)
94. instead of making it
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 06:50 PM
Jun 2014

a battle of the ages or sexes (like some folks on DU enjoy doing for some reason)..

how about we all think about re-examining the words 'progressive' and 'liberal'.. and how everyone has their own personal definition of what that means obviously ... lol

i never call myself progressive or liberal anymore...
but then again, ive embraced democratic socialism .. and im not ashamed of it and say it proudly... because i understand completely what that means universally, not just in my opinion

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
96. You were here before they were and, if you choose, you'll be here long after they've gone....
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:07 PM
Jun 2014

Treat them like the prattling 5th graders they so closely resemble-ignore them, and remember that many of us were nearly as clueless when we were young....

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
97. I may have been clueless when younger, but I don't remember being rude.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:10 PM
Jun 2014

Or saying things just to anger people and get a rise out of them.

I never thought about age here, don't even know the ages of most. Nowhere close to how old people are here.

I think I will be more aware from now on.

Violet_Crumble

(35,961 posts)
109. Hey madflo. I agree with you and have never thought about age here...
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:41 PM
Jun 2014

I've been here at DU as long as you have, and I know the ages of most of my DU friends who talk to me by PM, but age isn't a factor when I read someone's post and think it's shit or I really like what they're saying.

I think I just read through one of those threads, and found myself biting my tongue pretty hard. I hate ageism, don't recall having seen it at DU before, and really don't like seeing it now..

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
116. I should have bitten my tongue last night instead of responding.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:06 PM
Jun 2014

But it's like I was on overload with all the slams against older people. I usually don't take part in threads like that, but that is two I have gotten way too involved in lately because I am fed up. I got in another when a buddy here had to take time out because a cartoon he posted was misunderstood. No one took the time to analyze it in the light of recent events.

You are right...been here a long time both of us.

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
180. I really believe part of it is the anonymnity granted by the keyboard...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:28 AM
Jun 2014

Since you're rarely held accountable for your words its easy to get hyperbolic. I try to act my age but I'll acknowledge some weak moments though, in retrospect, very few I truly regret.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
102. I, too, am an older (71) white woman AND A PROGRESSIVE.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:25 PM
Jun 2014

I haven't seen anyone complain that I am not progressive enough. I have had some complaints that I am not conservative or pro-Obama enough.

Those who complain about older white women are applying a stereotype to the DUers who do not share their opinions.

Those complaints are just absurd. The people making them don't know who they are talking about.

cachukis

(2,231 posts)
105. Still at it in the trenches in downtown tpa.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:31 PM
Jun 2014

Still look forward to your posts. The smarts always win out. Otherwise we'd still be cavemen.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
197. Hi there, haven't seen you post in ages.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:34 AM
Jun 2014

You need to do more of it. But then if you are in the trenches that's most important. Someday this area will go more liberal, at least the coastal areas might. Inland, now that's another matter entirely.

Faygo Kid

(21,478 posts)
107. Thank you. I've been here since 2002, and tired of being ripped to shreds.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:32 PM
Jun 2014

I think I have a good heart, and a sympathetic liberal viewpoint. But in the past year, I've been ripped to shreds.

I like sports, and enjoy that escapism and sometimes courage. That's ridiculed here at DU. At best.

I pulled heavily for Barack Obama in 2008. Now, I have the audacity to say I prefer Hillary Clinton to Ted Cruz, Rand Paul or Mike Huckabee. Again, ripped to shreds.

I could go on. But folks know me here, including Skinner. But I'm tired of the posters who only exist to be smug and superior. It gets tiresome to read of your self-proclaimed Perfection.

Me, I just want to be rid of you. And to do good things for others, but not you self-righteous assholes.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
111. I am also an oldie and wish to express a couple things to the youngsters onboard.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:42 PM
Jun 2014

Our generation brought about a lot of changes that benefit your lives today through determination and hard work. For instance, many of us never had health insurance provided by the company, but we fought for it to be included as one of our perks. We fought for equality for women--that was a tough one--and won some battles to close the gap between male/female pay, though not enough. Yes, it used to be worse.

Through the years, we improved the educational systems, built/maintained the infrastructure, improved transportation via the interstate highway system, and other such improvements. My old mind doesn't remember all of the improvements, but some early ones that come to mind are sliced bread, motels, drive-in restaurants, TV, air conditioning, computers and some pretty darned beautiful music. I could go on and on just in the improvements after WWII and thru the 1950s. It was an incredible time to grow up.

We didn't make decisions that were always right, but we sure tried.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
112. As an old white woman, I just assume that those here who stupidly broad-brush
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:45 PM
Jun 2014

Democrats by age are either clueless or deliberately being divisive.
Even dumber than the "all Floridians" nitwits.

 

redruddyred

(1,615 posts)
113. I get the distinct impression that DU is primarily made up of "older" people
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:48 PM
Jun 2014

therefore the distinct lack of trolling and internet humor (real internet humor).

I will mention that I have found some of the older men to be rather anti-feminist. ironically, however, they are much less misogynist than my own peers who it would appear are into shooting people because some woman didn't do her womanly duty and do what woman do which is to bestow sexual favors on deserving males, who deserve them after all. I guess that's a compliment.

GoneOffShore

(17,339 posts)
118. Thank you, from an old fart who's been here since the start of this place.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:38 PM
Jun 2014

I was 55 or 56 when I first signed on to DU.

It was, and to a certain extent, still is a haven for liberals to thrash out differences of opinion.

And yes, I too differ with the President on some policy matters. It would be surprising if this wasn't the case, particularly in light of my very leftist views on taxation.

I vote in EVERY election. I work for Democratic candidates. Some of my positions on corporate governance, nationalisation, public education, gun control and media are probably left enough to frighten the "moderates" ( Most moderates I've met don't get that one most even be moderate when it comes to moderation - you have to push the boundaries sometimes).

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
119. Another almost-retired teacher and white female.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:40 PM
Jun 2014

A life-long democrat and "old"-style liberal here. Was a "hippie" art student in the 1960s. They are just jealous because we had so damn much fun.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
121. My daughter says I have an "inner hippie".
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:45 PM
Jun 2014

I probably do, but never could let it show in this totally right wing Southern Baptist area.

Looking back I might have been a hippie type in another place than this.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
124. MF, most people ignore those who are here to divide people.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:35 PM
Jun 2014

It seems to me there are people trying to destroy the Dem Party. They never attack Republicans, but spend most of their time here attacking Dems. Now why would anyone do that?

I always consider the source, and just about NOTHING many of those individuals have to say, ever bothers me, I expect it of them.

You are one of DU's treasures, one of the reasons people still come here.

The dividers? They've driven more people away, not just from this forum, but from the Dem Party, which may be the goal for all I know, so just ignore them is my advice.

Lol, I will never, ever, ever again criticize Condi Rice or SC Justice Thomas. Because I heard on DU that if you don't agree with an African American politician you MUST be a racist and a Right Winger.

As if that is going to happen anytime soon. I will criticize policies that are not Democratic policies no matter who is responsible for them. Do they think that by calling people 'racist' it will 'control' political discussion on a Democratic Forum? What utter nonsense.

The whole premise is so ridiculous frankly it made me laugh. I guess I've been around that kind of personal attack now for so long it doesn't phase me in the least.

I hate liars

(165 posts)
125. Ad hominem arguments are distractions
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:36 PM
Jun 2014

Why should it matter how old, what race, what sex, what sexual preference applies to any commenter?

If the issue is important and the point is valid and honestly argued, then suck it up and respond on the basis of the argument's merits.

Ad hominem arguments are signs of weak minds and weak arguments.

We shouldn't have to argue this meta-crap.

I hate liars

(165 posts)
126. PS: I'm not criticizing this thread...
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:38 PM
Jun 2014

I think madfloridian makes a valid point, even if I don't agree with a lot of what Obama has done.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
166. MF is responding to some pretty nasty comments about 'old people' on this forum.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:51 PM
Jun 2014

You are correct, we should have to argue about this garbage, but DU has some pretty divisive people around these days and MF is correct to draw attention to what is going on here.

It appears, if we are to believe this faction on DU, that the Dem Party doesn't need the following voters anymore:

1)Old White Men
2)Anyone who ever disagreed with this President on issues, because according to this faction, if you disagree with this President, you are a racist and a right winger.
3)The 'left'. This faction despises the left even more than right wingers.

If this is the case, and if these people actually represent the Dem Party, it is going to become a pretty small party once they clear it of all the 'undesirables'.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
185. You are right though, Sabrina.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:35 AM
Jun 2014

I probably should have ignored it. It just hit me wrong. I got involved in the WillyT thread about the misunderstood cartoon as well. Guess I'd better lay low a while, you think?

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
393. No, I don't think you should lie low, MF. Liberals need to stand up more. It's because they often
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 03:20 AM
Jun 2014

do not, that the louder voices win. It hit a lot of people the wrong way, willy too.

What I meant was not that I don't respond to them, I do, but they NEVER get me upset, because I don't expect anything from them. Mostly I respond for those reading. Iow, the only people who can upset me are people I have respect for. I hope that explains it better!

 

OldRedneck

(1,397 posts)
131. I'm an older white man
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:56 PM
Jun 2014

70 to be exact.

Born 1944 in Wilkinson County, MS, which at that time was about one year removed from slavery. My g-g-granddaddy owned 83 slave. My g-granddaddy was head of the county Klan. Granddaddy owned a grocery store and an old country general store with a cotton gin.

In Granddad's office at the gin he had two pictures on the wall: Jesus and FDR. When he prayed, I was never certain to which of them he was praying.

My parents and grandparents grew up during the Depression, WW I, and WW II. They were thankful every day for the New Deal, something most of the young 'uns commenting on DU never heard of . . . the Rural Electrification Administration put electric lines down the road where we lived, enable Granddad to install an electric separator and electric lights in the barn at his little dairy . . . the WPA built a bridge over a stream that previously my parents and grandparents had to drive through, except when the water was high and they were stranded.

As a college student in Alabama, 1962-1967, I marched behind MLK in Montgomery, was arrested by Bull Conner's cops in Birmingham, and almost thrown out of college by a redneck dean who called me a "damn n****r lover."

My father and two aunts braved the Klan to teach in black schools in the Mississippi Delta.

I raised $250,000 for Obama's re-election and am now raising money for Hillary.

I could go on and on and on . . . but it's past my bedtime.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
187. Love your post. Thanks for sharing.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:40 AM
Jun 2014

I have a lot of memories like that.

I love this sentence:

"In Granddad's office at the gin he had two pictures on the wall: Jesus and FDR. When he prayed, I was never certain to which of them he was praying. "

We only had the Jesus picture but FDR was beloved.

Past your bedtime? Way too early.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
132. The account of the person who thinks "old white men" are...
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:57 PM
Jun 2014

the root of all evil has been flagged for review. Perhaps there's moderation after all.

