Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:06 AM Jun 2014

If old white men feel maligned, they should take their own advice to minorities.

Daily Caller editor Matt Lewis pulled off a rare feat last week with a piece about what he describes as an unfair bias against older white men. In the wake of a major conversation about reparations and a massacre in Isla Vista, Calif., Lewis set himself up to argue that white men have become a group that “it’s socially acceptable to stereotype and criticize en masse.”

That is not really what the Atlantic’s Ta-Nehisi Coates is saying when he outlines the ways in which government entities and private companies made deliberate decisions to keep black communities from accumulating wealth. It is not what my colleague Ann Hornaday means when she turns a gimlet eye on the cultural tropes produced by a movie industry dominated by white men. And it is not actually what Brittney Cooper is arguing for in Salon when she ponders how particular conceptions of gender and race seem to produce a disproportionate number of mass killings in America.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/act-four/wp/2014/06/02/if-old-white-men-feel-maligned-they-should-take-their-own-advice-to-minorities/

320 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If old white men feel maligned, they should take their own advice to minorities. (Original Post) bravenak Jun 2014 OP
DU rec... SidDithers Jun 2014 #1
I'm sorry. MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #2
Here: Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #4
Exactly!! n/t KarenS Jun 2014 #6
thank you. ya. really not hard. any of it. nt seabeyond Jun 2014 #7
Ouch. That about sums it up. nt Cali_Democrat Jun 2014 #32
Got it in one. Hekate Jun 2014 #34
always batting the eyelashes and feigning "no context". HA. bettyellen Jun 2014 #106
That's it. yardwork Jun 2014 #36
Yup. Starry Messenger Jun 2014 #74
+1 ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #177
+1 uponit7771 Jun 2014 #308
Not about you. bravenak Jun 2014 #5
He can read? without reading through the prism of his own experience? Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #18
Yes!!!! I get tired of repeating. bravenak Jun 2014 #20
He uh JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #278
Yes, i believe he should explain that vote. bravenak Jun 2014 #279
You know Manny, I appreciate this response. Because in four words, you've not only msanthrope Jun 2014 #33
Usually people who are genuinely sorry aren't sarcastic. yardwork Jun 2014 #37
typical, no surprise heaven05 Jun 2014 #52
Saw a presentation on the KKK in Maine in the 1920s Android3.14 Jun 2014 #85
+1000 heaven05 Jun 2014 #168
I wish there were prizes for great posts. I'd nominate this one. Squinch Jun 2014 #178
+1 uponit7771 Jun 2014 #309
Why can't you see that ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #179
He's comfortable in that space in real life, but just not on DU Cali_Democrat Jun 2014 #223
I'd say ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #231
I actually think that much of his fan club... Cali_Democrat Jun 2014 #237
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #244
Close call on this one, FYI. Laelth Jun 2014 #275
Thread winner! Winner, winner... Number23 Jun 2014 #251
Thank you! Cali_Democrat Jun 2014 #254
Ian Holm as Bilbo Baggins in The Fellowship of the Ring. Laelth Jun 2014 #276
Easy mistake to make when the sound of "whoosh" prevents us from a rational interpretation. LanternWaste Jun 2014 #304
Outstanding. redqueen Jun 2014 #3
This is what i was trying to explain but i just could not express it artfully. bravenak Jun 2014 #8
You may feel that you don't express yourself "artfully", bravenak, brer cat Jun 2014 #14
I don't want to make them into Soylent Green. bravenak Jun 2014 #16
... brer cat Jun 2014 #23
You express yourself perfectly well. Post 13 is a testament to that. redqueen Jun 2014 #29
Everyone knew that wasn't about all white men. If the shoe doesn't fit, why insist on wearing it? freshwest Jun 2014 #141
When these arguments come up, from now on can we just say: "If the shoe doesn't fit Squinch Jun 2014 #180
Yes, indeed! And quote the 'one of these things is not like the other' or post this: freshwest Jun 2014 #260
Fantastic post. Number23 Jun 2014 #253
Thanks, Number 23! freshwest Jun 2014 #277
As usual you JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #280
TY. Good morning to you, still haven't slept here, but the sun's coming up! freshwest Jun 2014 #282
Yes, I loved that bit too!! Number23 Jun 2014 #252
K&R Whisp Jun 2014 #9
talk about it! mackerel Jun 2014 #64
take your own advice to minorities noiretextatique Jun 2014 #10
Prime example.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #12
... noiretextatique Jun 2014 #15
As a White woman....I may not be a POC but I can extrapolate from the position of being a woman VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #11
Well, you know that map in the picture i was in front of? bravenak Jun 2014 #13
Heh,heh... Skidmore Jun 2014 #17
Some are playing a game. bravenak Jun 2014 #21
I think that there are people out there who fit into two groups. Skidmore Jun 2014 #22
take the advice you give to women noiretextatique Jun 2014 #62
K&R nt abelenkpe Jun 2014 #19
Cold But Fair, Ma'am The Magistrate Jun 2014 #24
It's a matter of how these subjects are brought up. Armstead Jun 2014 #25
I said at the time i was trying to find a way to explain what i meant. bravenak Jun 2014 #26
i have a friend who says the problem is older/white/str8t/protestant males are afraid to compete randys1 Jun 2014 #28
I really wouldn't want to compete with me either. bravenak Jun 2014 #41
"i am awesome" awoke_in_2003 Jun 2014 #140
Thank you. bravenak Jun 2014 #145
Yes you are awesome. FreedRadical Jun 2014 #188
You can piss me off and i will get over it in about an hour. bravenak Jun 2014 #236
You should talk to your friend about his stereotyping. n/t Comrade Grumpy Jun 2014 #61
The predictability of this response is off the charts... randys1 Jun 2014 #63
Indeed. nt redqueen Jun 2014 #77
That bus is NEVER late betsuni Jun 2014 #222
Me? bravenak Jun 2014 #68
I was referring to Randy and his bigoted friend. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2014 #89
sigh randys1 Jun 2014 #142
So me?nt bravenak Jun 2014 #146
They cant be reasoned with on this, evolution is the answer randys1 Jun 2014 #172
Time. bravenak Jun 2014 #182
Really? You talk about your fellow progressives like that? I think you're the problem. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2014 #196
you a progressive? heaven05 Jun 2014 #210
Are you? Comrade Grumpy Jun 2014 #215
I refer you to post #4 ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #187
Maybe he *is* an older white Protestant man. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #193
It's good to be honest, but sometimes filters are also helpful Armstead Jun 2014 #30
We are destroying the earth. bravenak Jun 2014 #39
You weren't nice enough. redqueen Jun 2014 #42
The tone argument is getting on my nerves. bravenak Jun 2014 #43
Same old same old. redqueen Jun 2014 #48
Just in case this post gets lost Armstead Jun 2014 #95
Well believe it or not, I can emphasize with you on that in some ways Armstead Jun 2014 #47
Except that i was not talking about her or you. bravenak Jun 2014 #53
I guess this gets down to a matter of individual style.... Armstead Jun 2014 #83
"...white men are irrelevant." No we're not. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #194
Now I really understand heaven05 Jun 2014 #218
And this was the same guy whining about being negatively stereotyped as a white male! nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #233
of course heaven05 Jun 2014 #294
I think the people yelling at me should apologize for not noticing when these things are said . bravenak Jun 2014 #241
Let's just let this go Armstead Jun 2014 #219
The text of that post JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #281
A black lesbian commune? bravenak Jun 2014 #283
Works for me! JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #284
Huzzah!! bravenak Jun 2014 #285
lovely heaven05 Jun 2014 #296
Yes we are. bravenak Jun 2014 #298
last line heaven05 Jun 2014 #295
"...the entire demographic she belongs to... makes her part of the problem." nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #195
That was a typo on my part Armstead Jun 2014 #216
I agree we should all be careful of excessive broadbrushing. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #224
Plese see my otehr response. Armstead Jun 2014 #228
you did well heaven05 Jun 2014 #50
Well, i apologized for the hurt feelings but not the words. bravenak Jun 2014 #55
as you should heaven05 Jun 2014 #72
TELL. IT. Number23 Jun 2014 #255
it is great thing, actually noiretextatique Jun 2014 #71
This is it exactly JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #289
I might start one noiretextatique Jun 2014 #306
Just make sure you JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #307
Best post in this thread. Thanks. (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #27
British people aren't a monolith. Those that were nationalist and reflexively got defensive when redqueen Jun 2014 #31
As I said above, it's a matter of how issues are addressed Armstead Jun 2014 #35
Nobody is making this personal but those who choose to be defensive. redqueen Jun 2014 #38
No, a better analogy would be... Armstead Jun 2014 #54
Who told anyone that they, *personally*, were inherently bad? Where's the quote? nt redqueen Jun 2014 #56
Nobody. Nt bravenak Jun 2014 #57
This Armstead Jun 2014 #76
I have read this many times. bravenak Jun 2014 #80
No, you said "telling the peasant" - telling an individual that they are x. redqueen Jun 2014 #81
I'm an old (semi old) white man and I know a lot of old white men who are... Armstead Jun 2014 #84
Are you or were any of them upset by this book? redqueen Jun 2014 #90
Personally, no. ....Politically I think it was stupid. Armstead Jun 2014 #93
She posted that ON DU. redqueen Jun 2014 #94
I disagree with it and took it personally Armstead Jun 2014 #100
Do you seriously think I was referring to you? redqueen Jun 2014 #104
I haven't got time to keep going around this mulberry bush right now Armstead Jun 2014 #114
Then the men you know are most likely not the problem. Nor you yourself. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #198
"...unless they totally reject their entire lives instantly." What does this even mean? nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #197
You added to your post while I was writing my rerply so... Armstead Jun 2014 #40
I do not have a problem with any harsh criticism of the british empire. pennylane100 Jun 2014 #96
Thoughtful reply, Armstead. enlightenment Jun 2014 #49
older white people are the GOP demographic...period noiretextatique Jun 2014 #65
That is a generalization and a sure formula for electoral defeat Armstead Jun 2014 #73
bullshit...it is a fact noiretextatique Jun 2014 #78
I face a lot of things. If you actually had any nuace in your argument, I might agree with you Armstead Jun 2014 #82
no I am not noiretextatique Jun 2014 #88
That's not in contention Armstead Jun 2014 #102
you seem to think that "not catered to as most important" = written off? bettyellen Jun 2014 #113
in the context of the tone of the whole post, yes Armstead Jun 2014 #115
well, that seems like part of the problem. the entitled feeling that you should remain catered to bettyellen Jun 2014 #117
Respectfully.....Wottaloadofcrap Armstead Jun 2014 #119
That was not respectful, nor was there any reason for you to take it personally. bettyellen Jun 2014 #123
"the entitled feeling that you should remain catered to..." Armstead Jun 2014 #152
"should remain catered to after generations of this group asking everyone else to play second fiddle bettyellen Jun 2014 #203
Well I can go along with that Armstead Jun 2014 #212
+1000000000 noiretextatique Jun 2014 #151
I don't understand it either betsuni Jun 2014 #239
+10,000 smirkymonkey Jun 2014 #312
again...I call bullshit noiretextatique Jun 2014 #130
The GOP is the party of very CONSERVATIVE white males (and femles) Armstead Jun 2014 #214
Duh...do we have to qualify that continuously? noiretextatique Jun 2014 #320
that is BS heaven05 Jun 2014 #70
And you are broadstroking an entire group of people yourself in the same damn way Armstead Jun 2014 #79
hey heaven05 Jun 2014 #87
No women ever vote for the GOP Armstead Jun 2014 #108
Never said any of that heaven05 Jun 2014 #120
I thought of including Anne Couler but..... Armstead Jun 2014 #121
ten-four heaven05 Jun 2014 #126
"...the whiners screaming of being a victim when they victimize others everyday..." nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #200
These are 3D issues with no easy answers. Armstead Jun 2014 #227
I agree that there's good and bad in (nearly) everyone. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #232
There are people who trend more to the a'hole side of the equation...regardless of ideology Armstead Jun 2014 #235
great post. n Demo_Chris Jun 2014 #91
Well said. nt Mojorabbit Jun 2014 #92
Well said. zeemike Jun 2014 #109
"...it is important to first recognize that demographic groups are not monolithic." nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #192
find replace works well PowerToThePeople Jun 2014 #44
I did not write the article. bravenak Jun 2014 #45
And... bravenak Jun 2014 #46
Don't plan alerting it PowerToThePeople Jun 2014 #59
What do you think about this? bravenak Jun 2014 #60
I support PowerToThePeople Jun 2014 #66
That post was bullcrap and generalizing black women as lacking birth control ed. bravenak Jun 2014 #67
So, baiting me PowerToThePeople Jun 2014 #69
It was an honest request. bravenak Jun 2014 #75
I did see it PowerToThePeople Jun 2014 #86
Do you see how easy it is to say something like that about people who look like me bravenak Jun 2014 #98
If someone had posted that PowerToThePeople Jun 2014 #111
That person is still here posting and the jury did nit see the racism in the post. bravenak Jun 2014 #129
I am done talking to you PowerToThePeople Jun 2014 #133
I asked you directly and showed it to you twice and asked if you saw it. bravenak Jun 2014 #138
The point is that another poster made an offensive generalization about an entire race nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #201
Thank you for the clarification PowerToThePeople Jun 2014 #204
did I miss one of your posts? heaven05 Jun 2014 #158
No. I apologized that someones feeling were hurt, not for what i said. bravenak Jun 2014 #164
I understand heaven05 Jun 2014 #209
you know who else smeared black fathers as deadbeats? alp227 Jun 2014 #124
Yes it is. bravenak Jun 2014 #132
Just a question ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #206
Wow PowerToThePeople Jun 2014 #259
How the hell can posting to a public message board ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #261
Do you seriously think that makes any sense at all? nt redqueen Jun 2014 #51
Excellent ismnotwasm Jun 2014 #58
Your divisive approach won't work. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #97
This is an article not written by me. Nt bravenak Jun 2014 #99
I'm well aware of that. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #101
I like the article. bravenak Jun 2014 #103
Learn from your elders. I have. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #112
I can't tell if you are being deliberately condescending or just simply have no idea how you are Number23 Jun 2014 #258
Did you decide not to bow out of this "cesspool" after all? WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #262
Oh so you READ the AA forum, just have never posted in it, huh?? Number23 Jun 2014 #264
Between some recent choice vanity posts, OMG, yes. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #265
Well, your presence in the more than THREE YEARS that the forum has existed has been missed Number23 Jun 2014 #266
Looks like it's just reading the AA forum to find out what its members Cha Jun 2014 #270
Yep. Probably the first time they even clicked in there Number23 Jun 2014 #271
"It's"? WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #291
Because it's very Meta, and I stayed clear of that group/forum/whatever as well. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #290
I just want everyone to see the forum here that you are dismissing as 'Meta' Number23 Jun 2014 #311
It says everything about them, 23. Poor things don't Cha Jun 2014 #314
"Us" v. "them." Bra-vo. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #317
Why would I want to spend my precious time in a forum... WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #316
Your continued minimization and ignoring of what is discussed in the forum has been noted Number23 Jun 2014 #318
More insults... delightful. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #319
it is working quite well Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #110
True. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #116
That is, indeed, their right and their privilege to make liberal use of that feature so kindly Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #118
While others patrol the site with their itchy trigger fingers... WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #125
You posted it without any kind of disparging comment. Kurska Jun 2014 #134
I agree with the article. bravenak Jun 2014 #136
Why is this the news standard defense? Kurska Jun 2014 #143
Then if it does not apply to you why not just move on. bravenak Jun 2014 #154
It is great that you've given up on defending this trash. Kurska Jun 2014 #156
I am done with trying to speak with you, sir. bravenak Jun 2014 #159
Oh I'm dreadfully sorry I keep forcing you to respond to every single comment I make. Kurska Jun 2014 #161
Oh i know what you want. bravenak Jun 2014 #170
Dang it didn't work Kurska Jun 2014 #171
"Therefore they are feeling feelings that they would not feel if they read it." WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #147
Did i say i was? bravenak Jun 2014 #150
These are your words: WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #165
They think the article is aimed at all of them. bravenak Jun 2014 #166
I see a fair number of old white men in that picture. Armstead Jun 2014 #174
LOL WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #184
Let's not stereotype anyone. CJCRANE Jun 2014 #105
It is an ARTICLE i did not write it. bravenak Jun 2014 #107
Here lemme go grab an article telling all gay people what they need to do Kurska Jun 2014 #131
I have no idea what you are going on about. bravenak Jun 2014 #135
I thought I was clear "addressing millions of people as homogeneous blobs is stupid." Kurska Jun 2014 #137
Read the article before you ask me questions about it. bravenak Jun 2014 #139
The first thing I did when I entered your thread was read your article LOL. Kurska Jun 2014 #144
Then you know i did not write it. bravenak Jun 2014 #148
What a hilarious defense Kurska Jun 2014 #153
Good bye, sir. bravenak Jun 2014 #155
See you champ and if I see any old white men I'll be sure to give them hell! Kurska Jun 2014 #160
No thanks buddy. bravenak Jun 2014 #173
I'm a gay man who has faced down plenty of homophobia in my life. Kurska Jun 2014 #176
I do not know you. I have also faced violence from males in racist attacks. bravenak Jun 2014 #181
I received some horrific violence both from people I don't know and most troubling Kurska Jun 2014 #186
DU is well aware of those statistics. WorseBeforeBetter Jun 2014 #189
Glad to see you mention an actual issue. The war on drugs is the new Jim Crow... Comrade Grumpy Jun 2014 #211
I love how the only issue you consider "real" gollygee Jun 2014 #213
That is not the only "real" issue. We face lots of real issues. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2014 #217
you are a prime example heaven05 Jun 2014 #220
Except I'm not an old white person. Kurska Jun 2014 #305
no, you're wrong heaven05 Jun 2014 #310
and judge them by the content of their character, Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #122
No I'm sorry we can't Kurska Jun 2014 #128
right heaven05 Jun 2014 #225
If people who try to talk to groups of millions of people as if they are identical feel maligned Kurska Jun 2014 #127
lol..I see what you did there.. Inkfreak Jun 2014 #286
This seems obviously to be specifically about "old white men who feel maligned" gollygee Jun 2014 #149
It is directed at those who feel maligned. bravenak Jun 2014 #157
I appreciate your post noiretextatique Jun 2014 #167
I sometime feel like i say things that people want to say, but know not to. bravenak Jun 2014 #169
no problem noiretextatique Jun 2014 #175
I am too. bravenak Jun 2014 #183
OK I'll say what I'm really thinking gollygee Jun 2014 #185
+1000 heaven05 Jun 2014 #226
Me too. bravenak Jun 2014 #242
Either that Bobbie Jo Jun 2014 #247
duh noiretextatique Jun 2014 #162
But, those who have no idea what they're talking about Insist Cha Jun 2014 #272
like the taxi driver said: " Are you talking to me?" answer here is no, just looks like it Leme Jun 2014 #163
I see you've offended the usual people who are wrong about everything. LeftyMom Jun 2014 #190
+1 nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #202
Replace "white" with "black" to see how racist a statement that is Corruption Inc Jun 2014 #191
But it's false equivalency. alp227 Jun 2014 #199
... nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #205
yup, it's like the right wing always claiming christians are being oppressed and discirminated JI7 Jun 2014 #208
Exactly Bobbie Jo Jun 2014 #245
+100. Skip Intro Jun 2014 #257
This message was self-deleted by its author Inkfreak Jun 2014 #287
It is? heaven05 Jun 2014 #300
This message was self-deleted by its author Inkfreak Jun 2014 #302
actually heaven05 Jun 2014 #303
Going through the article and links, I love this. It has something for everyone to feel good about. freshwest Jun 2014 #207
"Daily Caller editor Matt Lewis"? I just had member who tried to Cha Jun 2014 #221
excellent photo heaven05 Jun 2014 #301
Priceless look on the brother's face! nm Cha Jun 2014 #315
I am so glad I heaven05 Jun 2014 #229
You're welcome. Glad we could enlighten you Armstead Jun 2014 #230
me too heaven05 Jun 2014 #297
Thank you bravenak. sheshe2 Jun 2014 #234
No, thank you for the thread you did. bravenak Jun 2014 #243
"I think we need to hold the party's feet to the fire and help them progress on race issues." sheshe2 Jun 2014 #246
As an old white woman, I am INVISIBLE HockeyMom Jun 2014 #238
Exactly. bravenak Jun 2014 #240
After reading through 247 replies ... GeorgeGist Jun 2014 #248
I am glad you know i was not talking about you. bravenak Jun 2014 #250
Oh My God. But that I could rec this a HUNDRED times. Bravenak, girl WELL PLAYED Number23 Jun 2014 #249
Lewis is right. Dems and DUers have made the "White man" the root of all evil. Skip Intro Jun 2014 #256
Lewis is right? Just like how you defended Duck Dynasty and Chik-fil-A after homophobic remarks: Cali_Democrat Jun 2014 #263
What now? Skip Intro Jun 2014 #267
ROFL! "just like you bla bla bla bla..." Sez ms self-delete. Skip Intro Jun 2014 #268
Hey, remember this? bravenak Jun 2014 #269
Right on topic! Skip Intro Jun 2014 #273
Exactly. bravenak Jun 2014 #274
Saw that on your FB feed JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #288
I was looking for something cool and there it was. bravenak Jun 2014 #292
Aw shucks! JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #293
EXACT example heaven05 Jun 2014 #299
K&R! smirkymonkey Jun 2014 #313

