Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,366 posts)
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:12 PM Jun 2014

Study Ties Plummeting Monarch Population to Modern Agriculture

Last edited Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:19 PM - Edit history (2)

http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/06/decline-of-monarch-butterflies-linked-to-modern-agriculture/

Decline of monarch butterflies linked to modern agriculture
Loss of milkweed plants in the midwest reduces caterpillar survival.

by Kate Prengaman - June 5 2014, 10:21am EDT

------

Their conclusions suggest that we can't blame deforestation in Mexico for this environmental problem. The monarchs are suffering from a lack of milkweed, the only plant the caterpillars eat. In fact, a model built by the researchers suggested that monarch populations were four times more sensitive to the loss of milkweed on their breeding grounds than the loss of the forested habitat in which they spend the winters.

The spatial model was built using population dynamics data, which incorporated locations and life stages, known survival rates at different stages, and standard reproductive success. It used this data to predict how various changes in the system, from climate to habitat, would affect the insects' complex lives.

Using their model, the scientists found a 21 percent decline in milkweed abundance between 1995 and 2013. The largest declines, in the midwest, line up with the largest declines in butterfly population.

The monarchs depend on milkweed—it's the plants' chemical defenses that give the butterflies their infamous unpalatability. The adults only lay their eggs on milkweed to give the larvae a strong start in life, so the researchers say the plants' decreasing abundance has implications across the life cycle.

Milkweed is disappearing, they write, because of the increasingly intensive land use of agriculture; although the study didn't do primary research on this connection, it has been demonstrated by others. Milkweed is still common in nature preserves, gardens, and along roadways, but for farmers, it's a weed. In the corn belt, agricultural land is being used more intensely, which means fewer buffers and borders of natural plants between the fields, and more powerful herbicides to reduce the number of weeds. The invention of herbicide-tolerant corn and soybeans has made growing more efficient, since it allows farmers to spray and kill off everything else, but it's bad news for milkweed and monarchs.

-----
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Study Ties Plummeting Monarch Population to Modern Agriculture (Original Post) G_j Jun 2014 OP
Cue the Pro-GMO brigade... tenderfoot Jun 2014 #1
Ha! Blue_In_AK Jun 2014 #17
Are we talking about crops that contain insecticide ... surrealAmerican Jun 2014 #2
I believe herbicide-resistant. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #3
WE grew a ton of milkweed and it no longer comes up. glinda Jun 2014 #7
its worse than that airplaneman Jun 2014 #18
Well that sounds like a wonderful idea. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #23
hadn't thought of that part. BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #27
full article at the link Takket Jun 2014 #4
thank you G_j Jun 2014 #9
But it's so safe!!!!!!! BrotherIvan Jun 2014 #5
The Monarch butterfly population has been decimated on the West Coast... Brother Buzz Jun 2014 #6
But they're safe! I read it right here at DU1! City Lights Jun 2014 #8
I have milkweeds on my property that have been here for 25+/- years, japple Jun 2014 #10
What a great idea, thanks! I'll try to plant some next year. Zorra Jun 2014 #21
kicking this for mention of a GREAT book…. dhill926 Jun 2014 #24
Yay! G_j Jun 2014 #28
The genetic modifications of the crops are not directly causing a decline in milkweed or butterflies MNBrewer Jun 2014 #11
Edited to add: Part of the problem is that Johnson grass is japple Jun 2014 #12
Nicotinoid insecticides are distinct from genetic modifications MNBrewer Jun 2014 #13
Exactly skepticscott Jun 2014 #25
just not clear G_j Jun 2014 #26
The spraying would do it, regardless of the presence of the GMO plants MNBrewer Jun 2014 #32
The spraying wouldn't occur at that level without GMO plants. Crunchy Frog Jun 2014 #40
Or antiGMO hysterics don't bother to read the article... roseBudd Jun 2014 #35
milkweed galore amidst total ag production reddread Jun 2014 #41
More info at Monarch Watch! See what You can do!! hue Jun 2014 #14
You're reading into this Bickle Jun 2014 #15
"I bet you're a rival to boot" G_j Jun 2014 #16
you have no idea of what you are talking about... NRaleighLiberal Jun 2014 #19
I love Bickle Jun 2014 #31
Ha. my chemistry PhD and biology bs work pretty well NRaleighLiberal Jun 2014 #34
They gave one of those Bickle Jun 2014 #36
What makes your understanding of science Curmudgeoness Jun 2014 #38
You don't understand it. Curmudgeoness Jun 2014 #20
those asshokes are so problematic.... NRaleighLiberal Jun 2014 #29
No Bickle Jun 2014 #30
These insect problems do not bode well for human beings. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #22
This is one example of what habitat loss can do to a species MNBrewer Jun 2014 #33
I have paw paw trees from the farmer's mkt RainDog Jun 2014 #37
k&r, n/t appal_jack Jun 2014 #39