I appreciate your invective-free, thoughtful posts, Madfloridian.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
137. Thank you. I usually stay out of stuff. This is twice in two weeks...
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:06 PM
Jun 2014

so I need to watch myself. When WillyT got a time-out because a cartoon was misinterpreted, I really jumped in then.

Thanks so much for letting me know.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
146. I really value your input and that of older DU'ers
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:17 PM
Jun 2014

Your posts on education are invaluable. Keep up the good work.

The Chinese culture has one thing really going for it, and that is the reverence and respect for the older adults. They get that right. We here at DU and in the Democratic Party can learn a great deal from those who have been there/done that.

I always try to remind myself that some here are not liberals/progressives, and we have our goodly share of trolls and stealth conservatives/Republicans. There is absolutely no rational reason for our seniors to be attacked here. Let's keep our differences over policy strictly to policy without dragging in irrelevant factors.

NBachers

(17,096 posts)
147. "Who let all these old people in here?"
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:18 PM
Jun 2014

April 10th, 1949

When I get to one of those number charts where I have to highlight my birth year, I've got to dig deeper and deeper to get there.

I was goofing off at the dinner table while President Kennedy made his Missile Crisis speech. My mom said, "Pay attention, because this is almost a declaration of war."

Yup, I remember "I Like Ike," and I remember John Cameron Swayze listing all the military bases around the world where Camel Cigarettes were being sent.

I'm here. I ain't leaving.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
150. Old memories...bet I could list more.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:24 PM
Jun 2014

I think some of my earliest (very early) memories were of the Life Magazine pics of the Holocaust. No TV of course, but movies had news clips of the war. Nothing like this instant age we live in now.

Lots more, but sometimes memories overwhelm.

G_j

(40,366 posts)
155. There are people here who were involved in the civil rights, environmental, anti-war, etc. movements
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:36 PM
Jun 2014

IMO, most everything from Reagan on, that the RW has done, has been a reaction to the gains and ideas we put into motion.
We rocked the boat, and the repercussions still echo.

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
160. I've been here since 2001.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:12 PM
Jun 2014

And I'm what's considered "old" I suppose, though not retired yet (but I goddamned well should be).

I didn't see those threads. Good thing. Because one result of getting older is that I'm grumpier and more easily speak my mind.

 

Corruption Inc

(1,568 posts)
161. It's been OK for a long time to "hate old white guys", if we're being blunt
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:18 PM
Jun 2014

I pointed it out months ago, how racist it is, and got fully ignored. So my advice is to use the ignore function, it is the only thing that makes DU readable.

 

JEB

(4,748 posts)
162. I am not old, only 62, and
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:23 PM
Jun 2014

I plan on fighting the fascists and their apologists (third way) for many more years. Confront at every opportunity, Resistance is a way of life.

akbacchus_BC

(5,704 posts)
165. Madfloridian, you have always been advocating for education
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:50 PM
Jun 2014

from the time I joined DU and am glad you are advocating for public schools. I support your advocacy but if you are retiring, how would you be able to voice an opinion?

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
177. I have been retired for a while. I see what is happening by contact and research.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:16 AM
Jun 2014

I talk to teachers and I know their fears. I also do a lot of digging.

Being retired means I have time to help spread the word. If I were still working I would have to keep my mouth shut.

paleotn

(17,902 posts)
173. Well said, Mad....
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:07 AM
Jun 2014

....middle aged white guy here, who proudly cast his first vote for Jimmy Carter in '80. We're keeping the board from becoming more progressive? Whaa?! No offense to our younger members, but I doubt many of them have any clue what the Democratic party use to be. Back in the day, folks like Bernie Sanders were mainstream Dems and we were proud to call ourselves Liberals. Many of us still are. On the other hand, I am very much encouraged by the lefty bent of most younger folks and I do hope that our national politics once again swings back to sanity so that they can also experience what we once knew, back when our liberal views were conventional wisdom and guys like Paul Ryan were considered nuts and cranks and few paid any attention to them.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
179. Just try real hard not to take it to heart, madfloridian...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:26 AM
Jun 2014

when people around here get into personalities instead of hashing out what needs to be done, my tendency is just to try and move on. I do think that what went on yesterday evening may have initially been a failure to communicate effectively. I was sitting here scratching my head and wondering if I'd read things correctly, right when you jumped into that thread and since you are a poster that I've followed since forever (always read your threads), I understand exactly why you're writing about it today.

senior member of the bite your tongue club

NuttyFluffers

(6,811 posts)
182. the FUD looking for fissures has been extremely strong this past year
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:29 AM
Jun 2014

as i predicted as well, so i am none surprised.

just remember, there's a way to accommodate "united we stand, divided we fall" and "my country right, and when its wrong i fix it." and blind obedience and enforced right-thinking is the absolute worst way to go about it.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
186. If we are dragging those "younger folk" down, I think they ought to take their young asses,
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:37 AM
Jun 2014

put them in gear, and create for themselves a "Young People Geezer Hatin' Club" with all of the functionality of this place, and bar us from membership.

And then see how well they do.

Huge dose of for the irony-impaired.

There doesn't need to be more "moderation." I'll tell you, though--I'll vote HIDE for egregious racism, sexism and homophobia--and I'll add ageism to my list, too.

Being a rude asshole doesn't make a person "cool." It makes them simply rude assholes.

davidthegnome

(2,983 posts)
189. Some of my favorite people
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:49 AM
Jun 2014

are older white women.

At one point or another, I've had unpopular opinions about all kinds of things. Generally it seems to bring out people who are very eager to tell me who I am or to accuse me of being something I'm not.

Shrug it off, laugh at it. Don't ever let them bring you down to their level. Only you can decide who you really are.

I've been reading your posts for years - and for whatever it's worth, I think you're a pretty awesome white lady. Anyhow... K & R - your wisdom and experience are very needed here.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
199. do not be fooled
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:08 AM
Jun 2014

the conservatives of both parties have been pushign generational warfare for a while, and they do this because if generations united and saw what was happening the oligarchs would know they are dead.

If everyone from the 15 year old who knows his future got sold down the river, the 90 year old retired teacher who knows her future got sold down the river, and all those in between, were to unite behind the on true, indisputable common cause, the oligarchs would be taken to the river, and drowned like a bunch of kittens!

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
209. I'm a middle-aged feminist
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:07 AM
Jun 2014

who has my very legitimacy to participate on this board attacked on a regular basis. The same is true for the few people of color that remain on this site. If I posted a thread like this, it would be met with tremendous hostility. White senior citizens are the majority of posters on this board. You are not discriminated against on DU.

The way in which age can influence (though is certainly not determinative) political discussions is that anyone with any higher education in the liberal arts in the past quarter century would have some exposure to thinking about issues of race, class, and gender. That was not always the case. When people say discussing such issues is "divisive," they make clear they want no one who doesn't think like them to speak at all. The fact is American society is stratified, and race is a key axis of discrimination. I consider it a great shame that some are so hostile to the fact that even a tiny number of people of color speak discuss politics from their POV, a view that is framed by their life experiences, just as yours are.

BlueMTexpat

(15,366 posts)
210. Dear Mad ... hang in there!
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:10 AM
Jun 2014

Among other things, I have been a teacher. I am likely even older than you though! LOL

Now that I am retired, I continue to teach as an adjunct ... but plan finally to bow out after the 2014-2015 academic year. I find that teaching, when not having to deal with seemingly senseless administrative red tape, handle every administrative "fad" or deal with parents wanting to micromanage (sometimes well-meaning, sometimes deliberately obstructionist), can be addictive. If anything, I keep learning for and from my students.

I only discovered DU in 2004 (a friend suggested it and EarlG's TTCI thoroughly "hooked" me) after desperately being in need of something to maintain comparative sanity after Bush II "defeated" Kerry, but did not actually sign up until 2008. I still do a LOT more lurking than posting. I am a lifelong Dem - and my actions, including lifestyle choices - demonstrate this.

Even so and considering my comparatively low-count # of posts, I have been lectured by those who have never walked in my shoes and who know nothing about me as to my "purity" because I occasionally try to provide perspective. Perhaps I am not always successful or perhaps some take well-intentioned comments the wrong way (always a risk when one speaks out, after all), but believe me, I appreciate the variety of Dem POVs expressed here. By all. What discourages me is to see GOP talking points, some better disguised than others, appear in order to sow dissension. Happily, I find those to be in the minority. May it continue to be so!

Anyone who consistently follows your posts, whether wholeheartedly agreeing with them or not, should NEVER EVER doubt that you are a credit to DU, whatever your age.

Response to madfloridian (Original post)

raccoon

(31,106 posts)
216. Little old 60+ woman here,not yet retired, but wannabe.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:24 AM
Jun 2014

A flaming liberal.

Missed the threads you mentioned but sounds like I didn't miss much.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
218. What so many younger people tend to forget is that too will someday be older
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:32 AM
Jun 2014

And for some of them, age will change their politics (from Democratic to Repub). For others, they'll see how silly they're comments about older people not being progressive enough.

And lets face it, too many younger people only care about one thing... the legalization of marijuana (see, I can generalize too).

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
231. That sort of stuff is why I barely ever post here any.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:36 AM
Jun 2014

I do not feel welcome here anymore as a lifelong liberal and Democrat, The hippy punching and denigrating of those of us that have actual Democratic values, by the corporate ass-kissing, authoritarian, Republican Lite crowd has me reconsidering my party affiliation. The only reason I have not reregistered as an Independent, is the faint hope of having someone decent to vote for in the primaries.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
409. You're not the only one reconsidering your party affiliation. If the party doesn't want 'old white
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 02:01 AM
Jun 2014

people' or traditional Dems who will not be silenced when they see policies being implemented that are harmful to this country, they need to say so. If what is going on here actually represents the Dem Party, it isn't the Big Tent as it claims to be.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
410. Sabrina, question. I swear I must be stupid.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 02:09 AM
Jun 2014

I see in a thread where people are organizing Jury Blacklists, which I take to mean people who can't be on any jury for you. Now I just checked under my profile and transparency, and it says I have had 0 posts hidden and gives the total number of posts.

Everyone seems to know about this but me. I checked my settings and I see no option for anything like that. I am not signed up to be on a jury, I said no for various reasons.

I never thought about any of this until this week, but now I wonder if should have one and if so how do I make it. If I decide to keep posting, I probably need one now.

Thanks. Color me confused.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
412. Look at the top of this page.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 02:25 AM
Jun 2014

To the right of center you'll see your name.

Next to your name you'll see 'My Profile' then 'My Account'. Click on 'My Account'.

Right under the title: 'My Account' you'll see several buttons, see below:


My Account:
Account---Bookmarks---Ignore List---Jury Blacklist---Trash Can---Star Membership


Click on Jury Blacklist and you will see a window in which you can type the names of those you think would be biased against you on a jury. There are spaces for 15 names if you a Star Member, I believe.

I forgot about that also, need to update it.