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
18. He can read? without reading through the prism of his own experience?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:54 AM
Jun 2014

Can he walk a mile in your shoes?

Can he even try to understand?

Can he spell *deliberately obtuse*

So tired of having to hold this remedial class after hours, aren't you?

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
20. Yes!!!! I get tired of repeating.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:56 AM
Jun 2014

I think he wanted some attention and he got it and is happy now. We'll see him again and he probably won't read the article next time either.

JustAnotherGen

(31,780 posts)
278. He uh
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 07:27 AM
Jun 2014

Well he voted for Reagan in 1980 - so I guess he should apologize for voting in the Southern Strategy and ignoring St. Ronnies words in 1976 in Mississippi where you and me (you weren't even born yet ) were painted as welfare queens in Cadillacs takin' sum'thin from some'un!

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
279. Yes, i believe he should explain that vote.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 07:30 AM
Jun 2014

We should hold his feet to the fire for answers. I hope he stops by and explains it to us one day.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
33. You know Manny, I appreciate this response. Because in four words, you've not only
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:36 PM
Jun 2014

perfectly illustrated the OP's point, you've perfectly illuminated your character.

yardwork

(61,538 posts)
37. Usually people who are genuinely sorry aren't sarcastic.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:42 PM
Jun 2014

Just a thought. In my experience, people who have genuine regrets try to do something to make amends.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
85. Saw a presentation on the KKK in Maine in the 1920s
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:51 PM
Jun 2014

The KKK became fairly powerful as they set off bombs and burned crosses against the growing ethnic group in Maine, the French Catholics (there were few blacks to suppress in white bread Maine). Eventually things settled down and then, years later, in the 1980s, the KKK had a resurgence as they targeted black immigrants. One of the groups from which members passionately joined the KKK in that second round were the French Catholics.
Be careful lest you become what you hate.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
179. Why can't you see that ...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:47 PM
Jun 2014

with that B.S., you are on the same page as Matt K. Lewis of The Daily Caller ... the guy that was honor by the American Conservative Union as CPAC "Blogger of the Year."

Are you comfortable in that space? {Rhetorical Question}

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
223. He's comfortable in that space in real life, but just not on DU
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:32 PM
Jun 2014

When one poses as something they're not, the mask occasionally slips.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
237. I actually think that much of his fan club...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:09 PM
Jun 2014

is made up of useful idiots who actually believe he's a liberal.