surrealAmerican

(11,357 posts)
2. Are we talking about crops that contain insecticide ...
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:32 PM
Jun 2014

... or crops that resist herbicide? Either way, it's hardly surprising that they would have an adverse effect on butterflies.

I wonder if we, as a nation, actually care enough to do anything about this.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
3. I believe herbicide-resistant.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:41 PM
Jun 2014

Once your crop is h-resistant, you spray to your heart's content, and the cropland is essentially a sterile wasteland, with any non-resistant flora almost wiped out. Favourite food supply gone, the butterflies have to go much longer distances to find anything edible.

I've left the milkweed alone in my back yard this year, and will do so going forward, I guess.

airplaneman

(1,239 posts)
18. its worse than that
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:25 PM
Jun 2014

The secondary problem is soil microbial collapse which will ultimately degrade the health of the GMO crops themselves and anything else trying to grow in this now dead soil.

http://www.psrast.org/soilecolart.htm

-Airplane

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
23. Well that sounds like a wonderful idea.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:48 PM
Jun 2014

Doesn't this occur to these people that this is not a good long term weed control strategy.

Brother Buzz

(36,373 posts)
6. The Monarch butterfly population has been decimated on the West Coast...
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:08 PM
Jun 2014

and their their winter habit is largely intact.

I've mostly assumed it was due to extensive use of insecticides and herbicides (agricultural communities don't like milkweed), but I can accept that GMO shit has contributed.

japple

(9,806 posts)
10. I have milkweeds on my property that have been here for 25+/- years,
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:40 PM
Jun 2014

planted by my parents. This year, I ordered 32 milkweed plugs from Monarch Watch and several friends and I planted them in our yards. We plan to keep this up every spring. Monarch Watch is a a wonderful organization. There is a grammar school (or maybe a middle school) in Charlotte, NC that has done an amazing job of spreading the word about the plight of the Monarch Butterflys and getting people interested in growing milkweeds.

http://www.monarchwatch.org/

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
21. What a great idea, thanks! I'll try to plant some next year.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:42 PM
Jun 2014

Flight Behavior is a 2012 novel by Barbara Kingsolver. It is her seventh novel, is a New York Times Bestseller, and was declared "Best book of the year" by the Washington Post and USA Today.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_Behavior

dhill926

(16,314 posts)
24. kicking this for mention of a GREAT book….
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:51 PM
Jun 2014

and yep, makes you care more about Monarchs more….

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
11. The genetic modifications of the crops are not directly causing a decline in milkweed or butterflies
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:41 PM
Jun 2014

It's the other agricultural practices that accompany the GMO crops that are implicated in this article.

japple

(9,806 posts)
12. Edited to add: Part of the problem is that Johnson grass is
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:43 PM
Jun 2014

growing in profusion and choking out everything around it. We used to have roadside mowing in this county several times every summer. Now, they just mow 2 times per year and the johnson grass has taken over everything. It is over-taking our vegetable gardens and the fields we once mowed for hay are overrun with it. The folks who once were eager to mow my fields for the hay now consider it not worth their time. My neighbor now plants corn and beans on it. He uses mules and horses to do the plowing, planting & tilling. It is a thing of beauty to watch.



MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
13. Nicotinoid insecticides are distinct from genetic modifications
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:45 PM
Jun 2014

And have no ability to cause a decline in milkweed populations.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
25. Exactly
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:57 PM
Jun 2014

The original title of the OP was deeply dishonest and misleading. And people like this wonder why the woo-woo label is attached to them. When you have to make things up to make your alarmist case against GMOs, that should tell you something.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
32. The spraying would do it, regardless of the presence of the GMO plants
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:46 AM
Jun 2014

if the hypothesis that milkweed population decline is the proximate cause of the monarch decline.