Hope that helps

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
414. It's definitely a good idea. I filled it out a while ago, still have a few spaces though which
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 02:49 AM
Jun 2014

I will fill in now.

Better safe than sorry. As you say, 'after this' it's almost a necessity!

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
417. It helps a lot
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 08:37 AM
Jun 2014

Mine has had all 15 spots full for a while.

Gonna have to make a couple changes to it I think. I put put posters who have been the most aggressive towards me on my blacklist.

You have been very strong in this situation, I applaud you.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
243. I have always been a registered Democrat, and a two-time Obama voter.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:34 AM
Jun 2014

My immediate family were the only Democrats in a mostly Republican family. SO no I am not an ex Republican trolling here. I have never voted anything but Democratic, and my late hubby and I voted for President Obama twice...we campaigned for him, bought yard signs for others here, donated freely.



madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
244. Per more stuff in this thread....I ALERTED ONCE.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:41 AM
Jun 2014

That was all. No more than once. I do not alert stalk. I believe since I came to DU3 I have used the alert only 3 times.

rogerashton

(3,920 posts)
247. OK, I'm a white male, 71.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:52 AM
Jun 2014

Like some other posters I marched for Gene McCarthy in 68 and I aint taking any bull about old people getting more conservative. Some do, but some young lefties age like a good cheese. In 68, our McCarthy campaign group had two co-leaders. One was 14. (Sadly, he has since died of AIDS.) The other was 80 -- a veteran of the White Army in the Russian Revolution, a pacifist and vegetarian for most of his life after than experience. I support our young activists, and I trust that they will continue in their commitment as the best always have.

mgardener

(1,814 posts)
248. I am an older white women, retired school nurse
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:53 AM
Jun 2014

I agree.

I am decidedly more liberal since I get older. I know the importance of things and know how important it is to stop the tea party and people like Ted Cruz.
I have lived through JFK and Nixon. I have seen so much and know the importance of choices, right and wrong.

Listen to us with as much respect as you expect from others.
I come here with the expectation that there will be disagreements, and that we are on the same side.
If we cannot get along and accept others views, then we are no better the the RW christian extremists.

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
252. People should know what this is about
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:23 AM
Jun 2014

No one insulted the OP. She decided to take offense at something not directed at her. She alerted, and a jury chose not to hide the post. The person who made the comment apologized quite graciously. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025060206#post139 Rather than responding to her apology, the OP decided to start this thread.

Now the thread has become a campaign against one of less than a dozen active African American posters on this site. It is unfair and based on false accusations taken entirely out of context.

If people find a single comment about age so offensive, imagine what it is like to be subject to racism on a daily basis and then to come on to DU to find yourself targeted, dismissed, and resented because your skin color means your life experiences and thus political outlook differs from the majority of this site, who are indeed white, older, and relatively fortunate economically. I truly wish that people cared enough to think about that just a little bit.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
255. Okay, here goes. Here's the text since you keep pushing it.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:41 AM
Jun 2014

First let me say my late hubby and I campaigned strongly for Obama both times.

I do not like some of his policies, I have been disappointed that he missed some real chances for making life easier for the people of this country.

However since I am going to continue to be pushed on this...here is the direct link to a post in question.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5060383

We can not win if the party is so divided by left/right, white/black, old/young. There is no need for it at all.

The post, one of several:

After you old guys are gone the rest of us will make up the new majority.

I think it will take much less time than the estimates project. I have two children, he has four, i expect to have two more and that will still mean i will have the least amount of children for a Lady in my family. My grandmother had ten. Most of my friends have several already and are continuing to procreate. Many of my white friends are in mixed marriages and have several children who identify as asian or black or hispanic not white. Minorities are not cozy with wall street for the most part, and women especially single one are less likely to vote Republican. So in twenty years we will not have 2 Parties run by Old white Dudes who service the rich. We will be voting ourselves a right good part of their money, praise R'hllor.

You got to realize that power is shifting towards a more liberal society and that it is the old white men who are standing in the way of progress, passing shit laws and fighting against womens rights. The kids growing up see their congressmen screeching about illegals, urban youths, thugs, wetbacks and more. They will not be voting for Republicans. And Democrats better get our shit together and start bringing in the next generation quickly before Republicans decide to get smart, steal our platform, and out voters. Because sorry to tell you, the youth is not interested in the NSA all day everyday, they post every private thought they have on Tumblr, facebook, etc.

They will kill wall street when they get their time. I'll be right here helping them find the means. And we need their help to do it because the old party bosses still control the legislature, for now.
The only way to get the votes is to get the voters engaged. And horror stories about how much you hate Obama is not a good lure when you are fishing in a pond of Obama supporters, and the youth , women, lgbt's, and minorities are supporters of this President. You are driving them away and losing us votes.


That is why I posted.

We should be all in this together. Now I know there's an AA forum, because I am a topic of not so nice conversation there.

Should I have stayed out of the conversation. Maybe. I usually do. But I didn't, and I am going to respond to continued attacks.

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
257. If you wanted to "be in this together"
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:49 AM
Jun 2014

You would have discussed the issue with her rather than posting this OP. You clearly do not want her or those who think like her in it. Your it therefore excludes the majority of Americans.

When you go about targeting another member, you can hardly be surprised she seeks support for being singled out. Now you begrudge her even that?

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
259. You didn't respond to her apology
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:00 AM
Jun 2014

You sought to talk ABOUT her rather than talk TO her. She made clear she was talking about demographic phenomena and not you, and not women generally. Yet knowing that you chose to misrepresent her comments and insist you had been insulted.

I have to leave this discussion before I lose my temper. I will just say I am disheartened by what I see.

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
261. That is what you single out as nasty?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:07 AM
Jun 2014

I wish I could say I was surprised.

I keep forgetting that as a lesser life form I'm not allowed five minutes to digest a really awful insult whereas more important people are allowed to complain about theirs for months on end. That you think there is anything comparable between Bravenak's comment and what was said to me says a lot.

Violet_Crumble

(35,961 posts)
262. It was an example of a really nasty response to a genuine and heartfelt apology...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:09 AM
Jun 2014

There's no way of spinning that so that it's not.

Response to Violet_Crumble (Reply #262)

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
325. Oh please.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:12 PM
Jun 2014

You have now brought up the dog insult against me more than I have!

Enough!!!!!!

I have moved on, even though I NEVER received an apology.

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
342. She never apologized to me.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:58 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:05 PM - Edit history (1)

I really wish you would stop talking about it; like I said I have moved on but you keep stirring the pot with your false statements.

I'm a mature adult.

These were the apologies I saw, and none seemed directed at me. As a matter of fact, the second one seems to say she doesn't need to apologize because the jury left it.


Things have been said in the heat of "battle" ---

Some things said have been worse than others
(because I totally understand the difference between slander and insult)


I am going to do my best to not engage or allow myself to be drawn into it anymore.

I apologize for my part in it.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/125544536#post11

Downthread, this was posted, which doesn't seem like an apology to me at all:

taking the heat for something -I- said. I take full credit for what I said. Always have. I have tried multiple times to explain it.

The post went to jury. The jury allowed it.

Am I supposed to apologize for a jury?


http://www.democraticunderground.com/125544536#post38

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
265. I never mentioned the name, never gave a link until just now when you pushed it.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:21 AM
Jun 2014

I did mention her apology last night on this thread. Now that I am a topic of a not so nice thread at the AA forum I have to wonder if it were sincere.

Yes, I think it is time to leave it alone.

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
278. I guess we had it coming to us.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:11 AM
Jun 2014

Only white men can broad brush and call other white men stupid.




Now, privileged white, that might have some traction. It is easier to see in Florida suburban societies, where distinct dual societies take hold. In this environment, I have seen Dems making the same bad decisions as the Republicans. Not many, mind you. Just the ones that forget they live in the USA and allow themselves to get seduced by the local culture for the perks it offers them. I have even heard one white friend confess to me when she moved in an upscale development that she's finally leaving like a white man.

Yeah, about those Dems. The one I'm thinking about was a Commissioner. In a city meeting they were talking about getting sued because the city didn't have enough multi-family homes within the city limits. This didn't happen by accident. There was an odd movement in the eighties and nineties where a local sovereign mentality took over and the city abandoned the city designs they had submitted to the State to justify their reason for becoming a municipality.

By the time we got to the 21st Century the city had very little multi-family homes that offered affordable housing to those with minimum income means, like minorities. So they were facing a lawsuit. So this Dem Commissioner talks about her ideas about affordable housing for minorities. She said that she always anticipated spreading out those kind of homes within the city limits, instead of approving one development with affordable housing. (What could she possibly be worried about? ) However, she fully supported the idea when someone said that they could approve the multi-family home plans for another developer, who was going with a Seniors only concept.

And just in case I missed the point of that move, one particularly ignorant white woman bumps into me in a grocery store to attempt to encourage me to attend a city meeting to support the idea, because, you know, the place would accept OLDER minorities. wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

It would be wrong to forget that we come to the Democratic party bringing in our own different set of experiences. Those experiences are going to affect our perceptions, and as such, we put labels to our terms as we see them. In a nutshell, in Florida, there aren't many white liberal ladies, old or young, walking around willing to show us what we have in common. (Well, Occupy being the exception) Even madfloridian admits that she's affected by the conservative culture she lives in. So I think we can be forgiven if we don't feel any instant camaraderie with the local Democratic party, because we don't view it as liberal.

Frankly, I see too many people in local leadership basing their decisions on the statistics. Statistically, there aren't many minorities in suburban Florida, so minority issues are ignored, or they become a bargaining chip; and, let's face it, anti-minority views become a bonding tool for conservative Dems and Republicans.

I'm just saying, this is what we see on a local basis. It is also not uncommon to see white progressives promoting white candidates who have close ties with supporters who are responsible for these near segregated societies. So I think you can see why our first impulse is to go with a term that supports our perceptions. But I agree that it should be qualified somewhere in the sentence that we are primarily referring to the racist ilk who gravitate to the Republican party.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
256. I think it was a good post.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:48 AM
Jun 2014

It stood the jury and i believe i do not need to do the 'not all men' thing. We know it's not ALL of anybody doing anything.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
274. It was an EXCELLENT post.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:01 AM
Jun 2014

People need to learn something. If it's not about you, it's not about you. Its really not that hard.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
277. It is SO clear in your post which segment of society you were talking about.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:06 AM
Jun 2014

How anyone got 'old white liberal women' or 'old white liberal men' from that is fucking baffling.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
280. Because that is not how it was stated
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:19 AM
Jun 2014

Lots of back-pedaling going on since the original thread in question.

historylovr

(1,557 posts)
286. To be honest, it made me do a second and third read.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:50 AM
Jun 2014

And it gave me pause, because I've always appreciated your posts on racial issues and issues of sexism. You always seem so thoughtful. But the opinions expressed by other posters as well as what you had to say certainly do give the impression that older people should just get out of the way. That they have no clue what they're talking about. That you will create a more liberal society on the basis of changing demographics alone.