But of course there are some who know the truth, but continue to play along anyways.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
244. LOL ...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:38 PM
Jun 2014

Useful idiots, i.e., left leaning folks that hate President Obama and unwilling to admit why ... so "it's his policies", just like manny says; but can't/won't ask themselves why Bernie and Elizabeth, who consistently support and vote for those same policies, are untainted, per manny.

I guess if I were a similarly conflicted liberal, I wouldn't question it, either ... it might lead me to answers that I do not answered.

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
275. Close call on this one, FYI.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 07:02 AM
Jun 2014
ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Ugly attack here on Manny, a fellow Duer, as well as those who agree with Manny. Pretty much all this poster ever does is attack other DUers. It got old a long time ago.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Jun 9, 2014, 06:59 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Manny gets old too
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I think Manny IS a liberal. I suppose that makes me a member of the "useful idiot" club, and, in that sense, this post is a direct attack upon me, but I voted to hide this post because it accuses Manny of being a troll, quite directly, and that's unacceptable behavior on DU.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Obvious personal attack is obvious.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: On a progressive website, I would think that there would be an understanding of where our socio-political problems stem from. Maybe it would be easier if they heard it from Michael Moore?

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.


-Laelth
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
304. Easy mistake to make when the sound of "whoosh" prevents us from a rational interpretation.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 11:17 AM
Jun 2014

I suppose it's easy to confuse "the point" with "for everything."

Easy mistake to make when the sound of "whoosh" prevents us from a rational interpretation.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
3. Outstanding.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:12 AM
Jun 2014


Love this, too:

These suggestions are often presented as radically simple solutions to centuries of structural inequality. In reality, they function mostly as an attempt to make people with legitimate grievances less irritating to the powerful figures who might be expected to respond to their demands.


 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
8. This is what i was trying to explain but i just could not express it artfully.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:18 AM
Jun 2014

Then i just looked around and this one spoke to me. Hopefully people will read it and take it to heart.

brer cat

(24,523 posts)
14. You may feel that you don't express yourself "artfully", bravenak,
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:45 AM
Jun 2014

but your voice and POV is important. Your life experiences are different from mine as well as other DUers, and we can learn much from hearing you. We don't learn much if we are in an echo chamber or if we fail to take the time to relate to people who express a different POV.

btw, this old white lady feels the same as you about the old white men who run too many things. It has been true all my life...it needs to end during yours. I am not advocating killing them off or grave dancing as the older folks die, just expressing the desire to see women and minorities take their place running things.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
16. I don't want to make them into Soylent Green.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:48 AM
Jun 2014

I just want them to learn to share and that their needs are not the only ones we should focus on. Everyone else has gotten left behind. And now that they feel the pinch they want to concentrate solely on class issues, but i say we need to do the race stuff at the same time. Not just scream race card whenever issues are brought up.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
29. You express yourself perfectly well. Post 13 is a testament to that.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:31 PM
Jun 2014

People are using excuses to avoid subjects that make them uncomfortable.

I don't recall too many liberal white guys bellyaching about this:

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
141. Everyone knew that wasn't about all white men. If the shoe doesn't fit, why insist on wearing it?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:11 PM
Jun 2014
Moore was not writing about himself but criticizing a segment of society that refuses to give others equal chances in this world. When Franken published this:



He wasn't talking about heavy people. And Moore is well known as a heavy person, too:




Both books are really about heartlessness, not heavy-ness, white-ness, or male-ness. And they were written by white men calling out their alleged kin.

Haven't writers such as Moore used the same designation and not been accused of racism or sexism but been acclaimed as speaking truth to power and calling out conservatives?

Why is it so uncomfortable to listen to others who are not white males, who want to join into the same conversation on reactionaries?

Why are they not respected as allies, as they seek to express their oppression, to teach those who say they're against oppression?


Some seek to find an offense any criticism of what they consider their exterior qualities, when it's not about that at all. It's like identifying with a team. Just as I am of a certain physical type in race and gender, but not heart and mindset to this person:



There are critical differences between this person and myself, though some would say she might be my 'kin.' I barely regard her as a member of homo sapiens in good standing, we're so far apart:


First, I wouldn't dress with a cheesy patriotic fabric. Teabaggers think they're making a political statement and looking patriotic. Bullshit, there's nothing patriotic about hate.

Second, I never, make such a hateful, hostile face, particularly with that open mouthed yelling. Just imagine the coarseness you'd expect to issue out of that mouth. Hate is not interesting, nor is any help, and that is a hate group.

Third, I can spell and don't wave around signs. Might as well have a Fox News icon tatooed on their foreheads. They hav no original thoughts, just stupid, repeated slogans.

Fourth, I am aware of the issue of making all people talk and act and look the same, and don't approve. We don't have a national language because it isn't needed. The language of most of business, science and other enterprises at this time on Planet Earth is English. It's not endangered. Quit the hysteria.

Fifth, I have better uses of my time than to prate about things that mean nothing. These are simply th arguments of egotism. The baggers have the luxury of first amendent rights and the right to protest in public but this is what they do with their rights, hate on others instead of anything positive.

So I'm not offended. Why should others be?

I'm also older than some who post here. I feel more fortunate than the current generation, having lived through the sixties and seventies and seeing and hearing JFK, MLK, RFK and others as they changed the world for me and others. I lived in a time of brave and noble people, not the grifters I see today running amuck and trying to destroy the lives of so many who never did them any harm.

I grew up in a time when unions and workers and doing the right thing by others in general but certainly not all was a given, not subjct to debate, nor was protecting the environment or personal freedoms an issue.

It was the right thing to do. A lot was done in that era, that's since been lost in a tsunami of right wing propaganda working to erase every good idea ever fought and died for to create peace within us.

Those ideals are the shared legacy of my generation of Democrats, not other parties. I'm here to remind those who have not lived in those days, there's a better way to live than what Reagan era spin tells us there is, better than the reality the Koch's are determined to force on us and the generations to come.

So I am and have been blessed, despite hardships and things I do not bring here, never internalizing criticisms of the worst of all, as some do. I don't understand why they would identify with the worst human specimens, because that's who is being called out, and not them, and if they valued what is right, there'd be no fighting.

JMHO.

Squinch

(50,911 posts)
180. When these arguments come up, from now on can we just say: "If the shoe doesn't fit
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:53 PM
Jun 2014

why insist on wearing it?" and then just refuse to repeat all the assurances we have been giving for eleventy seven threads to those who demand apologies and retractions because it doesn't apply to them?

PLEEEEEEEEZZZZZEEEE?????

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
260. Yes, indeed! And quote the 'one of these things is not like the other' or post this:
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:26 PM
Jun 2014


The physical nature of a person does not define all the qualities of that person.

Although some have believed political views are inherited. The Third Reich did.

Don't waste time with those who believe 'biology is destiny.' That's authoritarian.

Just sayin'

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
9. K&R
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:21 AM
Jun 2014

there was an unfair bias against everyone except older white men - that's how they accumulated the privileges they now own.

belly aching white folk need to just stfu about how hard done by they are. Paint up brown or black and live like a non-white person for a month or so then report back.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
11. As a White woman....I may not be a POC but I can extrapolate from the position of being a woman
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:36 AM
Jun 2014

in this world to that of a woman of color being doubly oppressed. I stand with you Bravenak! Old White men are whiners!

Never back down....just fight on!

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
13. Well, you know that map in the picture i was in front of?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:45 AM
Jun 2014

I'm oppressing the whole thing now, so i demand that all men on DU send me money now, so that i may buy tools of oppression.
Imaging having to read posts that make you uncomfortable? It must hurt so much to hear an honest opinion about a group you identify with when you are the group in power. I bet some felt like they were lumped in with people who are despicable.

I feel like that everyday. All day. In Walmart. At the mall. At work. In the car. Listening to talk radio. And even reading certain things here about black men leaving their families and the women not knowing how to use birth control and having too many babies. And the Trayvon threads. And Jordan.
And the dudes who like to whip out black on white crime stats out of nowhere.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
17. Heh,heh...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:49 AM
Jun 2014

you troublemaker, you. Keep agitating! And I'll join you. The level of pushback needed is depressing sometimes.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
21. Some are playing a game.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:00 PM
Jun 2014

I know i have explained my pov to certain people many many times. Then they act brand new the next day. Deliberately obtuse some might say.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
22. I think that there are people out there who fit into two groups.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:05 PM
Jun 2014

One group really is wilfully ignorant and does not take any information in which does not fit into their own worldview. The other group is made up of people who manipulate information and feedback given them to support an established agenda on their part. Neither one of these groups are interested in discourse or entertaining other points of view. It becomes really frustrating when you consider how hard some of the elements of our political system have worked to shut it all down by making this sort of thing systemic.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
25. It's a matter of how these subjects are brought up.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:21 PM
Jun 2014

Our exchange yesterday was not about whether or not it is "legitimate" to bring up the subject of race, etc.

It was the dismissiveness of an entire demographic group (and the tendency of some to assume that criticisms of President Obama always have a racial undercurrent). This approach is a mirror image of what the GOP does in reverse. Divide and conqueror.

If one is trying to change social attitudes and oppressive social systems, it is important to first recognize that demographic groups are not monolithic. Society is a collection of individuals, who have a wide range of attitudes, levels of awareness and motivations. That also applies to demographic groups whose collective actions and attitudes one might collectively consider to be victimizers as well as those who have suffered because of that.

President Obama himself recognizes these complexities, and has addressed it, such as in his great speech during the campaign when he was attacked for his affiliations with Rev. Wright.

Any effort to change oppressive attitudes, behavior and policies -- and the systems that result -- has to accept people on their own terms as a starting point. Being accusatory and/or telling people they have to instantly transform themselves to fall into a certain mold of thought and behavior only alienates people, including those who are inherently sympathetic. It is no different than white people telling black people that they have to become white to raise themselves up.

And, in a larger sense, it requires a recognition that to lift everyone up requires lifting everyone up, and focusing on the systemic institutional problems and economic systems that are much larger and oppressive to the majority, regardless of color, ethnic background and gender.

For example, in the 18th to mid-20th Century, Britain was a colonial empire that subjugated, exploited and did some awful things to the "colonies" they acquired and ruled over.

It's fair to say, that the British Empire did a lot of damage and colonialism was a fundamentally bad system. However, it would be wrongheaded to say that the British people were by extension, all guilty of being members of a Colonial Empire and were terrible exploiters individually

In fact, many British citizens were exploited and abused themselves (read Charles Dickens)....Or were at least not part off the problem and included people who supported reforms to the system (Or would have if they had the knowledge of the realities of colonialism, and access to a larger reform movement).

Therefore it is a totally inaccurate generalization to say that if a person was British automatically meant they were part of the system of exploitation and abuse, and was therefore guilty of the evils inflicted by the British Empire. In fact, it was a larger system that was put into place and run by a particular segment of the population of Britain.

It is not much different than using a broad brush to portray everyone who is white, and especially of a certain age group, as being the cause of current problems.

It is a complex issue with a lot of nuances. There were (and are) people who had (have) widely differing shades of opinion and levels of knowledge about the realities of the system, which also shapes their role and opinion of it. There were people in Britain who had a sense of patriotism and pride in the Empire, for example, who did not necessarily know about the actual facts of what that really meant.

There are hard-nosed racists and sexists. There are also well meaning people who may behave or think in ways that are racist or sexist, but not because of bad intent. It is more a matter of lack of knowledge and awareness.

Telling people that progress will only be made when their demographic group becomes insignificant and/or dies off is not the way to gain their support for solving and rectifying legitimate grievances.


 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
26. I said at the time i was trying to find a way to explain what i meant.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:23 PM
Jun 2014

I have no filter. I think it may be a good thing.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
28. i have a friend who says the problem is older/white/str8t/protestant males are afraid to compete
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:30 PM
Jun 2014

fairly...

And when a Black woman like you speaks up, for example, it frightens them because to compete on an actual level playing field is something they have never been required to do before.



The day you stop talking about this is the day I give up, for real.

[link:

|
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
41. I really wouldn't want to compete with me either.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:47 PM
Jun 2014

I pick thing up pretty fast and i am awesome. I am getting the tone argument quite a bit.

