Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThanks for nothing, jerkface (on Google +'s real name enforcement)
Summary: OPINION: One month after creator and leader of Google+, Vic Gundotra, quietly quit, Google chief Sergey Brin told a conference audience last week that involvement in Google+ was "a mistake." He made the exact opposite statement in 2011.
Brin told the audience at boutique Bay Area tech conference Recode that he was "kind of a weirdo" and that, "it was probably a mistake for me to be working on anything tangentially related to social to begin with."
It runs in stark contrast to when Brin told the world how he came to love Google+, and admitted to taking a direct hand in its design at the October 2011 Web 2.0 conference.
Seated onstage next to Brin, Vic Gundotra told the audience that its "design owes a lot to Brin's vision."
Brin's statement comes only one month after the man he hired to create and run the search giant's social network, Vic Gundotra, quietly quit the company, and without explanation.
...
Google began its "real name" enforcement with mass Google+ account suspensions and deletions shortly after Google+ launched in July 2011. The whole mess is called Nymwars.
...
At-risk users were disproportionately affected, most especially transgender people who needed to keep their identities separate for personal safety and employment reasons.
One woman was outed to a co-worker when she texted him, and risked losing her employment.
Brin told the audience at boutique Bay Area tech conference Recode that he was "kind of a weirdo" and that, "it was probably a mistake for me to be working on anything tangentially related to social to begin with."
It runs in stark contrast to when Brin told the world how he came to love Google+, and admitted to taking a direct hand in its design at the October 2011 Web 2.0 conference.
Seated onstage next to Brin, Vic Gundotra told the audience that its "design owes a lot to Brin's vision."
Brin's statement comes only one month after the man he hired to create and run the search giant's social network, Vic Gundotra, quietly quit the company, and without explanation.
...
Google began its "real name" enforcement with mass Google+ account suspensions and deletions shortly after Google+ launched in July 2011. The whole mess is called Nymwars.
...
At-risk users were disproportionately affected, most especially transgender people who needed to keep their identities separate for personal safety and employment reasons.
One woman was outed to a co-worker when she texted him, and risked losing her employment.
Very good stuff. The rest is here: http://www.zdnet.com/thanks-for-nothing-jerkface-7000030306/
BTW, Google asked her to make the headline more polite. I'm not sure if this one's the polite version.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1271 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thanks for nothing, jerkface (on Google +'s real name enforcement) (Original Post)
Benton D Struckcheon
Jun 2014
OP
KG
(28,751 posts)1. since niether FB nor G+ require any kind of documentation, there's no reason to use real names
I have accounts at both sites under made up names.
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)2. Facebook will require you to scan & upload photo ID if
it suspects you aren't using your real identity:
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)3. Wow....just jaw dropping wow......
I had no idea, since I refuse to do Facebook.
Guess a lot of people fall for that crap, tho.
Which is screamingly ironic in the face of recent revelations that the CIA and DHS have admittedly hired people to be sock puppets on social media.
Betcha those guys do not have to provide real ID.
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)4. I couldn't take the article seriously after ...
" ... boutique Bay Area tech conference Recode ..."
Initech
(100,043 posts)5. I'll never post on Google +, Youtube, IMDB, Huff Post...
Or any site that won't allow users to log in anonymously. Fuck that.