I can understand your points, but I can also understand the points of MadFloridian and others who have fought in the trenches before us and have been made to feel that their efforts were worth nothing because they are now old.

I admire your optimism, but I urge you to read Dragonfli's response here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5062968, followed by Scarletwoman's.

There is a lot of wisdom in those threads, and in Armstead's, higher up in that thread. You can't clean up the incestuous relationship between D. C. and Wall Street, or "kill" the latter, by changing demographics and being more liberal on social issues. Unless there is a massive shift away from Reagan's economic policies and New Dem, DLC policies-policies embraced by both older and younger people-the 2 parties of course will not be older white men serving Wall Street, they will be 2 parties of younger people serving Wall Street.

I understand your frustrations, but age alone isn't the issue. Yes, some older people have really destroyed this country, but some younger people have helped them achieve that goal--to the detriment of all but a few.

Pax

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
263. +1000...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:16 AM
Jun 2014

and the multiple alerts on bravenak, over and over until they got 2 hides and got her flagged, were bullshit.

Sid

Union Scribe

(7,099 posts)
386. This thread is about posters
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:20 AM
Jun 2014

being tired of those who are only here to bait people into fighting and division; who are driving down the quality of the site and making it a hostile place for long-timers like the OP, who is worth a million of the GD meta warriors. I guess what I'm saying is I'm not terribly surprised to see you object to this thread. Try not to break your mouse on the alert button.

BainsBane

(53,026 posts)
394. I would think if people were tired of division
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 03:52 AM
Jun 2014

Last edited Mon Jun 9, 2014, 06:33 AM - Edit history (1)

They wouldn't single out a member to create more and insist, as you just did, that some human beings on this site are worth intrinsically less than others. The post that prompted this OP was about the future of the Democratic Party, whereas this one you applaud is Meta. What I object to is a blatantly false mischaracterization of the exchange in question and especially your assertion that some people are worth more than others, particularly when the person you have decided is worth less is a person of color, as you well know from my post.

You accuse others of stoking division simply for being who they are, from writing from the perspective of their experiences as a person of color, whereas you stoke division by insisting people who don't adhere to your orthodoxy of silence on issues or race and gender--issues that pertain to the majority of the country's population--are worthless because you have decided their concerns and hence their very worth as human beings are inconsequential. That is precisely what stokes division, and it is entirely deliberate. You seek to exclude anyone who has the audacity to be born different, to think differently, and to care about anyone the lives of people of the majority of people in this nation.

As for your "bait" comment, it can hardly be bating when she wasn't even addressing the person offended. Perhaps you should consider for a minute or two that other people have the right to express views, even if you don't like them. Since you find diversity of opinion so objectionable, use ignore. No one requires you to read posts you don't like, and I seriously doubt anyone will be heartbroken if you choose not to.

questionseverything

(9,646 posts)
254. anytime any1 says
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:36 AM
Jun 2014

a certain group all act in a certain way,they are probably mistaken

painting every1 in that certain group with the same broad brush is prejudice

the poster said "old white men",now they are clarifying it by saying" some older white conservative men " are the problem,which is true afterall the koch brothers are older white conservative men

if the poster would of just admitted they did not mean to use such encompassing language this whole thing could be over

i admit i was offended when i read the original "old white men" comment because i live with an old white man that has broke his back for half a century trying to help the oppressed...but i did not read the rest, i x'ed out

NEVER STOP POSTING HERE MAD, YOUR POST ON EDUCATION ARE SOME OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ON DU

libodem

(19,288 posts)
272. I see all my friends are under the transparency tab
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:46 AM
Jun 2014

Better recommend. And you kids get offa my lawn. Wonder how many put that in their responses?

Maeve

(42,279 posts)
273. Another old broad checking in
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:52 AM
Jun 2014

Been here since summer of 2001. I was raised Republican, but got over it...Ford was the last one I voted for. I left the political right for the same reason I left the church--I actually believe in love, forgiveness, peace and giving a hand up to those who need it, taking care of the less fortunate.

Many I went to school with are "those" older folks--conservative because they are watching the world they grew up in shrink and be forgotten, the identity and pride dissolving with the jobs that don't exist. We were the cutting edge, once upon a time, when computers were new and "punch card operator" was a thing... when family farms were financially viable and towns had vibrant downtown shopping areas. Now the phones are smarter than the users, the towns are empty of young people and the shopping is all at Walmart. Someone has to be blamed for this, so they pick on the "new" faces that are different from what they grew up with. It is hard to stay flexible as you age, and some just can't. You younger people will see it, too, if you live long enough. (And I hope you do)

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
284. frankly, I do not believe age is the issue
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:46 AM
Jun 2014

The issue is: the GOP constiuency is overwhelemingly white, male, and older. How can we discuss that fact?

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
288. There's been an attempt generally to divide the young from the old(er) in the media.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:03 PM
Jun 2014

I've noticed lots of articles blaming boomers for all the economic problems, and also for not retiring in order to open up jobs. Aside from the fact many people can't afford to retire, older people are being laid off in place of younger, cheaper employees and also facing rampant age discrimination in hiring, although that is supposed to be illegal.

And then there are the articles denigrating young people as "lazy" or entitled. Some are, maybe. I have seen it with some of my technicians, but then there are others who work much harder than I ever have. So, who knows?

The generational clash has always gone on and probably always will. I don't think it's any more widespread than it used to be. But we definitely can't let it drive people off this site, from one side or the other. I think everybody's concerns matter and that we don't have to pit one group against the other.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
292. Noticed the "old" meme crop up, which is generally applied to anyone middle-aged or older...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:24 PM
Jun 2014

... which is kind of hilarious on a "progressive" board, since it kind of parrots a TV-commercial-products-hysteria about what is "old," etc.

More to the point, as a middle aged white dude myself, I am usually to the left of the "Bell Curve" of this particular board...

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
298. Exactly.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:52 PM
Jun 2014

So it becomes a kind of cake-and-eat-it-too criticism, since "old" stereotypically means "more rigid," or "conservative" (and certainly, of course, it can) -- yet the irony of this board is how many of the "oldsters" are to the left of younger posters.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
329. as though the party's problem is rigid, doctrinaire lefties rather than glib corporate spokesmodels
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:05 PM
Jun 2014

who say one thing and do another and adopt half the Republican plan while bragging about how much they managed to salvage for us ingrates (who aren't "REAL Democrats" like Zell Miller)

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
300. If there is honest sincerity about not wanting to disparage older people here...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:54 PM
Jun 2014

then there would not still be a thread in the AA forum that is ridiculing not just me but other older posters here.

One which appears to refer to me says that 4 different boards are calling for me to be banned from this board. Doesn't say why.

I am more liberal than I ever was before, and so are many here. There's danger with all the dividing going on here.


madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
315. That was published in 2001.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:43 PM
Jun 2014

I don't think DU started until then.

Maybe there was stuff about it. I don't remember. I joined here the middle of 2002, and I simply do not remember.

Meanwhile today a post ridiculing me and others is growing in AA., Why? What does that accomplish.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
317. Are you talking about the thread where bravenak talks about being alert stalked?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:47 PM
Jun 2014

I skimmed it but didn't see a post about you. Could you PM me a link to the part you're talking about?

As for the book, I was on other liberal boards, and there was no hue and cry. And whenever the book was discussed here later, there was also no bellyaching.

Something to think about.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
320. It reads like the future of DU to me.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:01 PM
Jun 2014

And I am not sure I feel like posting in that future scenario where there is such division.

Have you read the Michael Moore book, or is it just the title that bothers you.

Read some of the Amazon reviews. I remember reading about parts of it but at that time in our history there were a whole lot of men of various colors acting crazy and taking us to war on lies.

Here's the link to some of the reviews.

http://www.amazon.com/Stupid-White-Men-Excuses/dp/B000GH2YPQ

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
321. The title does not bother me. It also doesn't bother me when women complain about white feminists.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:09 PM
Jun 2014

I can pass as white, and I know that if something said about white feminists stings then maybe I should examine my thoughts and behavior to see if I have some work to do - and that if it's not about me then it's not about me.

Would you please PM me with the link to the posts ridiculing you?

Response to madfloridian (Original post)

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
308. Older DUers do not likely vote Republican in large numbers.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:36 PM
Jun 2014

It would be so very easy when posting criticism to include that they are not referring to DUers.

As to why so many do that? Good question. Maybe Democrats need to embrace the elderly more and stop talking about cutting their safety nets.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
312. Some people here don't want to talk about what bravenak ACTUALLY WROTE,
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:41 PM
Jun 2014

they prefer instead to personalize things, or make it about DU.

Similar to what happens when people post about rape culture, some people get all het up and demand to know why we are talking about it on DU, because no rapists are on DU.

This, despite the fact that we discuss all kinds of nastiness about the world here, and usually no one chooses to ignore all context, make it personal, and throw a fit.

I wonder why this behavior is common with these two particular topics.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
339. racism and sexism often go hand in hand. A lot of overlap there ...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:18 PM
Jun 2014

I understand more about the men/women divide as it crosses all races.

I really don't understand why we all are letting the 1% divide the 99% but, maybe the 99% can have these arguments and still pull together to vote our own best interest at the polls.

After all this is an election year.

Peace.


noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
313. older white people are the GOP demographic...period
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:42 PM
Jun 2014

I get your generational warfare point, but that fact cannot be ignored. And it should not remain in the closet.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
316. Wrong, there are many older and elderly white Democrats in America.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:45 PM
Jun 2014

Black and white thinking always fails.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
318. who votes for republicans?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:49 PM
Jun 2014

White people, older white males specifically and no, that does not mean all white males or old white people are assholes

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
327. And many of those elderly white Democrats are Southern style Democrats.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:24 PM
Jun 2014

ie, their feelings about minorities are on par with Republicans.

I agree that we should qualify our statements when we refer to white privilege. But it exists and it is something that needs to be discussed.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
407. I am tired of qualifying...it is privilege to demand that
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:37 AM
Jun 2014

But it is not offered to poc, women, etc. FUCK qualifying...let's just tell the truth.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
474. okay...who the fuck is the GOP demographic?
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 02:32 PM
Jul 2014

older white people. does that mean ALL older white people vote GOP, um NO. black and white thinking is precisely what the GOP does to capture its demographic.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
477. wtf...you would think i said all white americans are fascists or something
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 02:37 PM
Jul 2014
i am perplexed by the responses to my post stating this simple fact.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
482. I'm not perplexed at all nor am I perplexed by the responses you got from particular posters
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 06:58 PM
Jul 2014

This is DU. Now you know why so many of us put quotes when we talk about the "liberals" here.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
392. Joe Biden is an old White Man. So is Sen Sanders and Reid and every old Democrat I know
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:57 AM
Jun 2014

are people who fought for equality for all Americans all their lives. Painting with broad brushes without specifying who one is talking about, is a form of bigotry in itself. And people have every right to object to labels being attached to people who do not fall under those labels simply because they are members of a group. I thought that was general knowledge for liberals at least.