FreedRadical

(518 posts)
188. Yes you are awesome.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 04:21 PM
Jun 2014

You remind me of my mother. Rest her soul. You two are utterly fearless, powerful and relentless. I made the mistake of pissing her off once or twice. BIG mistake. I hope I don't make that mistake with you.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
236. You can piss me off and i will get over it in about an hour.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:08 PM
Jun 2014

But i'll remember forever.
Thank you for that. That was a sweet thing to say .

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
89. I was referring to Randy and his bigoted friend.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:54 PM
Jun 2014

I don't fight it useful to talk trash about different demographic groups.

"I have a friend who told me the problem with young black guys is..."

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
196. Really? You talk about your fellow progressives like that? I think you're the problem.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:15 PM
Jun 2014

You have no content, only attitude. Sneering disdain for anyone who doesn't take your ultra positions. Good luck with that.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
210. you a progressive?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:48 PM
Jun 2014

okay. I think that content is readily apparent. No disdain. No 'ultra position". Just truth you can't handle. Simple as that. Always about "attitude" because it's not deferential enough and can't be controlled. Dealt with that word my whole life and thank god I had "attitude". Controlling truthful, uncomfortable dialog doesn't work anymore, anyplace, anytime. Never again!

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
193. Maybe he *is* an older white Protestant man.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 04:56 PM
Jun 2014

In which case, I'd be inclined to think that he knows what he's talking about.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
30. It's good to be honest, but sometimes filters are also helpful
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:32 PM
Jun 2014

If I remove my filters I'd say we are all assholes for willingly destroying the earth willingly by cars. And everyone who drives is an asshole because they know that.

I'm an asshole every time I get in my car and turn the key because I know that I am sending out a cloud of noxious gas that will help to destroy the planet and make it inhospitable for human habitation in the very near future.

But calling people assholes is not going to convince them to support policies and behavior to reduce (and hopefully repair) the damage we are collectively causing to the planet.

Rather, changing society so that we are not destroying the planet it requires taking people on their own terms and raising awareness of the problem, and encouraging them to both be more conservation-oriented in their behavior, and looking for ways we can all minimize our individual damage while dealing with the requirements of living in society, and also convincing more people to support policies tat collectively encourage alternative policies and systems.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
39. We are destroying the earth.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:44 PM
Jun 2014

We are doing it willfully. We are assholes. We know it. We want people to sugar coat it for us so that we don't feel bad. Once the oil runs out we will have no choice but to find other methods of fueling our lives. If people want to pretend that drill baby drill is going to last forever, that's sad that they do not believe in science.

I also do not sugar coat things for my husband and family, myself or anybody really. Does no good and makes it seem like we can push it off forever.

I never called anybody an asshole, just spoke on age and demographics and how they vote. Then the large swarm. I apologized for hurting her and she responded by posting an anti Bravenak thread and posting all through it were people calling me racist, ageist and viciously attacking me. For a post i apologized for and the jury refused to hide. Message after message attacking me and calling me names. And i'm the oppressor? The villain? I was trying to explain my meaning. This article says what i was trying to say better.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
42. You weren't nice enough.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:49 PM
Jun 2014

Therefore your words were twisted, your meaning changed, and the pile on crew went apeshit. 260 recs for that huge fucking self-pitying strawman of an OP.

And now you're being treated to another lecture on how to be nicer.

I swear to Goddess the shit that happens on this liberal, progressive site.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
43. The tone argument is getting on my nerves.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:52 PM
Jun 2014

So many people to offend, so little time. Nobody cares when i get called names but if i say old white men + a negative, all hell breaks loose.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
48. Same old same old.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:00 PM
Jun 2014

And yeah, the tone argument is so over. Nobody but those making them thinks they hold even a molecule of water. Everyone else just rolls their eyes and keeps moving forward.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
47. Well believe it or not, I can emphasize with you on that in some ways
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:58 PM
Jun 2014

I've been accused of wanting pomies" and bein an "unrealistic leftist" and a lot of otehr things for some of the things I post regarding the corporate state and the concentration of wealth and power.

And I've certainly not always practiced what I am preaching all the time. I can be strident at times when people react in ways that seem like baseless attacks. (When people disagree in civil ways I do respond civilly.)

So I can understand your response. But just because I sometimes live in a glass house doesnlt mean my points weren't valid.

For example the poster who got so upset yesterday is a very stalwart, very progressive long time member of DU. And being told that the entire demographic she belongs to (apart from gender) makes her part of the problem is understandable. It's the way I felt.

That's a problem with generalizations that dismiss whole groups, regardless of the political perspective or goal.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
53. Except that i was not talking about her or you.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:03 PM
Jun 2014

No matter how many times i say it, nor the fact that I apologized and received a bash me thread in response that i rec'd, i am still getting the lecture. The post went to jury and it stood. It was not a controversial post.

Someone posted this:http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4953402

Where was the out cry by the same posters who hate generalities? You guys did not show up to help me and i was hurt very bad reading that. I guess the groups attacked in that post in the link do nit merit the sane amount of support. I am sad that it is that way. You guys should have stepped up to the plate and defended me.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
83. I guess this gets down to a matter of individual style....
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:47 PM
Jun 2014

" I have read too many times here that we need to try to reach out to... Drumroll please...... WHITE MEN! Not our base, and our voters, but we need to reach out to old white males and not say stuff that might make them anxious. Why? Because the board is full of them and some of them think that the nation is not paying attention to their problems."

I am sorry if you feel that me and others overreacted to that. Personally, I reacted because I have a fundamental disagreement with it for a variety of reasons. It gets very,very complicated and the weather is too sunny outside today for me to go into all of it now.

I will just say that as a White Man, I reacted strongly because it hit a fundamental chord that goes back through my years of experience as a progressive/liberal since the 70's. I believe that statement is both tactically wrong, does not represent history and I found it personally insulting to hear white men are irrelevant to efforts to revitalize the Democratic Party as a politically effective force to represent the poor, working and middle class of all gender and races -- i.e. the majority of the population.

It also runs contrary to a fundamental belief -- that I have professionally worked on with reasonable success in my own tiny little sphere -- that the best way to foster positive change is to accept all people on their terms as a starting point, rather than putting them on the defensive about where tey are in life at the time. It also requires addressing the reasons people develop stereotypes or fallacious briefs.

As for the post you cited from another thread....Well, I happened to just hear a debate a little while ago on MSNBC (Melissa Harris Perry) in which President Obama was being criticized for saying some things tat were some what similar to that post.

As I said it all gets very complicated.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
194. "...white men are irrelevant." No we're not.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:00 PM
Jun 2014

Not unless we act like we're the only people who matter, and everyone should cater to our perspective 24/7. Those are the white men we don't need, and who will only hold us back.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
218. Now I really understand
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:14 PM
Jun 2014

after reading that link. Man I was bowled over by the so-called progressives. Damn! And they want you to feel bad? I'm always amazed at hypocrisy run rampant. Damn!!! I am so sorry I missed that post and didn't have your back.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
233. And this was the same guy whining about being negatively stereotyped as a white male!
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:56 PM
Jun 2014

"Hypocrisy run rampant" is a good way to put it.

Not to mention I got my first-ever hidden post when I responded angrily to his bullshit. Meanwhile said bullshit is still up there for all to see.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
294. of course
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 09:12 AM
Jun 2014

i've grown to expect it and am surprised no more at the...............pick your words. There are a lot of them to explain such actions.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
241. I think the people yelling at me should apologize for not noticing when these things are said .
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:24 PM
Jun 2014

If it pisses them off directed at them they should be especially vigilant about it coming from their demographic instead of trying to nanny me. I love this hipocrisy on parade.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
219. Let's just let this go
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:15 PM
Jun 2014

You said something I responded to viscerally, whether intended to me or not. Also I strongly disagreed with your premise.

Emotions got overheated, making calm discussion about it difficult.

We're ultimately on the same side, even if we don't see eye to eye on this point. So let's just agree to disagree on that and move on.

As for the other post you referred to. I'm not on DU 24/7. I check in and out irregularly, and only read a fraction of the threads....and of those I only comment on a tiny fraction of the posts.

And frankly, I think it goes with the DU (and Internet) territory that whatever one posts has a chance of eliciting responses that are negative or that cause offense to someone or another....... Heck, I've often found that even when I post something here I think is totally innocuous and inoffensive -- including non-political tidbits -- it will generate that.

JustAnotherGen

(31,780 posts)
281. The text of that post
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 07:59 AM
Jun 2014

So we can see precisely what the issue is and why you are linking to it.


224. To be blunt prvilege has nothing to do with the fact

that single mothers are on the rise in our country and children simply don't have two parents to help raise them. Also a single mother must work more hours to raise children compared to a household that has two incomes to pull from. The government is tight on money and more and more men (especially black men) are incarcerated for not paying child support whether they are they father or not (biological). Straight Black males have walked away from father hood because there are no role models to look to for inspiration anymore and the entertainment media portrays them as fools. Bill Cosby I rarely agree with but he has talked about how there have always been strong black role models to look to but instead of focusing on black achievement the focus has shifted now.

The black community has the same issues as the LDC of the world in that that birth control education is lacking and that having a lot of kids reduces your spending power simply put. This cycle is difficult to break but it starts at the school level or more specifically public education levels.



We should start a lesbian black commune to fix this problem for that poster. But then we will get accused of discriminating against older white men for not letting them join. Smack my ass and call me sally - this shit was for real!
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
283. A black lesbian commune?
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 08:12 AM
Jun 2014

Why does that sound so pleasant and i'm not even lesbian. I am kinda ready to move there if it has a beach and a mall. And alcohol. But i need my white ladies and asian ladies and more. Maybe a rainbow lesbian commune with free margaritas and vollyball. Misandrists get in free.

JustAnotherGen

(31,780 posts)
284. Works for me!
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 08:20 AM
Jun 2014

And yep - no charge for misandrists! And we shall start each day with bellinis or kir royales! Cheers!

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
195. "...the entire demographic she belongs to... makes her part of the problem."
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:06 PM
Jun 2014

That is false, and a strawman. Not every white person is a "problem" - only the ignorant and bigoted and clueless.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
216. That was a typo on my part
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:06 PM
Jun 2014

"For example the poster who got so upset yesterday is a very stalwart, very progressive long time member of DU. And being told that the entire age demographic she belongs to (apart from gender) makes her part of the problem is understandable. It's the way I felt."

It should have read:

"For example the poster who got so upset yesterday is a very stalwart, very progressive long time member of DU. And HER UPSET REACTION TO THE IMPLICATION that the entire age demographic she belongs to makes her part of the problem is understandable. It's the way I felt."

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
224. I agree we should all be careful of excessive broadbrushing.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:32 PM
Jun 2014

My own parents are nearly 60, and very progressive, conscientious people.

But there are also those - yes, even on DU - who use the "tone argument" as an excuse to shut down discussion of uncomfortable topics.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
228. Plese see my otehr response.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:37 PM
Jun 2014

It explains my on views more fully from the perspective of a 62 year old "old fart" progressive.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
50. you did well
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:01 PM
Jun 2014

and no apology is needed ever for the truth about a certain demographic that is now whining because people are on to them and their world destroying shenanigans. Those on here attacking you cannot take the heat of the pure light of truth. Keep up the good fight.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
55. Well, i apologized for the hurt feelings but not the words.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:05 PM
Jun 2014

I believe what i wrote with all of my heart.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
72. as you should
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:35 PM
Jun 2014

because they were/are the presented truth that is hard to take by some. Stand tall.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
71. it is great thing, actually
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:34 PM
Jun 2014
I am not understanding what is going in here, to be honest. The GOP constituency is overwhelmingly white and male. is the problem with stating that fact?

JustAnotherGen

(31,780 posts)
307. Just make sure you
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:00 PM
Jun 2014

Point out the GOP IS indeed those things in the title.

Of course - that could be a really interesting 'thread' to see some additional 'layers' to folks around here.

Be interesting to see how we CAN'T point it out eveeeeeeeeeeeeer because one of them over there might be offended.

Alas - I'm anxiously awaiting this!

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
31. British people aren't a monolith. Those that were nationalist and reflexively got defensive when
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:33 PM
Jun 2014

others criticized the empire WERE part of the problem.