Crunchy Frog

(26,578 posts)
40. The spraying wouldn't occur at that level without GMO plants.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 07:32 AM
Jun 2014

That's the entire point of Roundup resistent GMO crops.

roseBudd

(8,718 posts)
35. Or antiGMO hysterics don't bother to read the article...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:29 PM
Jun 2014

Tilling land to plant crops, destroys milkweed (invasive native plant) eliminbates the only food the monarch larvae eat. They don't eat Bt corn they don't eat transgenic beats, they don't eat anything but milkweed. No milkweed no monarch larvae.

Weeds between crops especially invasive ones are not somethuing we can expect farmers to allow.

Pay farmers to maintain isolated milkweed stands.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
41. milkweed galore amidst total ag production
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 07:39 AM
Jun 2014

20-30 years ago in Five Points CA. not every inch of ground was tilled for crops, those spots sported mad Milkweed.
But then there used to be dragonflies, butterflies, frogs and lizards as well.

Bickle

(109 posts)
15. You're reading into this
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:52 PM
Jun 2014

GMOs are,many eill always be just as safe, unless engineered to cause harm

Blame the asshokes who are spraying, not the GMO.

And yes, Minaanto/whoever evil, but stop taking out the pitchforkss where you don't understand what you're talking about. Without primitive selective breeding and splicing, the human race would be far more screwed than we are today as far as food goes. It's essential we do this in the future to create healthier, more productive plants.

The issue is with laziness and greed, not the science. I bet you're a rival to boot

G_j

(40,366 posts)
16. "I bet you're a rival to boot"
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:04 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:50 PM - Edit history (1)

Not sure what that means..
Actually I had already changed the OP title. There is a better link above:
"modern agriculture" is more accurate.

Bickle

(109 posts)
31. I love
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:46 PM
Jun 2014

Howmyiunhave nothing in your dismissal other than spelling.

I have a lot more idea what I'm talking about than you do. Because I actually understand science, and don't see it as a boogeyman.

NRaleighLiberal

(60,006 posts)
34. Ha. my chemistry PhD and biology bs work pretty well
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:12 AM
Jun 2014

For me...if you wish to be taken at all seriously at least try to write coherently.

Bickle

(109 posts)
36. They gave one of those
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:34 PM
Jun 2014

In paleontology to a young earth creationist. From a real, accredited program at URI. He has since made a fortune with his degree he uses solely to give himself expert status, where he mouthed the right words long enough to fool,the board. A divinity school wouldn't give an atheist a degree. The head of the department told me there was no mechanism to deny it, though there probably should be.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/12/science/12geologist.html?pagewanted=all

My cousin has a Masters in chemistry and discovered, among other things, that quinine causes night blindness, which lead to the tonic water pilots were drinking before night flights being banned. She constantly denies basic science for her apocalyptic fundamentalism.

So even if your claim I'd true, demonstrate it by actually applying said degree.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
38. What makes your understanding of science
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:48 PM
Jun 2014

trump NRaleighLiberal's degrees? Or my BS in biology? You had better research NRL's credentials before you accuse him of not knowing what he is talking about.

And seriously, I have no idea what you love----"Howmyiunhave"? You have been told that spell check is your friend, and right there, where the "Post my reply" button is, you will find "Check Spelling". It has been made exceedingly easy for you and will not take long to use before you fit "Post".

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
20. You don't understand it.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:39 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:41 PM - Edit history (1)

Blaming the "asshokes" who are spraying is the same thing as blaming the GMO crops. These crops are being engineered to withstand spraying.....so doesn't that mean that the GMO plant and the spraying are hand in hand?

Bickle

(109 posts)
30. No
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:44 PM
Jun 2014

There's a difference between culling weeds, and the scorched earth they're doing. It's the difference between Agent Orange dumping and getting rid of a stump. These people are using these crops to hire less workers, and "automate" their farming, formlackmof a better term for it. Same old problems. Different spplication

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
33. This is one example of what habitat loss can do to a species
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:52 AM
Jun 2014

this process is being multiplied over and over all over the planet in various ways.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
37. I have paw paw trees from the farmer's mkt
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:42 PM
Jun 2014

they're also breeding areas for zebra swallowtails.

I noted the bumblebees were out in force this spring with my flowers. I've never used any pesticide or herbicide and the one neighbor who ever did is long gone.

Time to get some milkweed to plant, I see.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Study Ties Plummeting Mon...