I know that right wingers use labels to denigrate all those they despise, which includes Old White Men and Women who fight for the rights of all minorities. They have all kinds of labels for them. But labels are anathema to most liberals, generally speaking because they are intended to divide people, to create an 'other'. So strange to learn that I was so very wrong about Liberals.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
476. that does not change the reality of the GOP's demographic
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 02:36 PM
Jul 2014

does it? what is so controversial about stating the fact that the GOP demographic is mostly older and mostly white? that fact has nothing to with Biden or people who fight for equality. frankly, i perplexed by the defensiveness.

Jakes Progress

(11,122 posts)
442. So your point is to drive all older white people
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 03:10 PM
Jun 2014

to vote for republicans? You would like to get rid of the liberal seniors because you think that would help?

Now I've been voting liberal - even socialist - for longer than you. I know how politics work much better than you if this is something you think will work. In elections, you need more votes, not fewer. The smug immature whining of the posts lambasting senior DUers serves no purpose more than it serves the republican party.

I celebrate the young, serious liberals I know. I encourage them. Many of my group of old liberal geezers help them find out how to work precincts and stuff. They are grateful. I am grateful for them.

You need to get out more and see more of your community if you don't think the republican party, the christian right, gun fetishists, immigrant haters and such don't have huge numbers of young people in their groups.

Jakes Progress

(11,122 posts)
479. Your facts are the republicans dream.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 05:41 PM
Jul 2014

Thank you so much for helping republicans divide and cause decent between liberals. Of course if I thought like you, I would say something like "That kind of behavior is so typical of young Democrats who haven't the experience to know when they are being used."

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
480. how absolutely ridiculous...you can continue to deny reality all you like
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 05:53 PM
Jul 2014

but as i stated several times, there is nothing at all controversial about stating the FACT that the GOP voters are overwhelmingly older and white and male. if you can dispute that fact, please do so. otherwise, you are full of

GOP Voters: Overwhelmingly White, Mostly Male

The demographic differences between the Republican and Democratic voters are reflected in current profiles of the two parties’ bases. In surveys conducted in 2012, nearly nine-in-ten (87%) Republican and Republican-leaning registered voters are white, while just 11% are minorities. In contrast, 61% of Democrats are white, while nearly four-in-ten are African American (21%), Hispanic (10%) or another race (7%).

Men make up a majority (52%) of Republican Republican-leaning voters; among Democratic voters, 43% are men while 57% are women. Republican and Republican-leaning voters also are far more likely than Democratic voters to be married (65% of Republicans vs. 49% of Democrats).

http://www.people-press.org/2012/08/23/a-closer-look-at-the-parties-in-2012/

To start, the obvious conclusion from the breakdown of ages is that most Republican voters are quite old. The party will probably lose over a third of its members to old age in the next 20 years and has only tiny base of younger voters to replace them.
Age Range Graph Percent
18-27 6%
28-37 14%
38-47 15%
48-57 24%
58+ 37%
http://blogcritics.org/demographic-trends-in-the-republican-party/

Jakes Progress

(11,122 posts)
484. Still missing the point,
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 01:12 AM
Jul 2014

while still helping republicans divide progressives. Let me guess - 23?

If you want to grow, to help, to learn, go back and read your posts as if you didn't write them. Then pretend it is forty years later. You have marched in protests and been arrested for doing so, supported union strikes, spent thousands of hours canvassing and campaigning for the most liberal candidates you can. Then you read shit like your posts.

Just stating the obvious (that most older people vote more conservatively) as if it were a revaluation that you had personally divined and yipping it over and over like it was something new, doesn't serve to do anything helpful.

(Just to help you understand what happens, most of those old geezers voting republican weren't republican when they were young. You like figures so much, you need to understand that those cool dudes you hang out with now will likely become republican assholes when they make a little money. Hell, look at the odds and chances are you will too. Your desire to castigate people by class or age or whatever, indicates tendencies that could just go bad if you don't learn from those of us who have spent your years avoiding that.)

merrily

(45,251 posts)
473. Not older Democrats of any shade, though.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 04:21 AM
Jul 2014

They are among the most liberal of Democrats, anti-war, pro-labor, pro-pot, pro-civil rights, etc. Everything traditional Democrats stood for and then some.

ETA: Oops. Sorry. I did not realize how old this thread was. I got to reading and forgot that I had followed a link here. I'm so very sorry to have kicked it.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
478. duh...of course not. real democrats typically do no fall for the GOP's bullshit
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 02:38 PM
Jul 2014

including white democrats. still, the GOP base is mostly older white americans.

Liberal_Dog

(11,075 posts)
319. I Was More Conservative When I Was Younger
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:52 PM
Jun 2014

As I have grown older, I have become more and more liberal/progressive.

So, I obviously do not believe that just because someone may be older, then that person is automatically more conservative. It is nonsense.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
322. Older, white retired widow agreeing with you, MadFlo.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:15 PM
Jun 2014

Enough is enough, especially on the older white male put-downs, but all of the ageism in general has become too much. I'm glad you brought it up, it needed doing.

I'll stand up alongside anybody for their equal rights, but NOT if they are at the same time tearing some other group down. My feeling then is, "fine, do it yourself then, clearly you have more help than you need".

As CS&N put it...



As to the digs from certain people, I hope you won't take any notice of them because it doesn't mean a damn thing. None that I've seen in this thread are reality-based.
 

Corruption Inc

(1,568 posts)
326. It's more threads than that now, they just keep coming
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:19 PM
Jun 2014

This place is seriously racist as hell now and the racism is fully supported too as multiple racist posts are allowed to stand one after the other.

I read about how all the older white people need to just die off, how all older white people are republicans, etc...

How f-ing long DU, how f-ing long are you going to allow this racist shit???

aikoaiko

(34,165 posts)
345. And the jury results are in....
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:29 PM
Jun 2014
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:19 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

It's more threads than that now, they just keep coming
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5066550

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

"I read about how all the older white people need to just die off, how all older white people are republicans, etc..." Seriously? o_O

This is offensive on multiple levels: whining about DU and bearing false witness on posts like this one: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025065109

As well as dishonest broad brushing.

Basically a polite version of the mantra "anti-racist is a code word for anti-white" http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Anti-racist_is_a_codeword_for_anti-white

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:26 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Now that the DU porn wars and DU gender wars are over it appears we now need to enter the DU race wars. So be it.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: In fact, I am broadly in agreement with the post, and am glad the poster actually "put the bell on the cat". The alerter is in denial.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Tough. There is some truth in this post.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: What a whinefest.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Offers no evidence for accusations (links), and its accusatory tone will only lead to counter accusations and more accusations, not an enlightening discussion. This reads like the person simply wants to get into an argument.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
349. NO, I am not an "alert stalker", not an ex Repub troll stalking. Defending myself...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:53 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Tue Jun 10, 2014, 09:41 AM - Edit history (1)

because I think I must do so.

In this very thread I was several times said to be alerting on just about everything. In the threads last night I alerted one time only. I even let the person know I did so. I seldom alert. I resent being called a serial alerter.

I have always been a Democrat since the day I first registered. I have always voted Democratic. I supported Obama both elections as did my late hubby. We kept our community supplied with yard signs for Obama, and before that for Kerry. I resent being called a Republican stalker. I have been here too long for that.

I did not link to one of the posts that bothered me when I started this thread. It still doesn't feel right. But now I will link to a post. Since I am still being talked about like I am not even here, I will do so.

Most of the elderly folks here are more liberal than President Obama is. Yes, old white men tend to be in the Republican party. BUT..if you are posting this at a Democratic forum with many many good elderly folks....it should be made clear what is meant. I really don't like people waiting with bated breath for me to be gone. Gives me chills. And angers me.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5060383


After you old guys are gone the rest of us will make up the new majority.

I think it will take much less time than the estimates project. I have two children, he has four, i expect to have two more and that will still mean i will have the least amount of children for a Lady in my family. My grandmother had ten. Most of my friends have several already and are continuing to procreate. Many of my white friends are in mixed marriages and have several children who identify as asian or black or hispanic not white. Minorities are not cozy with wall street for the most part, and women especially single one are less likely to vote Republican. So in twenty years we will not have 2 Parties run by Old white Dudes who service the rich. We will be voting ourselves a right good part of their money, praise R'hllor.

You got to realize that power is shifting towards a more liberal society and that it is the old white men who are standing in the way of progress, passing shit laws and fighting against womens rights. The kids growing up see their congressmen screeching about illegals, urban youths, thugs, wetbacks and more. They will not be voting for Republicans. And Democrats better get our shit together and start bringing in the next generation quickly before Republicans decide to get smart, steal our platform, and out voters. Because sorry to tell you, the youth is not interested in the NSA all day everyday, they post every private thought they have on Tumblr, facebook, etc.

They will kill wall street when they get their time. I'll be right here helping them find the means. And we need their help to do it because the old party bosses still control the legislature, for now.
The only way to get the votes is to get the voters engaged. And horror stories about how much you hate Obama is not a good lure when you are fishing in a pond of Obama supporters, and the youth , women, lgbt's, and minorities are supporters of this President. You are driving them away and losing us votes
.

And also, since I am also above being accused of not accepting an apology....perhaps the fact that this thread is still going strong in the AA forum makes me doubt the sincerity of it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1187&pid=7313

EDITING 6/10/14 to add a part about the make-up of DU by the same poster in the same thread. I had not responded to this part exactly, but further down the line.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5060274

My best explanation for the lack of support he receives here as opposed to the broad support he receives from the party as a whole is because the make up/demographics of DU is not representative of the party's demographics nationally. The base of the party is women, Blacks, Asians and Latinos/Hispanics along with LGBT and young people. The make up of DU skews heavily older, whiter, and more male than the Democratic party and has a heavy streak of Libertarianism. We have been seeing a bit of a xenophobic attitude lately, a coldness towards AA's, some homophobia and a nice tasty dash of sexism to round out the course. And those posts can go to jury and stand.
Why would anyone who isn't already here who is of the base as i described above want to join and engage with us just to be called a Obamabot or a reverse racist or a screeching feminist or told to speak english or go away by democrats?
Our democratic board has so much in common with republican boards i like to read and compare us to them and sometimes i LOL at the similarities between their posters and ours.
I have read too many times here that we need to try to reach out to... Drumroll please...... WHITE MEN! Not our base, and our voters, but we need to reach out to old white males and not say stuff that might make them anxious. Why? Because the board is full of them and some of them think that the nation is not paying attention to their problems.


It is not my nature to repost other posts here, but now I feel I have to take great care when I post. So I added that in my defense as to why I responded about being older and white.

There is room here for everyone, I would think.