Those that recognized their country's awful practices, and didn't whine about being smeared when people talked about how awful the british empire is, are part of the solution.

And being nice and polite and genteel when criticizing the british empire is a red herring.

I think this needs to be posted again:

These suggestions are often presented as radically simple solutions to centuries of structural inequality. In reality, they function mostly as an attempt to make people with legitimate grievances less irritating to the powerful figures who might be expected to respond to their demands.
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
35. As I said above, it's a matter of how issues are addressed
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:37 PM
Jun 2014

Telling someone who who was just barely eking by in Britain that they were automatically colonialist pigs because they were British would not have been the way to start to encourage them to support change to the colonial system.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
38. Nobody is making this personal but those who choose to be defensive.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:43 PM
Jun 2014

Nobody told anyone on here that they were anything. They read a criticism of conservative old white men, and somehow managed to miss the copious amounts of context which signaled that it was not about them.

The analogous situation would be if someone wrote that the british were no longer going to be an empire in the future and would have to compete with other nations on a more even footing, and some peasant getting all upset because someone said they were a bad person.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
54. No, a better analogy would be...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:04 PM
Jun 2014

telling the peasant that s/he is inherently bad because they part of a society that is awful and by extension they are bad people unless they totally reject their entire lives instantly (and most likely either get kicked off their land to starve to death or possibly just getting directly killed or tossed into prison)

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
76. This
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:42 PM
Jun 2014

" I have read too many times here that we need to try to reach out to... Drumroll please...... WHITE MEN! Not our base, and our voters, but we need to reach out to old white males and not say stuff that might make them anxious. Why? Because the board is full of them and some of them think that the nation is not paying attention to their problems."

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
81. No, you said "telling the peasant" - telling an individual that they are x.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:45 PM
Jun 2014

That did not happen here.

That a few people are choosing to try to make her comment all about them is the problem.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
84. I'm an old (semi old) white man and I know a lot of old white men who are...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:51 PM
Jun 2014

staunch and loyal Democrats, liberal and progressive and have been for decades.

The statement that older while males are politically irrelevant is personal. Just as personal as if I said that women, yong peope or any otehr group are irrelevant.

It's a mirror image of the GOP saying that women, non-WASP ethnic groups and gays are irrelevant.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
90. Are you or were any of them upset by this book?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:54 PM
Jun 2014



It is so far from a mirror image. That is false equivalence at its finest.
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
93. Personally, no. ....Politically I think it was stupid.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:59 PM
Jun 2014

Michael Moore says a lot of things i totally aree with, and i think would resonate with a lot of white men, if it weren't packaged that way.

He's an entertainer, so being shocking is part of his schtick.

But he isn't nearly as effective in affecting the actual machinations of public opinion and politics as he could be. All he really does is massage the people who already agree with him.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
94. She posted that ON DU.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:01 PM
Jun 2014

She didn't make it the title of a book.

Her post was aimed at people who (we would think) agree with her about the stupid, selfish, greedy old white men who are holding back progress.

Why then this rush to take her words as a personal insult? HERE?

HMM?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
100. I disagree with it and took it personally
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:08 PM
Jun 2014

I guess because as an older white male I am automatically greedy and a victimizer.

You're correct, I give up. We're all useless, irrelevant and inherently piggy. Not entitled to have an alternative opinion.


redqueen

(115,103 posts)
104. Do you seriously think I was referring to you?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:12 PM
Jun 2014

Did you really miss the point of my post - which is that the reason white liberal men didn't whine and cry about the title of his book is because they understood the context?

And that it is worth thinking about why this context is being ignored in bravenak's post?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
114. I haven't got time to keep going around this mulberry bush right now
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:23 PM
Jun 2014

I disagree with the point in the excerpt I originally quoted that started this all is that white males -- especially older white males -- should not be considered in efforts to revitalize the Democratic Party and bring about positive social change -- including on matters of racial justice and gender equality.

Things got too personal and emotional from there. As in many situations there's a lot of room for differences of opinion and nuanced consideration, but not when personality and emotions get involved.

That's it for now. I'm going outside.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
198. Then the men you know are most likely not the problem. Nor you yourself.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:19 PM
Jun 2014

I don't know how many times "it's not about you" has to be repeated before it sinks in.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
197. "...unless they totally reject their entire lives instantly." What does this even mean?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:18 PM
Jun 2014

We all have to work within the circumstances we've been given. Anything else is unrealistic.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
40. You added to your post while I was writing my rerply so...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:46 PM
Jun 2014

To be perectly honest, it is not a matter of making people with grievances "less irritating to the powerful."

It is a matter of getting average people who may be inadvertently supporting oppression to recognize the falicacy of their stereotypes, and to recognize the common humanity of people.

Yes, it does require a certain amount of shit stirring. But i also should be seen as a process.

IMO, gay-rights activists have made a positive difference. But what really made the difference has been getting previously homophobic people to recognize that the gay couple down the street were not a different exotic species, and are deserving of the same rights that straight people have, and the same "live and let live" tolerance they expect for themselves.

pennylane100

(3,425 posts)
96. I do not have a problem with any harsh criticism of the british empire.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:05 PM
Jun 2014

While it is amazing just how much of the world was colonized during the life of the Empire, there can be no polite way to criticize the harm that we (the British) caused to the countries we occupied.

The crimes our country committed during these years are part of our history and smearing our behavior during this period is legitimate. It is important to remember our history so we can learn from it.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
82. I face a lot of things. If you actually had any nuace in your argument, I might agree with you
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:47 PM
Jun 2014

But you are making a generalization that is the same as the GOP saying "We don't need any minorities."


Both are formulas for political extinction.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
88. no I am not
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:53 PM
Jun 2014

I am stating the fact that GOP voters are mostly white and male. That is all. I am really not understanding why that is in contention.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
102. That's not in contention
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:11 PM
Jun 2014

What seems to be in contention is whether or not whites and males should be written off by the Democratic Party.

I dont think they should be written off. My opinion. Your mileage may vary.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
117. well, that seems like part of the problem. the entitled feeling that you should remain catered to
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:29 PM
Jun 2014

after generations of this group asking everyone else to play second fiddle. It's time to get over it and treat others as equally important, and not expect them to tip toe around with their concerns, waiting for some cue that is is their turn.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
119. Respectfully.....Wottaloadofcrap
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:38 PM
Jun 2014

If you believe this is about not treating others as equally important, you have no clue what I believe, which is that EVERYBODY should have the right to have a decent life, equal opportunity, the ability to be treated as individuals (not as part of some bigoted or sexist stereotype) and that we should not be ruled by an economic elite.

Everyone -- including thee and me -- has personal priorities. That's called human nature. You can feel free to believe that any part of that agenda is some "white male" wish list -- and I am free to tell you that you're wrong if you believe that has anything to do with perpetuating white male entitlement.



 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
123. That was not respectful, nor was there any reason for you to take it personally.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:53 PM
Jun 2014

Never said it was about you- we are talking about white men who shoo away others concerns. Expect that they should be catered to, first and foremost. Only if the shoe fits, should you be getting all emotional like that about this topic.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
152. "the entitled feeling that you should remain catered to..."
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:16 PM
Jun 2014

hard not to take that personally with that little "you" in there

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
203. "should remain catered to after generations of this group asking everyone else to play second fiddle
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:43 PM
Jun 2014

It's time to get over it (that feeling of entitlement) and treat others (particularly women and POC) as equally important".

Left out "this group" and all context. I added some clarification above. Hope that helps.

betsuni

(25,379 posts)
239. I don't understand it either
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:19 PM
Jun 2014

I feel like I've been eavesdropping on a group therapy session but the denial is too strong and that breakthrough isn't going to happen. You all should be charging by the hour!

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
312. +10,000
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 07:43 PM
Jun 2014


You could not have put this any more plainly, yet some will still misconstrue your message.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
130. again...I call bullshit
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:03 PM
Jun 2014

Stating a fact is not 'writing off' anyone. It is just the reality. I really do not understand the opposition to this reality , especially not from such smart people.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
320. Duh...do we have to qualify that continuously?
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:32 AM
Jun 2014

No we do not. There is a rich tradition of liberalism in this country. We should already know who we are, and be able to talk about reality without having to qualify everything. I see you as an ally, and I still know that GOP voters are mostly white and male. Really quite simple.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
70. that is BS
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:33 PM
Jun 2014

It has always been the distraction used by those receiving a truth that is uncomfortable, to whine about how that truth is presented and that that truth may be taken as offensive therefore whining is justified. No matter the offense the oppressed may be responding to. While the demographic described is still in a position to ignore the truth of their privilege and racism, which they typically do, they always tell the oppressed group, go back rewrite and present it again and I might just read it. No change, just read. Usually it's something like, "you can't call a asshole an asshole even if the asshole is an asshole because you might offend them and they won't want to change. So change the wording so I don't feel the hate. BS, the whiner never has changed the wording and/or meaning while denigrating minorities and women. Wouldn't have changed anyway. The old/middle white male demographic has had generations to change and accept everyone as an equal. THEY HAVE NOT WANTED EQUALITY and a lot still don't. As evidenced by old and middle demographic examples now running rampant in the halls of Congress, on the Supreme Court and definitely in state and local politics. Turning back voting rights that for the most part will affect minorities, turning back civil rights, same effect, "post racial society" according to one of those old white men on the SCOTUS who is in the majority is now the order of the day. BS!!!!!! Gender rights under a most vicious attack not seen since ROEvsWADE. An asshole is an asshole. Unless they want to change and do change they are an asshole..... You talk about broad brushes, just go to Discussionist.com, you'll find a lot of broad brush from the group under discussion and that are the reason for this OP. All gays, all blacks, all minorities, all women are broad stroked by the rampant racism, bigotry and misogyny that is still very evident and perpetrated by old, middle and young white males in this american society of 2014. Sometime I think the only solution will be the dying off of a certain breed of human being that finds it impossible to live in peace and equality with their neighbor no matter the superficial differences.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
79. And you are broadstroking an entire group of people yourself in the same damn way
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:44 PM
Jun 2014

Good luck with that in terms of actually changing anything

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
87. hey
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:53 PM
Jun 2014

the people I am "broad stroking" don't want any damn change. And have been the same damn way for generations. Please! Don't try to insult me with an insulting answer. You're right about that luck thing! Change hasn't happened significantly for 300+ years in this country alone because of ............. good luck to you.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
108. No women ever vote for the GOP
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:17 PM
Jun 2014

and no white males ever support social progress or ever vote for Democrats. The Labor Union movement never existed. No white males supported the civil rights movement. LBJ and FDR were not older white males. Bernie Sanders is really an African American woman in disguise. Sarah Palin, and all the women who love her and go to Tea Party Rallies and people like Michelle Malkin and Laura Ingam are are secretly male cross dressers.

Yuppers. Okay. Yes good luck with that belief.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
120. Never said any of that
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:40 PM
Jun 2014

or suggested anything as you say. There is a huge demographic out there in la la land that is hateful and racist for one reason only. They hate people because of the melanin in their skin. And they are NOT going to change and they will be called out for what they are each and every time they rear their racist, hateful, bigoted heads and utter vile despicable things. People like Ryan, Issa, Cruz, Limbaugh, West, yes west, Clarence, yes clarence, beckerhead, handmedown, wordsalad palin. People who kill kids with skittles and tea in their hands. Whether it's cultural, which it is, whether it's religious, which is a large part of the reason for racial hate, gender and sexual orientation attacks of violence, I can't break down those numbers because they're not out there. Certain segment wouldn't want that broadcast, I'm sure. Why I have friend who sat with Bill Ayres and Bernadine Dohrn just a week or so ago. They are not part of what I'm talking about or referring to. There are GOOD people of many racial and ethnic persuasions out there and I don't think the writer of the original OP and neither do I, deny that fact and NEVER said there wasn't. The point being made by me, is about the whiner screaming of being a victim when they victimize others everyday by virtue of the privilege they gain by being a certain demographic segment of our society...... You forgot anne coulter. have a good one.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
200. "...the whiners screaming of being a victim when they victimize others everyday..."
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:27 PM
Jun 2014

This is really the crux of it, right here. The subset of white, mostly male Americans who don't believe others deserve even the most basic human rights or considerations.

Frankly, I can understand why one would be offended at being lumped in with that group. But that's not what's happening here - if anything, it's a matter of certain DU'ers (perhaps unwittingly) identifying with people they should be running away from as fast as possible.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
227. These are 3D issues with no easy answers.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:35 PM
Jun 2014

One of the things I most like about President Obama his recognition of that.

I know older white conservatives (and younger ones too) who are thoroughly decent people. They grew up in different times and different circumstances, and were shaped by that and/or they are uninformed or swallowed a bunch of crap from the right wing and corporate propaganda machine that unfortunately took hold. But they try to do what they think is right in their daily lives, and many believe that conservatism will "lift all boats."

Most people have a lot of internal contradictions. My late mother thought of herself as a staunch liberal and Democrat. She thought Obama was the greatest thing since sliced toast and unabashedly supported him during the 08 primaies and election. (Unfortunately she passed away before the inauguration.) ....But she was also a product of growing up in the south, and she had a blind spot about immigration, which she thought was eroding American society with foreign influences.

I also know a woman who was a staunch liberal and extremely progressive on women's issues. But as soon as her daughter didn't get into a certain school, she got pissed off about affirmative action because she though it was unfair that her daughter couldn't get into a school, while in her view less academically accomplished people of color did.

Nobody (at least hardly anybody) is all good or all bad. Most of us are a mix of conflicting motivations and views, and we're all shaped by individual circumstances and experiences.

Any effort to move (or nudge) society in a better direction has to start from a recognition of that fact.


nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
232. I agree that there's good and bad in (nearly) everyone.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:52 PM
Jun 2014

But when I see the vile racist comments posted on blogs and articles - all manner of vicious racial slurs, gloating over the violent deaths of people of color, saying a murdered unarmed teenager got what he deserved for being a "thug" - it's hard to think that these individuals are in any way redeemable.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
235. There are people who trend more to the a'hole side of the equation...regardless of ideology
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:05 PM
Jun 2014

As I said originally, it's a complex subject.

Some people are just a'holes regardless of their political beliefs. Some people are a'holes in one aspect of their life, and great people in another.

That's just human nature. Was ever thus and, unfortunately will probably always be.




zeemike

(18,998 posts)
109. Well said.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:18 PM
Jun 2014

There is no better way to divide people than pointing out their differences.
Today it might be old white men, tomorrow the Millennials and emoprogs...but it is always about why we should hate or fear them as a class or group.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
192. "...it is important to first recognize that demographic groups are not monolithic."
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 04:55 PM
Jun 2014

Virtually everyone recognizes this already. But as I've said before on here, adding "some" as a prefix ("some men," "some white people," etc.) presents the problem in such a way that one may be inclined to absolve themselves of responsibility, i.e. "not my problem." When in reality, trying to make the world a less shitty place is the responsibility of all of us.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
44. find replace works well
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:52 PM
Jun 2014

It is an easy tool to use and gives results that are easy to see.

http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=DKvfZ84U

If young (old) black (white) women (men) feel maligned, they should take their own advice to white men (minorities)

Daily Caller editor Matt Lewis pulled off a rare feat last week with a piece about what he describes as an unfair bias against younger (older) black (white) women (men). In the wake of a major conversation about reparations and a massacre in Isla Vista, Calif., Lewis set himself up to argue that black (white) women (men) have become a group that “it’s socially acceptable to stereotype and criticize en masse.”

That is not really what the Atlantic’s Ta-Nehisi Coates is saying when he outlines the ways in which government entities and private companies made deliberate decisions to keep white (black) communities from accumulating wealth. It is not what my colleague Ann Hornaday means when she turns a gimlet eye on the cultural tropes produced by a movie industry dominated by black (white) women (men). And it is not actually what Brittney Cooper is arguing for in Salon when she ponders how particular conceptions of gender and race seem to produce a disproportionate number of mass killings in America.

But by suggesting that is the case, Lewis seems to have done a pretty effective job of inducing other people to work themselves up into a lather. “No one should have to feel this way about who they are,” he laments. “Not even historically under(privileged) black (white) females (males).” Lewis is a cordial correspondent of mine, so I will give him credit for pulling off an intentional act of provocation, rather than tilting at windmills.

In the spirit of Lewis’s piece, I would like to offer him some advice. If younger (older) black (white) women (men) feel maligned, they might try taking some of the recommendations that they routinely offer to Caucasians (people of color) and men (women) who want to better their lot. These suggestions are often presented as radically simple solutions to centuries of structural inequality. In reality, they function mostly as an attempt to make people with legitimate grievances less irritating to the powerful figures who might be expected to respond to their demands.


Cont at link...

Would you alert this?
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
45. I did not write the article.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 12:56 PM
Jun 2014

I do the same thing when posters write things like this:

The government is tight on money and more and more men (especially black men) are incarcerated for not paying child support whether they are they father or not (biological). Straight Black males have walked away from father hood because there are no role models to look to for inspiration anymore and the entertainment media portrays them as fools. Bill Cosby I rarely agree with but he has talked about how there have always been strong black role models to look to but instead of focusing on black achievement the focus has shifted now.

The black community has the same issues as the LDC of the world in that that birth control education is lacking and that having a lot of kids reduces your spending power simply put. This cycle is difficult to break but it starts at the school level or more specifically public education levels.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4953402

TO THE JURY :THIS IS A QUOTE FROM A POST THAT I ALERTED ON AND THE JURY LET IT STAND
 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
59. Don't plan alerting it
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:09 PM
Jun 2014

The way I see it, AA do not like to be all grouped as thugs and gang bangers, and they do not deserve it. Hispanics do not like to all be grouped as border jumpers and illegal aliens. In the same light, white men do not like to all be grouped as bigots and barriers to progress. It seems simple to me. Maybe it is not.

About 100 or so days ago, I had 4 posts hidden within 10 minutes. I was ticked off because there had been a number of cop killings in the news. I broad brushed all cops in the same light. Said the exact same statement 4 times in four threads. All my posts got alerted and hidden. Not because I attacked any one individual or DUer (because I did not), but because I lumped the whole group "COPS" into the same negative light. In hindsight, it was wrong for me to do that, though at the time I felt very justified in my statement.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
60. What do you think about this?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:16 PM
Jun 2014
Also a single mother must work more hours to raise children compared to a household that has two incomes to pull from. The government is tight on money and more and more men (especially black men) are incarcerated for not paying child support whether they are they father or not (biological). Straight Black males have walked away from father hood because there are no role models to look to for inspiration anymore and the entertainment media portrays them as fools. Bill Cosby I rarely agree with but he has talked about how there have always been strong black role models to look to but instead of focusing on black achievement the focus has shifted now.

The black community has the same issues as the LDC of the world in that that birth control education is lacking and that having a lot of kids reduces your spending power simply put. This cycle is difficult to break but it starts at the school level or more specifically public education levels.



Where were you to defend me from this?
 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
66. I support
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:24 PM
Jun 2014

I support and vote for politicians who support a strong safety net. Ideally, I would like to see a socialist system in place where every citizen has enough resources to support the standard of living that our GDP can support. That is a tough fight though. I support better education and fully support Planned Parenthood and other similar organizations.

I am a single father of a young child and do not receive any support from the child's mother. I can relate to and appreciate what you must be going through on a daily basis.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
67. That post was bullcrap and generalizing black women as lacking birth control ed.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:26 PM
Jun 2014

And it was saying that BLACK fathers leave their families. Do search and replace on that one for me please?

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
69. So, baiting me
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:30 PM
Jun 2014

Ask for help in regard to a bullcrap post? I took you at your word and thought it was an honest request, sorry.

Maybe text only format does not do this discussion justice.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
75. It was an honest request.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 01:42 PM
Jun 2014

I want you to see it from the perspective you looked at the old white men post and wanted to see if you could see the racism in a post directed to a class of people you do not belong to. You did not see it. There fore i wanted you to replace the words black men with the words white men and see if you then saw the racism. It is not called baiting you. It is called putting you in my shoes.
I'll do it manually for you.

(that single mothers are on the rise in our country and children simply don't have two parents to help raise them. Also a white single mother must work more hours to raise children compared to a household that has two incomes to pull from. The government is tight on money and more and more men (especially white men) are incarcerated for not paying child support whether they are they father or not (biological). Straight White males have walked away from father hood because there are no role models to look to for inspiration anymore and the entertainment media portrays them as fools. Bill O'Reilly and I rarely agree with but he has talked about how there have always been strong white role models to look to but instead of focusing on white achievement the focus has shifted now.

The white community has the same issues as the LDC of the world in that that birth control education is lacking and that having a lot of kids reduces your spending power simply put. This cycle is difficult to break but it starts at the school level or more specifically public education levels. )


TO THE JURY. I DID A REPLACE OF THE WORDS BLACK TO WHITE TO DEMONSTRATE THE RACISM OF THE POST. THESE ARE NOT MY WORDS BUT THE WORDS FROM A POST THAT IS UNDER DISCUSSION

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
98. Do you see how easy it is to say something like that about people who look like me
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:06 PM
Jun 2014

and get lots of support and no push back from hundreds of posters who look nothing like me?
Things like that get said about people who look like me everyday and it happens alot around here. So forgive me if i thought that it was okay for me to say something like what i said. If it's sauce for the goose it's sauce for the gander right? I received very little assistance from those who are calling me racist when i was upset at that broad brush of black people. Why don't they ever get angry when those type of things are said about me and those who share my color. I expected better from liberal than to leave me flailing in the wind when attacked and generalizations are made about people of color, but then to attack me with such zeal even after i apologized. No one ever apologized for hurting me and no one attacked that poster for saying those things about us. Why?

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
111. If someone had posted that
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:20 PM
Jun 2014

If someone had posted that without the context and knowledge that I had (about you) in this particular instance, I would have very likely alerted it and called it out for a bigoted post too.

I do understand that there are still many right-wing tea-party Caucasian bigots in the USA preaching hate on a daily basis. I do not think there are any here on DU, at least not for any real length of time before MIRT gets to them. If there are bigoted/racist/anti-AA posters floating around and posting on this board, I will have your back calling those posters out for what they are, racist fucks.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
129. That person is still here posting and the jury did nit see the racism in the post.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:03 PM
Jun 2014

You also did not see it until i changed the words black to white. Then you saw it. I see broad-brushes of black people all the time and i never see the out cry or the rush to denigrate posters who do that to people who look like me. They use generalities about us here day after day and only notice when it applies to them and could not care less when it does not. When i point something out that is racist and say it was racist, my statement gets hidden. I get told i am playing the race card. I have been called racist many times today and no one told them they were playing the race card and no one alerted on the posts calling me a racist. All those people that are a part of the majority bashing a minority woman loudly and proudly and calling her names with zeal and high fives galore. Enjoying my misery because i made them uncomfortable and never acknowledging my apology. I find it strange that you do not see the irony in a hundred white people bashing a black woman even after she apologized while ignoring hurtful things said about her and patting themselves on the back and being spiteful towards her. I hope you guys enjoyed yourselves at my expense.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
133. I am done talking to you
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:05 PM
Jun 2014

This is a completely false analysis:

You also did not see it until i changed the words black to white. Then you saw it.


You obviously have some very poor preconceived notions going on. You should work on that.
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
138. I asked you directly and showed it to you twice and asked if you saw it.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:09 PM
Jun 2014

You did not say you did until i switched out the words. Have a good day.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
201. The point is that another poster made an offensive generalization about an entire race
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:33 PM
Jun 2014

in the very same thread where he was whining about being broadbrushed as a white male. Irony much?

So you question this OP, but thinly veiled racism is allowed to stand all the time around here.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
204. Thank you for the clarification
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:48 PM
Jun 2014

I was unaware of the other poster's reply, I do not read every post in these multi-hundred post threads.