We have a long road to hoe before the elections this year. Angering any group is harmful. There is no need for it.

If the future of DU is going to be like this, many of us will not be welcome. That's a shame.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
354. I am defending myself against those attacks. If you call that drama queen so be it.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:28 PM
Jun 2014

I have been called far worse.

If this forum is going to be divided this way, then things are not going to be pleasant.

That's a shame. Drama queen or whatever you want to call me.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
364. You know what? I don't give a damn what anyone says here anymore.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:10 AM
Jun 2014

And that's not a good sign. I have a history of being sensible in my posts, and I just expect others to as well.

I don't stalk, I don't name the one who stalks me, I take it...I don't troll. that's ridiculous.

It's frankly getting a lot of racial undertones here and I don't know how to handle it since I have never thought that way.

I don't care, Skittles. Call me whatever.

And here's the link to my defense of myself.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5067681

It includes the link the post in the AA forum that is still going on, and which makes me think I don't need to worry about accepting an apology.

It just doesn't matter when no one believes you anywy.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
375. +1000 - I support you, I have read your posts for over a decade now.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:27 AM
Jun 2014

Your contributions speak for themselves.

We know you by now, it's because of what we know that we respect you and who you are.
Labels suck, especially incorrect ones applied to apparently foster division and encourage separation.

Union Scribe

(7,099 posts)
388. There are many sincere people here
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:31 AM
Jun 2014

and many insincere people who have found little cracks in the grouting and learned how to break them open and cause chaos here, winding people up and siccing them on each other. White v. Black, men v. women, young v. old, north v. south, and on and on. Now GD is in a war about someone putting up a post with another language in it.

I've put quite a few people on ignore, and things are looking better on DU for having done so. I know a lot of people don't like doing that and I didn't either but filtering out that noise has made a lot more substance easier to find!

Those of us who care about things that matter like education value your input. Take care

historylovr

(1,557 posts)
395. No, you're no drama queen.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:32 PM
Jun 2014

Nor did you mischaracterize anything or imply that it was all about you. You asked honest questions about the content of those posts--questions that needed to be asked.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
397. Again for visibility..my defense of me and some links I didn't post before trying to be nice.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:52 PM
Jun 2014

In this very thread I was several times said to alerting on everything just about. In the threads last night I alerted one time only. I even let the person know I did so. I seldom alert. Maybe 3 times in DU3. I resent being called a serial alerter.

I have always been a Democrat since the day I first registered. I have always voted Democratic. I supported Obama both elections as did my late hubby. We kept our community supplied with yard signs for Obama, and before that for Kerry. I resent being called a Republican stalker. I have been here too long for that.

I did not link to one of the posts that bothered me when I started this thread. It still doesn't feel right. But now I will link to a post. Since I am still being talked about like I am not even here, I will do so.

Most of the elderly folks here are more liberal than President Obama is. Yes, old white men tend to be in the Republican party. BUT..if you are posting this at a Democratic forum with many many good elderly folks....it should be made clear what is meant. I really don't like people waiting with bated breath for me to be gone. Gives me chills. And angers me.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5060383


After you old guys are gone the rest of us will make up the new majority.

I think it will take much less time than the estimates project. I have two children, he has four, i expect to have two more and that will still mean i will have the least amount of children for a Lady in my family. My grandmother had ten. Most of my friends have several already and are continuing to procreate. Many of my white friends are in mixed marriages and have several children who identify as asian or black or hispanic not white. Minorities are not cozy with wall street for the most part, and women especially single one are less likely to vote Republican. So in twenty years we will not have 2 Parties run by Old white Dudes who service the rich. We will be voting ourselves a right good part of their money, praise R'hllor.

You got to realize that power is shifting towards a more liberal society and that it is the old white men who are standing in the way of progress, passing shit laws and fighting against womens rights. The kids growing up see their congressmen screeching about illegals, urban youths, thugs, wetbacks and more. They will not be voting for Republicans. And Democrats better get our shit together and start bringing in the next generation quickly before Republicans decide to get smart, steal our platform, and out voters. Because sorry to tell you, the youth is not interested in the NSA all day everyday, they post every private thought they have on Tumblr, facebook, etc.

They will kill wall street when they get their time. I'll be right here helping them find the means. And we need their help to do it because the old party bosses still control the legislature, for now.
The only way to get the votes is to get the voters engaged. And horror stories about how much you hate Obama is not a good lure when you are fishing in a pond of Obama supporters, and the youth , women, lgbt's, and minorities are supporters of this President. You are driving them away and losing us votes
.

And also, since I am also above being accused of not accepting an apology....perhaps the fact that this thread is still going strong in the AA forum makes me doubt the sincerity of it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1187&pid=7313

We have a long road to hoe before the elections this year. Angering any group is harmful. There is no need for it.

If the future of DU is going to be like this, many of us will not be welcome. That's a shame.

ladyVet

(1,587 posts)
399. I already feel like I'm not wanted here, or as a Democrat.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 05:43 PM
Jun 2014

I'm female, overweight, poor and from the South. And I'm a feminist. Gods help me. Now I'm not wanted because I'm "old", and I'm not sixty yet!

I haven't done as much as some of you as far as working on campaigns, or donating money (because poor, see above), but I've talked to countless people over the years, worked hard to get the Democratic party line out, and tried to raise my children to be liberal, human-rights supporters and all around good people. I deserve to stand with the liberal front of this party.

I'm leaning so far left now that I'm more a Democratic Socialist, or maybe even slipping into anarchy. Conservative, my ass. I've got nothing personally against Obama. I voted for him twice (and convinced my family and lots of other people to do the same), but I reserve the right to criticize his policies and actions if I don't agree with them.

I've read the post about how all the old people should die so those fantastically more liberal and less-white folks can take over. Great. Demographics are changing, and I don't see that as good or bad, just what is. I don't think I misunderstood a damned thing. Maybe that OP needs to work on clarifying her language, rather than getting pissed that people didn't get what she meant.

Just remember, one day you'll be old and the younger people will be pushing you out. Maybe you'll remember your words, and how they hurt the very people that made it possible for you to even be able to vote and speak out.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
404. I am amazed at how far left I am heading.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 08:45 PM
Jun 2014

Growing up here years ago I guess I was just as conservative as everyone else. I just wasn't even aware. I see you are in NC, and I hear you guys have some extremists in control there. You have my sympathy.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
406. Just remember, you are in very good company. Those few who are slamming Democrats on this forum have
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:02 AM
Jun 2014

also slammed most Liberal Journalists, most Liberal Democrats, including FDR. They have slammed almost everyone who dares to stick to the principles they had during the Bush era.

I can't think of ANY Liberal who has NOT been attacked by this small group.

Old, young (see OWS and the attacks on all those young people who dared to exercise their right to protest eg)

I am of the opinion and have been for a long time, that being attacked by this faction is a COMPLIMENT. Eg, I have notices few attacks on Republicans but fierce attacks on the Left.

They are driving people away from the Dem Party and my question is, 'why'? Is that the purpose of attacking so many great Dems? I could be wrong, but I'm searching to find something in these attacks which are increasing as time goes by, that is likely to help the Dem Party and I am having a serious problem finding it.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
436. FDR said, "I welcome their hatred"
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:47 PM
Jun 2014

of his attackers (the 1%). I feel the same about the small group of shit-stirrers here. As you said, it is a COMPLIMENT to be on their shit list.

They aren't driving me away though, from the party or the site. They can guess again, I'm not moving over one inch for them. And I'm not changing one bit what I think or say, to suit what they like. Oh, hell no. I might not start a flame war over everything they say that deserves it (on occasion though), or endlessly argue with them as they like to do, to run up the post count of their bullshit threads.

But when they pile on like this, oh yes, I will be there. Glad to see so many are here too. I find that very encouraging, actually.


To the bitter broad-brush fallacy-slingers, I would simply say this: you do not gain support from people by attacking them. It is called "cause and effect", it's no-brainer common sense. Call it "the tone argument" and laugh your ass off, and keep on ignoring that if you want, but don't be surprised to find yourself more and more on the fringe, and don't forget to put the blame for that squarely where it belongs -- on yourself. Don't even post as I have seen several times already "why doesn't anybody stick up for ME"? because I will be linking you right back here. You know why. You attack people, and you can defend yourself by yourself (as far as I'm concerned, and I'm sure many agree with that).

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
416. Yeah, me too.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 08:27 AM
Jun 2014

I think it's time to take another break from DU. If they think MF is a drama queen, MF who is always pleasant, nice, polite with well-thought-out posts, people like me who are more firey in their speech, are passionate about their beliefs and not afraid to show it and rarely constrained by decorum, what the hell chance do we have?

5,036 posts about white privilege, and disagree with any of it and you're a racist. Now it's a war on old people and we should all die off so the world will be a better place. I'm truly heartsick and it takes a lot for me to reach that stage and even more for me to say it.

historylovr

(1,557 posts)
444. +1.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 03:20 PM
Jun 2014

Hard to misconstrue that post.

My old white southern parents raised me to be a liberal who despises conservative ideology and policies. That's the only diversity I have a problem with, even if, or rather especially since, its wormed its way into the Democratic party. I'm not yet fifty but I guess that makes me an "old guy" too. Probably racist as well.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
418. I updated the post in which I defend myself and give examples of why I posted.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 09:47 AM
Jun 2014

NO, I am not an "alert stalker", not an ex Repub troll stalking. Defending myself...because I think I must do so.

In this very thread I was several times said to be alerting on just about everything. In the threads last night I alerted one time only. I even let the person know I did so. I seldom alert. I resent being called a serial alerter.

I have always been a Democrat since the day I first registered. I have always voted Democratic. I supported Obama both elections as did my late hubby. We kept our community supplied with yard signs for Obama, and before that for Kerry. I resent being called a Republican stalker. I have been here too long for that.

I did not link to one of the posts that bothered me when I started this thread. It still doesn't feel right. But now I will link to a post. Since I am still being talked about like I am not even here, I will do so.

Most of the elderly folks here are more liberal than President Obama is. Yes, old white men tend to be in the Republican party. BUT..if you are posting this at a Democratic forum with many many good elderly folks....it should be made clear what is meant. I really don't like people waiting with bated breath for me to be gone. Gives me chills. And angers me.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5060383


After you old guys are gone the rest of us will make up the new majority.

I think it will take much less time than the estimates project. I have two children, he has four, i expect to have two more and that will still mean i will have the least amount of children for a Lady in my family. My grandmother had ten. Most of my friends have several already and are continuing to procreate. Many of my white friends are in mixed marriages and have several children who identify as asian or black or hispanic not white. Minorities are not cozy with wall street for the most part, and women especially single one are less likely to vote Republican. So in twenty years we will not have 2 Parties run by Old white Dudes who service the rich. We will be voting ourselves a right good part of their money, praise R'hllor.