As I said before, had I seen that post I would have alerted on it for it's bigoted viewpoints.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
158. did I miss one of your posts?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:19 PM
Jun 2014

the maligned one is true. So if you had to apologize for that one, I'm pissed! One way to look at the racism alerts directed toward you is that it brings out the normal hidden attitude of people good at hiding it. I have experienced a lot of that in this society in the last 6 years or so, even during the run up to election. Black women have been racistly maligned and abused for as long as black women have been a part of this society. Anyone who alerts on a statement such as that is a hypocrite. Anyone high fiving and trying to denigrate your truth is the same slick type that has been denigrating blacks and minorities for generations. You have NOTHING to apologize for. I love ya!!!! Hang in there, we need truth speakers in all 'progressive and liberal' forums. You're shining lights in very dark places and it causes the denizens of that darkness to scatter, scamper and whine about the light.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
164. No. I apologized that someones feeling were hurt, not for what i said.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:26 PM
Jun 2014

What i said was true, i just do not feel like getting attacked by strangers all day long. I just sometimes think that people need to hear from a pov that they are not aware of. I hear their pov all day every day, but if i say something that makes them uncomfortable there is a mad rush to jump on the band wagon and insult me and call me names. I want them to be able to look back in a few years and know that something i said made them mire aware and empathetic towards people who do not look like them. One day their posterity will be in the minority and i want them to see what their grandchildren may be facing from a majority minority nation. I hope they do not face what i face. If we don't fix this stuff now, i think they will.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
209. I understand
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:25 PM
Jun 2014

ditto on everything you just wrote. Can't wait. Apologize for the truth and it gives people a reason to believe they spotted a chink in your armor. I have never apologized for truth hurting anyone.. You spoke/wrote/referred to the truth. I love it!

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
132. Yes it is.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:05 PM
Jun 2014

It is also scary to see the enjoyment they share at my misery and the enthusiasm with which they go after a black woman even after she apologized for hurt feelings. Hundreds of strangers attacking me and calling me names. I would call it a lynchmob but we are on the internet and i can leave if i choose.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
206. Just a question ...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:04 PM
Jun 2014
I am a single father of a young child and do not receive any support from the child's mother. I can relate to and appreciate what you must be going through on a daily basis.


How many custodial fathers refer to their child/children as "the child"?

Yes ... as a father, I'm calling B.S.
 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
259. Wow
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:18 PM
Jun 2014

Talking behind my back negatively about me.

1StrongBlackMan (11,254 posts)
206. Just a question ...

I am a single father of a young child and do not receive any support from the child's mother. I can relate to and appreciate what you must be going through on a daily basis.



How many custodial fathers refer to their child/children as "the child"?

Yes ... as a father, I'm calling B.S.


Maybe I wanted to be as generic as possible so that no one knows too much info about me. Internet has all kinds out there. Your hate has kept you very close to my ignore list. This shity unsubstantiated post about me lying about my child's existence just put you over the limit.

Good bye.
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
261. How the hell can posting to a public message board ...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:27 PM
Jun 2014

in a thread that you are actively participating in be considered "talking behind your back"?

Maybe I wanted to be as generic as possible so that no one knows too much info about me.


Maybe ... But most parents would find "The Child" versus "My Child" a very strange construction.

Just saying ...

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
97. Your divisive approach won't work.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:05 PM
Jun 2014

THIS is what works:



Moral Mondays... people coming together, not pounding away on keyboards.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
101. I'm well aware of that.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:09 PM
Jun 2014

But you brought it here, along with other divisive posts. It won't work. Trust me.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
103. I like the article.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:12 PM
Jun 2014

You do not have to enjoy it. I do not know what you are talking about otherwise.
You can ignore me instead of being nasty. Good day!

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
112. Learn from your elders. I have.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:21 PM
Jun 2014
?w=650







Notice anything interesting about that last pic? It's a sea of white. Mostly older. They're not your enemy.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
258. I can't tell if you are being deliberately condescending or just simply have no idea how you are
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:29 PM
Jun 2014

coming across.

The fact that you see bravenak as saying all old white people are the enemy and yet this thread is absolutely FULL of older white people agreeing with her and telling her that her voice is needed and disagreeing quite passionately with people like you that keep denigrating her and distorting her crystal clear message, I keep waiting for some type of awareness to come into play.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
262. Did you decide not to bow out of this "cesspool" after all?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:45 PM
Jun 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1187&pid=7296

I've had enough Bravenak and her "crystal clear message" for one day.

Ditto re: "awareness."

Number23

(24,544 posts)
264. Oh so you READ the AA forum, just have never posted in it, huh??
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:05 AM
Jun 2014


I've had enough Bravenak and her "crystal clear message" for one day.

Your almost dozen posts in this thread alone say otherwise.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
265. Between some recent choice vanity posts, OMG, yes.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:14 AM
Jun 2014

I popped on over to see some quality posting and, wow, there it was. Whole lotta whining going on about DU; it's very Meta in that regard. Which I tended to stay out of when it existed.

"For one day" -- get it? Pulling the plug "for one day," capisce? I'm not sure why you're having difficulty with that.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
266. Well, your presence in the more than THREE YEARS that the forum has existed has been missed
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 12:24 AM
Jun 2014

And we've all seen your "quality posting" and know that we have sorely been deprived. Wonder why that is, exactly??

Cha

(296,848 posts)
270. Looks like it's just reading the AA forum to find out what its members
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:02 AM
Jun 2014

are up to so they can whine about it later.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
290. Because it's very Meta, and I stayed clear of that group/forum/whatever as well.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 08:54 AM
Jun 2014

I don't come to DU bitch/whine/complain about DU or my fellow DUers. If you and others consider this site a "cesspool," why keep returning to it? And if DU doesn't matter in the real world, why are so many invested in it?

Number23

(24,544 posts)
311. I just want everyone to see the forum here that you are dismissing as 'Meta'
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 07:10 PM
Jun 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1187

Where we discuss movies, prison sentencing, gun rights, civil rights heroes, politics, racism and bigotry -- on the right AND left -- and about 100 other issues that you apparently can't be bothered to wade through because of the handful of posts where people have discussed the well noticed, well documented ignoring of our issues, lives and perspectives on DU.

Your (and those like you) dismissal of this forum says more about you than it will EVER say about the AA forum or the AA posters and our friends that post there. Which is why so many of us have left and the forum, much as this entire site, is just a shell of its former self.

Cha

(296,848 posts)
314. It says everything about them, 23. Poor things don't
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 08:16 PM
Jun 2014

like the AA forum. "It's very Meta" They hate the BOG.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
317. "Us" v. "them." Bra-vo.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 10:27 PM
Jun 2014

This delightful little post of yours could be one example of why the vast majority of DUers are dismissive of the BOG: condescending, mean-spirited, and childish use of smilies.

Look in a mirror, Cha.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
316. Why would I want to spend my precious time in a forum...
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 10:15 PM
Jun 2014

in which so many members consider DU a "cesspool"? I don't care for whining about DU, accusations of stalking and witch-hunts, the persecution complexes, etc. -- in ANY forum.

If you were to visit the NC group, you'd see that I have started numerous threads on issues that affect the AA community, including proposed dumping of fracking fluid in coastal counties with high AA populations, no Medicaid expansion, hospital closures in rural communities, repeal of the Racial Justice Act, exorbitant electric bills in poverty counties, and voter suppression.

Have you participated in those threads? It's a drama-free zone, and doesn't garner much attention. And if there's one thing DU does, it's drama. And division. The "old white" threads are perfect examples, and I'm happy to see the majority of my fellow DUers rejecting them.

I'll stick to this...



...not the nonsense I'm seeing on DU of late.







Number23

(24,544 posts)
318. Your continued minimization and ignoring of what is discussed in the forum has been noted
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 10:35 PM
Jun 2014

Really. It has. And you seem to have not realized that when I noted that you had been "missed" from the forum, that was a joke. Please believe that no one wants you to spend your "precious time" with groups of people you obviously find beneath you.

Your lack of participation has not been noted or missed in the slightest.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
319. More insults... delightful.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 10:53 PM
Jun 2014

And trust me, I fully realized your little swipe late last night. You're not challenging me in the least.

Again, the NC group touches on issues affecting the AA community and raises awareness re: the NC GOP juggernaut. Join in. Or don't. We tend to be issue, rather than personality, driven. And I don't recall ever seeing any "DU is a cesspool" threads in all the time I've participated. It's refreshing.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
118. That is, indeed, their right and their privilege to make liberal use of that feature so kindly
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:32 PM
Jun 2014

provided by our illustrious Admin.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
125. While others patrol the site with their itchy trigger fingers...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:56 PM
Jun 2014

alerting on wayward cartoons and politically incorrect language.

I feel safer already.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
134. You posted it without any kind of disparging comment.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:05 PM
Jun 2014

Why are you offended that someone would assume that this represents your views?

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
136. I agree with the article.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:07 PM
Jun 2014

I actually read it. Many did not. Therefore they are feeling feelings that they would not feel if they read it.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
143. Why is this the news standard defense?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:13 PM
Jun 2014

"If you don't agree with my interpretation of the article, you clearly didn't read it".

I read it

"Other white people have dismissed mass stereotyping of other races, so particular white people have no grounds to say that it shouldn't happen to them when it happens to them"

I'm sorry, I don't accept collective responsibility for everything every other white person has ever done. Just like I don't accept collective responsibility for everything every other gay or Jewish person has done. I deserve to be treated as individual. Actually, I demand to be treated as an individual. If you're going to lump me together with our people, I'm going to tell you to sod off.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
156. It is great that you've given up on defending this trash.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:18 PM
Jun 2014

I just wish you hadn't of dumped it in the middle of DU before you decided to.

If you disagree with me, clearly you just didn't read my post.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
161. Oh I'm dreadfully sorry I keep forcing you to respond to every single comment I make.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:21 PM
Jun 2014

I'll stop that immediately.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
171. Dang it didn't work
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:35 PM
Jun 2014

Gimme a sec I'll try harder. Don't worry, I'll get you of this endless cycle of posting soon my friend!

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
147. "Therefore they are feeling feelings that they would not feel if they read it."
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:14 PM
Jun 2014

You are not the arbiter of what anyone "feels."

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
150. Did i say i was?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:16 PM
Jun 2014

You are very angry and i do not know you well enough to continue with you. Good day to you.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
165. These are your words:
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:27 PM
Jun 2014
Therefore they are feeling feelings that they would not feel if they read it.


Seriously bravenak, assigning emotions to anyone on a message board is weak. You may think it's some sort of effective debating technique, but it's not.

Trying listening, rather than just talking AT people.
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
166. They think the article is aimed at all of them.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:28 PM
Jun 2014

It is not. It is aimed at those who feel maligned and suggesting that they take their own advice.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
174. I see a fair number of old white men in that picture.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:40 PM
Jun 2014

They much have lost their way while en route to a Tea Party rally

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
107. It is an ARTICLE i did not write it.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:16 PM
Jun 2014

If you read it you will get the picture better than just assuming that it is stereotyping.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
131. Here lemme go grab an article telling all gay people what they need to do
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:03 PM
Jun 2014

Hey there buddy, I didn't write it, so it must be kosher for DU.

I'm gay by the way.

People are individuals, addressing millions of people as homogeneous blobs is stupid. Not to mention incredibly lazy thinking.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
137. I thought I was clear "addressing millions of people as homogeneous blobs is stupid."
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:08 PM
Jun 2014

Understand now?

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
139. Read the article before you ask me questions about it.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:11 PM
Jun 2014

You are being very aggressive and i do not know you, sir and have not had many interactions with you.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
144. The first thing I did when I entered your thread was read your article LOL.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:13 PM
Jun 2014

I didn't ask you a single question about the article, are you kidding me?

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
153. What a hilarious defense
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:17 PM
Jun 2014

"I didn't write this, so I won't defend it. Except when I feel like defending it, because I also say that I agree with it. But It isn't my responsibility for bringing it to this forum, because reasons."

Mind boggling.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
160. See you champ and if I see any old white men I'll be sure to give them hell!
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:20 PM
Jun 2014

I'll fight the good fight right along with you buddy.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
176. I'm a gay man who has faced down plenty of homophobia in my life.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:41 PM
Jun 2014

Some of it in the form of open violence towards me.

But yeah, clearly I don't know nothing bout feeling discriminated against. Otherwise I'd have problems with old white men too.

Also, I thought you were done talking to me? Does this ride never end?

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
181. I do not know you. I have also faced violence from males in racist attacks.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:57 PM
Jun 2014

I have gotten told to Africa by a dude throwing a Big gulp at me. I have been raped. I have been called names by teachers and students alike. I have gone to schools where i was the only black person there and got hostility from students and staff. I have been pushed in creeks by teenage boys playing drown the n-word. I have had ropes put atound my neck while they played hang the nword. I have told adults who refused to help me because i was a nword and they didn't want to look like nword lovers. I have no idea what discrimination you have faced, and you know now just the tip of the iceberg of foul treatment i recieved. I have stories for days.

I never said anything about you. You are taking this personally and i do not know you and did not post this article as a slight against you. Please stop.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
186. I received some horrific violence both from people I don't know and most troubling
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 04:07 PM
Jun 2014

from people who I really ought to have been able to trust. The specifics, I am frankly not comfortably discussing with someone I do not know.

I'm proud to say that in some instances, I got the chance to give a little violence back to those horrific people.

I do take it personally when you imply I don't know what it is like to feel discriminated against. I can't marry the man I love in the state I live in. I can be fired for being nothing but myself. This isn't a competition though, though based on what you say you'd probably win that one. All I can say is it really rubs me the wrong way when we talk about a group, any group, as nothing but a blob instead of the individuals they deserve to be considered as.

That inclination is the root of all discrimination in society and it disgusts me whenever I see it.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
189. DU is well aware of those statistics.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 04:22 PM
Jun 2014

And many DUers have championed decriminalization and/or legalization for YEARS. But just the other day we learned that the AA group busts their collective guts over the pot warriors. Why not be thankful for those in Colorado and Washington? Who cares if they're predominantly white? They've accomplished something huge, and it's going to trickle down to other states. Well, sane states, at least on this issue. And hopefully it will benefit blacks.



Again, whitey is not the enemy.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
211. Glad to see you mention an actual issue. The war on drugs is the new Jim Crow...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:57 PM
Jun 2014

...if I may lift a phrase from Michelle Alexander.

A lot of us have been working on this issue for a long time. And, finally, some progress is being made. Obama got the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 passed that reduced--but didn't eliminate--the crack/powder sentencing disparity. A policy screamingly racist in its results, even if you're willing to give the people who passed it the benefit of the doubt. There's more sentencing reform legislation in the pipe, and Obama and Holder are practically begging drug war prisoners (mainly black) to apply for clemency.

I think it was you who made a crack about all those white Libertarian drug legalizers who just want to smoke pot (and if it wasn't, this isn't about you). There are some folks like that--the drug reform movement cuts across ideological lines--but there are a whole lot more who are involved in this issue for social and racial justice reasons. And a whole bunch of them are white, and increasingly old.

And here's something to think about regarding those white pot heads: I suspect that for many of them, their persecution for smoking pot was the first thing that opened their eyes to the injustices of the criminal justice system. Once you've been fucked over by the system, it may make you somewhat more likely to have to some empathy and sympathy for other people being fucked over by the system.

If you want to work to end the racially discriminatory war on drugs, I'm with you. I'm not the enemy. And neither are the other people you're managing to piss off with your divisive posts. I gotta give it to you, though: In that thread started in response to your stuff yesterday, you managed to get a lot of people to post that I haven't seen for awhile. Of course, none of them are very happy with you.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
213. I love how the only issue you consider "real"
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:59 PM
Jun 2014

is the one where you have a personal interest.

That doesn't mean the other issues aren't just as real, just that you aren't able to empathize because it doesn't benefit you to do so.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
217. That is not the only "real" issue. We face lots of real issues.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:09 PM
Jun 2014

Bravenak posted about the racially discriminatory drug war. If Bravenak wants to post about issues like social justice, or racial inequality, or the military industrial complex, or corporate control of our political system, for starters, I'm happy to engage.

But in my opinion, talking about how bad white people are isn't a useful way to solve the real issues we face.

I love you how you think you know how I feel. You don't know me. Take your snark and insults and put them where they belong.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
220. you are a prime example
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:27 PM
Jun 2014

of person with a persecution complex. Whether the article/statement is true or not, disparaged or agreed with, you take it all to heart because maybe you see yourself in the point of that article as being the person described? If so, then you have the problem. The poster was not the author, just found it interesting, I'm sure. I did...."Thou protesteth too much" to be taken as a serious individual with a balanced argument against the article mentioned.That type of attack is incredibly stupid and lazy thinking. You attacked the wrong person, YOU ARE WRONG!

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
305. Except I'm not an old white person.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:07 PM
Jun 2014

So no the article isn't about me in the slightest, I just think it is a dumb article. So no I don't think I'm being persecuted for anything. I just think it is an idiotic article, for the same reason I think moralizing to all gay people (which I am one of of) would be equally idiotic.

Thanks for playing I guess, maybe leave your assumptions at the door next time? It will save you looking pretty dang foolish when they are flat out wrong.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
310. no, you're wrong
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:38 PM
Jun 2014

in the sense that you were projecting your sexual orientation upon the article. Don't have to be "foolish" to see that, just aware of ones motivations, mine and others. No assumptions. The article stands as well as the pro-poster responses stand. Go try to confuse the issue with someone else. bye.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
122. and judge them by the content of their character,
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 02:43 PM
Jun 2014

not their age, or their skin color.

Older white guys are not all Donald Sterling.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
127. If people who try to talk to groups of millions of people as if they are identical feel maligned
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:00 PM
Jun 2014

by their supposed ethnic and age based foes.

They should make a thread on DU.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
149. This seems obviously to be specifically about "old white men who feel maligned"
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:16 PM
Jun 2014

"If old white men feel maligned they should X" assumes that old white men who don't feel maligned need not do X.

In fact, it is even more specifically aimed at old white men who feel maligned and give advice to minorities, or else there is no X.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
157. It is directed at those who feel maligned.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:19 PM
Jun 2014

I have not clue as to why people assume i wrote it and am directing it at them. I never met any of these people.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
169. I sometime feel like i say things that people want to say, but know not to.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:33 PM
Jun 2014

I think it's called a lack of tact. Thank you for you help today. I really needed it.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
175. no problem
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 03:40 PM
Jun 2014

You brought up a subject that I am shocked that has such resistance...on a so-called 'liberal' site, and I an astonished by some of the responses.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
185. OK I'll say what I'm really thinking
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 04:07 PM
Jun 2014

I think they know it isn't about them but don't want racism discussed and so they use this kind of a thing as a way to derail any discussion about racism.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
247. Either that
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:55 PM
Jun 2014

Or you're dealing with people who struggle with extreme self-centeredness.

I mean, that's the only way you can misinterpret this issue, continually.

It looks seriously dismissive to me.

Cha

(296,848 posts)
272. But, those who have no idea what they're talking about Insist
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:15 AM
Jun 2014
on taking Umbrage!

They will not be denied!

alp227

(32,006 posts)
199. But it's false equivalency.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:21 PM
Jun 2014

Look up systematic discrimination. Racial inequality is a real thing in modern America, something even DU sadly wants to deny.

JI7

(89,240 posts)
208. yup, it's like the right wing always claiming christians are being oppressed and discirminated
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:24 PM
Jun 2014

in this country because a someone at a store might say happy holidays instead of merry christmas .

Response to Skip Intro (Reply #257)

Response to heaven05 (Reply #300)

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
207. Going through the article and links, I love this. It has something for everyone to feel good about.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 06:07 PM
Jun 2014


We're all in this together. Now it's time to act like it. Thanks for posting this piece.


Cha

(296,848 posts)
221. "Daily Caller editor Matt Lewis"? I just had member who tried to
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:28 PM
Jun 2014

link me to that con propaganda site that got MIRTed.

Anyway, Alyssa Rosenberg responds to him well.. "they should take their own advice to Minorites.."

"First, I would recommend a healthy dose of self-respect. Lewis seems to have that down all right, reminding readers that “A lot of old white men have done really great things!"

White Privilege on parade..


Casey @pari_passu
Follow

What if this situation were reversed? This is what #WhitePrivilege looks like: #p2 #tcot
12:41 AM - 6 Jun 2014
327 Retweets 184 favorites

Thank you, bravenak

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
301. excellent photo
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 09:53 AM
Jun 2014

of white fear and intimidation tactics all because we have an AA POTUS, National Security Adviser and Attorney General. Their heads are exploding. Although the brother doesn't look too afraid of that ding a ling.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
229. I am so glad I
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:44 PM
Jun 2014

ran into this thread. It has really provided me with an eye opening experience about so called progressives and leftists on this site. I also know you are a true progressive in how you have revealed how much work we still have in ferreting out the truth as to what so called lefties are supposed to represent. The attacks on you have not been representative of balanced and fair disagreement. Talk of white male privilege and the underlying racism really scares a lot of people on this board. Really has been an eye opening afternoon. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
230. You're welcome. Glad we could enlighten you
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 07:46 PM
Jun 2014

So many of us are schmucks. I'm glad we were able to demonstrate that.

sheshe2

(83,654 posts)
234. Thank you bravenak.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:05 PM
Jun 2014

You are awesome, keep on fighting for the truth and some justice! We will not sit down and we will not shut up!

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
243. No, thank you for the thread you did.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:37 PM
Jun 2014

It led to this and that is a good thing. I think we need to hold the party's feet to the fire and help them progress on race issues. I want no one shocked or to say they were not told that there are race issues in the nation, and yes, even in the Democratic party.

sheshe2

(83,654 posts)
246. "I think we need to hold the party's feet to the fire and help them progress on race issues."
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:50 PM
Jun 2014

This I like! Yes! Let's hold the party's feet to the fire for a change, for a change that enlightens people of a real issue that has plagued America for centuries.

It is time, bravenak, past time. Both AA and women are way past due for the respect and equality that they rightfully deserve.

And, you are welcome. You are right, it is a good thing.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
238. As an old white woman, I am INVISIBLE
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:13 PM
Jun 2014

and totally IGORNED. I say this all the time to my old, white husband. Try being FEMALE, whatever race, if you think you have it bad.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
240. Exactly.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 08:21 PM
Jun 2014

The world does not cater to us and we don't have the priviledge of expecting it to. They do.

GeorgeGist

(25,311 posts)
248. After reading through 247 replies ...
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:27 PM
Jun 2014

it's apparent that DU has a few old white men feeling maligned.

I'm not one of them.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
250. I am glad you know i was not talking about you.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:51 PM
Jun 2014

Please spread the word. I'd really appreciate not getting bashed anymore.
I only mention one democrat by name- Bart Stupak. I meant conservative politicians and conservative democrats.

Anyone not fitting into the leans more conservative group was not being discussed.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
249. Oh My God. But that I could rec this a HUNDRED times. Bravenak, girl WELL PLAYED
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 09:46 PM
Jun 2014

WELL DONE. I bow down to your pwnage which is the sweetest most excellent executed pwnage I've seen around here.

Well done.

Skip Intro

(19,768 posts)
256. Lewis is right. Dems and DUers have made the "White man" the root of all evil.
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 10:20 PM
Jun 2014

This place has been thick with that bashing for some time, to the point that the admin felt compelled to make a statement on it. The cries of racism at every criticism have been incessant, here and from the larger party.

A "na-ah" piece in wp doesn't change that reality.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
263. Lewis is right? Just like how you defended Duck Dynasty and Chik-fil-A after homophobic remarks:
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 11:46 PM
Jun 2014
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4207381

Thank you for always providing us with the right wing perspective when it comes to bigotry.

At least you're consistent.

Skip Intro

(19,768 posts)
268. ROFL! "just like you bla bla bla bla..." Sez ms self-delete.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:42 AM
Jun 2014

Posting things that you repeatedly decide you want to quickly hide.

Too bad no one has any screen shots of any of the many offensive and sick self-deletes you kick out on a regular basis, eh?



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If old white men feel mal...