You got to realize that power is shifting towards a more liberal society and that it is the old white men who are standing in the way of progress, passing shit laws and fighting against womens rights. The kids growing up see their congressmen screeching about illegals, urban youths, thugs, wetbacks and more. They will not be voting for Republicans. And Democrats better get our shit together and start bringing in the next generation quickly before Republicans decide to get smart, steal our platform, and out voters. Because sorry to tell you, the youth is not interested in the NSA all day everyday, they post every private thought they have on Tumblr, facebook, etc.

They will kill wall street when they get their time. I'll be right here helping them find the means. And we need their help to do it because the old party bosses still control the legislature, for now.
The only way to get the votes is to get the voters engaged. And horror stories about how much you hate Obama is not a good lure when you are fishing in a pond of Obama supporters, and the youth , women, lgbt's, and minorities are supporters of this President. You are driving them away and losing us votes
.

And also, since I am also above being accused of not accepting an apology....perhaps the fact that this thread is still going strong in the AA forum makes me doubt the sincerity of it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1187&pid=7313

EDITING 6/10/14 to add a part about the make-up of DU by the same poster in the same thread. I had not responded to this part exactly, but further down the line.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5060274

My best explanation for the lack of support he receives here as opposed to the broad support he receives from the party as a whole is because the make up/demographics of DU is not representative of the party's demographics nationally. The base of the party is women, Blacks, Asians and Latinos/Hispanics along with LGBT and young people. The make up of DU skews heavily older, whiter, and more male than the Democratic party and has a heavy streak of Libertarianism. We have been seeing a bit of a xenophobic attitude lately, a coldness towards AA's, some homophobia and a nice tasty dash of sexism to round out the course. And those posts can go to jury and stand.
Why would anyone who isn't already here who is of the base as i described above want to join and engage with us just to be called a Obamabot or a reverse racist or a screeching feminist or told to speak english or go away by democrats?
Our democratic board has so much in common with republican boards i like to read and compare us to them and sometimes i LOL at the similarities between their posters and ours.
I have read too many times here that we need to try to reach out to... Drumroll please...... WHITE MEN! Not our base, and our voters, but we need to reach out to old white males and not say stuff that might make them anxious. Why? Because the board is full of them and some of them think that the nation is not paying attention to their problems.


It is not my nature to repost other posts here, but now I feel I have to take great care when I post. So I added that in my defense as to why I responded about being older and white.

There is room here for everyone, I would think.

We have a long road to hoe before the elections this year. Angering any group is harmful. There is no need for it.

If the future of DU is going to be like this, many of us will not be welcome. That's a shame.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
423. AND
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 10:44 AM
Jun 2014

I put it in my journal so I can refer readily if needed. Yes, I do feel the need now to defend myself, but I do not regret my post at all. DU should not be a place where we have to be on guard all the time.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/~madfloridian

The ones attacking me on this topic mentioned organizing at FB, so I am being careful. The thread about this goes on and on in AA.

Sancho

(9,067 posts)
431. I've been watching this thread and I feel a need to comment....
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 11:54 AM
Jun 2014

I don't post a lot, but I've been on DU quite a while. I'm one of the older white men and I jump in on occasion.

First, I really agree with madfloridian. I've seen a number of posts assuming that "old" or "white" or "men" are the "conservatives". I disagree with the limited evidence cited by some (like exit polls) for a number of reasons.

In context, I was one of those 1960's liberals who burned draft cards (I was A1 in the draft), marched for the 18 year old vote, supported the ERA (what's that you say?), and was an early supporter of environmental sustainability. Who do you think started Earth Day??? I was literally not able to go home as a teenage for a year because I was sympathetic to integration and women's rights in a typical SC household. It was tough to protest against the Vietnam war! Before LBGT was an issue we were very aware of sexual freedom as a personal choice no matter how you described it. I supported women attending military academies and some of my family (graduates of military academies) literally left the room at the holiday dinner!

When I went to college and entered the work force, I supported Jimmy Carter, and later worked for Richard Riley (Gov. of SC and Secretary of Education) so that I could make a difference in some ways besides just protesting. Now that I've been employed (mostly to teach something) for 40 years I'm active with unions, education, gun control, and election integrity. I've always been into something that DUer's would appreciate.

I see derogatory inferences on lots of thread to a particular demographic group as the problem. Heck, one could just as easily say the biggest problem now is the lack of involvement and action by the current younger, female, and minority generation. I really don't see young adults today taking an active stand like we did...even if there are demographically more "young liberals" than some poll of the retired voters you see showing up at exit polls. It's no secret that we need to get housewives, teachers, and minorities to exercise their vote more than they do now. The younger group on DU may or may not be active in the field, and no one can tell simply from posting threads. It's easy to blame our current problems (like Rick Scott!! ) on old white men, but if young liberals had voted we wouldn't have him in office now! Even so, I avoid calling out anyone on the basis of any demographic. I consider that a personal attack even though I've never alerted on anyone.

My wife (38 years teaching so far) recently was part of a union-supported, class action lawsuit against the school district for age discrimination. They won! Lots of young teachers in the future will benefit from action by those willing to stick their neck out a few years before retiring just to keep the school board under control in the future! Sometimes, the older liberals effect change and we should appreciate them and not insinuate that they are a problem.

Did you know that some school districts are still under court ordered monitoring to integrate from decades ago? I was recently a guest speaker at one of our local committees charged with that monitoring. None of the volunteers on that monitoring board are young - almost all are older and most are old white men and women from my generation who simply want to charge up the hill because we believe it's the right thing to do. We don't have to be minority or represent a particular orientation to support everyone's rights.

Frankly, I don't want to feel marginalized on DU just because of my age, race, or gender. DUers should know better than to slip into such thinking!

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
433. Thanks so much for your post. Lots of wisdom as usual.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:10 PM
Jun 2014

I follow your posts in the FL forum, even though I seldom post there. I have much respected your activism and your knowledge on voting issues.

I did not realize your wife was a teacher. I only got 33 years in, so give her a pat on the back from me. 38 yrs is a long time.

Jakes Progress

(11,122 posts)
445. I tried reading all this crap.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 03:29 PM
Jun 2014

How in the hell did they get "racism" out of what you wrote?

It would be better if people who claim to support equal rights would try to see more than age and skin color in people.

Wear a nazi uniform and I'm gonna judge you. I don't care what your color or age. Applaud a bill oreilly speech and I'm gonna judge you regardless of your income or religion. But never do I prejudge based on those elements. If someone thinks I do, then they are the ones who prejudge.

(Oh. And how the hell can you know someone's color on DU? It's the internet. I could say I'm a 12 year old girl from Samoa. You wouldn't know. I don't decide how old someone is or what color someone is by reading their post. Even when they tell you they are this or that, they could be lying. I mean, this is the internet. Heck, I think the posts that stir this stuff up most likely come from paid agitators from the other side.)

It is this kind of stuff that makes me give up on politics. As I age, I become more virulently liberal. Show me a Socialist candidate with any world awareness and speaking ability, and I might switch parties after voting liberal for almost five decades. (First campaign volunteer effort was for Barbara Jordan's state senate election in 1966)

Hang in there Mad.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
451. K&R! Almost 300 recs!
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 04:26 PM
Jun 2014

But ya know...that doesn't mean anything to those here that worship false idols etc..

Upton

(9,709 posts)
453. 300th rec...
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 04:53 PM
Jun 2014

excellent post. I'm tired of being told there's something wrong with me because I'm a heterosexual white male..

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
454. Thanks for linking the two original posts which mention the WHITE MEN on DU ...
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 09:15 PM
Jun 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025060206#post12

"...I have read too many times here that we need to try to reach out to... Drumroll please...... WHITE MEN! Not our base, and our voters, but we need to reach out to old white males and not say stuff that might make them anxious. Why? Because the board is full of them and some of them think that the nation is not paying attention to their problems ..."

Then in response to another poster ...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5060383

"After you old guys are gone the rest of us will make up the new majority ..."

Since then there seems to have been lots of back peddling, but those were the original comments directed at old, white men of DU. Sad that these type of comments will now be acceptable on DU.










madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
455. In my journal I put two posts with what was said.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 09:18 PM
Jun 2014

I should have done it at the start, but it used to be against the rules...so I felt funny about it.

And I put a link to the thread in AA that is making me sound like a total b***h.

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
456. Old rules seem to no longer matter ...
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 09:51 PM
Jun 2014

but I can understand why you did not link the original comments from the start, unfortunately the original comments are now being twisted to say 'the meant something different.'

You are right to defend yourself and all the people who have fought for equality without mentioning age or race. I think it is a sad turn when others try and divide people.

As for sounding like a total b***h on that that thread I would not worry too much, but it is enlightening to read the altered history of events.

Many people read the original posts as you did, thanks for speaking out.



kiva

(4,373 posts)
457. A couple of months ago
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 10:20 PM
Jun 2014

I started using 'hide thread', something I had only done in the last 7 years to avoid animal cruelty threads. I doubled the size of my ignore list, it's just over a dozen now. I did these things because I no longer enjoyed coming to DU and reading threads that insisted that my race or gender or some other aspect of my being was offensive to some people on the board.

The fact that I've voted for Democrats for over 35 years, the fact that I have proudly labeled myself a feminist since I was in high school, the fact that I have grown even more liberal as I've aged mean nothing to some on this board, so their opinions mean nothing to me.

Thanks you for this thread.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
459. I've decided not to use it.
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 01:22 AM
Jun 2014

I think I would rather leave and not post anymore.

I used to have a lot on ignore at the old DU. If I ignore them I won't see them but they will still be there.

I have used hide thread sometimes.

Yes, you are right. We are being talked about as though we were not even Democrats.

kiva

(4,373 posts)
460. I respect your decision.
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 01:51 AM
Jun 2014

I'm not yet ready to leave DU, there are still some great things to be learned here, but I reached the point where I would spend ten minutes or less on then leave in frustration.

At this point I'm looking forward to the primary wars in the hope that it will be less divisive that the current battles...and really, who would have ever thought the primary wars would be the lesser of two divisive evils?

Hang in there madfloridian, and please don't leave...you're an important voice that many here would miss.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
458. I just heard through the grapevine that I am still being accused of serial stalking and trolling.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 11:51 PM
Jun 2014

Yes, there is a grapevine around and about. I will now repost the post I wrote to defend myself including the statements I was referring to. This post below is in my journal so I won't lose it. I never expected to have to use my journal as a tool of self defense, but so be it.

Is it even worth it anymore? I don't know.
......

http://www.democraticunderground.com/~madfloridian

NO, I am not an "alert stalker", not an ex Repub troll stalking. Defending myself...because I think I must do so.

In this very thread I was several times said to be alerting on just about everything. In the threads last night I alerted one time only. I even let the person know I did so. I seldom alert. I resent being called a serial alerter.

I have always been a Democrat since the day I first registered. I have always voted Democratic. I supported Obama both elections as did my late hubby. We kept our community supplied with yard signs for Obama, and before that for Kerry. I resent being called a Republican stalker. I have been here too long for that.

I did not link to one of the posts that bothered me when I started this thread. It still doesn't feel right. But now I will link to a post. Since I am still being talked about like I am not even here, I will do so.

Most of the elderly folks here are more liberal than President Obama is. Yes, old white men tend to be in the Republican party. BUT..if you are posting this at a Democratic forum with many many good elderly folks....it should be made clear what is meant. I really don't like people waiting with bated breath for me to be gone. Gives me chills. And angers me.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5060383


After you old guys are gone the rest of us will make up the new majority.

I think it will take much less time than the estimates project. I have two children, he has four, i expect to have two more and that will still mean i will have the least amount of children for a Lady in my family. My grandmother had ten. Most of my friends have several already and are continuing to procreate. Many of my white friends are in mixed marriages and have several children who identify as asian or black or hispanic not white. Minorities are not cozy with wall street for the most part, and women especially single one are less likely to vote Republican. So in twenty years we will not have 2 Parties run by Old white Dudes who service the rich. We will be voting ourselves a right good part of their money, praise R'hllor.

You got to realize that power is shifting towards a more liberal society and that it is the old white men who are standing in the way of progress, passing shit laws and fighting against womens rights. The kids growing up see their congressmen screeching about illegals, urban youths, thugs, wetbacks and more. They will not be voting for Republicans. And Democrats better get our shit together and start bringing in the next generation quickly before Republicans decide to get smart, steal our platform, and out voters. Because sorry to tell you, the youth is not interested in the NSA all day everyday, they post every private thought they have on Tumblr, facebook, etc.

They will kill wall street when they get their time. I'll be right here helping them find the means. And we need their help to do it because the old party bosses still control the legislature, for now.
The only way to get the votes is to get the voters engaged. And horror stories about how much you hate Obama is not a good lure when you are fishing in a pond of Obama supporters, and the youth , women, lgbt's, and minorities are supporters of this President. You are driving them away and losing us votes
.

And also, since I am also above being accused of not accepting an apology....perhaps the fact that this thread is still going strong in the AA forum makes me doubt the sincerity of it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1187&pid=7313

EDITING 6/10/14 to add a part about the make-up of DU by the same poster in the same thread. I had not responded to this part exactly, but further down the line.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5060274

My best explanation for the lack of support he receives here as opposed to the broad support he receives from the party as a whole is because the make up/demographics of DU is not representative of the party's demographics nationally. The base of the party is women, Blacks, Asians and Latinos/Hispanics along with LGBT and young people. The make up of DU skews heavily older, whiter, and more male than the Democratic party and has a heavy streak of Libertarianism. We have been seeing a bit of a xenophobic attitude lately, a coldness towards AA's, some homophobia and a nice tasty dash of sexism to round out the course. And those posts can go to jury and stand.
Why would anyone who isn't already here who is of the base as i described above want to join and engage with us just to be called a Obamabot or a reverse racist or a screeching feminist or told to speak english or go away by democrats?
Our democratic board has so much in common with republican boards i like to read and compare us to them and sometimes i LOL at the similarities between their posters and ours.
I have read too many times here that we need to try to reach out to... Drumroll please...... WHITE MEN! Not our base, and our voters, but we need to reach out to old white males and not say stuff that might make them anxious. Why? Because the board is full of them and some of them think that the nation is not paying attention to their problems.


It is not my nature to repost other posts here, but now I feel I have to take great care when I post. So I added that in my defense as to why I responded about being older and white.

There is room here for everyone, I would think.

We have a long road to hoe before the elections this year. Angering any group is harmful. There is no need for it.

If the future of DU is going to be like this, many of us will not be welcome. That's a shame.



Response to madfloridian (Reply #458)

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
462. The theme of *white liberals are racists* continues...
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 07:12 AM
Jun 2014

Is this DU thread right here in GD by the very same poster a misunderstanding and/or coincidence too? Or is it once again making the same point? Personally, I don't think benefit of the doubt stretches that far, to believe that the two threads at the same time are just a coincidence.

A History of Liberal White Racism

Apparently now, as we learn from this thread, some nobody white racist Democrat in Mississippi makes FDR racist by association too, and all of his programs count for nothing now. Does the article linked there specifically say that? No, it doesn't dare to, but that meaning is assumed by most posting in the thread nonetheless. Progressivism is racist, and Liberalism is racist. Oh and we already knew that the Founders count for nothing because some of them had slaves at that time.

What a load of bigoted hooey.

(And no, before they even go there, I wasn't the one who alerted on that thread.)

JustAnotherGen

(31,798 posts)
463. Bigoted? Reverse bigoted hooey?
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 07:55 AM
Jun 2014

If you read through that - it's pretty clear that yep -

As a black woman I like the America of 2014 far more than I would like the America of the 1940s.

We have to keep moving forward.

I would roll up in a ball and die if my only options were being a cleaning woman in someones house or a share cropper and I had to take a pee in a nasty outhouse because my ass wasn't good enough to use the ladies room.

^That doesn't have to be like or accepted by anyone here^ - but it's my truth. And I'm standing in it.

Keep moving forward and lets admit that things weren't always perfect and they never WILL be perfect - but we can at least try.

Oh god - I wouldn't even want to have to live in the 1960's let alone the 1940's. Just shoot me now if I have to go back in time and live in either era for 5 minutes. Shoot me now because they will hang me back in time.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
464. If that's the reason for ditching FDR, it's a lame one.
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 08:09 AM
Jun 2014

It's possible to give credit to how much he achieved with his programs without whole-hog approving of every aspect of life at that time.

Of course it isn't only about FDR, the subject is larger than him, but he is representative of it.

JustAnotherGen

(31,798 posts)
465. It's not ditching FDR
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 08:25 AM
Jun 2014

To point out his flaws - is it?

It is very hard to disconnect a man of his time - from his times.

And if FDR came back to life in 2016 - and there were no term limits - I'd vote Obama over FDR.

If it was Bill Clinton vs FDR - I'd vote for Clinton.

If it was my sweetpea sweetheart Carter - I'd vote for him over FDR. And we wouldn't have the term limit issue for Carter.

If it was LBJ vs FDR - I'd vote for LBJ.

That doesn't dismiss him or throw him under the bus - it just means time has marched on.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
466. Wow.
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 08:48 AM
Jun 2014

Well, all I can say is, you're entitled to your opinion. But I can really see why we (Americans and Democrats, both) have such a big problem today. So many just do not get it -- what we're up against, and what the solutions are for it.

Clinton's free trade without Glass Steagall is cool, and Carter's 15+% mortgages and gas crisis was great, and LBJ's murderous illegal war that killed 58,000 of my schoolmates is just fine.

And FDR is meh.

Well maybe that's what Obama thinks too, and if so, that would explain why his Presidency has been such a mess.

JustAnotherGen

(31,798 posts)
467. And I can appreciate that
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 08:56 AM
Jun 2014

But my life as black woman/bi-racial for that matter in NJ in 2014 is so much better than my grandmothers as a black woman/bi-racial (I know she ID'd as just black even though she was fair with blue eyes) in Mississippi and Alabama ever was from about 1900 to 1983.

There was a case in the early 80's where Morris Dees (look him up) sued the KKK because they murdered this woman's son (lynching/race crime) and I know my Grandmamma left a chunk of her change to the SPLC for the sole purpose of sticking it to them.

Even at the end of her life it came down to sticking it to people financially when she could. And I applaud her for that. She was a tough cookie - and I will never be as tough as those women were back in the day.

I would just roll up in a ball and die if I had to live in the 1940's where my brown ass had to use a nasty old outhouse because black women weren't 'ladies room' worthy.

It's how you have experienced your world and America. I totally get that.

But how I've experienced America is very different. Even though it's better than it was - we can and should WANT to do better. I'm not a member of the dominant culture or the power structure. I'm just one person. One woman. Whose had to live with their boots on my neck . . .

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
469. Do you really think
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 09:09 AM
Jun 2014

that reinstituting again today, for instance, FDR's banking policies which made banks safe again, or his infrastructure programs which put so many people to work and modernized this country so quickly... would mean a return to the social conditions you're talking about? His policies had nothing to do with that, and did not in any way depend on that... so why is it being connected as if it were an all-or-nothing package?

I mean this sincerely, not rudely, but that makes no sense.

JustAnotherGen

(31,798 posts)
470. And I can appreciate that
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 09:17 AM
Jun 2014


If you want an honest answer to the question - it's going to break your heart. I'm serious.

Will you not get angry if I say:


I truly believe my country feels I'm an expendable throw away.



So if that is how I've experienced America - why should I believe in anything?

And you have to accept that experience and where I've ended up.

You do NOT have to like it.

But you have to accept my truth. Because I'm not the only black woman that feels that. I'm just one voice - but we are singing - and I'm not alone.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
472. Everybody's experience is valid, I do believe that wholeheartedly.
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 10:02 AM
Jun 2014

And everybody is valuable. I understand hurt, and loss. But I have to wonder, that being the case, do you really think that your view of the political landscape is entirely objective? I'm not saying it isn't, just raising the rhetorical question fwiw, because it seems a logical one to ask.

You say why should you believe in anything? Well (on the other hand), why not? It doesn't cost anything to hope, or dream of a better day, and think of how to get there. Some dreams happen and some don't, but they're good practice for us anyway. I understand justified cynicism, but nothing ventured, nothing gained. Sometimes we have to just let go of the cynicism, and make a bet on a roll of the dice. We have no certainties in life, so a calculated risk is as good as it gets, for any of us.

Our country is treating all of us as if we're expendable, so I can relate to that feeling too in my own way, but we are not. I'll tell you something out of my truth and my (protest) past that may make you angry though (hopefully not)... we have to all stand together undivided or that will never change.

Well anyway, those are just thoughts, and they may be neither here nor there. I wish you well, JAG. And I'll look into the book suggestion, thanks for it.

JustAnotherGen

(31,798 posts)
468. Here's a good book that will help you understand us
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 09:07 AM
Jun 2014
http://www.amazon.com/Sister-Citizen-Shame-Stereotypes-America/dp/0300188188


Sister Citizen: Shame, Stereotypes, and Black Women in AmericaPaperback -by Melissa V. Harris-Perry

If you have cable - Melissa has a show on MSNBC Saturday and Sunday mornings.

She really nails it in this book. She explains how we (black women) are experiencing America in the modern era - and how we (black women) can shift internally - i.e. not allowing anyone to tell us ANYTHING about us -

And transform our world.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
481. anti seniorism is stupid
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 06:47 PM
Jul 2014

and I say this as someone who is a gen Xer, who has gotten into many fights defending Obama, and more tha few few criticizing him. What we are seeing is an attempt to drives us into controllable groups so that we cannot unite aginst the people the rich ordain to control us.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am an older white woman...